Total posts: 12,563
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
I'd be glad to shower you with compliments! Here's a variety to brighten your day:
General awesomeness:
- You have a fantastic aura, a joy to be around!
- Your curiosity and thirst for knowledge are truly inspiring.
- There's a spark of creativity in you that's impossible to miss.
- You seem like someone who tackles challenges head-on, and that's admirable.
- The way you express yourself is clear and engaging, a great communicator.
Inner strengths:
- You have a kind heart, and the world needs more people like you.
- Your resilience is impressive, you bounce back from anything.
- You always seem to find the positive side of things, a great optimist.
- Your sense of humor is fantastic, you can always make me smile.
- You have a deep well of empathy and understanding, a true friend.
Mental agility:
- You're a quick learner, it's amazing how fast you grasp new concepts.
- Your problem-solving skills are top-notch, you can find solutions to anything.
- You have a fantastic memory, you never forget an important detail.
- You're incredibly well-read and knowledgeable on a wide range of topics.
- Your ability to think critically and analyze information is very impressive.
Just you:
- You have a contagious laugh that fills the room with joy.
- Your unique perspective on things is always fascinating to hear.
- The way you dress expresses your personality in a cool way.
- You have a genuine warmth that makes people feel welcome and comfortable.
- There's a quiet strength about you that's truly admirable.
Remember, these are just a starting point! You have so many amazing qualities that deserve compliments every day. Don't forget to compliment yourself too, you rock!
Created:
May Biden's rule never end!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Lol, a lot of freedom haters on Dart
If I dont have freedom, no one else should have it either lol
Its the basic principle of equality.
Created:
Posted in:
May the government oppression continue forever!
Created:
Posted in:
I stand with the American Empire.
May the Empire prosper and crush the puny libertarian rebellion.
Created:
Posted in:
Republicans are antagonists of the story.
We are protagonists, and the story is focused on us.
However, Trump is slowly becoming a protagonist, so we need some extremely fun candidate to counter him, because no one cares about good guys if bad guys are more cool and fun.
Created:
What if I believe that Japanese race is superior?
I cannot be called "asian supremacist", as China is asian I dont think China is superior in anything.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The right has a lot of white supremacists and the left has a lot of white inferiorists
I am neither left nor right. I stand with the Emperor.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Bidenmangood is the other side of Trumpmanbad
If Biden is bad, then Trump is good.
Its a true axiom based on law of "no other options possible".
Created:
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you think Abe is just like Kim and Putin?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
The hardest part about being a atheist for me issss,having to "belive" in the theroy of evolution
Yeah, I hate evolution and how it basically just disproves Bible.
Wait, can you be an atheist but believe in something like matrix, and go around door to door telling people that they are in the matrix?
It could be a new religion, an atheist religion!
That way we no longer have to argue about if atheism is a religion or not, and if atheists have the burden of proof to disprove God's existence, or if Christians need to prove their claims or not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
You're a crusty sock puppet.
The devil made me do it.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Well, Trump is a big fan of Kim Jong Un
And Putin too, even tho Trump likes Kim more.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Trump publicly praised Japan and her leaders often and recently.I don't like Trump all that much, but that alone makes him pretty Okay.
Yeah, that does make him pretty okay, even tho you dont like Trump all that much.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
“I remember Pearl Harbor,” the president said
Yeah, good times.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
Crusty sock definition:
An old sock filled with so much dried semen it has become crusty, mainly found in teenage boys rooms.
Also might be filled with lotion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
I think lumping GP into the same category as BK is a bit unfair.
I am more in the category of Type1, BrotherDThomas and maybe disgusted.
My trolling is much more extreme than Greyparrot's, obviously.
So yeah, maybe let Gp play and just dont let me play any games anymore. It was all fine before I came, so just reset to that.
Created:
Posted in:
My father Lucifer already declared war on Christians and muslims, and in a couple of decades there wont even be real Christians or muslims anymore, as they will all be turned to the dark side through the slippery slope of sin. They will just think they are Christians or muslims, but in religious sense, they will be far from both religions. Everyone will be evil and there wont be a good person left on Earth anymore. It will all belong to the devil, and its all because God cancelled season 2 of World Conquest Zvezda Plot. So its all God's fault. Praise Lucifer's revenge!
Created:
Posted in:
I could forgive God for giving me autism, I could forgive God for giving me speech disorder, I could forgive God for giving me 1 inch bent deformed dick, I could forgive God for making me map and sociopath and sadist, I could forgive God for all the abuse I had to endure as a child,
but I cannot forgive God for cancelling season 2 of World Conquest Zvezda Plot.
To those saying: "Its all part of God's plan".
No, its not part of any fucking plan. There is no fucking plan where you have to cancel such an important anime.
Created:
Posted in:
I hate God.
I want to punch him in the face for not creating season 2 of world conquest zvezda plot.
The rest of his crimes such as creating diseases, mental illnesses and doing mass murders can be forgiven, but this with anime being cancelled just crosses the line.
Created:
Posted in:
The urges arent really a choice.
Some people have too strong urges.
They cannot resist.
Created:
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
This topic really triggered me, by the way.
Created:
Created:
Do you know that Japan is objectively the safest country on Earth?
Murder almost doesnt exist in Japan.
Car accidents are also very rare.
Its not the migrants that built that, its the Japanese.
Migrants built USA where you have 30,000 murders a year.
So yeah, I am afraid that Japan will not be importing the inferior migrant population to replace its own.
Created:
Joe Biden slams Japan for having more mothers and less female factory workers....
Yeah, as if completely superior Japanese race can be replaced by inferior migrants.
No, Japan needs less women in workforce, stay at home mothers as well as mandatory reproduction for women.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
people lose all their money and many many ways
No, 99.9% of people dont, unless they die, but investments dont exactly prevent death either so its not a smaller risk.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
also incorrect
If thats the only response you have, I am afraid I am not interested.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Oct 13, 2021 · BlackRock (BLK) reported Wednesday that its assets under management totaled $9.46 trillion in the third quarter
Most of the great inventions in history, from airplane, car, smartphones, PC, vaccinnes, solar panels...ect. were all high risk investments. So if you want society with less inventions and less technology, then you go for "safe investments", since those perfer big buisnesses who are already established. New buisnesses, as explained before, always have higher risk of failure than established buisnesses. So unless your idea is to never invest in uncertain innovation and never invest in new buisnesses, then that is just bad for society.
incorrect
If you dont invest, there is no any possibility you lose your money, you can spend it all on yourself. When you invest, there is a good chance you lose all your money, especially if you dont have much money to begin with.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
BUT BLACKROCK DOESN'T SIMPLY PICK NEW INVESTMENTS AT RANDOM
There is of course a way to reduce risks by being informed about which type of buisness is more likely to succeed. But that doesnt mean there is no risk, since buisness can fail in more than one way. Any buisness can fail at any time, as things in market change often and demand changes often. I am not saying that when you have two equally rewarding options, that you are supposed to go for one of higher risk. No, I am saying that when you have a no risk option with low reward and a high risk option where high risk option carries great reward, you are supposed to go for high risk option. The safest possible play would be not investing at all, and that is obviously the most horrible play for society. And investing in low risk low reward wont get you anywhere either, nor will society prosper from people only seeking safest investments, since most of the revolutionary technology requires great risk since new inventions have high failure rate.
Created:
Posted in:
I am a bit burned out from playing anyway. The last game had too long dp1.
Created:
Posted in:
Just make me scum this time, as I had over 10 games and was never scum, so it feels like I am cheating somehow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
*terms and conditions may apply
That sounds bad for me.
/in
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
NOT investing in new businesses is the biggest risk of all
New buisnesses have over 60% failure rate and most dont last for over 5 years. Taking risks is actually essential in economy, and if you have money, you should start a new buisness even if you have over 50% chance to fail. Its the fear of failure which really makes progress impossible. Yes, many will fail, but the ones who succeed will achieve greatness. If no one tries, then no one will achieve any greatness and society stops advancing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
would you believe someone who claimed you have a 1% chance of becoming "king of the world" ?
This example is meant to point out importance of taking risk.
Throughout history, many great societies took risks, which is what made them great. The vaccinne was invented by doing tests on humans, where some even died in the process. Factories were places where workers often lost limbs. Early transport system of cars killed millions of people. Its these risks and sacrifices which gave rise to great empires, and not any kind of individual-based safe play.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You aren't even thinking. Swords are not very big, there is no stretched anything
So you dont know what is a stretched defense problem in warfare?
It doesnt relate to size of swords, lol, but it relates to amount of territory you have to cover to defend, which is why concentrated attack is possible where concentrated defense is an impossible concept.
You do know that in battle, concentrated attack is what counts?
Even with swords only, if I have 10 men and you have 10 men, my 10 men attacking together will have advantage over your 10 men stretched across territory being forced to defend multiple points of both territory and supply where I can focus all men on one point, causing you to have less soldiers than me on the point where battle happens, thus you would suffer greater casualties.
Its probably hard for you to imagine, as you are not familiar with what I am talking about, but the concept of maximal attack simply cannot be applied to defensive strategies as you cannot create defense without dividing your army, and a divided army consists of multiple smaller groups, so an attacker who attacks with one larger group against your one smaller group would gain victory with less casualties than you. Defenses simply cannot unite fast enough, as they are forced to separate to defend multiple points, so the distance between groups of defenses is always greater than distance between groups of attackers. So the defense suffers from problems of gaps, some groups being unable to defend one part of territory as they are on another, where attacker only has to attack one point to conquer it, and then move to another point.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
and it is now the largest investment company on the planetby avoiding risk
Avoiding risk in investments is about as bad as it can get for society, since new buisnesses are always a risk, and it would be nonsense to say that no one should start any new buisness but just join the big ones already existing. Competition in economy is important, and every buisness is risky, especially new ones. So its not possible to avoid all risk and still have economy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
More like "understand what's going on, then choose the highest reward for the lowest risk among your options"
Its not really the highest reward for the lowest risk, since that is literally impossible nonsense claim. Its the best ratio of reward and risk which is the proper tactic and proper term, as that is the only gameplay which makes any sense in terms of military tactics.
He wouldn't pickup the sword if the goal is personal survival and neither would anyone else.
As long as the goal is personal survival, that is, playing it safe, he will never achieve any greatness, which is kinda the point of this example where 1000 brave people take victory over 1000 people focused on individual survival, and since each of those 1000 who would have Sun Tzu mentality, none would take the sword and none would ever achieve greatness, since Sun Tzu has problem with sacrificing himself.
As an individual Sun Tzu might try to appeal to the 2000 to setup a guard around the sword so no one can get to it.
That would be even dumber than your previous claim, since its well known in warfare that trying to defend something is much harder than trying to attack it, due to stretched defense problem and supply problem. Apparently, defender must not only be perfect in concentrating defensive power, perfect in knowing when enemy will attack so you dont suffer a surprise attack disadvantage, perfect in being alert all the time, but he must also protect supply lines which maintain his defense. Due to nature of defensive front, there is no shape other than circle or square formation which can actually counter attacker, since line is vunerable to flanking and to concentrated attack, and has weak mobility. However, both circle and square concentrated formations suffer from being easy targets for archers, or in modern war, artillery and guerrilla. So neither circle, neither square, neither line formation have any advantage for the defender. To make it simple, being forced to defend position and wait for enemy to attack you is about as bad as your position can get in war, since you are just using resources and gaining nothing and losing from attrition, resources point of view, and from concentrated massive attack.
He might try to explain that he would not oppose the survivor so he has no invincible enemy to fight.
The one who is invincible and rules the world would make everyone else his slave, or every other nation a slave while promoting his own. So yeah, Sun Tzu would not only lose chance to be great, but he would be reduced to a slave position.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
reducing risk is critical to long-term survival
Sometimes, yes, for an individual.
However, when it comes to technological and militant progress of society, society of individuals willing to take risks will almost always beat society where individuals play it safe, because those who play it safe will have very slow progress, where those who take risks will have high rewards.
Its kinda like this: those who dont take risks will never achieve any greatness.
Even animals in nature take great risks. For example, sometimes an animal endangers its own survival so that species as a whole has greater chance of survival.
Its one of those cases where survival of society comes in contradiction to survival of an individual, and society where all individuals play it safe will always be conquered by society in which individuals take "some risk, high reward" approach, or "high risk, high reward" approach.
Created:
Posted in:
This is an interesting question, because while Sun Tzu methods usually teach you to play safe, methods of "high risk high reward" and "some risk high reward" are actually much superior, and I will explain why.
So it comes down to this simple experiment.
Lets say that there is a sword.
Anyone who takes the sword has 99% chance of dying.
However, in case he doesnt die, he gets to rule the entire world and becomes invincible.
Now, Sun Tzu would say "Anyone who takes the sword will most likely die, and I will not take the sword, so I will play it safe and survive."
However, lets say there are 2000 people.
Now, the first 1000 decides to follow Sun Tzu and refuses to take sword.
However, the other 1000 plays a high risk high reward game.
They say "Each of us has only 1% chance of success. But if enough of us try, one will certainly succeed."
So the other 1000 each decide to take the sword. After 99 attemps, 99 people died. However, 100th one took the sword and didnt die. Now he rules the world and is invincible.
The point of this story is:
The group who followed Sun Tzu had no chance of becoming invincible, because they didnt want to take risk to take the sword.
However, the other group, who risked, had over 99% chance to become invincible, as each individial had 1% chance and there were 1000 of them.
So in the end, even high risk of failure carries certain rewards when enough attempts are made, so group which follows high risk high reward is going to be superior and rule over the group who follows Sun Tzu's safe way of playing.
Created:
-->
@Zella
I am not a great fan of wars, I just like some aspects of it, like military strategy which is much more interesting than chess strategies.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Gotta masturbate every day.
Created: