Pro will be arguing in favor of abolishing the veto power of the permanent members of the UNSC on UN Resolutions Con will be arguing for upholding the status quo, maintaining the veto power of the UNSC permanent members on UN Resolutions
The topic should be self explanatory.
This is a taste battle, it IS SUBJECTIVE but has OBJECTIVE ARGUMENTS allowed. Who has the better taste in rap?
This debate is only for Wisdom of Ages. Do not accept unless you are him. It is also for Virtuoso's Tournament.
This is to see whether or not abortion should be legal beyond 3 weeks.
It's pretty obvious that god intended for humans to sin, right?
This debate is about if Viruses are alive. Three rounds, one for making positions, one for refuting opponents, and one for recapping.
I am arguing for the fact that the death penalty should be abolished
In this debate, I try to prove that time is discrete, like little grains of sand in a clepsydra.
This is a redo of our previous debate. You can find the original here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/509 Let's tango. ;-)
No human ever needs to be validated to EXIST and DIE by some Bible/Koran vomiting imbecile that plays "GOD" in some absurd Halloween Glory Gown Costume.
I am against banning all guns. My opponent is for banning all guns.
The proposition is "God exists". Pro has to prove the proposition to be true and Con will have to negate the proposition by showing that God does not exist. Therefore, the burden of proof is shared.