3RU7AL

Citizens have used guns to stop both mass shootings and crime in general[1].

is multiverse scenario an infinite set?

I forced you into nothing.

ntal consent) for male and female voluntary service; no conscription  (currently inactive, but males aged 18-25 must register with Selective Service in case conscription is re

Initially, Black soldiers were restricted to “labor units,” but this too ended as the war progressed, when they were finally used in combat.

" does this mean we will be raising the age of conscription to the age of 21 too"

LOL. Do you really not know who that is and that they're being satirical yet insulting?

One only has "free speech" on one's own property.

(ironic that is it predominantly the right wing conservatives are worries about Islam spreading and influencing the West, when Islam is a greater enemy of the left wing, liberal agenda)

However, based on your position, it should apply not only in this case. For example, imagine that a teacher has a female student that he doesn't like. This student was born female, and is not trans, but is slightly overweight and has some masculine features that she is embarrassed about. The teacher decides to disrespect her by referring to her as male throughout the class, even after she politely asks him not to. Would you maintain your position that this decision is totally up to the teacher's discretion, and that the teacher has no obligation to "indulge" the girl's request to be referred to as female?

often times because they are abruptly stopped by someone else with a gun. 

I was asked by moderation if I would  agree to a RO with the Witch. And I did.

An armed society is a polite society

which would confirm my point on Norway

the mods could make an OPTIONAL moderator-muted-list of users they deemed "inappropriate" so they would be invisible to the public and also invisible to all site members - UNLESS - site members un-checked the OPTIONAL moderator-muted-list

the mods could make an OPTIONAL moderator-muted-list of users they deemed "inappropriate" so they would be invisible to the public and also invisible to all site members - UNLESS - site members un-checked the OPTIONAL moderator-muted-list

There will several other people suggest to be on the list as well wasn't just me and RM.

It was also discussed that this list would be secret and that we would just have to figure out that's what was going on.

both me and RM were to definitely be on that list

And you told me I was 100% false, little liar.

there is currently a very complicated process used by the mods that is some sort of "mutual restraining order"

Then why are you even suggesting blind posting if that in your opinion is enough?

I don't think I ever said I'd use blocking as much if it disallowed communication entirely to the point we can't read each other's posts. 

Discipulus_Didicit

Norway has by far the highest mass shooting rate per capita out of any country, and it has gun laws that are stricter than in the US. You can only legally get a gun for hunting  or for sport shooting. Only 9% of the population owns a gun, but in the US there are more guns than people.

" does this mean we will be raising the age of conscription to the age of 21 too"?

Never ceases to amaze me how right wingers think teachers cannot be trusted to teach, but should be trusted to arm themselves and stop mass shooters.

There were two proposals.

Hate is not a COC rule.

What you appear to be advocating is for those that block other members should be allowed to put in print anything about anyone they don't agree with or simply outright hate and make unsupported claims about anything  while displaying out-right double standards and  allowing intentional misquotation and misrepresentation  while not allowing the blocked member any sort of response.

Now take a good look at that and tell me, would you have ever had a chance to dispute, deny and or correct what the Witch had to say had she had YOU on blind block where YOU were unable to see and read her  " 100% false claims" ? 

A full site back-up with graphics was unfortunately not possible. All the information is unformatted text in html files.

As I have said, those that decide to block other members because of something they have "written in stone" and disagree with should be the very same people that have no direct contact with those they have decided to block.       After all, they are the ones that have taken offence and offence has to be taken doesn't it?:  there is a choice involved.

What you appear to be advocating is for those that block other members should be allowed to put in print anything about anyone they don't agree with or simply outright hate and make unsupported claims about anything  while displaying out-right double standards and  allowing intentional misquotation and misrepresentation  while not allowing the blocked member any sort of response.

But we are speaking of the written word, 3RU7AL . If one decides to put their thoughts down in writing on a public forum on the WWW then it is they that engrave their own thoughts and words in stone.

I never found the original post but I did find where it was discussed.  3RU7AL suggested it would be easy to do a list of banned members, both me and RM were to definitely be on that list, where we would be basically blocked no one could see our post and that in order for people to see those posts they'd have to opt out.  It was also discussed that this list would be secret and that we would just have to figure out that's what was going on. It was basically a list of members disliked or mods hate.  As long as the mods are going to allow people to make disgusting comments then I'm going to use the block function especially so I don't get messages from those people. That said those functions only work when you're logged in anyway log out and you can see everything.

There are a lot of people that changed their stance on bodily autonomy when it came to masks and vaccines  based on the lie that it would save lives.

That would be unfair imo.