Pro argues that a wall should be built on the U.S-Mexico Border. Con argues that a wall should not be built.
This is to see if Voting should be mandatory in the US. I got this idea from Virtuoso.
Should Autism be cured? I, as an Autistic person, say no. Pro starts.
I'd appreciate if this was not accepted by rational madman or other people with similar issues. He honestly writes in some sort of oddball way. Like he can write I am going to the grocery store and not only would it take him 2 sentences to write it, but it would be written in some mix of Olde English, baby talk and using odd slang, which would take me 2 hours to interpret his writing, giving me an unfair disadvantage.
My first and possibly only debate
JESUS and ALLAH = ZEUS and ODIN = Mythology..... None of these GODS have been visible if ever since the most recent contact...which supposedly was by MUHAMMAD and ALLAH 600 AD.....even then .....ALLAH was not present in some form...human or otherwise. and what of ZEUS and ODIN which were popular for some time then just faded into irrelevance ? Point ? as Zeus and Odin have come and gone and now reside in Mythology for entertainment...time NOW for JESUS and ALLAH to join Zeus and Odin
SupaDudz is an upstanding member of DDO. Unaware of his own potential, he has refrained from asking out his crush until now. I, Logical-Master, say it's high time he asked her out and endeavor to prove it!
GOD...the word has NEVER existed as a reference to some Super Being/Entity Creator of all things...it came into that context around 400 AD when a GOTHIC Bible translation was created...GOD is a twist of some germanic word... a word that has nothing to do with DIVINE SUPER BEING CREATORS... The HEBREW Bible is known as the "Tanakh"...this word ? is also an ACRONYM for the 3 divisions that make up the HEBREW BIBLE..the word "GOD" truly represents the Genius Of Deception..by humans that play "GOD"
There should not be a 15 minute window to delete your vote.
I will say no
Bring forth points that explain the issue with cohabitation in the context of the topic. I've selected the "pro" position which represents in this case as it relates to me that I'll be questioning the arguments. If the arguments hold validity and consistency, the person in that position would have therefore proven their case and I would have a new thought process. For any questions , clarifications or confirmations, please send a message.