Athias

Haiti is great country. It is obvious you come from a people who can effectively self govern. 

Where do you live?

Are you a citizen of a real country?

they did, they weren't elected to the highest public office

Ok, so you are confusing it with your own experience 

I’m just asking questions.

No insults.

Perhaps you are suffering from island life.

Too much sun.

did they pinch your nipples before they died? 

That’s a lie. You are a liar.

What is wrong with your brain?

There is no pinching of any nipples at the swearing in ceremony.

Perhaps you are confusing Biden with your own grandfather 

We all know (or should know) the longest serving Republican Speaker of the House was a child molester. Dennis Hastert, sexually abused boys on the high school wrestling team he coached, before he was elected to Congress. That is not in dispute. That is the kind of guy Republicans elect and the kind of guy other Republicans elevate to leadership positions in their party. They still operate the House under the “Hastert Rule” which says: the Speaker will not schedule a floor vote on any bill that does not have majority support within their party—even if the majority of the members of the House would vote to pass it. Leave it to Republicans to base their operations on the judgement of a child molester.

Now they are seriously considering another degenerate wrestling coach for the Speaker position - Jim SEE NO EVIL Jordan. Jordan was a coach at Ohio State when the team doctor was molesting members of his team some years back. Jordan turned a blind eye to the abuse and did nothing that any normal adult would do in that situation. This is the kind of guy Republicans see leadership potential in.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/powerful-gop-rep-jim-jordan-accused-turning-blind-eye-sexual-n888386

Maybe it has been scrambled so you cannot understand it the queation is, do you need to know?

We do not have to prove abortion is murder, we proven abortion is an admission to murder,

is the admission illegal yes it has been proven by the supreme court.

We prove United State Constitutional Right such as Female-specific amputation. We do not have to ratify the United State Constitutional Right only describe as large a group of females, in the best way as a United State Constitutional Rights so it can be said to be a possible task. 

That's why we included it for about basically no middle schools, some high school electives, and a viable major for virtually all research-based universities! Yay!

No seriously, is that all?

I'd like to start another topic now that this one has finished. Perhaps you have some interesting philosophy suggestions?

What stops you doing stuff that you don't regularly do.

And what makes you do stuff that you regularly do.

It seemingly takes no mental effort to be habitual,

But a deliberate amount of effort to change one's routine.

One would assume that it's all down to how our operating system becomes established.

Well, they can, but they usually dont.

It is almost always done as punishment and against their will.

Why do women tend to have longer hair than men on average?

This is not applied in all cultures

it is just something I see in the "mainstream" western or even oriental culture.

But seriously what purpose does it serve?

No, we can just prove abort is an order to officially stop,then prove abort is connected to the termination of a pregnancy, with a connection of a birth by the word abortion to women, by act of conception to men. Once that is done abortion becomes aadmission to a use of lethal force, not murder.

The legislators, by writing legislation with criminal law, the people never had a way of knowing if murder had taken place as there is only a crime involved in establishing justice and never a established right. The victim is not a citizen to be charged with attempted murder of the mother turning the lethal force into self-defense as publicly claimed often. Even though the a as United State of Constitution.  The admission to the use of lethal force can be used against us in a court of law, then becoming murder, indenture dservitude, or even slavery by conviction. It is the way an admission to a possible criminal law is collected which can be subject to criminal law, this as a litteral form of organized crime or legalmal practice. By United State Constitutional Right in connection to established justice linking the whole process as well with the RICO Act. With whom does the order of stop officially start? With whom doesthe official order to stop end?

Question, is it implausable argument as women had sought Constitutional Right having been and are sold criminal law instead.

There is no valid interpretation of God's direct words, they are exactly as God intended, literal.

Your claim is paradoxical, self-contradictory, and illogical. Don't try to escape this claim and muddle up the water by simply quoting many scriptures without context or a point to make, as you have done till now.

You'll find out soon enough, if you haven't already, that their arguments relentlessly consist of quotes taken out of context, and syntactic literalism.

You are feeding a troll who will do nothing but insult you.

He is not interested in honest debate, nor in any kind of productive conversation.

All he is interested in is writing a wall of insults in a repeating structure to provoke people, and he will never admit that he is wrong.

Now there's a moot point.

Athias is russian pronunciation of a Russian word that means "communist" so I just assumed.

I am not native English speaker so maybe it has different meaning in English.

but I could be mistaken as your net worth is the ultimate determinING factor of that.

Why would a woke person such as you

find something objectionable about men pretending to be women?

For your information.  I am woman

Legal Argument 

(1) Murder is the taking of an innocent person’s life.

(2) According to the law, a pregnancy is not recognized as a person. 

(3) Therefore, abortion is not murder.

Premise 2 is arbitrary.

What if the law is wrong?

Then, the conclusion must also be wrong. 

If everyone wants a good argument with this reasoning, then debaters should agree on a specific definition of personhood that the law can recognize. 

The law argument is circular reasoning and irrelevant until the debaters agree on a logical definition of personhood.

Personhood Argument

It's easier said than done to come up with a good concept of personhood. Finding a coherent concept of personhood is a philosophical exercise and a rabbit hole.

Some people think viability is the answer, which I’m unconvinced about. 

Many premature births require medical assistance to survive. Requiring medical assistance isn’t the typical idea of viability, which one thinks.

A healthy, full-term baby fits this ideal concept of viability since it can survive without medical assistance. However, most people couldn’t agree with this extreme case of viability since many consider abortion in the third-trimester murder.

However, medical viability depends on the capabilities of advanced medical care, which once didn’t exist and could improve in the future.

The fetus/embryo/(input early stage) is a clump of cells and not a human being

Many people think that a pregnancy is a group of cells that is no more a human being than a foot or hand. However, the pregnancy at conception is a human organism and continues to be the same human organism when it dies. On the other hand, a clump of cells does not constitute a human organism and can’t grow into one. 

Therefore, it seems reasonable to say that pregnancy is a human being at the initial stage of their life and continues to be for their existence.

If you make enough money, I will gladly get engaged to you. 

And funnily enough, as young children my sister and I were only allowed to watch children's T.V. between 5 and 6pm.

Suggests that you and I were conditioned.

Which is probably  also why I am atheist. 

And goes to prove that what we think today is likely to be based upon what we were taught as young children.

I guess you are probably a man, and a single one if you do not realize we use a lot of beauty products and they all have very specific uses. Like my sunscreen protects me from the sun. My mascara helps me create my fuck me eyes. 

We just wanted to make you feel wanted.

Though I suppose one could draw certain conclusions about the DebateArt community, from the apparent unpopularity of said entertainment vehicle.

Not that I wish to do so.

I suppose that my formative conditioning was why I grew up with only a limited interest in televisual and cinematic entertainment mediums.

Over a year I probably average less than one hour per day watching TV.

And I can't remember the last time I visited a cinema... It's certainly more than ten years ago.

Latterly, my laptop and primarily DebatArt have become my main entertainment and reference mediums of choice.

Though I make a conscious effort to not become dependant upon them.

Younger people and their reliance on hand held devices is an all too apparent sign of the times.

What form  do you think the next phase of the human/techno symbiosis will take?

Or should I say, the next phase of the technological takeover.

->

@n8nrgim

aren't most third world economies free markets?

Unlikely.

Most 3rd world countries don't have very strong private property laws

1. Weak Legal Systems: 3rd world nations typically have underdeveloped legal systems that struggle to enforce property rights effectively. This can lead to disputes over land and property ownership.
   
2. Corruption: Corruption within legal and governmental institutions in 3rd world countries undermine property rights by allowing powerful individuals or entities to encroach on the property rights of others with impunity.
   
3. Unclear Land Tenure: Land tenure systems may be informal or unclear, leading to disputes over land ownership and use.
   
4. Lack of Access: Vulnerable populations, such as indigenous communities or rural farmers, have limited access to legal mechanisms to protect their property rights.
   
5. State Control: Most developing countries have historically had a strong presence of state-owned enterprises and significant government intervention in key industries such as energy, telecommunications, and banking.
   
6. Economic Liberalization: Over the past few decades, many developing countries have pursued economic liberalization policies, including privatization of state-owned enterprises, trade liberalization, and deregulation, with the aim of increasing economic freedom and attracting foreign investment, but not to the extent of a free market.
   

Black people often have different hair care needs than non blacks.

Also razor bump treatment is more common I. African Americans. 

Different skin tones have different needs. 

In 2018, Essie Grundy sued Walmart for locking up beauty items catering to black women. According to the complaint, Grundy went to the Walmart store in Perris, California several times and had to ask a sales clerk to unlock the display case for black hair and body products. Meanwhile, beauty items for non-blacks were not under lock and key, according to the suit. Grundy said she felt “shame and humiliation” as people were staring at her as if she were criminal as she waited for assistance.

every sucessful country has a social safety net...

there are no successful libertarian countries.

it's just a question of what policies we use to at least try to make things a little better for everyone.

maybe we should just build more housing for poor people, but no one has given a decent reason why my proposal is bad either. 

Isn't it more a case of affording to buy.

Because I assume that in a capitalist society, all U.S. citizens are allowed to own said property.

So unless your referring to a socialist utopia, the current  status quo would remain in the U.S.

And of course in a true socialist utopia, ownership and value would be irrelevant.

Society is such that people become rich and poor.

And attempts to realign society always fail.

Because in your utopia, you would just replace one ruling class with another.

You cannot enforce equality. 

Enforcing equality is a contradiction in terms.

And let's face it...The passive introduction of equality is also a non-starter.

the richest one percent of americans own more than sixteen times as much as the bottom fifty percent of americans.

so, it's more than just a simple case of supply and demand, as if that's all there is to it. with that much buying power, the rich jack up prices,

and become landlords able to leach wealth off the backs of the working class. 

What specifically is Black?

And what specifically is White?

Is a swarthy Spaniard for example, black or white?

Is it just skin pigment that is the indicator?

If so can you quantify the amount of pigment that defines the difference between the generalisations that are "black and white".

And therefore are higher levels of pigment the specific cause of dishonesty and poor social morality?

Here is question for you . Let's say a retailer looks at the theft rate of items and it just so happens the highest theft items are black beauty products. Is it racist to then put more theft prevention devices on those black beauty products?

I am also aware that from a business owners perspective it might be beneficial not o ly to avoid racism but to avoid being seen as racist even if it involves eating the cost of extra theft or also putting theft prevention devices on white beauty products as well, but I am asking from a different perspective. One of reality not perception.

You were correct on the uselessness of the word objectivity. It is irrational to believe in a reality beyond perception without perceiving it. The word I was looking for and accidentally defined as the underlying consistency throughout subjectivity for a rational definition of objectivity, was actually the definition intersubjectivity.

In essence, objectivity is a theory, while subjective and intersubjective can be known.

Christainity wouldn’t be nearly as common here.

He impregnated a girl

that in the modern day is underage.

Change the definition for the age of consent to 13, and God is no longer legally a pedophille.

So if you choose to get drunk and agree to sex when your drunk, you would want that to be legal?

With a sufficiently violent government anything is possible

I believe there is consistency among all individuals who gain trauma because even if the physical experience that caused the trauma is different for each person the emotional state that caused the trauma will be the same. Perhaps once we understand how trauma is psychologically stimulated, we can deduce which circumstances would induce it.

It is. No one can force a change to the checksum algorithms and those algorithms require a global asymptote (some other coins include growth curves based on transactions).

Indeed they would have to tear down the internet and make private computing without backdoors illegal to enforce such a thing.

That's why privacy coins are superior.

Bitcoin (and analogs) destroy money supply manipulation such as inflation and remove the weakness of government being able to remove your money without your consent and without capturing and torturing you as they can do now by simply going to the bank.

Monero (and analogs) do all that and they will effectively create a condition where any disturbance to the system will cause a chain reaction that destroys taxation (involuntary fees of any kind) because the government will not even be able to quantify most people's income or transactions without cooperation.

They will likely ban privacy coins the moment any gains traction with the excuse being it is used by criminals. Of course anyone who refuses to pay taxes is a criminal in their view so that's not inaccurate to the hope. Cash is also preferred by true criminals today but its popularity makes it hard to use that excuse to remove it and the same would be true if a privacy coin was adopted faster than the gears of government could react.

Note also that it isn't the cash economy that need be targeted for subversion but the credit card economy as well as things like google or apple pay. The USD and all the cash would still exist, but from the government's point of view it just sits in big exchange accounts and does nothing taxable.

People will be paid in crypto, will buy in crypto, and need only concern themselves with USD for the purposes of cash. Of course the IRS will learn to track and tax but they already have the ability to audit everything you buy electronically or are paid through W2 employment.

It's still a step forward to remove ways they can steal. Even people immorally supporting taxes would agree that preventing currency manipulation so that all taxation must go through legislative process is a benefit.

It is impossible to inflate,

why would they pursue it if they can't manipulate it?

I suppose you don't believe there is an underlying consistency among all individuals that triggers trauma?

So they say.

The people can obsolete it themselves by adopting cryptocurrency.

"People have the government they deserve" is not literally true but it is true that governments don't exist a certain way without a whole lot of people going with the flow.

So then do you believe people only act morally out of self-interest, since people who don't act morally will be outcasts and no longer capable of being trusted or bargained with?

But you forgot that government uses that money to pay for poor people's food and healthcare.

But you think thats bad.

Well, okay, tell me when you succeed.

Government makes you serve Communist ideals by "donating" part of your wealth to the poor.

Okay, I guess 95% of anarchy just isnt good enough for you.

how about something that can be done?

Well yeah, but failing that, a return to 2020 prices and a 2020 value for the dollar would be a huge improvement.

Communism, good idea on paper, bad in practice.

Well, sorry but no. You will have to be satisfied with 95% for now.

Well, you can either have Communism or Feudalism Or slavery. Out of these 3, Communism lets you have most of the anarchy.

Well, yes, but pure anarchy doesnt exist. So what now?

In order to reverse the damage done by Biden, we would have to have an equivilent deflationary period to restore normal dollar values for goods. That probably isn't going to be happening.