ILikePie5's avatar

ILikePie5

A member since

3
7
10

Total posts: 17,895

Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
@Barney
@whiteflame
Joining Pie in claiming functional illiteracy? I've been crystal clear for quite awhile that I used my motion detector on whiteflame, not the role blocking second half of the power. Hence I got the result that whiteflame did not move, and subsequently you were not roleblocked. With how you're acting, I wouldn't be surprised if you're now going to change your story to having been roleblocked by me.
This is just next level gaslighting—nothing in this answers my question. I know you used the “MD” on Whiteflame. My question is why? Based on the dashboard you posted, Moozer was the most likely to move at that point in time if you wanted to use your roleblock for positive utility. So why did you choose Whiteflame? 

I'm saying how the PM described it. Whereas you and Lunatic are claiming that you are privately mod confirmed RB/messenger/day cop who is right that Joebob was actually scum in spite what he looks like in the graveyard etc... I can't keep track of how many traits you two have added to your role. It's insane.

Again, your role apparently told you with certainty that Joebob was guilty in DP1... and he flipped innocent, but we're just supposed to forget?
Neither me nor Lunatic said anything close to what you’re saying here. This is the biggest strawman I have ever seen. I never claimed Day Cop or Messenger. You don’t know my role, and you won’t know it until tomorrow.

As stated literally on the first post of this page: "Me not saying motion detector right away, is because the mod did not call my role a motion detector. He called it "The Pin!" and went on to describe the two tiered function of it."
So after I said Motion Detector, you just went along with it and didn’t clarify that MD is not your role? Why?
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
For now, suffice it to say that I believe the argument that Barney would necessarily have obtained some information from Austin about why his role (whatever it is) failed, I just don’t know if I buy that Austin volunteered even more information, i.e. the kind of breakdown that would have included specifics on what other roles would fail that were largely distinct from his. If he had received that information, I don’t think he would have then failed to claim Motion Detector knowing that I would have townread that claim, nor would he have any reason to claim the attached RB.
See that’s the thing though. He’s not claiming Motion Detector. He’s claiming “The Pin.” So even if Austin mentioned the MD, it doesn’t matter because that isn’t Barney’s role in the first place. The way Barney’s role works is half of the MD.

I still just don’t see it as the most plausible set of circumstances that could lead to this conclusion, and frankly, I don’t buy that he somehow intuited a lack of movement on my part. He would have had to receive that information from Austin.
I disagree with this. Either way Austin could have told him.

So if he is scum, either Austin gave him just enough information to know that the RB failed, which makes me question why he would take the logical leap to saying that I hadn’t moved and then bank wholly on that leap for his claim, or Austin gave him way too much information and Barney, for reasons I cannot fathom, chose to only use a bit of it and give a claim that would inherently set off alarm bells to boot, given that it’s hard to see a town RB and think anything else.
What’s odd is that he didn’t claim “The Pin.” He claimed investigator Roleblocker hybrid. I mentioned the Motion Detector. Anyways. If not Barney, then it’s Supa. We still go through POE.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
Honestly I am not convinced. 
Why?
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
Alright, that makes sense. I’ll stick with Vader for now, and you’re welcome to join me. I am sorry, but I completely forgot how me and Vader can confirm you, can you say that again?
What makes sense?
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
As for Pie, a lot of his reasoning depends on me being a mind reader who knew ahead of time that whiteflame would have the cop ability last night (which if scum and I knew he had any investigative power, he would have been high priority for the NK).
That’s just wrong. You willingly chose to target Whiteflame over someone you knew had a power role and was likely going to target someone. Why? You must’ve thought he had some power role as scum. He’s the only logical person you can claim to have visited 

Even had I the ability to detect roles (quite possible scum used such an ability on me; and yet they still won't directly counter claim since we're not at mislynch and lose yet... mislynching me would put us there), it would not have detected the item he was given, and I would have not known last night to use any non-blockable power on him. ... The truth doesn't align to their narrative, whereas their narrative is questionable at best.
This is all gibberish and makes zero sense. Knowing WF used a cop has nothing to do with you choosing to visit him to use your roleblocker.

Me not saying motion detector right away, is because the mod did not call my role a motion detector. He called it "The Pin!" and went on to describe the two tiered function of it.
So your character is the same as your role? Cause your character is Pin. And now you’re saying that it’s “The Pin.” That is very very weird.

I called it a weak investigator to know if someone moved, someone else who knows the game better than me knew what type of weak investigator that is. When tagging you and Vader in a post, I even referred to that Vader would see someone was targeted by the pin, rather than expressly a motion detector. Of course, the desire to kill any investigators is key for scum to win.
So why would you not clarify this when you full claimed? 
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
@Moozer325
Ok, here it's possible he's an inventor, messenger, roleblocker, mod confirmed to the target hybrid... Pigs occasionally fly as well.
Lol, see now you’re grasping at straws. You’re working with incomplete information and just diverting town away from yourself. You haven’t even responded to my line of logic
Created:
2
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
I mean… no? Did anyone confirm that? Earth visited me, Barney claims he did.
The message you got from Austin wouldn’t have come if someone other than Earth visited you. If Barney is scum, which is likely, either he or his partner visited you
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
Just… could you wait? I’ve been on here all morning and I’m still trying to process a good deal of information. If it gets near to the end of the DP and the votes are as they currently stand, unless I come to a very different conclusion than I am now, I’ll hammer.
Aight 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
@whiteflame
Dude, I’m sincerely so tired of you mischaracterizing my argument that, at this point, I just want to drop it. None of what you’re saying here has been my position. I called out the issue with having so many confirmable roles earlier, and how that means not all of them can be town. I haven’t discounted behavior, either, but I do (and should) take results and actions into account. Just because you disagree with what I’m prioritizing in my reads doesn’t mean I’m dismissing large swaths of information, or expecting the game to solve itself, and sincerely, I resent that you think that’s my mindset.
I genuinely think this is town v town situation and we’re getting diverted. You both are on the same page that Barney is not affiliation confirmed. The only thing that is confirmed is that Barney visited Whiteflame.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
@whiteflame
What is stopping you both from voting Barney at this juncture?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
@Lunatic
@whiteflame
@Moozer325
I asked Austin whether a non-active role usage would count as a visit, and he said no.

I also asked whether a hypothetical hybrid role would count as visiting one or two players. He just said if you do any active action to another player, it counts as a visit, which doesn’t really answer the question 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
did you have a chance to read my post to Moozer
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
Anyways we have limited time remaining. I agree with suspicion on supas role but I’m honestly still pretty convinced Barney is scum and supa can be lynched tomorrow if he doesn’t yield results or if the results don’t make any sense. I don’t think my vote is moving into anyone else besides maybe mixer this day phase for buddying Barney and overall just lack of contribution to the game
I agree. Barney today and Supa tomorrow
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
@Moozer325
Like i said before, it’s mostly just that he did give us his role (albeit after a little proding), but his claim seems pretty solid to me, but like said, change my mind.
Sure—here are a couple reasons

1) He claimed Pin. Pinning a piece in chess is a negative for the person in the pin. The pinned piece cannot move. So for example. Let’s say say there’s a Queen in between her own king and an enemy rook. The enemy rook is protect by the other enemy rook. The queen is pinned and cannot move because moving the queen would be an illegal move. 

2) Barney claimed weak investigator roleblocker hybrid. But the first part is that someone has to move before a second person can be roleblocked. Now, we know that there is a redirector/bus driver/etc in the came based on the roles of two people (yourself and Lunatic) and Austin’s message to Whiteflame. Three people cannot be scum. With you, you strengthen and protect the same person if I read correctly, so the target is only one person. Barney can target two people (and conveniently still hasn’t answered whether his action counts as visiting two people).

3) We also know that Barney said he visited Whiteflame. That means 2 people visited Whiteflame—Barney and Earth (presumably). Whiteflame is the only convenient person Barney can visit, which is odd. He didn’t know that Whiteflame had an action that would cause him to move, while he knew that you did, yet he targeted Whiteflame instead of you? As town, his utility would be to stop a NK with his subsequent roleblock. Why did he not target you? It’s convenient that Whiteflame got the message after the DP and everything started, so we know Barney had to have visited Whiteflame
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
I wouldn’t go for Barney, probably just because I think he has a pretty good claim, but change my mind by a means.
Can you explain this first before I go Steven Crowder on you?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
I've been convinced for a little while that the scum team is either you and Luna, who claim to have largely confirmed each other, or Barney and Vader. PoE comes down to you four at the moment, with Moozer as a less likely outlier. So the flip should be informative regardless, particularly if Moozer uses his role.
My confirmation tomorrow will get rid of me at the very least. Supa theoretically could confirm himself as well. You said you are confirmable. Lunatic is with me for reasons I will mention tomorrow. That leaves Barney who’s role is negative utility anyways.

I'll have a decision on this by the end of the day. I don't plan on letting the DP go by without a lynch, regardless.
I agree
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
Who would you have me use it on?
Think about it hard. Use your intuition
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
You need to use your action tonight. Use your best judgement
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
For now, I'm going to Unvote. I'd be willing to consider Vader as a lynch right now, so that's less of an issue. If I'm misunderstanding something about Barney, then Vader's flip and your claim would at least give me some basis for reducing my PoE. I don't think Barney is confirmed by any means, but I'd need that kind of information to give me more reason to push on him.
With POE from my POV, it comes down to Barney, Vader, you, and Moozer in that order of most scummy to least. I’m comfortable voting Vader today for the reasons I mentioned earlier. Barney just rubs me off the wrong way and has been this entire game. From his claim to what he did last night just all seems convenient.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
I just find it funny that you ignore any variable that could mean barney is scum
I'm literally asking you to explain what variables you see that could explain these results, and your response is to rub in my face that I didn't think of them. Why?

So your answers come down to:
Let me explain a couple of ways it could have gone. Scum Barney or his partner target you last night with an action that interferes with your investigation. Let’s say roleblock for example. At the beginning of the DP, you come out and say that you successfully investigated Earth. Scum Barney/partner asks Austin how that’s possible. Austin explains the whole Active Action bullshit that he uses. Then he realizes oh shit, I haven’t told Whiteflame this, so I better tell him.

Like maybe him asking the mod how a role like yours would work and whether it would count as a visit. He could have gotten the same answer as you from the mod before claiming his result. 
The mod could have offered up essential details of how a role he specifically defined works such that he effectively received the same information the person who used it got... then he sat on that information for much of the DP, only choosing to reveal it under great pressure later. I guess if we're assuming bastard modding to the extreme where everyone who asks receives a detailed set of information about how a role works...? You were so dismissive of the mod actively giving information that could solve the game, but now you're talking as though Austin's giving that information out to everyone who asks.
Austin would have to explain why scum action on you didn’t work. Imo he probably fucked up in processing the actions and is using this active action thing as a coverup. Either way, it doesn’t affiliation confirm Barney at all.


He could have been lucky in guessing that it didn't count as a visit.
That's an incredibly lucky guess considering he had no basis for making that call and none of what I said during the DP before that hinted that my using it didn't count as a visit. Almost any other choice would have been a far safer bet, but you want me to believe he just lucked into the perfect guess with the greatest degree of risk?
It’s not luck—it’s a logical inference. If you can’t be roleblocked, your action doesn’t count as a visit. Then it’s only a simple matter of asking the mod if non-active role usage counts as a visit. I asked just now 


Your are dis-regarding him way too easily. 
I'm not disregarding anything, that's why I'm making a big fucking deal out of this and asking you, specifically, what could explain it. So far, despite your claim that there are "a million ways barney could be scum," I'm not seeing a lot of explanations for this series of events.
He’s not questioning whether it happened, he’s questioning why it makes Barney town. Scum Barney would receive the exact same explanation as Town Barney as to why you didn’t move. There’s no difference .

What do you think about the two town roleblocker thing?
I'm still not clear that there are two RBs. Both you and Vader have mentioned this. The only explanation I've seen for why there must be someone other than Barney who has an RB is the somewhat confusing breakdown of the Mathematician role you mentioned before, and I'm not sure how much I buy of that to begin with.
I will comment on this tomorrow.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
If that's the case, then I sincerely don't understand why you're holding back on claiming to establish that Luna is town. Maybe there's some other facet to your role that would allow you to confirm yourself as well and that hasn't been used yet, but it shouldn't prevent you from explaining how you are this certain that Luna it town based on the other aspect of your role. Luna keeps saying that he knows he was RB'd and that he can virtually confirm that the person who did it was town, strongly hinting it was you. Can you just confirm that?
Yes, I can. My role, my role PM, and Lunatic’s role make him likely town. That could change with your claim tomorrow tho. As of now though, I’d put him as 90% town. Once I confirm my role tomorrow, everything will make sense. 

Right now I think scum is Barney and Vader
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
  • Pie - Basically either Pie is scum, or is really bad (not to say outright horrible) at this game. The truly excessive tunneling, and doubling down any time he got anything from it... The result of actually giving him information isn't shifting his vote to pressure anyone who has given less information, it's a desperate push for a mislynch. While mislynching me is not as easy as pie (pun intended), he's used me being busy DP1 to justify it when that has zero barring on if I am or am not town.
    And of course the communication with Lunatic should speak for itself., to include Lunatic outright telling everyone that Pie was not really tunneling... If nothing else were true, it'd still be true that Pie is obsessively tunnely on me.
    Lunatic says Pie is a RB and "100% town," whereas Pie strongly hints to be an inventor. Too damned much doesn't fit.
    Regarding Joebob, while Lunatic initiated the wagon, Pie largely lead it, even claiming he was certain Joebob was scum (others seemed to more of accept killing a low utility townie because not lynching is not an option to most).
Youre confused because you don’t know my role and how it works. You can see tomorrow how exactly everything squares but I don’t think you’re going to be alive
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
@whiteflame
Your argument with each other for the last two pages was confusing. Let me try to explain what I think Lunatic is trying to say. Both of you can correct me if I am wrong.

Whiteflame revealed that he got a chess engine and accepted to use it at the expense of his own action. With that power, he chose to investigate Earth and got an innocent. Then, Whiteflame gets a message from Austin saying the investigation was not considered an active action, and thus, could not be Roleblocked, Redirected, etc. Great. Hope we’re all on the same page here.

Then Barney claims “weak investigator roleblocker hybrid,” and he explains that he targets two people. If selected Person A moves, then selected Person B gets roleblocked. Now after that, Pie goes in and says how its like a Motion Detector/Roleblocker hybrid. Then, Whiteflame says this:

That at least makes sense with the role. I haven't actually asked whether my use of the chess engine counts as a move. I'm going to inquire about that. Who else did you select? And would that register as you visiting both players, even if the RB fails?
This is an odd statement from Whiteflame. Austin already told Whiteflame that the investigation did not count as an active action, which means that it wouldn’t be detected likely. Still Whiteflame said he would ask the mod—I don’t think I have seen the answer yet that Austin game. Nor have I seen Barney answer the question. Great, we’re on the same page hopefully.

Now, here’s the next interesting part:

So, I'll be blunt: I'm not voting Barney unless something dramatic changes. When Austin sent me that PM detailing how my investigation worked (after the fact), I assumed it was because someone targeted me. It's possible that the person who did that targeted me with an RB, that's literally on the list of actions he said would not affect mine. What was also on the list, and what I left off just in case it came up, was Motion Detector, the role that Barney just claimed.
Whiteflame says Austin specifically mentioned a Motion Detector. The problem here is that Barney never claimed Motion Detector. I brought that up as it sounded familiar since I look for roles all the time for my games. Functionally though, it is not a Motion Detector. The other half of the role is missing—motion detectors detect whether the person moves or whether someone visits that person. Barney never said Motion Detector, it was me.

Following that, Lunatic says this, which I agree with:

At most this should be null. Barney is claiming information that's been made publicly known in the day phase since the first page. It's funny you would jump to the conclusion he was town and mod-confirmed to you here only. That would be rather convenient, but yeah doesn't seem like Austin would do that. 
There is guarantee that Barney is town which I mentioned earlier. Barney could also be scum and furious as to why his Roleblocker did not work on you even though you used a Cop action. What’s also convenient on Barney’s part is that he targeted you in the first place knowing full well that your use of the cop does not count as an active action and thus could not be detected. Note that the only other player who confirmed to move was Earth, but if scum Barney fake claiming a role similar to MD said he targeted Earth, he would have to justify why I wasn’t roleblocked without knowing my role. It also explains why he took an eternity to full claim. Austin’s comment to you is not indicative of Barney’s affiliation—just that he targeted you with some action.

Then there’s back and forth about the whole movement aspect. Whiteflame, you said that Austin told you that the investigation did not count as an active action and thus could not be roleblocked, etc. The logical conclusion from that is that you wouldn’t move either since the roleblocked/redirector requires you to move in the first place. Barney also picked up this here before the argument between you two even began:

Austin messaged you about it already, (presumably) to prevent a mess wherein I accused you of not moving, when that item didn't count as an active move.
Here’s the next post from Whiteflame:

So, what you’re assuming is that, somehow, Barney discerned from the limited information I gave within the DP that I used the chess engine, but in my use of it, I didn’t move? He somehow figured that out? Also, to be very clear about this, we’re talking about bastard modding either way. Austin delivered this info to me after the start of the DP, basically confirming that a role was used on me that fit that description. Either the person who used it was scum or they were town, but the confirmation was there regardless. The series of events fits far better for a town Barney than it does for a scum Barney.
Couple of things to note here. Barney actually could and did assume that because you were not an active action, the action does not count as move. Asking the mod that is an easy fix. The series of events though is not indicative of affiliation at all. Scum Barney would be pissed his roleblock or action or whatever did not work. You are right in there’s confirmation there’s possible confirmation that someone visited you but their action did not work because the investigation was not considered active.  So when Lunatic says this:

How are you jumping to that conclusion or the conclusion he is town at all? How does it fit town Barney more than scum Barney?
It’s a perfectly logical question to ask.

Here’s Whiteflame’s next post:

c: Let's put all this together. So, according to you, Barney somehow intuited that I didn't move. He specifically chose the Motion Detector, the one role listed in my PM from Austin that I didn't state would be ineffective when used on me, so he just lucked out picking that single role to use on me that Austin had confirmed wouldn't produce a result if used on me. That's the only way Barney's scum based on your logic: he somehow figured all this out based on a pair of posts that gave none of this information away. It has nothing to do with him claiming town RB. It never has.
The first part is basic infrencing and even asking mod, which is not hard to do. Second, Barney didn’t even claim Motion Detector. The mechanics aren’t similar at all. Barney explicitly stated weak investigator and roleblocker, not MD and Roleblocker. Second the luck factor is not there because he didn’t claim MD in the first place. He only claimed half of the role. Basically I agree with Lunatic in his response to this post.

He targeted me. He didn’t see that I moved. That’s either a Tracker, a Motion Detector, or some derivation thereof. I sincerely do not give a fuck if his role actually says “Motion Detector” - it does not change much since, like I said, it still means that Barney got an accurate result when I used my role, which I would argue is not what someone else would expect upon seeing the information I was given.
But again—it doesn’t indicate his affiliation. And the argument that the inference doesn’t make sense is contradicted by the fact that he could’ve asked the mod or just realized that if it can’t be roleblocked, then it can’t be motion detected. Furthermore, it’s possible he could be a MD/RB but be scum. He can only target you based on all the info that was revealed at that point in time. It’s not affiliation indicative at all.

Now let me address this post by you Whiteflame where you tagged me:

Now, let's assume Barney's scum. That would mean that he saw my claim at the beginning of the DP and made the decision to select a role that would tell him if I had moved.
Not necessarily. Scum Barney would know that his or his partner’s action on you did not work, so they can conclude and ask the mod whether you would move or not.

Based on the information I had provided up to that point, that would have been a supremely ballsy move. He knew I had used a role like Cop on Earth. He knew that that would likely result in movement on my part. He nonetheless chose to claim a role that would monitor movement and a target for that role that had actively claimed they had targeted another player successfully.
But again—he could’ve asked the mod or even guessed that because you could not be roleblocked, you investigation does not count as a visit. Barney even admitted that he thought you did that.

He would have to somehow know in advance that my using the "chess engine" would not act as a movement. Can anyone explain to me how he would have intuited that from any of the posts I made before he clarified his role? Because I can't. Maybe this is just the craziest scum tactic I've ever seen and Barney just targeted me with something else during the NP, failed, and just went for it for unknown reasons. If so, more power to him, that's quite the gambit.
It all comes down to infrencing and the mod. All of the information you’re talking about can be derived from either of those two things. Also at this point, I am presuming Austin got back to you and your investigating did not count as a target.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
For now, I will state that based on everyone that’s claimed so far, Lunatic has to be town because of my role. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
I’m having a huge post coming, so please don’t take any actions until then.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
@Lunatic
@whiteflame
@Moozer325
Yeah just gonna come out and claim Even Night Voyeur. On even nights I visit a player to see what actions were performed on them. I was going to test this out by picking someone at random and outting them. 

This is also why I was sus of JoeBob because I thought his claim and mine would be very OP, but considering how many logical inconsistencies there are with this game, I think that it just happens that balancing and other things were off
I hate this claim. For one it overlaps with a claimed town. “Black pieces” include Pawn which Savant already claimed. Second the role itself is an even night Voyeur. This is really different from everything that’s been revealed. Every role has a weird mechanic attached to it. JoeBob was a flipped Tracker. Savant had 2 roles. Earth has a unique role. I have a unique role. Lunatic has a unique role. His is just even night voyeur. Third, he said he could confirm himself. How would a Voyeur be able to confirm themself if they mistarget or are conveniently interfered with. Furthermore, role confirmation is not equivalent to affiliation confirmation. My only concern is the fact that he soft claimed this in DP1 with the reason for voting JoeBob—if someone can point me to that, I may reconsider.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
Alright I’m back.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
Same. I think I would have to reveal some stuff in order to make that case for other townies to also buy this logic though. Should I reveal? Or at least partially reveal the part relevant here?
Do whatever you think is best
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
Earth gives something but the person can’t use their action if they want to use it. Barney can see if someone moves and if they do, they can roleblock
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
yeah you were right about him being a roleblocker though. As mafia, I can see if he straight out claimed roleblocker he might think that was more scummy than outlining a roleblocker with specific function like this. But do you find it odd that there would be multiple town roleblocking roles? 
Very odd isn’t it? That’s why I don’t believe it one bit
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
@Barney
Yeah… that’s not what he claimed at all….
It’s a very odd claim. He claimed investigator roleblocker where he targets two people. If he targets Person A and if Person A moves, person B gets roleblocked. I’m curious to hear the justification for that since a pin involves one move. He thinks I’m bullying him so can you ask for his justification.

It was actually me that brought up the Motion Detector based on what I remembered about the role. Now that you brought it up, I looked at MafiaScum and MafiaUniverse and it says MD detects motions on and by the person. It’s very odd
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
Yes, and given the nature of how it confirms me, it also strongly supports my alignment.
So three of us have confirmable roles. Fascinating
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
As my character very clearly gives away my role and I can confirm myself (character, role and, most importantly, alignment), I would prefer not to.
So your role is also confirmable?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
Moozer - Castling
JoeBob - Algebraic Notation
Savant - Pawn
Earth - Stockfish
Lunatic - ELO Rating System
Barney - Pin
SupaDudz - Black Pieces

Whiteflame - Strategy
Pie - Platform

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
Alright.

Right now, I’m not liking that the number of supposedly confirmable roles exceeds the number of people who could be town, particularly given Earth is basically confirmed town and Barney a pretty solid town lean based on his claim. Moozer claimed a confirmable role, and both you and Pie claim you’re confirmable. It’s doubly strange that so many of you claim to be confirmable, but only by DP3.

So that leaves Luna as the only person who hasn’t claimed a confirmable role. Guess he’s next. 

Unvote
VTL Luna

Unless anyone can think of a better way to go, I’m going to need that role claim at this point.
I would like for you to character claim at this point. Lunatic is town for me right now
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
I have commencement today so will be busy. Still want to hear from Lunatic 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
No offense pie, but I’m calling bullshit on that. You may be right about having a complicated role, but it just seems to ridiculous, and you make no sense. Anyone who wants t vote with me can, but this is mostly just me voting with my conscience, even though I wont get anywhere.
I like the renewed vigor. Reminds me a little of Jeb Bush. But Vader said the exact same thing as me. Is there a reason why you’re not pursuing him but pursuing me? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
As would I. There is some possibility that Barney tried to RB me, got pissed that it didn't work, talked with Austin and got him to send me these details to explain it. Possible, but unlikely. I don't think scum would then push for Austin to send me a message like that. I certainly don't see Barney then outing himself as having the RB. Maybe he's pulling an incredible gambit, but I don't buy it based on the information we have.
I think it’s more that Austin fucked up and then created this whole Active Action bs to keep the game running. But the that’s just speculation 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
@Lunatic
Thoughts on Barney’s claims and actions?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
What I find harder to believe is that Austin would actively facilitate scum like this by sending me that information after the night actions played out. It's not the best that it came out after the beginning of DP2 to begin with, but it lines up with Barney's telling of events. Maybe Austin would do this, actively affording scum an alibi for their actions that just so happens to include a fake claim that Barney actively used. Right now, I don't buy it.
If I was scum and my role blocker on you didn’t work, I’d be furious. Either way, I want to hear from Lunatic and Earth on this matter
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
An inventor is not the same as a cop; most likely it was only a single use of that power. And the tracker was a particularly weak variant.
A.) How do you know he’s an inventor
B.) Even if it was, it’s not an active action

But you're committed to killing towns investigators...

Lol. You’re gonna laugh tomorrow when I confirm my tole.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
You actually. You were key to mislynching JoeBob. If you have a complex role like he and I, then I would expect hesitation when he full claimed early something so unexpected by normal game standards.

Even you should realize that killing town is scummy.
Thats fine. Valid reason. My role is complex, just not in the sense that JoeBob’s was. His utility made no sense, which is objectively true.

And yes, for your confirmation I will target someone else tonight (have to spell that out for everyone else. If you are scum, then NKing me and saying you were RBed would be a nice way to buy time).
Target who you think is scum. Assuming you’re not lynched. I don’t believe your claim one bit 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@whiteflame
That would explain the message I received from him. Never mind about detailing the specific target you chose or how your movements would (or wouldn't) register. 
That it does, but it’s really convenient imo. Either way, it’s not affiliation indicative for Barney. We all know a town roleblocker is SOP. And a cop, with a motion detector, with a tracker.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
Why do you insists on only claiming tomorrow? 

Why not now?

Seems like a pretty clear stalling tactic to me
Because my role is confirmable tomorrow. I have no point lying to you because if I do, I am lynched tomorrow. So it makes no sense for me to full claim right now.

Anyways, until you do claim, I would have everyone else at least take your claims with a grain of salt, and I would still like you to claim now, so I’m keeping my vote.
I don’t plan on claiming today. There is no objective reason to because you can lynch me tomorrow.

You might have a reason, but it seems like pretty clear stalling to me, and that is super counterproductive if your with us.
I’m not stalling, there’s a reason why I’m not claiming, and it’s a valid reason. Not some bullshit reason like “bullying”
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
You really can't? I have a dozen or so notifications notifications from Pie with his BS bullying tactic. When someone else (Lunatic) without being a bastard simply asked, I gave information.

It's a policy of not rewarding Pie's lameness. 
“Bullying.” Literally everyone wants you to full claim and you just keep dodging.

Adding to it, Pie gaslighting claiming he's already done a partial claim... But also not saying when and where... I mean either of us could have missed it, and he could have missed the list not including it... But all three seems unlikely if he's actually provided information.
I soft claimed earlier as to my character

Further, Pie seems certain as to what my role is from my character claim, which makes the point of pressuring me more moot.

...
I said it screams roleblocker, not that you are a roleblocker.

Anyways I'm a weak investigator roleblocker hybrid.
Oh look—I was right. Curious as to why you wouldn’t claim that as SOP. A motion detector/roleblocker hybrid when we have a Cop and a Tracker.

Each night I select two players, the first of which I get a notification if they target another player (I don't know which player). The second gets roleblocked if the first moved.

NP1 watched whiteflame, who did not move, so my roleblock did not trigger.
And who did you target for a roleblock and why?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Moozer325
No offense to you, but you have been pretty aggressive on hounding claims out of people.
Thank you

Not that it's necessarily bad, it's just a little suspicious, and you haven't really given us a big claim either, so I think I have the right to be at least a little sceptical. I do agree with you that we need a hard claim barney, but I would like one out of you too before you go asking for other people's.
My role is confirmable tomorrow. Barney’s clearly is not.  I don’t plan on hard claiming today. Tomorrow, you’ll see my character and my role
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Earth
@Lunatic
@Vader
@whiteflame
@Moozer325
I totally agree with you about pie here. If you can give us a better claim, I'm with you if you want to go after him next, but I need that claim first. 
I’m interested to hear your thoughts on this comment by Moozer
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@AustinL0926
@JoeBob
@Moozer325
Can we do a Moozer/JoeBob hydra
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Barney
You obsessing over one person for information, then when information is given demanding more and more… You’re damned obvious in trying to get a mislynch. Of course, you’re welcome to have your scum buddy out themselves by laying down the hammer.
Ive asked you to full claim since literally the last DP. You have delayed for more than a day. I’m asking for your role so that I may consider putting you in the town pile depending on whether I find it important/adequate and move on to someone else.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP2
-->
@Lunatic
I hate to have to say this publicly, as yes I can see how you can view that as a role blocker. But I can also see that justifying a protective role. At any rate I don't really see the harm in him just coming out with it at this point, because I think mafia would have picked up on that by now as well if he isn't mafia. Also we already have an outed cop giver in earth, so the POE from mass claiming right now might be more beneficial to town. 
I heavily disagree with you on this. A move that results in a pin is 99% of the time bad for the opposing party. As for the mass claim, I think we should at the very least do it methodically. 
Created:
0