3RU7AL

God is perfect

The whole election integrity narrative is simply controlled opposition from both parties to give the public an alternative theory as to why their vote doesn't matter to the elite oligarchs that run DC.

People's votes don't count anyway in a legitimate system. Laws are written and passed by lobbyists, not voters.

From an atheists perspective no but if you were talking someone religious for example a christian they would probably say god is perfect and has committed no sin otherwise they might say mary or jesus

Every second you waste looking after an animal could have instead been spent as labor toward the wellbeing of your people.

Discriminating against criminals would also be a crime then.

How would a non-discriminating system work?

92% of black people get welfare, plus the black thug stereotype is true and there is no justification for their crimes

What we're dealing with is SAMPLE-BIAS, more specifically SURVIVOR-BIAS.

Photos of capital inmates shown to entry-level criminal justice students for them to evaluate the trustworthiness of the faces.

There is a widely cited study conducted in italy where identical resumes were sent to apply for jobs.

The only difference was that the attached photo was of a "more attractive" man or woman and the twin resume had an attached photo of an "average" or "unattractive" man or woman (all of roughly the same skin-tone).

The results showed that BOTH "attractive" men and "attractive" women have a significantly easier time getting call-backs.

Similar studies have been conducted for people standing trial.

Conviction rates are measurably higher for "less attractive" individuals.

Are you suggesting that black people are less "attractive"

All kids living in the United States have the right to a free public education. And the Constitution requires that all kids be given equal educational opportunity no matter what their race, ethnic background, religion, or sex, or whether they are rich or poor, citizen or non-citizen.

Black areas have significantly less school funding; school funding greatly determines your success and education.

Photos of capital inmates shown to entry-level criminal justice students for them to evaluate the trustworthiness of the faces.

Throwing money at poor people doesn't have the best track record.

That's not throwing money at them its funding their underfunded areas and schools so they have equal opportunity.

Well first we would need to destroy the stereotype of black people being "thugs". i would suggest putting more funding into their neighborhoods as low funding is one of the primary reasons that they have a higher rate of crime. but there is probably a way better solution im not aware. 

Also this forum isn't about how we should fix its about if it exists.

Photos of capital inmates shown to entry-level criminal justice students for them to evaluate the trustworthiness of the faces.

Also if a person from a another country or his or her second language is english they would probably score lower which doesn't mean they are dumber.

If a person has a tribalistic bent for their family, or clan, or nation. It 'really doesn't matter if the other guy's smarter, or stronger, what matters to someone with such a bent, is whether their 'own people can survive, or better thrive. Defeat their enemies, even if superior.

If we focus on 'groups, as worthy of interest, how is the racist wrong for focusing on his 'own group, as worthy of interest?

The point I mean is, if different groups are recognized to exist, and helping one group will 'not help other groups, assuming one believes in a zero sum game.

For example, the 'ratio of groups to one another, in a percentage, in a country.

Well, if groups can be identified as being 'singular to themselves, one can assume their interests are as well.

If one chooses to ignore race, and decide we'll all be interbred into a breed, then there's little problem.

But if 'interests are recognized, races 'clarified. . . 'well.

If there really was widespread systemic discrimination I don't think you'd need to use statistical modeling with who knows how many assumptions to tease it out, the raw numbers would do the job for you.

The results show that police stopped and searched black and Latino drivers on the basis of less evidence than used in stopping white drivers, who are searched less often but are more likely to be found with illegal items.

"the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another"

Yes white privilege exists if you are white your chances of getting pulled over without reason are significantly lower.

All white people benefit from white privilege at the expense of other races, whether they admit it or not. And while the phrase "everything is racist" could be viewed as an oversimplified generalization, CRT is about examining society looking for any racial disparities which serve as "proof" that systemic racism exists. So the reason people say "everything is racist" is because you can examine anything - even the ratio of trees in white and black neighborhoods - and point to it as a form of systemic racism. These "proofs" are outcomes of power structures created to benefit white people.

Please explain how this is not concurrent with Critical Race Theory in an American context? Is UCLA just as wrong as DiAngelo apparently is?

it is not considered terrorism by the state conducting it, making legality a largely grey-area issue.

Any gang with a propensity for violence is a terrorist group.  

yeah the race essentialism is very, very bad and needs to be stopped.

Just so I'm not misunderstanding you, your intention was to bait me into arguing a point that was off topic - a point that you now admit misrepresented my position? And your deception in getting me to do this was done in order to show how dishonest I am? Was the rudeness and demeaning language also a part of this deception, or was that genuine?

Difference in perception, isn't the same as a difference in individual honesty, is my opinion.

whenever you are being so obviously dishonest

That is interesting info about the census. And it sounds like you are not necessarily a fan of viewing all of life through the lens of race then?

SKIN TONE ≠ "RACE"

This is the problem with the social construct of race. There are benefits to these manmade categories, but you have identified a major weakness. The parameters for different categories are sometimes contradictory (are Russians Asian or white?). In my worldview, there is ultimately only one race (human) with many shades of the same color based on melanin count. I admit I am more melanin-challenged than my darker counterparts.

We are not an evolving group of organisms, some being closer to monkeys than others. We are an utterly distinct group that have always been and will always be human.

DOES THIS FAMILIAL PREFERENCE MAKE YOU A "RACIST" ?

My worldview would say that valuing familial ties is a moral obligation. But there are CRT advocates who would accuse me of racism for that. Black Lives Matter is one such organization that believes valuing the nuclear family is a form of white supremacy.

It seems both of you believe it is reprehensible to make comments regarding the proximity of a particular race to monkeys

Something can only be known to be a fact or defined, if it can be known to be a fact and defined.

Tautology. 

Presumably it still would be....But that wouldn't be a fact unless it could be known.

You are not necessary for it to exist, yet I would argue God is. 

What part of perception is irrelevant don’t you understand?

If, indeed, God knows all, seems to me eternity would get boring.

Yes. Although man is his most advanced creation, he decided to grant other animals abilities beyond ours. Such as my spirit guide, the frog. It has, within that entire species, vocal expressions that far exceed the ability of man to produce. In fact, no other creature ha the vocal range as has the frog.

The fact that evil exists means that either God didn't do a good job in creating the first "perfect" being, or he just doesn't exist. 

Asked [your #125] and answered [my #131]