ILikePie5

Ok I don’t know how important it is but I will try to explain it better.

1. D6, D4

The one at the start is what number moves we are on. It goes up by one once both white and black make a move. It goes white in front, then black always. The D6 is a pawn moving to D6. Every other leave has a letter in front of the D to let us know what piece it is. For example, kD6 would be the knight, which is k, moving to D6. If you look at the chess board, or an image online, you will see that each space has a letter at number, letter first then number. Back to the pawn. After white moves, there is a comma, then black moves. 

Rhat is the basics to it. Though I quit chess a bit ago so some parts may be incorrect.

I’m asking Austin if I get to know who visited who when I track someone, or is it only when I die do I get to know, though he is asleep so I won’t get an answer until the morning.

ChatGPT messed up that second last sentence a bit. I bet it’s just a list of whoever I chose that night, who they tracked/visited, if anyone.

But some background information. A notation sheet is all of the algebraic notations that were made, put in a list. For example:

1. D6, D4

2 would be the same as 1, and it continues until the game ends.

I’m essentially an algebraic notation, a method of encoding used to document chess game moves for review, sharing, and playback post-game. This notation relies on a detailed coordinate grid to track pieces' movements to specific squares. Think of me as the Flipped Tracker: I can monitor a player each night, noting whom they visited, if anyone. In case of my demise, this notation sheet unveils my findings. I win with the town.

What is a miller? I looked it up and it was something about BusBoy, and Polygraph or something, which I doubt is it.

why? 

Am I just supposed to accept the lynch?

sorry yall but I accept defeat 

Like no. I’m going to be defending my points. I am also trying to take a more active stance since I know I haven’t been and because of that I haven’t been a good town member last game for example. But I’m looking to change that so I become more active.

Austin said some of his videos will hint to the theme split. Does that fit?

So you want to lynch me because I worded a post weird in your eyes, and that my character doesn’t fit with what you aren’t even sure is the theme split.

Also I’m not sure if you have said it, but what do you think is even the theme split?

Why do you want to lynch me. I want to hear your reasons.

I will think about a suitable soft claim and will do so if I like it.

Per your request: something! 🙃

And yet you’re saying I’m scum because of it.

I doubt that im the only one that’s an outlier.

You are. All I literally said was to not lynch Savant today, and your harping me on it.

Algebraic Notation doesn't seem to be outside the realm of possibility. You say it's universal, but I'm not really buying it. Besides, he putted his claim in like 10 minutes.

I’ll consider it, but I want at least a couple of the inactives to chime in before pursuing anything.

In a sense, yes. That’s why I’m considering your proposed split, though I think I need to see a couple of other soft claims before I can come to any conclusion.

It is still an opportunity to get some intel on his behavior as scum, and notably, the only one we have. 

It expresses a degree of uncertainty that I would not expect to see in a scum post from him. That caution would have to be his scum partner coming through, which is possible, but I don’t have good reason to believe that yet.

I guess that’s one way to look at it. I think there are several plausible theme splits, though I’ll note that Algebraic Notation isn’t consistently an outlier.

Alright, having just caught up on the DP… yeah, I don’t get the basis for this push on JoeBob. I think the basis for sussing him is weak at best, and this statement by Pie is just flat out false:

I can confirm that I’ve played with JoeBob as scum. I’ve seen how he behaves in the role. I think he’d be more careful about his posts if he was scum, since he regularly requested help with those posts in that game. None of what I’ve seen so far matches his scum behavior in that game.

That being said, the character claim doesn’t automatically give much away (though I’ll note that it’s also associated with moves, bringing it in line thematically with Castling), so the information garnered can still be useful without providing too much info to scum.

Point still stands. I put dots and your loosing it thinking I’m scum. You’re being ridiculous.

I have no clue what you mean by that.

I am algebraic notation.

So because I used dots, I’m suspicious? That makes no sense.

You keep forgetting JoeBob is a new player.

How about... not lynching Savant day one, as you could have voted out a town because of a policy you have. Let him live for at least today.

JoeBob doesn't strike me as suspicious so far. I'm not saying that you are scum or that he isn't, but pushing for claims this early based on extremely limited evidence is not a good idea.

I'm fine with that. Haven't played with a lot of people before so my behavioral reads may be off. My inclination is to suspect you since you are accusing me and I know I'm town. But you also strike me as a very proactive player in general, so that's far from conclusive. For now, I'll take your accusation on the chin and keep an eye out for scum.

How about... not lynching Savant day one, as you could have voted out a town because of a policy you have. Let him live for at least today.

I expected some level of suspicion, but there's no reason to lynch me day one when I've been transparent about being a Miller. That's basically throwing every single game that has a Miller in it.

I'm going to come right out and say this in D1, since revealing it after being investigated would just be suspicious. Despite winning with the town, my role has a "Miller" modifier, which means I will be shown as guilty if investigated by the cop.  Revealing the rest of my role would be pretty bad for the town, and I couldn't confirm it anyway. If it comes to revealing or being lynched, I'll reveal, but it would be far from ideal.

I'll suppose I'll be honest. I'm a castling, I can use my ability once to protect one piece (king), and make one piece's next moves untamperable (rook).

Unless Earth proceeds to drop out of the discussion and vanish into the background of this DP, I’m not onboard for pushing him. That being said, you do have a tendency to do that for long stretches, so keep in mind that it’ll make you a target for pushes like this if you do.

I suppose. But I still don't see why you need a claim to accomplish that. 

tbh this is a little odd because it seems like a non sequitur to ask for a claim because I am not active. 

Does Pie always demand claims from a lot of players? He did so last game and was mafia.

I know the normal rules from summer camp, but are there any special chess mafia rules?

Oh, and I did read the rule guide, and it sounds a bit more complicated, but fun too.

Why does everyone call Vader supa?

Not really going to wade into this, but I think lumping GP into the same category as BK is a bit unfair. He legitimately puts in effort in many of his games, and even called the entire scum team at the end of DP1. His lack of analysis can be frustrating, but I've never seen him actively troll or throw a game.

Then you should have no problem bringing your prosecution. Good luck.