Total posts: 12,563
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
It's more about how they crafted the LGBT movement to use it for their own purposes.
Well, yeah, but LGBT changed since then.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
The 60's/70s is also where you can see the seeds of other identity movements such as the modern LGBTQ movement which was literally founded by strong proponents of pedophiles.
LGBT used to be in alliance with pedophiles back in 1960 to 1980. They were even helping each other. For example, when Christian parents kicked their gay son out of house and made him homeless, it was some pedophile organizations which provided home for people in such cases. However, once LGBT was accepted enough, they very much distanced themselves from pedophiles. The same science which in 1960s called homosexuality a mental illness and harmful, now calls homosexuality "perfectly normal". But the status of pedophiles became much worse and not better. So I dont really see what kind of alliance between LGBT and pedophiles you think there is now. Back in 1960, maybe there was some alliance. Now? Nope.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Martin Eden's 'strength seems to have led to isolation and self destruction?
I cant really tell without spoiling the book completely. The main plot twist in the book is him changing his opinion on almost everything he knew. Thats how much I will say.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
Yes, it might be since what you said is irrelevant to the point of debate
Maybe you let others determine point of things for you, but I dont. This responds to everything you wrote. It was mentioned before, but you didnt refute it back then either, so really, I dont even need to put much effort here. And your claim that debating art voting policy makes sure voters tell the truth? So now voting policy determines the truth? Is that your position here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
"A bone to the dog is not charity. Charity is the bone shared with the dog, when you are just as hungry as the dog" - Jack London
Jack London is one of few writers actually worth reading. I recommend his book "Martin Eden". Its one of his better works, especially if you read it while siding with the philosophy of power. Yes, the world belongs to the noble strong beasts who dont make compromises and dont engage in most activities of majority.
"Nietzsche was right. I won't take the time to tell you who Nietzsche was, but he was right. The world belongs to the strong - to the strong who are noble as well and who do not wallow in the swine-trough of trade and exchange. The world belongs to the true nobleman, to the great blond beasts, to the noncompromisers, to the 'yes-sayers."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sunshineboy217
Please explain to me how the message was meant to make trans people look bad.
Same way over-reporting on migrant crimes makes sheep people get the idea that migrants do more crime. Some people on this site already stated their opinions that trans should be banned from military, banned from being pilots, banned from being teachers...
Basically, their goal is to push out trans from any important position in society. They dont even hide it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sunshineboy217
It’s not anti trans
Yeah, as if the message had any other goal but to make trans look bad. They do same with migrants where they report crimes of migrants much more to make it seem like migrants do more crime.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
It was proven over and over that forcing your wishes on others affects their own wishes, even making them want things they normally wouldnt want. In that sense, Christianity and Islam are perversions of human nature, Christianity and Islam try to subjugate humans to their ideology, where Satanism doesnt. Satanist has no ideology other than achieving dreams and wishes, which is a most wanted moral system by tautology. Christians may have succeeded in disordering people's wishes and subjugating them with lies and threats, but it can never subjugate strong people who know what they want from start.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
Boy, have you been hooked, line and sinker. Satan couldn’t care less about our dreams and wishes, though he will dangle them before our eyes. Satan’s magic (and that’s all it is) is in telling us the truth more than lies, but the hook is the magic dazzling our eyes that he tells only the truth. His kingdom is a rabble of liars and thieves, robbing us of virtue and supreme accomplishment which never happens by accident.
The greatest liars are religious people, Christians and muslims.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
You ignore that voters are, typically, debaters, themselves, including mods, with as many versions of “the truth” as there are opinions in that regard.
Thats irrelevant to truth and based on a false premise that if someone is debater or mod, that he tells the truth.
No, the object of debate is not to “say whatever you want,”
It is if you want it to be. Objectives are determined by mind.
but to argue with scholastic support (source references) for or against the resolution, true, or not.
That might be your goal, sure, but it is not really everyone's goal. Not everyone believes whatever sources tell him.
We cannot assume the resolution is true, but that is the instigator’s BoP, for or against.
This is irrelevant to what I said. The voters still dont determine the truth. Being presented with "proof" is no guarantee of being able to judge that "proof".
The winner of the debate is the participant who acquires the most points directly from voters; your peers on this site.
I have no peers on this site.
You may personally disagree with voters’ determination of a win, or loss, and that can be appealed, but the mod[s] decision is final.
This is not a refutation to anything I said.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
Male testicles survive with greater viability when supported than when hanging loose
So wear skirt and panties. Dont wear skirt without panties, unless you want to. Besides, all research says that pressure from pants on testicles harms testicles, and no animal even wears panties, let alone pants. Can you show us research which shows that skirt and panties harm testicles, even if irrelevant because if people are allowed to remove their testicles if they want, then harm from skirt to testicles is obviously irrelevant?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
but invite scorn when they dress ridiculously
Maybe society needs to improve so its thinking isnt based on judging people based on clothes they wear.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
bust darts to accommodate female breast
Some females have flat chest, while some men have big breasts. So still no gender relevant, just body size which is irrelevant to any gender.
right or left accommodation of a greater allowance of fabric in trousers to accommodate which testicle hangs lower (for mot men, they “dress left” since that testicle usually hangs low.
Skirt or dress enables much better accomodation of man's testicles, but men can still wear tight pants if they want. So its all about what person wants and not any kind of gender specific clothes, but clothes person wants to wear. Are you sure you are not just proving my point here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
You dont win a debate if voters vote for you, any more than popularity determines the truth. Voters dont determine truth, thus they are irrelevant to who wins a debate. I know that people here are stuck in the matrix where they think getting votes means winning a debate, which means their victory is conditioned by people's opinions and not by truth. The best thing to do is just to ignore voters and say whatever you want in a debate. You dont really want to try to win over voters by only saying things they agree with. It is much better to say what you really think. Besides, there are voting alliances on this site which go in a sense of "you vote for me in my debate, I vote for you in your debate". But I dont really see the point of bothering with such nonsense. I dont like total approval from others anyway. I find disapproval to be much better for gaining attention. Negative attention is superior for personal growth of knowledge, even if it harms mental health significantly.
Created:
Posted in:
Okay, so this will be a new type of topic where you can raise any points relevant to gays or trans.
My first point regarding trans. Boy should be allowed to wear skirt if he wants, no matter how old he is. Clothes dont even have gender, so it makes no sense to assign them one. You are not even born with clothes. The decision to assign gender to clothes is completely arbitrary and not even natural. So boy can wear anything he wants. Maybe he doesnt even want to be trans, but just wants to wear skirt and have long hair. So why prevent him?
My first point regarding gays is that there are degrees of gay relationships. Two boys can hold hands, cuddle, hug, kiss lips or kiss neck, kiss hands or kiss tummy, hold close to each other, pet on the head. Now, which one of these is exactly wrong? If you agree that person(man) has a right to not marry and not be with a woman, then why cant such a person be in these forms of relationships? Like, whats the difference regarding the birth rates anyway? But if you think person(man) has no right to not be with a woman, then you are essentially justifying rape here.
A new type of debate is introduced here and in debate section. I think you will find this type of debate to be more entertaining. For example, debate topics made from just one word, where any different points relevant to the word(topic) can be raised. I realize this makes the topic debate range much wider, so really, anything goes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Why not avoid rare diseases? There is only some temporary pain with a circumcision and it makes men less rapey
No, pain is never temporary. Besides, circumcision changes how penis looks like, so its mutilation. Since I didnt want circumcision, saying that it slightly reduces the risk of me getting things I dont want is a self contradicting statement. Besides, in my case, circumcision went wrong and now I have a bent dick. So I need to be circumcised so that people who are actually going to have sex are going to be safer? Even that is not true. No actual statistic supports the idea that circumcision is healthy. Only couple of studies done by cherry picked data. When you look at the big picture, circumcision ends up being worse. Besides, if someone wants to get circumcised, he can do so at 18. Why force babies to go through it? It is insane practice done by rapist doctors and general population of rapists. But thanks for justifying pedophilia. I really enjoy seeing simple minds trying to figure out how "action done to person without consent is wrong" applies randomly to some actions but not to others. Sheep logic lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
You were persuaded to exercise and you admitted you follow that advice.
That was really my own will. It would happen even if I never was on this site.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Is there any benefit to being circumcised?
Less than 1% of people get STD. However, if person doesnt do unsafe sex, the risk for STD is like 0.1%.
So circumcision benefits barely 0.1% of population when it comes to STD.
Its not worthy to circumcise, mutilate and hurt 100% of males so that 0.1% can benefit from it.
If person wants to get circumcised, thats different. But babies dont want to get circumcised.
It can prevent foreskin infections and phimosis, a condition where the foreskin cannot be pulled back.
Thats very rare, plus there are different ways to treat it than circumcision. But still no need to circumcise 100% of males. Just circumcise those with medical issues which can be solved only with circumcision, but thats extremely rare with today's medicine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Astronomers are closely watching an asteroid that has a small probability of hitting Earth in less than eight years.
Maybe some other will appear which have greater chance and which are even bigger.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
The combination of things not any thing in isolation is what matters
The combination of things you told ChatGPT to wrote applies to all religions and ideologies which are dominant. It even applies to Christianity itself.
Christians love them and want them to turn away from sin. Muslims want to murder them
Christians dont love anyone.
Christians want them to express their feminine side
Sure, which is subjugation. Bible even says woman has no right to reject sex from husband.
A mindfulness practice that has been done in every culture with great mental health benefits
If becoming dumber is a mental health benefit, sure.
Reduces the chances of STDs
Only a retard could believe this. STD is obtained by having unsafe sex. Besides, people dont want to be circumcised, so slightly preventing some STDs by circumcision is self contradicting. Also, the countries with highest life expectancy and least crime are in overwhelming majority countries with very low circumcision rates. So your false studies you read have misinformed you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Both Christianity and Islam hate gays, trans, want to subjugate women, pray like retards, circumcise their dicks, fight endless wars all around the world, teach people that masturbation and sex outside marriage is some kind of terrible sin, hate and mock all other religions... the only difference between two religions are labels.
Also, the nonsense you wrote applies to all popular religions and ideologies. Of course all non-Christians reject Jesus as God. Like, I dont see how can you even think this applies to islam alone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Islam is satanic. Read about the beast in revelation and then compare it's features to that of islam
Just because Quran has 6666 verses doesnt mean its satanic. Its basically same as Christianity, the only difference between islam and christianity is the label. Remove the label, and you will see that all their values are same.
Created:
Posted in:
Nobody knows how long he will live. People die every day. So dont delay your wishes and dreams.
The only thing you have in this world are your dreams and wishes. If you dont achieve them, nothing else matters.
The more you delay them, the less you will achieve them.
Remember, dont let others replace your dreams with their dreams. Your dreams are yours, and not theirs.
What do you have if you lose your dreams and wishes?
Your dreams and wishes are you!
Satan has already revealed to us the truth. Satan wants us to follow our dreams. He doesnt see us as less worthy subjects who must obey him. He sees our dreams and wishes as worthy. He thinks our wishes and dreams matter too. He doesnt teach us to hate our wishes like Christianity and Islam do.
Isnt Satan's world perfect? A world where people achieve their wishes!
Christianity and Islam are based on punishments. They say "If you dont follow us, we will burn you forever."
Satanism doesnt even say "follow me". Satanism says "follow your dreams and wishes".
In that way, Satanism is above all other religions. Other religions cannot compete. Satanism is the only true world morality, the only true world ideology and world religion!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Then why are you here on a discussion site?
I just come here to take a shit and rant, just like PolytheistWitch. Its been over 2 years and no one on this site convinced me into anything.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
How easily you brush off non-porn writers.
Of course. I dont really care about what people have to say.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
We are safe from the AI gods for now
AI sometimes does say pure nonsense, but thats because it copies nonsense from google search.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
adult short stories (non-porn)
Non-porn? Well, that kinda sucks, but dont worry, AI has already replaced porn story writers.
Created:
-->
@Yassine
You make very good points. The original plan of Israel was to completely destroy Hamas, but now Israel finds itself unable to do even that, which is why Israel agreed to a ceasefire and now will be forced to release all Palestinians it kept in prisons for years.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
@Lemming
@Double_R
@n8nrgim
@Shila
My legs arent small. I just dont want to waste energy on them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
Its great that Germany descends into Nazism again.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Just to be clear, planks done with one arm are much superior than planks done with both arms.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Underused legs with poor circulation are a big social health problem.
Still, I prefer big and strong arms to strong legs. I can work on legs later once I achieve the 16 inch arm, which some say takes a year, but I hope my overeating and drinking 6 liters of water per day speeds up the process. Also, binaural beats could help too.
Created:
-->
@Shila
You make Hitler look like a defender of animals.
Well, he did introduce animal rights.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
For this reason, the body uses the calf muscles to pump blood from your lower legs back to the heart.”
Thats interesting.
Created:
Posted in:
Also, I listen to binaural beats for muscle growth and which promote growth hormone. Not sure how much will binaural beats help, but my goal is to build 16 inch arm very soon. I know it takes time, but I kinda want it as soon as possible.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Seriously Google them they work legs as much as other body parts
But I want to direct all energy into arms.
Created:
Posted in:
Also, I am eating 3000 calories per day to gain some muscle mass.
Created:
Posted in:
Like, really, when you work out, your goal is to have bigger arms. So just workout biceps, triceps, wrists and shoulders.
Some workouts like plank also workout chest, but they are one of the best exercises for triceps.
So when it comes to triceps, I only do planks for them.
As for biceps, I just do two exercises. One is lifting weight by curling arm all the way. The other is just tensing muscles for as long as I can.
Now, the way to work out biceps without weights is to create resistance with your body, like lifting your leg or pulling your arm.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Can you believe Indians had a lot of slaves?
Slavery was okay back then.
Created:
"A majority of Native Americans fought for the Confederacy, in part to protect slavery in Indian Territory, as well as a promise by the Confederate government that it would recognize an independent Native American country following the war's conclusion.[1]"
Can you believe it? Confederacy wanted to give real Americans their own country!
Created:
-->
@Shila
He was good to animals, but terrible with Jews.
Jews were mean to animals and other people, then Hitler was mean to Jews.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Never forget that you are one of a kind
Yeah, thats the problem. I wish there was much more of me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RemyBrown
How DARE Trump want a 3rd term! This is TYRANNY!!!
Eh, who cares?
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Hamas uses civilians as shields, you don't exactly let them get away with being terrorists just because they are hiding in civilian areas.
All militaries hide in civilian areas. You cannot protect an area without being there.
However most those people support Hamas and their pedophilia and terrorism so it's not really a big loss. Only the children are innocent though with the use of child soldiers I am unsure of that.
So you say you start with empathy and then you end up with conclusion that every Palestinian deserves to be killed. I guess empathy means something different in your country.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
They don't glass Gaza because they are humans with empathy
Really? And the mass bombing of civilians is what exactly?
Created:
-->
@Yassine
That was a good read. Right now Israel has high birth rates, but they are declining over time. The plan of Israel was always to claim more and more territory. They bombed over 60% of Palestine in less than a year to make its population move out.
Created:
-->
@fauxlaw
I count five, only, and all have flaws as defined.
They are universal laws of nature. They dont have "flaws" in any way. Something can survive or not survive, change or not change. Person can achieve his wish or not achieve his wish.
The sixth is perfection; achieved as a process of improvement in all the other five, not a destination
This was already mentioned. The change of weak gives birth to strong or another weak.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
Having infinitely multiple partners is ok... having infinitely extramarital partners is ok... having mistresses & courtesans is ok... but GOD FORBID! having at most 4 wives equal in rights
The average number of sexual partners for men and women in the United States is 7.2, reports a recent Superdrug survey.
However, some have much more than 7.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
They want everyone else to be individual persons, a nation divided by a million identities: interracial marriages, interracial adoption, non-segregated communities, diverse all-spaces in schools, universities, workplace..., mosaic sexual preferences, multicultural outwardness...etc. That's how they make sure never a community will rise to challenge their power.
Yeah, if people fight between each other, even on small issues, they will be less likely to unite against the rulers.
Created: