Total posts: 3,192
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Both theoretical physicists had opposing views of God. So who's right, especially considering that you're attempting to appeal to their authorities?
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Exactly my point.
Is it? Because the logic isn't on your side since your argument operates on post hoc and ecological inference fallacies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Basic common sense would say that someone designed this, but no human designed it. Like we said:
Excellent! This is the reason materialistic atheists are hypocrites. They're just substituting one god for another.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Perhaps we can take a cue from Sandra Bullock, and use the foreskin facial--specifically the foreskin of Korean male infants--to attract more females to this website?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Why do you think half the population is not interested in this site?
This site isn't popular enough to fall within the radar of half the population.
Could it be the anti-vaxxers?
COVID-19 cannot be contracted through online interaction, can it? (Best update my engine and definitions, right away.)
You still haven't answered my question, and I'm going to guess that you have no intention of doing so.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Now, who am I more likely to listen to?A. SadoliteB. A Virologist.Well, if I have a preoccupation with conspiracy theory then probably Sadolite.
Who are you going to listen to about the QUANTIFICATION of a virus's epidemicity:
A. A website which can't clarify or argue back? Or...
B. A person who works as a data analyst, having a master's in Quantitative Methods & Social Analysis, who understands the ins-and-outs of logistic regressions, reference categorization, multivariate analysis, as well as the issues concerning rendering ecological inferences using complex datasets. Or to put simply, "a trypanophobe"?
I've gone toe-to-toe with virologists (even on this forum) and other physicians on this subject (remember, my family is lousy with physicians and health care professionals.) And no matter the profession--no matter the level of education--one cannot escape the LOGIC.
I would suggest that the reduction in the effects of the Influenza Virus is perhaps a lot to do with VACCINATION.
Which effects were reduced?
Q. Why has life expectancy doubled over the past 250 years?A. Definitely not luck.
No one claimed that it was luck. But perhaps clean water, better personal hygiene, increased workplace safety has a more tangible effect on increased life expectancy, than the uncontrolled and unsubstantiated efficacy of a vaccine?
And Sadolites fellow trypanophobic Athias (just jibing),
I'm in stitches.
is still alive, because( in respect of the Covid virus) the chances of still being alive are far greater than not.
But what does this indicate to me individually? Why were the "chances" of those did contract the virus and succumbed worse?
prevention is better than cure as those conspiring health professionals would have us believe.
You don't need a vaccine for that.
Stay safe Guys.
Thank you.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I guess God protects you.
Always.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Then by that description, "having a penis" would make a person a boy. The desire to have one in and of itself isn't quantifiable. A person presumably wants to "have a penis" because that would make him feel like a boy--i.e. "having penises" is associated with the identification of males.
Created:
Gender is the social manifestation of one's biological sex. And the constellation of gendered behaviors are typically associated to particular physical characteristics. You can't have it both ways: either one's sex or gender can be physically identifiable or it can't. And if it isn't physically identifiable, then there really is no point to a man dressing up like woman, and vice versa, or having gender/sex reassignment surgery, or hormone therapy. If gender/sex is fluid, then why does typical behavior indicate anything but.
Created:
CDC COVID-19 Study Shows mRNA Vaccines Reduce Risk of Infection by 91 Percent for Fully Vaccinated People
Risks that are determined by ecological inferences. Not to mention, the "study" was conducted over a 17 week period (vaccines usually take up to a decade in trials to conclude anything) and the samples were self-obtained. Answer this question for me: why have I yet to die from COVID after being not only unvaccinated, but also exposed for almost four years?
Created:
-->
@sadolite
" Vaccination won't prevent one from contracting a virus.""Though it will limit the effects of the virus.""I can only speculate about other possible outcomes if I had not been vaccinated."What evidence is there that the vaccine you took limited any affects? How is this even scientifically proven given literally no time to even conduct a credible study. It takes years to prove such a thing.
Sounds like some weak ass sudo science. "Speculate"
There hasn't been sufficient time to conduct a true scientific study to give conclusive results. You can believe it if you want.
Well stated.
Created:
This is a consequence of abandoning the masculine principle.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@John_C_87
Capitalism is in communism the communist republic owns the Capital.
Well stated. That's the reason that not only Socialism/Communism has no real goal but to transfer proprietary rights from the individual to a nebulous group regulatory mechanism, which necessarily reduces freedom.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
That assumes billionaire media owned Fox isn't also covering up organized pedophilia.
Not to mention, participating. Well stated.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I don't know exactly where that is.
Not particularly difficult to find. For future reference, click on my pseudonym which will take you to my profile. On my profile click the "Forum" tab. "Topics" should appear by default. Scroll down to the very first topic, and there it is.
A link would be helpful.
Sure thing. This is a link to the video:
You tell me what you see with your own eyes.
But it REALLY sounds like bullshit.
"Sounds like" is very close to "seem." And, seem is not an argument.
I mean, republicans have been looking for literally any reason to attack biden.
I am not a Republican.
Members of congress have openly lied in an impeachment inquiry trying to smear him. (emmer said that text messages showed biden trying get his son help with a business venture, the truth was he was trying to get him help paying his alimony).
That may be, but how does this qualify at all the veracity of what you would characterize as my "allegation"?
So if there was any truth to your accusation,
There is.
the republicans and fox would have been running it as front page news and definitely brought it up in their stupid little impeachment time waster.
If the media fulfilled their intended purpose, then perhaps. The purpose of the mainstream (liberal) media is to propagate disinformation and socially engineer.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Enjoy the rest of your day, sir. I'm not interested in your assessments of my vocabulary, or your continued pretenses. You said it yourself, "literally no one cares what [my] concern is" so move along and have a nice day.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Literally no one cares what your concern is.
Then your solution is simple: stop responding to my comments (remember you initiated me) and enjoy the rest of your day, sir.
You think molesting boys is same as pinching the nipple. Lol
And you think they're different.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Stop complaining so much about a pinch.
Once again, how am I "complaining"?
Conservatives like circumcising baby boys,
Irrelevant (the veracity of which I am not concerned.)
but think that pinching nipple is bad.
Where did I qualify the action?
If she doesnt care about that pinch, why would you?s
Once again, I don't concern myself with Mr. Biden's predilection. I concern myself only with the consistency in which a particular member will engage in partisan and specious characterizations of so-called "conservatives" while neglecting the fact that "liberal" politicians--in this case, Mr. Joe Biden--can also be subject to the same characterization using his description.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
No, the real definition is pinching, obviously.
And this is mutually exclusive from sexual molestation? Don't answer that, since I presume you'll just offer an obtuse response which furthers your perpetuation of this pretense.
I sure hope you never pinched your friend's nipple.
I suppose that's a viable interpretation. A 72 year-old man testing his nipple twists with an eight year-old. I couldn't concern myself less with his predilection. My concern is the inconsistency.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Unsuitable for president.
No one is suited to be president.
We cant have a president who wants to fuck his own daughter.
I suppose if he just took showers with her when she was younger, that would've sufficed?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
It was just a pinch.
So Joe Biden. a then 72 year old man, pinched the nipple of a then eight year-old girl.
Stop overreacting.
Overreacting to what? How am I overreacting?
She smiled right after.
Which indicates what? That negates her flinching and recoiling?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
You are all conservatives to me.Anarchs, climate change deniers, democracy haters...
What I am "to you" is no indication of what I am. You allege that I'm a conservative, the description of which does not apply to my political philosophy, so own your mistake. You allege that I'm a liar, so you're more than welcome to demonstrate that about which I've "lied."
Anyone outside of the democratic party is technically a conservative.
You're the only one pretending that's a real definition.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
So, was Biden accused of molesting anyone?Thats not molestation.Molestation is when you grab by pussy or ass.
You're the only one pretending that's a real definition.
Plus, the girl wasnt even offended by Biden. She was smiling before and after.
Yeah, that's the reason she flinched and recoiled when he did it.
Derangement.
So, he's "deranged." Of what is that indicative?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
There hasn't been this much covering up for the powerful elites since the Catholic scandal.
And that's barely covered up.
Killing Epstein doesn't just wipe the slate clean you know.
Partisan delusion.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Its called making stuff up. Conservatives are liars.
I'm neither a "conservative" nor a "liar." The evidence is there in plain sight.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
1. Daniels told a magazine six years ago that she had an affair with Donald Trump starting right after his wife Melania gave birth to their son, Barron…He told me once that I was someone to be reckoned with, beautiful and smart just like his daughter.2. During a Feb. 27, 2013, interview on The Wendy Williams Show, Trump was asked what he and his daughter both consider their favorite things. Trump answered, “I was going to say sex, but I can relate to [golf and real estate].3. During a March 6, 2006 episode of The View, Donald Trump made a casual remark that really made my skin crawl. When a host asks how Donald Trump would feel about his daughter posing for Playboy, he says that “Ivanka posing for Playboy would be really disappointing… not really. But it would depend on what was inside the magazine … I don’t think Ivanka would [do a nude shoot] inside the magazine. Although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said that if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.4. On The Howard Stern Show, way back in 2003, Donald Trump had this to say about his daughter Ivanka: “You know who’s one of the great beauties of the world, according to everybody? And I helped create her. Ivanka. My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body.5. In 2016, there were reports that Ivanka Trump might be taking over the White House office space traditionally reserved for the First Lady.Journalist Julia Ioffe tweeted, “Either Trump is fucking his daughter or he’s shirking nepotism laws. Which is worse?” The tweet linked to a report in The Hill expanding on the claim.6. During a 2015 interview with Donald Trump for Rolling Stone, reporter Paul Solotaroff praised Ivanka Trump. The soon-to-be president’s response? “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father…”7. In an early draft of a piece by Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen, he purportedly wrote that “President-elect Donald Trump once asked, ‘Is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?’ — but the quote was quietly removed before the syndicated column was published.”Yes, it’s wrong, Donald.8. According to a soon-to-be-published book, Blowback: A Warning to Save Democracy From the Next Trump, the former president “regularly made lewd comments about his daughter Ivanka and fantasized about what it would be like to have sex with her.”According to The New Republic, “’Aides said he talked about Ivanka Trump’s breasts, her backside and what it might be like to have sex with her, remarks that once led [former Chief of Staff] John Kelly to remind the president that Ivanka was his daughter,’ Taylor, who served as a Department of Homeland Security chief of staff under Trump, wrote in his book.”
His fixation on his daughter's appearance is evidence of what exactly?
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
what? when has anyone ever accuse biden of underage sex or molestation?
For one, I have. You need only look in the first thread I've ever created where I provide video of him pinching the nipple of a then eight year old girl on national television.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Women are half the population and we have zero members now.
Again, what does this have to do with one's sex? Since, I presume, you haven't confirmed the sex of each member, much less conducted a census determining whether the entire male population is participating on this site, why are you intent on drawing in--particularly--female members?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
How else are we going to increase the membership?
What does that have to do with the member's sex?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Have you ever heard of this guy and his music?
Yes.
Man, I've come to listen to him sing and he really sucks, seriously.
Not different from much of the gibberish released by many of the other current artists.
He has no idea how to sing but he's the most popular among the youth.
Talent and stardom aren't necessarily related.
What the fuck is going on?
He's a cash-cow, as well as peddler for social-engineering.
Created:
If you're going to rail against underage sex and molestation, then be consistent, especially considering this nation's current President.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
What Forum Topics do you think would attract women?
Why so interested?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Alright; so you don't like Christianity.
I don't subscribe to a particular religion; that doesn't result in my not liking or disliking Christianity. In fact, I tend to defend Christianity especially in the face of non sequiturs and strawman arguments (a consequence of misinterpreted Bible quotes) which are wagered typically by atheists.
The main reasons why women don't consent to sex is the fear of pregnancy and STIs.
I think there's a bit more to it than that, e.g. sense of personal space.
So then it shouldn't have gotten raised if it meant God would be a child rapist by the new definition.
God is not a "child-rapist" by the new definition especially considering that he did not engage in any sexual contact with Mary.
The people then should have either denounced Christainiy because then God would be a child rapist or kept the age of consent 12 so God is not a child rapist.
Your entire argument is predicated on an arbitrary definition of the State.
I've never been drunk, but if all the people who have been drunk argue that drunk people can't consent to sex, I got to believe them.
Unfortunately, I have, and trust me, no one else was responsible for my actions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Lol, nobody with the average IQ of this site was supposed to get the inside joke :)
Yeah, it was easy to recognize. Whenever I see "a modest proposal" in a statement regardless of context, I immediately think of satire, and Jonathan Swift (Swyft.) It's one of my favorite essays. The reference to the film "Indecent Proposal" hopefully didn't go over the heads of some.
Classic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
The current salary for a US congressman is around $175,000 dollars. Each Representative represents close to a million people. The average salary of a CEO at a fortune 500 company is 16.7 million dollars.I propose to raise the salary of Congress to 20 million dollars a year with the provision that they must have term limits. The President will have a salary of 50 million. I base this off of the 400 million dollars Barack Obama accumulated from kickbacks during his 8 years as president.Here are the reasons:1) It would be a very small part of the national budget. 10 Billion dollars a year for the salary of Congress is definitely doable.2) It would make it much harder for a lobbyist to purchase a politician.3) It would attract much more competition and a higher quality of candidates for the job.What do you guys think?
First let me commend you for not proposing anything "swyft" like eating poor Irish babies, or "indecent" like paying me to pimp out my high school sweetheart, turned wife.
Second, my response is perhaps best exemplified through this question: why would one pay the incompetent more?
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Well, I assume that Universal progress goes from A to Z...(Then back to A perhaps)And events therefore all follow a previous event.Or just one big event.Or both.Just as a life goes from A to Z.
The power of your perception.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Yes, especially those who post that DART is a shit-hole and you are a bad person.
It was my hope that the thread would receive as little attention as possible so as not to indulge that pretentious and condescending display. But it has brought to my attention something far more disgraceful--at first, I thought it was fair to assess that ponikshiy was a "new persona" of Wylted, but something about that post reeked of another member, or a member who I assume intends to have everyone believe he's a former member. Particularly that stereotypical and quite racist, Russian "guise." I've since come to the conclusion that it's a single person through his dissociative personalities who's attempting to gaslight the members of this forum with pathetic, dim-witted, puerile farces for the sake of attention mongering. And Wylted, even ponikshiy, and some others whom I will not name just yet are one of the many broken personalities of this one farceur.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
It's actually quite simple to understand. A woman gestates, a man inseminates. The former takes considerably more labor than the latter. A woman typically gestates ONCE for a period of 36-40 weeks; A man can inseminate HUNDREDS of partners over that span. A woman has a few hundred egg cells. A man has billions of sperms cells. The reason a female is typically "more picky" is because she has more to lose with a bad prospect. It's like breeding red wolves (gestation) and breeding hamsters (insemination.) It's Economics. The scarcity of the female capacity to gestate dictates its price.
Created:
-->
@CoolApe
Real GDP growth inflation adjustedIts not impressive the economy grew 5.8% when everyone went back to work after covid. Any president in office could of achieved that.Notice Biden's second year is worse than Trump's first three years.Biden2021-2022 5.8%2022-2023 1.93%Trump2017-2018 2.462018-2019 2.972019-2020 2.472020-2021 -2.21Source Fred (federal reserve economic data)
I made a mistake. The aforementioned numbers were annually averaged over the year, so they're smoother than they should be.Here are the numbers based on Q4 percent change from a year ago. No averages involved.Real GDP Growth (Inflation Adjusted)Bidenmeasuring end of Q42021 5.42%2022 0.65%Trump2017 2.99%2018 2.13%2019 3.18%2020 -1.08%The economy is larger today than pre-CovidGDP fell during Q1 in 2020 because of Covid. 2019 Q4 was pre-covid. Lets calculate percent change of Real GDP from 2019 to 2021.Q42019 20,951 (2017 Billions dollars)2021 21,847 (2017 Billions dollars)2019-2021 4.28% (Real GDP growth from pre-Covid to a year after covid)Biden performed 1.10% better than the typical 3.18% Real GDP average. He grew the economy 0% in 2022. It looks like 2023 will end with 2.1% growth and 2024 a recession. Go Brandon.Notice Biden added more jobs in his first 30 months than Trump did in his first 30 months?Unemployment rate pre-covid 3.6%. Unemployment rate now 3.8%. Amazing, people went back to work after Covid
Different sources slightly different numbers. I could call you liar for not having numbers consistent with me. However, it's literally tenths of a percent your talking about here.Biden already beat Trump’s best unemployment rate of 3.67%. Loser!2021 - 3.61% and 2019 - 3.67% so a 0.06% difference. Dam Biden.Trump oversaw a 22 trillion dollar GDP in 2019Biden had a 25 trillion dollar GDP in 2022. Loser!
Outstanding!
Do you understand the difference between GDP and real GDP?
That has yet to be demonstrated. That would necessitate a fervor to consider information in context, and abandon partisan talking points.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Then it begs the question: why does any information a materialist would argue is "made up" disqualify itself especially in the face of the aforementioned undoubted and inevitable truism?
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
OK.So I'm uncertain as to how you're using "prescription" in that statement.
Prescrption
Noun
- a recommendation that is authoritatively put forward.
And I would suggest that either presuming or not presuming to dictate that which I WOULD do, is like tying the stick and carrot to the donkeys tail.Or, leaving the stick and carrot in the stable.
In other words, I'm incapable of providing you incentive to break your routine. I don't disagree. But that doesn't mean you can't break your routine, if you so choose.
Though I suppose that relative to this brief discussion, I CAN as you can, as we will do relative to a cause.Which won't necessarily result in a prescribed outcome.As a cause might stimulate an alternative effect, which relative to this discourse would not necessarily be disingenuous.Or perhaps I should say, SHOULD not necessarily be regarded as necessarily disingenuous.
A cause, which you would argue, doesn't "exist" correct?
Words are fun, are they not?
They sure are.
Created:
All U.S. citizens are by definition "debt-slaves" by means of the 14th Amendment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Trent0405
This is perhaps my biggest gripe with the way debates are conducted on this site. That is, the "expectation" that everything is readily available on an easily accessible online source. Perhaps it's my age, but I'm accustomed to conducting research by actually reading the material on the subject, whether it be books, journals, encyclopedias, almanacs, published essays, etc. And while I laud the readily available information which can be accessed on the internet, I think the oversupply has devalued said information, and has even diminished the eagerness to seek it. There are those who are no longer seeking information; they're just seeking regurgitation. And all this just goes to show the worth of an online debate--that is, if the information isn't worth much, then why would the debate be? Is one seeking information or just a transient gratification of having bested an opponent who's marginally less knowledgeable than oneself?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Critical-Tim
I'm not certain of my stance on that topic, but I'd love to explore it if you create the forum.
Perhaps sometime in the near future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Do you mean materialism or materialism?
I meant materialism as in "physicalism."
If the former, then perhaps the irrationality and futility of everything would be more appropriate.
I suppose that would be the logical counterargument of materialist dogma. If one maintains that everything = phyiscal, then the futility and irrationality of the physical would be a proposition of the futility and irrationality of everything. However my contention is against the very premise that "everything = physical." So no, it isn't appropriate.
Therefore, maybe I could propose the irrationality and futility of philosophy, within the context of everything and the irrationality and futility invested therein.
Elaborate.
Nonetheless, I currently run with the idea of an outcome, wherein noting can be over looked.Well let me rephrase that:Nothing as in something as in everything cannot be overlooked,
Materialist dogma necessarily overlooks everything by attempting to pigeonhole "everything."
Because we cannot conclude anything at this stage of material development.
That is a presumption with no substantiated basis.
Well let me rephrase that:I would suggest that we have concluded somethings, relative to material development and it's processes...Though we clearly cannot conclude an outcome to material development.
What you have concluded is riddled with contradiction as it concerns materialist description.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Back to where we started this brief discussion.
Are we? I would not presume to dictate to you that which you WOULD do. But I can offer prescription as to that which you CAN do.
Created:
Posted in:
We do not official stop pregnancy a woman is medicallyseeking to officially stop birth.
That isn't necessarily accurate for the following two reasons:
- Gestation spans over a 36-40 week period. An abortion during any point during this period would still be described as an end of pregnancy since the woman of subject is still gestating.
- Some methods of abortions can actually mimic what we know as "birth" especially if the zygote/embryo/fetus is expelled in tact. The only difference is that the zygote/embryo/fetus isn't viable.
A choice has been made to perform an officialstop of birth, not officially stop immigration by birth.
The deciding factor is the viability of the fetus, not its capacity "immigrate" from its mother's womb to space outside its mother's womb.
By using abortion as acrime in the legislation of criminal law a state of the union has been made to establishjustice.
Please substantiate.
A corruption that will always be as a united state made between allwomen and men and admission to a described abortion.
Please substantiate. You cannot replace "abortion" with "murder" and propose that as substantiation without first equating abortion with murder.
Demonstration: Ahired killer appears in a court of law at a trail and is ordered to take thestand. While under oath the person tells the jury and court, he / she has officiallyaborted the existence of 100,000 senior citizens. The killer did not know theage of the victims of his official stop of existence he / she called abortion.There are, however, official medical records of all the bodies which aredestroyed in connection to the official terminations.
Do not merely replace the term "abort" with "murder." Substantiate the equivalence.
I am taking adocumented crime written by Texas and other State legislation changing thewording and calling it at this time the most perfect United StateConstitutional Right there is in connection to females and basic principles inthe risks of birth, as a united state with all fertile women.
Please don't "change the wording." If you wish to propose an appropriate application of Texas state law, or any other state legislation, then by all means do so. It could perhaps be useful to cite the referenced legislation.
Abortion has only been entered intothe Courts of law as a crime and never a right. So far everyone in the worldhas failed to make this connection to established justice. It is not the onlyglobal democratic failure of this type either.
Understood.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
Reported for not using my preferred pronouns
Let me know how that works out for you, Wylted.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
Everybody insults mother Russia here, so I thought it was fair.
I can see how you came to that conclusion: other members insult your supposed native country, and you attempt to insult the native country of another member's father, who has not only never participated on this website, but also doesn't initiate insults on any subject matter. That is textbook "fair."
Love you.
You don't know me well enough, bro.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mr.BrotherD.Thomas
B-O-R-I-N-G, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ......... WAIT, never mind, if you two accomplish this discussion, let me know because it will be a great "sleep aid" to read it, thank you!
Glad I can help. Enjoy your night, sir.
Created: