3RU7AL

Nope. Not how you mean determinism. God's thoughts are his own; ours are ours, alone.

Fallacy of presumption. By saying God's thought you are assuming God exists. 

Special Pleading fallacy. Assuming that God has special characteristic, namely, avoids the argument 3RU7AL proposes. 

Self-caused

What caused "you" ?

That has two answers. Physically, may parents. Spiritually, God, the Father.

It kinda does. Human consciousness easily resembles the singularities of physics and mathematics. The whole world is inside your head. 

Consciousness refutes determinism

Without memories, the mind is incapable of thought.

Who told you that? Your sock puppet? Not a relevant, nor credible source. Never had amnesia? Amazing what can be thought, in spite of it.

My can-do attitude was caused. By me. My father taught me

"impulse-control"

can be learned by personal commitment

These reflections do not need memories as a prerequisite.

I believe the limitations do not constrict the possible existence of a free will. I believe you're still free to reflect on the features of the cave in spite of the fact that you'll be ignorant(for the rest of your life) of the facts outside  of the cave.

Why do memories matter? If they're still capable of reflection,

Get it. It's called self-improvement. It's called refusing to think like a victim. I know today's psycho babble is all about victimization, but, what if I decide I'm not a victim to everything around me? I have. "Oh, poor mer" is not in my vocabulary.

Limited free will, does not equal free will absolutely does not exist. If you said chocolate does not exist, but I showed a single chocolate chip, that would negate. However, if you instead argued there was a chocolate shortage, that single piece of evidence would be a poor counter.

Have a care for what goes in the pie hole,

Well we have every inductive reason to believe that my statement about the demon is true. 

Yes, still another who says aberrant behavior is at the root of all bad actors. Sure, but what is the cause of aberrant behavior? A tumor in the brain, says Eagleman, as if he can stop at that. But, the tumor is not root cause. Tumors can develop for a variety of reasons, some of which we cannot control.

I haven't seen it. Why do you ask?

Right, but there can be an event caused by multiple things, no? 

The existence of x does not preclude the existence of y. 

"Driven by" does not necessarily equal perfect predetermination.

Therefore, my decision to smoke, if I made such a decision, is entirely based on my free will to do so.

Because knowing why has no bearing on the command itself.

If there was a demon with perfect knowledge of all matter and energy in the present, that demon should [hypothetically] necessarily be able to perfectly predict the future and perfectly reconstruct the past

Sartrean Freedom - Existential Comics

prisoners in solitary confinement.

That's like me saying that I commanded an earthquake to happen on Mars without knowing why I did it or how I did it.

My reflections are the results of my inner-self.

You cannot know how things occur to you and neither can you know why you"chose" the option of which you did. 

You tell me.

The first thing to note is that you only "chose" it because it occurred to you.

And because I was WILLING to choose it.

I would disagree - not with what you have there neccessarily as premises, but the conclusion. You are assuming that because of a cause of x has a quality (or lack thereof) that the result also lacks that quality - which is neccessarily a fallacy of composition 

both end with the exact same result

Which is?

You haven't even heard my theory,

All women go to the same handful of stores as girls and are subject to toys for example marketed to girls like kitchens, barbies and play vacuums. So yes there is overlap on the conditioning process.

Not sure where you think the word "general" means all. It merely means more often than not. A 51% adoption of a trait would make it a general trait

How can you "resist" influences-and-biology without an impulse to "resist" influences-and-biology?

By having the urge to do so, and deciding to do so. Not sure how that is relevant to the topic at hand though, which is that generally women pick partners based on different qualities than men and generally adopt different dating strategies.  Are you going to either disprove my premise or offer an alternate one. Or is this just an exercise 9f how much you can annoy me, by incorrectly utilizing the socratic method?

What exactly do you think your "will" is "free" from?

Absolute control of outside entities. 

Okay, thanks. Supplies are in short supply here in Canada and like the States (thanks to Biden and his policies) the price has skyrocketed for lumber and other commodities. I was thinking we would be finished by now. It looks like another couple of weeks before I consider something like this. 

Well, (IFF) your "will" (or as one might say, "strategy") is influenced by your environment and biology (THEN) your "will" is not "free"

LOL. Freewill implies that you can resist influences and biology. Are you trolling me? You aren't actually struggling to grasp what 7 year olds easily grasp are you?

I am not sure it would be that simple, not only forum posts and debate arguments contain markup, which is not easy to reliably separate from normal words, but also it's not always clear what should be considered a word. I may look into it at some point but probably not soon.

Brutal is suggesting the following

"You can't have freewill and also be influenced by your environment and biology. Derp"

My strategies for accomplishing what you list would different depending on the wiring of my brain, and my social conditioning.  

I also agree with you that disfigured people have a harder time getting laid

There are more "outliers" than "conformists" in my experience.

That is stupid and the definitions of those words prove it.