"This dilemma is the gaslighting dilemma abusers put their victims into:
'stay with me you coward you can't escape, wow you ran off you coward trash pathetic loser.'"
Actually, the solution is not to run away and not to keep being abused, but to stay and destroy your abuser.
If you run away or just come back to be abused again, one can only think that you are weak.
RM, I dont think you care much for your mental health. Even when Lancelot was abusing you, you were always around him so he abuses you more. You could have just ignored him, but you kept coming back to him and he kept abusing you. So I think you like being abused. You want for people to abuse you. You also want to abuse others, but are not really capable of it when you engage someone stronger, so you resort to pretending to be a victim.
RM, if you are after people's approval this much, its no wonder your confidence shrinks once said approval is not there anymore.
When Lancelot was hurting you, I was the only one to come help you because I thought you were the victim in that situation and Lancelot did look like a bully from an uninformed perspective.
But I was wrong. Being abused doesnt mean you are victim. You attacked first. Its no wonder people fucked you up to the point where you called everyone on the site "shitstains" and ran away for 5 months to restore lost confidence.
His self esteem couldnt be worse. The mods are the only thing protecting him, thats why he runs away to them all the time when he is in trouble. If he wants total war, so be it.
He will just run away from the site again. His problem is that he attacks, and then runs away. We dont even need mods to ban him. He bans himself for 5 months once his confidence is destroyed, then after he gains some confidence back he comes back again for it to get destroyed again.
Apparently, imperialism and always attacking works in trolling too.
He might take the first 4 or 5 different attacks with some confidence, but after that he gets triggered quickly by almost anything and cries like a baby.
I will just pretend to respect you, so you unblock me, and then I will return again to not respecting you.
I already did so like 5 or 6 times with you and you fall for it every time, I am pretty sure you will fall for my fake respect again as soon as couple of months pass so you forget about this.
You can just come up with some excuse to vote for him to give him back elo.
And it should be easy too, since I literally posted songs that I dont even relate to, since my life has nothing to do with "miyasan miyasan" song or "red sun in the sky" song.
In fact, its impossible to relate to both since they come from opposite sides of politics.
It was also a mistake to vote on your songs debate. I liked your songs more, I thought they were better, I voted honestly. But I should have just not voted so you lose and then you would rage in comments as usual.
Then you go making mhar your enemy, and I do you a favor and make you guys friends again with just one comment, where otherwise he wouldnt be your friend either anymore.
I should just sit back and let you make enemies. I shouldnt defend you anymore. Thats what your plan on this site is, after all. Make bunch of enemies, then quit the site so people forget what you did, then come back after few months and do it all over again.
Just do me a favor. When Lancelot comes back to bully you again, dont ask me to save you again like you did before. That one time, I told Lancelot to stop and he stopped. However, next time, I wont be there to save you.
And that book, 48 laws of power? Do yourself a favor and throw it in garbage.
Enjoy losing friends, it seems that you lost 2 today.
I dont see you as a pathetic joke, because jokes are at least funny, but this is not funny. Your reporting is sad.
It was a mistake for me to vote on any of your debates, because I see that a debater like you doesnt even deserve to win.
In fact, no one should even read your debates, as you dont deserve that.
I shouldnt have taken your side when Lancelot bullied you, but I did because I was feeling bad that you were being hurt so much even tho you probably started it.
I guess your goal here was to give me the win and pretend that my definitions were somehow better than my opponent's definitions.
I know someone reported the vote on one of my debates before, and people accussed me of doing it, but now its clear who reports votes on my debates, so any time someone again thinks I reported the vote, I will just link them this so they see who is really doing the reporting.
Losing and winning is up to voters, and I dont care how voters vote on my debates, and if my opponent doesnt report vote either, no one should complain about it at all.
And about giving free wins, you know very well that I can give free wins if I want to, I can make unwinnable debates for me. If that was my goal, you wouldnt be able to stop it in any way, and this reporting of yours that you do is honestly pathetic and even makes me look bad because if you keep quiet it seems like I reported the vote.
I wouldnt waste my time even reading votes on non-my debates, let alone reporting them.
The fact that you do that honestly makes me wanna ban you from voting on my debates, and mods should publically reveal who reports so that such person can be subject to ridicule.
If you want to build relationship with anyone here, you will not get it through "being nice always" or "being enemies" or any such nonsense which you might be thinking right now.
From cartoons, I learned that every relationship is about "being nice" + "being enemies".
If you are always nice, relationship is boring.
If you are always enemies, you dont have a relationship.
But if you do both, if you switch between being nice and being enemies often enough, relationship can last much longer, maybe even for a life time.
The problem only rises when one type prevails over another, when you are too nice or too hostile.
I should have gone with 3 rounds of 20,000 characters, because it seems like not all will fit and I might lack about 5000 characters, but thats okay, I will just have to delete sentences which repeat.
This is really just everyone's opportunity to justify their hate.
Because if they dont even need to justify it, then we are not really living in society based on justified opinions, which only works against said society so I am fine with that.
"You guys are migrating so fast to the west because you know your culture is inferior and weak"
Actually, the birth rates are so bad in the west.
Muslim countries have high birth rates.
So we can see which culture is more sustainable and which destroyed its family values, but for those who cant see, the west destroyed its family values and now depends on muslims to support it.
Thats just sad.
You are weak and just want for abuse to stop.
You also come back for more abuse to practice being abused.
I guess too much abuse does make person act like you act.
"This dilemma is the gaslighting dilemma abusers put their victims into:
'stay with me you coward you can't escape, wow you ran off you coward trash pathetic loser.'"
Actually, the solution is not to run away and not to keep being abused, but to stay and destroy your abuser.
If you run away or just come back to be abused again, one can only think that you are weak.
"What I am reading is simply a cold take by 2 of the closest people to suicide on this site."
You wrote on your profile that you will commit honorable seppuku after people here fucked you up mentally.
Of course, I knew you wont do it, even tho you were clearly thinking about it.
"they leave the place that related them like dirt and come back if they wish to"
Yeah, so which part of that makes them strong?
Returning to be abused or running away because they were abused?
Thats disgusting that he probably masturbates while reading my abusive comments.
RM, I dont think you care much for your mental health. Even when Lancelot was abusing you, you were always around him so he abuses you more. You could have just ignored him, but you kept coming back to him and he kept abusing you. So I think you like being abused. You want for people to abuse you. You also want to abuse others, but are not really capable of it when you engage someone stronger, so you resort to pretending to be a victim.
RM, if you are after people's approval this much, its no wonder your confidence shrinks once said approval is not there anymore.
When Lancelot was hurting you, I was the only one to come help you because I thought you were the victim in that situation and Lancelot did look like a bully from an uninformed perspective.
But I was wrong. Being abused doesnt mean you are victim. You attacked first. Its no wonder people fucked you up to the point where you called everyone on the site "shitstains" and ran away for 5 months to restore lost confidence.
Well, do everyone a favor and dont come back next time.
His self esteem couldnt be worse. The mods are the only thing protecting him, thats why he runs away to them all the time when he is in trouble. If he wants total war, so be it.
He will just run away from the site again. His problem is that he attacks, and then runs away. We dont even need mods to ban him. He bans himself for 5 months once his confidence is destroyed, then after he gains some confidence back he comes back again for it to get destroyed again.
I dont see why would you defend him.
He intentionally fucked your rating to put you down and to give me the win because I was his friend.
He calls people stupid and morons, then runs away when people come after him.
If you want to defend him, sure, do so, but after years of my experience with him I would say there is not much worth to defend there.
"RM is thin skinned"
He is gonna quit the site again in 2 months, after he can no longer handle whats coming, just like he did 2 times last year.
You dont ever see me running away, because unlike some people, I dont run away. I just attack in a different spot.
He is gonna lose the attrition war very quickly.
Apparently, imperialism and always attacking works in trolling too.
He might take the first 4 or 5 different attacks with some confidence, but after that he gets triggered quickly by almost anything and cries like a baby.
You are a smart man 7k. ;)
Others won't see it at first but you and I were symbiotic during this.
"Veni, vidi, neglexi"
You have to make it standard.
He wont accept this because he doesnt wanna lose rating, which he will lose a lot if he accepts.
Such is the way of life,
Only hardship, pain and strife 😊
Okay, but thats your mistake.
I will just pretend to respect you, so you unblock me, and then I will return again to not respecting you.
I already did so like 5 or 6 times with you and you fall for it every time, I am pretty sure you will fall for my fake respect again as soon as couple of months pass so you forget about this.
No. As proven by my elo, I am just a bad retarded debater, so its reasonable to assume that I performed my best in this debate.
Now, unless you wanna cast another bad vote, I suggest you to vote as I have instructed you.
No, I am not admitting that.
I am just telling you how to reasonably vote, because you seemed to be on the path of voting unfairly again.
You can just come up with some excuse to vote for him to give him back elo.
And it should be easy too, since I literally posted songs that I dont even relate to, since my life has nothing to do with "miyasan miyasan" song or "red sun in the sky" song.
In fact, its impossible to relate to both since they come from opposite sides of politics.
Long live American imperialism!
Some people enjoy risk taking.
I do too.
Any votes?
Remember, dont be biased and vote in a fair way.
Yeah, I have 5 rounds written in advance, so you could say I am "ready".
It was also a mistake to vote on your songs debate. I liked your songs more, I thought they were better, I voted honestly. But I should have just not voted so you lose and then you would rage in comments as usual.
Then you go making mhar your enemy, and I do you a favor and make you guys friends again with just one comment, where otherwise he wouldnt be your friend either anymore.
I should just sit back and let you make enemies. I shouldnt defend you anymore. Thats what your plan on this site is, after all. Make bunch of enemies, then quit the site so people forget what you did, then come back after few months and do it all over again.
Just do me a favor. When Lancelot comes back to bully you again, dont ask me to save you again like you did before. That one time, I told Lancelot to stop and he stopped. However, next time, I wont be there to save you.
And that book, 48 laws of power? Do yourself a favor and throw it in garbage.
Enjoy losing friends, it seems that you lost 2 today.
I dont see you as a pathetic joke, because jokes are at least funny, but this is not funny. Your reporting is sad.
It was a mistake for me to vote on any of your debates, because I see that a debater like you doesnt even deserve to win.
In fact, no one should even read your debates, as you dont deserve that.
I shouldnt have taken your side when Lancelot bullied you, but I did because I was feeling bad that you were being hurt so much even tho you probably started it.
I guess your goal here was to give me the win and pretend that my definitions were somehow better than my opponent's definitions.
I know someone reported the vote on one of my debates before, and people accussed me of doing it, but now its clear who reports votes on my debates, so any time someone again thinks I reported the vote, I will just link them this so they see who is really doing the reporting.
They should remove your report button again.
I dont know why they even gave it back to you.
Maybe they enjoy having to respond to your constant reporting.
If I were mod, I would just ignore your reports.
Most of your reports are fake anyway.
You constantly complain, and of course people are gonna ridicule that.
Enjoy making enemies, I guess.
You know you are bad at handling when other people attack you, yet you do everything to make other people attack you.
I dont know why I was glad when you returned to the site. I guess I thought site will have more activity, but I dont think its worth it.
Losing and winning is up to voters, and I dont care how voters vote on my debates, and if my opponent doesnt report vote either, no one should complain about it at all.
And about giving free wins, you know very well that I can give free wins if I want to, I can make unwinnable debates for me. If that was my goal, you wouldnt be able to stop it in any way, and this reporting of yours that you do is honestly pathetic and even makes me look bad because if you keep quiet it seems like I reported the vote.
I wouldnt waste my time even reading votes on non-my debates, let alone reporting them.
The fact that you do that honestly makes me wanna ban you from voting on my debates, and mods should publically reveal who reports so that such person can be subject to ridicule.
I suggest you introduce a new policy.
Only remove votes on my debates if they are bad and if me or my opponent report them.
I dont see the point in removing a vote neither debater reported.
Good luck proving that.
Thats a 1 incher.
You have probably never heard of songs I will post.
I am certain because videos I will post have about 40k views, so less than 0.00005% of people in the world know about them.
But they are strong songs. They werent written by pussies but by real men.
You are wrong.
If you both do something bad, its wrong to want to punish just one.
Either want to punish both or no one.
If you did something bad but dont want to punish yourself, then how can you desire punishment for someone else who did something bad?
Didnt you both do something bad?
Thats exactly how logic works.
You cannot punish others if you are bad as well but you dont want to punish yourself but just them.
Thats just opinion which exists in your brain.
Well, I think its bad to hate 1 billion people.
Plus, Christians dont exactly have flawless history.
If you want to build relationship with anyone here, you will not get it through "being nice always" or "being enemies" or any such nonsense which you might be thinking right now.
From cartoons, I learned that every relationship is about "being nice" + "being enemies".
If you are always nice, relationship is boring.
If you are always enemies, you dont have a relationship.
But if you do both, if you switch between being nice and being enemies often enough, relationship can last much longer, maybe even for a life time.
The problem only rises when one type prevails over another, when you are too nice or too hostile.
Sure, hate muslims more.
What really happens is that maybe muslims arent as bad as you paint them.
Well, there is a huge difference between child marriage in islam and child marriage in some culture which promotes STD.
The comments on his channel disagree.
The comments on his channel think he won the debate.
Also, its not unusual to debate child marriages.
There is a debate on YouTube, on ModernDebate about child marriages, and muslim debater defended child marriages.
Well, WyIted can use that argument, but I am rather sure I addressed it somewhere among 60,000 characters.
But even if I didnt, I will instruct voters to consider all my opponent's arguments as false so I dont have to address each individually.
I just wish I set over 10,000 characters.
I should have gone with 3 rounds of 20,000 characters, because it seems like not all will fit and I might lack about 5000 characters, but thats okay, I will just have to delete sentences which repeat.
This is really just everyone's opportunity to justify their hate.
Because if they dont even need to justify it, then we are not really living in society based on justified opinions, which only works against said society so I am fine with that.
"You guys are migrating so fast to the west because you know your culture is inferior and weak."
I thought you were against their migration because they are slowly replacing your white race by having more children and higher birth rates.
"You guys are migrating so fast to the west because you know your culture is inferior and weak"
Actually, the birth rates are so bad in the west.
Muslim countries have high birth rates.
So we can see which culture is more sustainable and which destroyed its family values, but for those who cant see, the west destroyed its family values and now depends on muslims to support it.
You really hate muslims.
I should convert to islam to become your target.
Yeah, because I dont even need to read your arguments.
I approach debates whatever I want. They are my debates.
So it goes:
Round 1
-my arguments
Round 2
-more of my arguments
-saying that your arguments are all wrong
Round 3
-even more of my arguments
-again saying that all your arguments are all wrong.
Its a simple plan.
I have 5 rounds written before this debate even started.
My plan is to win by ignoring your statistics.
I already have used max character space for debate, so I have no room to answer your statistics.