Total posts: 5,766
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Fast food workers are people too. Kinda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Nothing wrong with that as long as you are blaming a POTUS you can blame any POTUS you want. Just don't go around trying to explain what actually happened like imabench.
Created:
Posted in:
Shout-out to my boy tejretics
My first friend on DDO
He has good genetics
Okay I'll stop now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Just kill yourself
Eh, bit busy for the next few months to be planning suicides. I'll check to see if I have some room in my schedule for June or July.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
We will see who is pulling the puppet strings when Lunatic makes me scum in this game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I like ancient Greek culture (my fascination with that is obvious in my profile bio), modern Greece... Mostly I just enjoy the cuisine.
More to the point though, have I said anything that is untrue?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
You're playing the game wrong. You are supposed to blame a POTUS.
Created:
Posted in:
So you see something wrong in the world and you want to blame someone? Well here is a simple solution... just blame the POTUS! You are pro Trump and therefore he can't be blamed for anything? That's fine, blame Obama since he used to be the POTUS. Pro Obama? Blame Bush.
Pro Bush? Blame Clinton.
Pro Clinton? Blame other Bush.
Pro other Bush? Blame Reagan.
Pro Reagan? Blame Carter.
Pro Carter? Blame Ford.
Pro Ford? Blame Nixon.
Pro Nixon? Blame Johnson.
Pro Johnson? Don't even bother blaming Kennedy, skip straight to Eisenhower.
Pro Eisenhower? Blame Truman.
Pro Truman? Blame Roosevelt.
Pro Roosevelt? Blame Hoover.
Pro Hoover? Blame Coolidge.
Pro Coolidge? Blame Harding?
Pro Harding? Of course you aren't, you've never even heard of him. If you want to give him the benefit of the doubt though then blame Wilson.
Pro Wilson? Blame Taft.
Pro Taft? Blame other Roosevelt.
Pro other Roosevelt? Blame McKinley.
Pro McKinley? Blame Cleaveland.
Pro Cleaveland? Blame Harrison?
Pro Harrison? Blame Arthur.
Pro Arthur? Blame Garfield.
Pro Garfield? Blame Hayes.
Pro Hayes? Blame Grant.
Pro Grant? Blame Johnson.
I hope you aren't pro Johnson though because you are going to have a hard time blaming Lincoln for anything.
Created:
Posted in:
Honestly looks like a cheap text prediction program came up with the titles then the titles were fed into one of those story-making AI that made a story based on the input then narrorated by a Microsoft Sam style voice emulator and animated by a bunch of highschool students for their graphics design class.
Overall 3.4/10, not impressed.
Created:
Posted in:
Choose Life: Your Mother Did.
Not my fault, the blame for that poor decision falls squarely on her shoulders. Yet who is made to live with the consequences? Myself and everyone around me.
Created:
Posted in:
A channel that posts videos that tell stories? I don't get it. Could you link an example of such a channel?
Created:
Posted in:
It's okay though, he got a new and better family at the end.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Wait, the report of post 60 was obviously a joke but was the report of post 59 from me accidentally pushing the report button when trying to upvote?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ronjs
If two people disagree and one is wrong then the person that is wrong is wrong.
If two people disagree and both are wrong then both are wrong.
I have a hypothesis that you may simply be grossly misusing the English language. Please allow me to test this hypothesis by reading the following question very carefully and answering with a simple "yes" or "no".
Do you think that the two statements below are saying the same thing?:
1) In Bobs opinion it is raining outside and in Claire's opinion it is not raining outside.
2) It is true for Bob that it is raining outside and it is true for Claire that it is not raining outside.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Conclusion: Tell DD to calm down.
Ethang5 says: Calm down DD
Ethang5 says: That conclusion is not mine
Allow me to quote a proverb from a wise philosopher that fits this situation nicely:
One of these things is not like the others,One of these things just doesn't belong,Can you tell which thing is not like the othersBy the time I finish my song?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I'm just going to upvote that every time you spam it. Get you that like medal if you don't have it already lol.
Created:
Posted in:
Fully caught up now. Pie is basically confirmed in my eyes.
VTL SA
And now if SA is still alive then he is confirmed as well since that should have been the hammer if he can be lynched.
VTL Bullish
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Yeah, that term has been thrown around a lot this DP and it has been misused. Every. Single. Time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@LordLuke
Maybe you can have it where individual threads can decide if they want to track editing or not.
As far as coding goes that would be just as burdensome to the coder. Technically more so, though I doubt it would be much more. My point is that it would not be less.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
<br>could you please explain how it would help the Mafia community?
Currently there is a kind of unofficial rule in the game that nobody is allowed to edit their posts because I guess it "allows scum to say something scummy then cover it up" or something. This leads to a bunch of people making weird spelling mistakes, getting shafted by their autocorrect, accidentally saying something they dont mean because thwy are in such a hurry to post (mafia can be a fast paced game at times), etc. and not being able to fix their posts right away for fear of displeasing the mob. This rule would become redundant if the above proposed change was put into effect.
Created:
Posted in:
Now that there's 5 votes on me, I should probably claim. Y'all are wasting your votes. I'm Black Widow. As a spy, she continually gets into difficult situations, but always escapes. Therefore, I am lynchproof
Okay good, maybe after testing this we can get back to goddamn lynching bullish like we should have done 30 pages ago.
Lemme finish catching up to see if this already happened though smh.
Created:
Posted in:
Catching up. On page 43 now. The fact that there seems to be a concerted last-second effort to divert from the obvious bullish vs pie lynch to SA screams scum plot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
He wins but the game doesn't end. You are forgetting post two.
Goodnight now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
<br>But the argument against it isn't to question the thematic split for no reason but why scum-Grey would openly claim a scum character. If that ultimately leads you to question a thematic split, that is understandable, but Sir didn't present that logic.
Post 68 contradicts this.
I am done for now though. Pointless to make posts that someone might use to falsely claim I am defending someone that I actually see as potential scum. You are also on the right track by looking for motivations rather than looking at actions - that is something a lot of people find hard to grasp - you simply seem to be missing certain things that I am seeing. I am going to be offline for a bit. We have almost exactly 14 hours left in the DP so let's please try to wrap this shitshow up one way or another people.
By 'one way or another' I obviously mean lynching bullish, as I have been trying to do for over 950 posts now, but a vtnl or a lynch of GP (because it is the same as a vtnl) would be coolsies too. I guess I can accept a pie lynch if I have to but I don't think we are quite into 'have to' territory just yet, I say another 8 hours or so until we are.
Created:
Posted in:
Suggestion: Put a button on edited posts that allows viewing of pre-edited version (or versions in the case of multiple edits) of said post. Probably not a very small change code-wise but the mafia community will sing your praises if such a thing is done.
Created:
Posted in:
as a middling town read
As a middling null read*
Almost edited last post before remembering stupid do-not-edit rule.
Created:
Posted in:
One of my two new theories actually has SA as hard scum for actual logical reasons and the other has him as a middling town read so it is pretty exasperating that I am being made to look like I am defending him when in reality I am not defending him, I am merely attacking the ridiculous premises that are currently being used to argue his alignment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
The thing that rings true for me is Sir implicitly operating on a "no thematic split" basis before the mod confirmed it.
False, all he did was state that the "anTaGONisT iZ ZcuM" rush was illogical. He was right to do so by the way - yes, even before speed said anything. Everything he said in that regard was nearly word for word what I would have said if I was online at the time and we could be here for an hour or so with me explaining why. You going to stay consistent and scum read me now too?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
The further this goes on the more convinced I am that you are town and bullish is scum. You currently have 5 votes, he has 4. Cut the crap with this whole "Not voting to punish town" sillyness and vote for him to tie the wagons and make it more likely I will be able to convince town to hop on his wagon instead of yours.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Which if any of the proposals in the second conclusion do you agree with and if there are any you do not then how did you reach the conclusion?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
But do you agree or disagree with it?
I disagree with it. Sorry for not clarifying before.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
His [Bullish] case against Sir is hard to argue
You and one or two others have said this. From what I remember his case mostly involves posts by SA that are nearly word-for-word what I would have said at the time if I was online so I am really just not seeing it. Is there anything besides SA fighting a poorly-reasoned wagon on GP that has you scum reading him?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Premise one: DD is not calm.Premise two: DD should be calm.Premise three: Telling a non-calm person to calm down is generally an effective way of calming them down.Conclusion: Tell DD to calm down.
I can see where you are coming from with premise one and two but I would disagree with both. Premise three is pretty absurd in my experience.
Created:
Posted in:
Okay dug up some games with me as scum as promised. Looked through the DART archives and only saw the one that I already linked earlier (Kim Possible game) and a bunch of games with me as town being NK'd NP 1 so I got depressed and went through the DDO archives. Yes the DDO games are from a long time ago but I simply haven't played as scum recently so ot sadly can't be helped.
My first game as scum. Beginners game with a Star Wars theme:
Another one I found had an economist theme. I replaced a player named tejretics during NP 1:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
P1: It is reasonable to expect that anyone possessing a sense of humor would make it obvious in their posts in some way on this debate site.P2: Any such posts would be noticed by me, Ethang5.C1: Given P1 and P2 it is reasonable to expect that I, Ethang5, would notice any users possessing a sense of humor.P3: I have not noticed any posts by DD indicating possession of a sense of humor prior to this thread.Conclusion: Given C1 and P3 it is/was reasonable for me to conclude that DD possessed no sense of humor prior to this thread.
The argument is internally consistent but I would take issue with both premise one and two.
Created:
ZOMG THIS IS THREAD NUMBER 3500 OF THE SITE ZOMG SO MUCH THREADS!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Push that theory next DP if I kick the bucket tonight please. Thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Still thinking of that random vote oro placed on ragnar for no reason earlier and it makes me think you may be right. Ragnar-bullish-oromagi scum team makes sense to me.
Created:
Posted in:
Got done re-reading as promised and still not buying the 'pie is scum' theory. Putting my vote back where it belongs.
VTL Bullish
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
If you are scum, I am openly exposing my logic and reasoning for you to follow unless you planned it, so I will refrain from doing so at this point in time.
I see my reputation for mastermind manipulation as scum has not diminished during my several months of absence from mafia.
Then everything is going according to plan muaha- er uh... *ahem* what I meant to say is that I am totes town bro.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
If I am alive DP2, my lynch vote will be on DD. I will explain this if I am alive DP2
If you and singlarity are town likelihood of you dying tonight is high since scum could get a 2-for-1 deal. I think it would be better for you to explain your scum read of me now or else town will probably never hear it.
I will be role confirmed tomorrow btw, though not necessarily town confirmed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
- Failed to CC when Lunatic claimed 1xROLE COP
- Comes later in the day, notices that nobody cc'd Lunatics claim, so thinks its safe to claim.
- Claimed ROLE COP in DP1 which is not like Pie
- Claims he was spooked cause he had 3 votes on him (he's read Lunatic's gambit so he knows that we are nowhere near quorum) in a 13 man game. I've never seen Pie get spooked in these games.
- I note that as pressure increases on Pie, 3 more players (including u) have suddenly arrived to change the subject. That is always interesting to note
Honestly some of these are pretty good points I has not considered, especially the first and - if true - the last. I'm going to re-read starting from lunatics gambit.
unvote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Why are you VTLing Bullish?
I have scum read him and advocated for his lynch all DP starting from post 181 and nothing that has happened since has changed my read on him or given me a stronger scum read on anyone else so that is where my vote is for now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
I'll try to find some of my scum games from DDO if you would like but as far as I remember I have only been scum once on DART (Kim Possible game).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Warren brought up the point of what justification Pie could have for Rhodey being a role cop. What do y'all think of this?
Weren't people complaining earlier in the DP about how GP and others had pretty weak justifications? Speaking for myself my justification is a bit of a stretch too, pretty sure speed designed the game by making a bunch of roles then trying to find characters to match the roles rather than the other way around (which is the correct way to do it really).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
You saying I don't have a sense of humor?
I take offense. Reported.
Created:
Posted in:
Imabench: Makes disparaging joke about the politics and religion fourms.
Reports have been handled
Created: