I'm trying to prove that the behave from a person depends on his learning through life. And, the response from a person depends on their growing context, admitting that one person never stops growing in knowledge. A response from a person is what a person does in a given situation. If somebody does something, in their way, it doesn't mean that is right or wrong. But, it means, that person doesn't know how to do "better".
SupaDudz is an upstanding member of DDO. Unaware of his own potential, he has refrained from asking out his crush until now. I, Logical-Master, say it's high time he asked her out and endeavor to prove it!
Bring forth points that explain the issue with cohabitation in the context of the topic. I've selected the "pro" position which represents in this case as it relates to me that I'll be questioning the arguments. If the arguments hold validity and consistency, the person in that position would have therefore proven their case and I would have a new thought process. For any questions , clarifications or confirmations, please send a message.
Anyone who is stupid enough to order drinks without ice in the drive-thru is welcome to debate me.
Con= pro-life Pro= pro-choice
It makes no sense
Complexity does not equal coherency. The human brain is both the most equipped to form intelligent neural connections and the most equipped to form insane ones out of all animals on earth.