Dr.Franklin

I say the 2000's a new millenium with the internet and cellphones. 2010's wasn't better. The 1960's would be second for me

Since this is popular I'm calling out EVERYBODY ON THIS SITE,YEAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAA

Have a nice day :)

God created the great,beautiful and expansive universe for a reason. It truly shows the great glory of God. The vast and beautiful universe is designed with purpose as God has shown in the Bible. First, the universe is beautiful because it is God’s canvas and great artwork masterpiece. Psalms 19:1 states-” The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.” It is clear that one of the purposes of the Universe was to show God’s majesty. Nebula’s for example are beautiful clusters of star dust that come together like an art piece that show God’s glory. He made the universe mind boggling large for us to explore and learn about it. Everything from the tiniest moon to the biggest galaxy shows God;s work and his people appreciate it,take Psalms 8:3-4 which states-” When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers,the moon and the stars, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him,and the son of man that you care for him?” Clearly The Bible hints to God’s Glory being recognized.[LINK]

God this song is so good,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvGeujU6iK0

Guys, I just wanted to say gooodbuye

He was a good President, But this opinion isn't very popular.Even among consveratives today. 

I'm on the first page of the leaderboards

I think Lincoln and Eisenhower are the best

RIP

I am kinda a goat at it

Today, I made a statue of Hitler and a trailer park full of confederate flags!

Anything after civil war and before WW1 is BORING, WW1 to Present is always good, 1783, the birth of the nation to around 1820 was also really good with Adams, Jefferson,Franklin, Burr,Hamiltonand Madison

Stop abusing locks and locking good threads

There is a competition ran by brotherDThomas to see who is the most inept fake Christian!

Vote Franklin

I think Bush deserved to win, a lot people don't.What do ya'll think. If you have learned about it like me or If you remember it, I would like to know

Also, I liked Bush the son, A Lot of people don't now. Why?

Oh it's ok when the voting mod wins, then you can CVB, but my CVB against King Ragnar, ooohhhhhh very bad no no. Ragnar cant lose,remember?

RM is gone, Mopac disappeared, disgusted is banned for a month, NO ONE WILL STOP ME BEING NUMBER 1 POSTER. BWUAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

Congrats to oromagi

tell me 

Where would you go, I would go back to Ancient Rome and then Italy during the Renaissance 

He was asking a question about ebuc and multi-accounting, I demand justice

Think about it, both sides has access to the same evidence,facts, and statistics. If the evidence in the world from Biology,Astronomy, Geology,Envioremtal Science the SAME. Then it ultimately comes up to belief.

What are your thoughst on FDR, they are no History board so here we go

What is your goal, mine is to go to heaven

What is death and what do you do when you die?, God has provided an answer but not atheists, so answer it already

That's right sign up to get the best debating expereince yet!

It's the same old shit with God and abortion,

Can we get blamonkey,oromagi,ramshustu and Ragnar, these people are the best debators here but they don't debate each-other, pick an interesting topic, probably from tejeretics post

Seriously, can we get more intelligent debates here?Blamonkey is the only one with balls actually STARTING debates

"What we have done in our paper," said Ken Ono, a number theorist at Emory University and co-author of the new proof, "is we revisited a very technical criterion which is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis … and we proved a large part of it. We proved a large chunk of this criterion."
A "criterion which is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis," in this case, refers to a separate statement that is mathematically equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis.
It's not obvious at first glance why the two statements are so connected. (The criterion has to do with something called the "hyperbolicity of Jensen polynomials.") But in the 1920s, a Hungarian mathematician named George Pólya proved that if this criterion is true, then the Riemann hypothesis is true — and vice versa. It's an old proposed route toward proving the hypothesis, but one that had been largely abandoned.
Ono and his colleagues, in a paper published May 21 in the journal Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences (PNAS), proved that in many, many cases, the criterion is true.
But in math, many is not enough to count as a proof. There are still some cases where they don't know if the criterion is true or false.
"It's like playing a million-number Powerball," Ono said. "And you know all the numbers but the last 20. If even one of those last 20 numbers is wrong, you lose. … It could still all fall apart."

Very true, gaming is dying and it's all Fortnite :(

The highest goal of your life is union with God in Heaven. Atheists think it's survive, reproduce and die happy and healthy,WHY are we here?,should we just waste our life away with a job, what's your goal?, Has Technological Evolution surpassed Evolution is terms of this question?, 

Tis true, he sucked

The family of grief-stricken Karin Cheshire, 55, said she 'could not see a future' without son Jay Cheshire, 17, who took his own life after a rape allegation was withdrawn-https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/heartbroken-mum-teen-who-killed-8518826

In Exodus 25:10-22, the specifics of the Ark were laid out. It needed to be two cubits and a half in length (one cubit being about 19.8-20.6 in.), a cubit and a half in breadth, and a cubit and a half in height. The Ark was overlaid inside and out with pure gold with a molding of gold around it.
For transportation, the Ark had four rings of gold with two rings on each side. A pole of acacia wood overlaid with gold was placed into the rings to carry the ark. These poles for transportation were to be permanent fixtures and never removed.

No disrespect to Ram, but I think this will happen

Why is this so popular now?

They stick to their body like diseases and it looks like a cult on your body, also EVERYONE HAS ONE so it' not even stylish

Biggest troll in internet history

-Donald Trump

So true, Obama in 2010 said to Blacks, Stop crying,stop grumbling and get up, Omar is an anti-semite and all of them are American-hating communists!

I want to play, but I don't know :(

Search online debating and we show up on the first page, not DDO

The cow represented the open, public display of sexual behavior. Following your animal instincts, your ego.
When Moses came down from the mountain and saw the Israelites “worshiping the golden calf” they were acting like the symbol of the bull. A bull does whatever it wants to in public without shame. It shows sexual emotion in public with no shame. The Israelites were acting like cattle.
To worship means to practice being like what you are worshiping until you become like it. If you practice it you’ll become it. When you have your children practice teaching others they become what they teach (have learned). When you select a book for your child think about what they are “practicing” or learning for they are “practicing” what they will become.
Ask yourself the question, “What will they become when they are finished with it (book, movie, show, art work, friends, etc.)?

Geological studies have shown that the level of the Dead Sea was at a low point during the Early Bronze Age (Neev and Emery 1995: 62) and thus the shallow basin, or "plain" south of the Dead Sea, would have been dry land and probably cultivated. The location of the Early Bronze Age sites along the eastern edge of the plain fits the Biblical description of the cities as being of the plain. "Cities of the Plain" is in the construct state in the Hebrew, which means that the word "cities" has a close association with the word "plain." The cities were not in the plain, or on the plain. If that were the case, a different construction would have been used. Rather, the cities were "of" the plain—they had a close association, or connection, with the plain. They were doubtless dependent upon the plain for their livelihood.