3RU7AL

You really need to check your skin color privilege bro.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrZjL1pNjrY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pu-LfmAmUA

anyone who designs different medicines for different races regarding diabetes and blood pressure amongst other things

IS THE CONSTITUTION PART OF THE SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY?

PERHAPS A CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THAT, BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT

WHAT DOES THE FUNCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT HAVE TO DO WITH A THREAD ABOUT SYSTEMIC RACISM?

If you want government bureaucrats to be in charge of determining what human rights you deserve,

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

Not quite. The politicians who think they have the right to rule as totalitarians still have the Constitution to keep them in check. But even that can only last so long when people have no desire for freedom. Just give them their iphone and a bag of Cheetos and they'll let the government bureaucrats do whatever they want.

So as a liberal, you think that it is better to defeat arguments you disagree with by banning the arguments, than it is by confronting them?

it is non-existent outside the mind, which can, at will, create fantasy as easily as fact.

If you want government bureaucrats to be in charge of determining what human rights you deserve,

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

Not quite.

IS THE CONSTITUTION PART OF THE SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY?

Why should the Supreme Court respect a racist document that is part of the system of white supremacy? Are you a white supremacists?

But isn't the Constitution itself part of the system of white supremacy? It was written by white men for white men. Why should they respect it?

The politicians who think they have the right to rule as totalitarians still have the Constitution to keep them in check.

If you want government bureaucrats to be in charge of determining what human rights you deserve,

Don't do a Ragnar now and keep repeating your conclusion over and over -- it doesn't make you any more right.

You can't keep saying this and ALSO insisting that "racerealismisobjectivelytrue".

Why not lol?

"Racism" is a nonsense term.

here's a powerful piece by him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Q-DUj9OHw

Actually one of my favorite rappers, Vinnie Paz,

Therefore, any noticable difference in outcome or performance, logically speaking, cannot be a result of genes. Otherwise such large disparations would not account for such a wide population of said group, it is therefore most likely the case that environment is the cause of said differences in outcomes. 

Your 100% environment explanation is fringe, stupid and wrong. You're literally denying the existence of genetics, at this point -- you are that stupid.

Notwithstanding that......Everyone is aware of perceivable differences and either does or doesn't discriminate....Therefore, race realism.

Race realism isn't built upon just "perceivable differences". It's built upon research and data that show "perceivable differences" are scientifically sound concepts (e.g. race).

You haven’t addressed a damn thing, that’s why I dropped the rest of it and asked you again to address the part of the conversation that actually mattered. You now respond by dropping the entire conversation.

As I stated to 3RU7AL....Race Realism is a truism....Doesn't take a lot of science to work it out.

Moral capacity is a variable concept, greatly influenced by variable conditioning and not directly relative to mental capacity or incapacity.

Genetic modification and development is such that better and smarter, was/is an inevitability.

In simple terms better and smarter, tends to breed with better and smarter.

And history clearly shows us that better and smarter certainly does have a variable approach to morality.

And physical characteristics are generally pretty standard anyway..... One head, two arms, two legs, with a few cosmetic variations, as it were.

CRT fully implemented as systemic racism.

Perhaps we need an era of Leroy Crow to drive the point home.

What philosophy will lead to NOT total-government-control ?

What's that one called ?

Not-Marxism?

pretty much but i do get why he would make that distinction

Do you think the disparity between penalties for powder-cocaine and crack-cocaine are evidence of systemic-racism™ ?

I hope these understandings help you comprehend race realism better.

Everyone is aware of perceivable differences and either does or doesn't discriminate

You can know x because you have inductive reasons to believe x, and if that belief corresponds to reality. If knowledge is justified true belief, then you can have knowledge through induction. The problem of induction does not mean we can't have knowledge about reality. 

Well map every single gene on the genome and figure out what all of it does, come back with a list of impacts and figure out which loci are important and which are not. Assign them a significance value, say 1-10. Then you can say "this gene matters, this gene doesn't matter" etc. Let me guess: You're going to select the ancestral markers as the only important loci.

anarchism would be chaotic an ideology that promotes so much violence and chaos should not be promoted

HUMANS WERE CATEGORIZED BY PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LONG BEFORE "GENETIC MARKERS" WERE EVER PROPOSED

Yes, biology didn't exist until genetic markers were proposed.

"RACE" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH "GENETICS"

This is the most stupid thing I've seen you say. It's also within the top 10 most stupid comments I've seen on this website.

The Weekly Stupid should be brought back just for this comment.

I hope these understandings help you comprehend race realism better.

Well, I will try showing it to you in another way because it did not work. You should not conflate that with a concession.

Your question isn't what the OP is about. Policy discussion happens *after* people agree that race realism is a reality. You're moving the goalposts by demanding that I provide airtight governmental policy with race realism. As to what governmental policy should be applied when race realism as accepted is entirely irrelevant to the validity of race realism.

You cannot prove that the next time you push a shopping cart "forward" and nothing else, it won't push back at you and smash you to the walls. You cannot prove that the next time an apple grows ripe, it won't fall endlessly to the sky. Even though we tend to believe our experiences and more often times than not, you see the objects behave exactly like how the old people tell you through the physic textbook that they are going to behave, it is through YOUR vision. You can only prove that this time it worked, subjectively, but never that it WILL work next time, objectively.

Taxation is merely a mechanism to control inflation.

Taxation can be used to regulate inflation, but not just merely.

A much more efficient way to control inflation would be to raise the mandatory reserve rate for banks.

Governments (sponsored and sanction by International Banks) will never allow this to happen because they don't want "real money" being exchanged.

Taxation doesn't "fund" anything.

What is the source of government revenue? With what does the government make expenditures?

But, this leads me to ask: is unconditional love excluded in Capitalism?

You neglect to mention the cost-burden and debt which parents willingly take on by exhibiting their unconditional love. That's all fine if they're willing participants; no such discretion, however, is allowed in communism.

In a capitalist framework, you only give things away for free, IFF THERE IS A LONG-TERM PROFIT INCENTIVE.

Why would charity within a capitalistic framework be necessarily contingent on long-term profits?

Your own children (citizens) should not be a source of income.

What if a child is doing something he or she loves? My first cousin, once removed, is about twelve years old, and she earns an income online. My first cousin, her mother, permits her to do this, and lets her keep all her money. Is she, my first cousin that is, doing something wrong?

I did originate as an egg. As my earliest memory is only at four, can't say abandonment was part of the equation, but that early memory was as a member of a small group of other people that did become fixated as an intact family.