I will argue that Richard Nixon was the best president of the United States. My opponent must choose another president that they believe was the best.
My position is that an intrinsic moral code that outlines and defines good as an objective standard, rather than a utilitarian standard or Kantian Maxim, cannot exist without a supreme and objective outside source defining an action or mode of action as good. Your position (con) would argue against that hypothesis, and that a code of objective values CAN exist without God, OR, that a subjective system of ethical values could be as strong of a system.
One week this time
As evidenced by historical facts.
Messi is better than Ronaldo.
Fedor Emelianenko is the greatest heavyweight of all time.
As the contender you will argue that there is a more efficient system economically speaking.
The British Empire Destroyed India. Prove to me why they were good/beneficial to India.
Border Wall Trump proposes
greetings gonna do a second debate on this subject
No Kritiks of the topic permitted, such trolling should please be punished by voters.
This debate will be over abortion and whether or not it should remain legal. The debate will take place over a matter of three rounds, with three days each to make an argument. The voting will then take place over a two week period to decide the victor.
Messi is better than Ronaldo. I will actually be active this debate. Sorry for the last few.