ILikePie5's avatar

ILikePie5

A member since

3
7
10

Total posts: 17,895

Posted in:
What is a republican?
-->
@TheUnderdog
How much is the total of this government spending?
In the billions. Again, go read it lol.

Maybe he just changed his mind on healthcare?  That's possible.  If politicians didn't expect other politicians to change their minds, there would be no point in arguing.  There would just be a solid vote.  Obamacare took years to make.  Someone had to have their mind changed.
Stop making excuses for someone who ran for more than a decade on repealing Obamacare. His constituents hated Obamacare, but he thinks he’s better than them.

The one exception to this is if there is corruption.  Corruption is fucked up!  But changing your mind is OK.  I mean, if you want abortion banned, and Biden changed his mind on abortion, you'd be giving him credit.

Let politicians change their minds (as long as corruption isn't the reason).
So after lying to your constituents for a decade, it’s okay to switch your mind in a heartbeat. Good job.

RFK is essentially a republican by what he talks about.  Like he can be against the vacciene and still run as a democrat.  But if he's going to do that, he would say something like, "I'm unvaccinated, I don't like vacciene mandates, and I think Trump is a bigoted racist, I think we should end deportations, I think we need Medicare for all paid for by the top 1%" (I mean, he ran as a democrat for a reason; it's not like he would be a DINO).  Right wingers that like RFK should try and figure out what his left wing views are before they decide to vote for him; he's left wing on something; otherwise he would be running as a republican.
It’s more of an f u to both sides.

There was a time when I liked RFK.  Him being against vacciene mandates and Citizens United; I agree with him on that.  Then he was saying shit like COVID was created to spare Jewish people (which to me, it code for he thinks the Jews started COVID).  It was at this point that I decided to not back RFK anymore.  RFK being on Epstein's plane 2x further cemented my belief against him.
He says some dumb shit obv.

If RFK didn't fuck up these 2x, I'd have no problem supporting him.  I got vaccinated, but I don't agree with vaccine mandates.  But if you say stupid stuff, don't expect me to vote for you (stupid is defined very strictly, any abortion position from (ban unless to save the mother's life with the penalty being the same as murder) to, (legalize up until the moment of birth and repeal the Hyde Amendment) wouldn't be in the range of what I classify as stupid, but saying something like, "The Jews started COVID" to me is stupid.
Good for you. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
What is a republican?
-->
@TheUnderdog
On what?
Lots of things. Go read Rand Paul’s annual festivus report that highlights dumb spending.

John McCain is left wing on healthcare (at least by American standards in that time).
John McCain ran on repealing Obamacare. He’s a fraud. Ever heard of the Hanoi Songbird or the fact he sealed all his Vietnam records.

How do you criticize right wing ideology (which isn't consistent in any way)?
I don’t vote for people I think will cause more harm than good. I would never vote for Mitch McConnell or Kevin McCarthy.

So wouldn't you then vote Christie or Haley over Biden?
No.

If X=Being a Neocon, Y="other shitty policies", Christie and Haley have X, Biden has X+Y

If all these values are negative, wouldn't X>X+Y?
Sure, but that doesn’t mean I will vote for them lol. Youre assuming it’s a binary choice. I would vote for RFK over them. If it’s just H2H I would choose not to vote, because they’re both in negatives and would be bad, and I don’t want to condone bad.
Created:
0
Posted in:
What is a republican?
-->
@TheUnderdog
Like when?
Spending. Healthcare (screw John McCain). Senate Republicans, etc.

Alright; but then how is Trump different from Haley or Christie in your view that justifies you voting for Trump over Biden but not Haley or Christie over Biden?
Haley and Christie are warmongering neocons. Biden is that + other shitty policies
Created:
1
Posted in:
What is a republican?
-->
@TheUnderdog
But then don't be afraid to criticize the GOP on issues where you disagree.
I do.

What about Chris Christie vs Joe Biden?  Or Chris Christie vs Marian Williamson?  Or Chris Christie vs Dean Phillips?

I think you would vote for your least favorite republican (assuming it's Chris Christie) over any democrat running for POTUS.
I wouldn’t vote for any of them actually. I’ve stayed numerous times in other threads that I wouldn’t vote for Nikki Haley either. Being a Republican doesn’t automatically garner my vote.
Created:
1
Posted in:
What is a republican?
-->
@TheUnderdog
Why does it matter? Supporting Republicans doesn’t mean I’m a republican by default. I believe in people and their policies/actions, not what party they are. There are many Republicans who I would never vote for
Created:
1
Posted in:
No morons, it’s not legal to steal less than a $1000 in California
-->
@Greyparrot
Dems are smart. Prosecutors just don’t charge them. 
Created:
3
Posted in:
Why as someone that hates Jan 6, is considering voting for Trump
-->
@TheUnderdog
@Double_R
@Best.Korea
@Sidewalker
I’m curious if anyone voting for Biden in a Trump v Biden scenario would vote for Nikki Haley in a Haley v Biden scenario.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Labor did very well in 2023. Thanks Joe! Thanks Bidenomics!
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Please keep running on Bidenomics. It’s a winning message
Created:
1
Posted in:
Labor did very well in 2023. Thanks Joe! Thanks Bidenomics!
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
He should. It’s only the morons watching FOX and other fake news that believe the economy is bad.

There’s the old saying, morons will be morons.
Yep, morons like me love high prices
Created:
0
Posted in:
Labor did very well in 2023. Thanks Joe! Thanks Bidenomics!
Keep running on that :)
Created:
0
Posted in:
Trump supporters need to pick at most 3 of the following 4 arguments
-->
@TheUnderdog
All but 3, they don't like capitalism.
Not necessarily true.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If Nikki Haley wants to know why states seceded from the Union…
Nimrata Randhawa 🤡
Created:
0
Posted in:
Jefferson Davis was never convicted or even tried for treason
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
That was referring to the passage of laws.
In relation to the amendments, including Section 3.

The Constitution explicitly says the states run their elections, which includes enforcement of disqualification.
Sure, but federal law > state law per the supremacy clause, especially in the case of federal elections.

Think about it. These people were banned from Federal AND state office. Are you suggesting Congress would prevent people from running for state offices, such as governor? That’s ridiculous 
Yes, actually. Radical Republicans in Congress wanted to punish the Southern states.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Jefferson Davis was never convicted or even tried for treason
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
The 14th Amendment also states that: “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

Not the states. Congress.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Jefferson Davis was never convicted or even tried for treason
-->
@FLRW
 “So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11780 votes, which is one more than we have. 
You forget the context. He was referring to illegal votes.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Jefferson Davis was never convicted or even tried for treason
Ya, they designed the 14th Amendment just for former confederates
Created:
0
Posted in:
Biden's "great economy" in perspective
Even voters are rejecting Bidenomics
Created:
0
Posted in:
Colorado Supreme Court rules that Trump is an insurrectionist! Not qualified to run
If the Supreme Court upholds this, expect Republicans in Texas, Florida, Georgia, etc to say Biden letting all of the illegals in is an insurrection.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Giuliani>Trumpet Sedition Duo
-->
@Double_R
Whether a jury is biased is irrelevant to the facts showing the defendant to be guilty. Trump supporters love to pretend there's no such thing as reality, it's all just my opinion vs yours.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is real :)
Created:
1
Posted in:
Giuliani>Trumpet Sedition Duo
-->
@Greyparrot
Ofc they want their darling establishment hack Nimrata Randhawa. I would never vote for her
Created:
0
Posted in:
Giuliani>Trumpet Sedition Duo
-->
@Greyparrot
DC: Deranged Court.
GOP needs to wake up. Democratic power grabs have led us to where we are right now. Unilateral surrender of power does no good.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Unrealized Gains Tax
-->
@Double_R
Absolutely, I would tax the hell out of estates after about $10 million. It's insane that people who work for a living have to pay 20-25 percent of the income they worked for but people who literally did nothing can get millions handed down to them and pay nothing.

It also helps to ensure the meritocracy the political right loves to boast about.
That’s actually where it is about right now. Something done by the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act. Glad we can agree on something.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Giuliani>Trumpet Sedition Duo
-->
@Double_R
Fixed
You and I both know a DC jury would never acquit Trump supporters. You’re welcome to be delusional, but that’s just the fact in a 92-5 area.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Israeli military mistakenly killed 3 Israeli hostages in Gaza
-->
@Best.Korea
No, I am pretty... sure that killing 20,000 civilians in two months is genocide, not irony.
Genocide of Hamas. Sure
Created:
0
Posted in:
Israeli military mistakenly killed 3 Israeli hostages in Gaza
-->
@Best.Korea
It’s called war crime.
The irony lol
Created:
0
Posted in:
Giuliani>Trumpet Sedition Duo
We sure love DC Juries
Created:
0
Posted in:
Israeli military mistakenly killed 3 Israeli hostages in Gaza
It’s called war.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Unrealized Gains Tax
-->
@Swagnarok
As Greyparrot mentioned, liquidity becomes a major issue since the government wants cold hard cash. That liquidity create risk for investors, and thus, they demand higher returns. The volatility would increase significantly because of this. IRAs and 401ks are the great equalizer because of their tax exempt growth status. You take that away and they become meaningless. You could exempt them, but that still doesn’t combat the volatility problem which can lead to bad returns. It’s a bad idea plain and simple.
Created:
3
Posted in:
PROPOSAL: Use of Electors in Sub-Presidential Races
Some one doesn’t know how to amend the Constitution ^^
Created:
1
Posted in:
As usual, Republicans are an absolute disgrace.
My 2nd most favorite senator!

Created:
2
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@Greyparrot
do you understand what price gouging means. If I raise my prices by 400% and people are still buying my products, that is both price gauging, and capitalism working as intended. 
It’s illegal though is my point. There is no such thing as unregulated capitalism in the United States.

I don't think you did. It says there has to be collusion. Two companies raising prices because they can isn't illegal. Even if those raises are price gouging.
“Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct)”

this is going around in circles. If they all raise prices independently of each other, it isn't illegal. There has to be collusion in order for it be a crime.
Collusion can be inferred. 

you aren't making any sense. You link to sources that say it requires collusion, then argue the opposite. Link the exact quote that says that companies raising prices independently of each other is illegal.
Independently raise prices to the same level of their competitors? That’s literally price-fixing by conduct.

lol, if I light a fire right before selling a house, does that mean fire wasn't an issue when I owned it? Trump set the economy on fire, then lost the election. If he had won, inflation would have been the same. Just because the inflation didn't jump to 10% the moment trump make decisions, doesn't mean his decisions didn't cause it.
So you’re saying the stimulus packages were not needed? The first one definitely was. Second one is debatable. But even in that scenario, the third was definitely not needed (which was done by Biden).

Keep in mind that the first two were overwhelmingly bipartisan. Feel free to blame Trump for the second one, but you can blame Democrats as well.

this sort of logic is endemic for republicans. Republican candidates push shitty policy that causes problems. The problems take a few years to become really bad, but by that point they have lost the election. Democrats spend years dealing with the mess they made and fixing it. But repubican voters go "Look, it was only a problem under the democrats" and completely ignore the fact that republican policy caused the problem in the 1st place. But then the cycle begins again.
What “shitty policy” of Trump caused inflation. Simple question.
Created:
0
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@Greyparrot
What's kind of funny is that before inflation, Democrats and the media regularly trashed Trump for not spending enough. Some of the plans proposed by a Democrat Congress would have doubled what Trump spent. That would have been hilarious to live through. Careful what you wish for.
What’s also funny is that the GOP wants to cut spending to reduce inflation (as fiscal policy dictates). Guess who is blocking them: the Dems and Joe Biden
Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@Greyparrot
To be fair, Trump did set the stage for inflation, Biden just managed to hit it out of the park with his massive corporate giveaway BBB spending stimulus.
There’s an argument to be had with if we needed a second round of stimulus. But there’s no debate that we didn’t need a third round and neither did he need the IRA. By Spring 2021, COVID was virtually over.
Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@HistoryBuff
no, it isn't. In order for it to be illegal, they have to collude. IE they need to come to an agreement that they will work together to raise prices. If they see the market will support them charging more, there is nothing illegal about raising prices. 
If supply and demand justifies the higher price, then by definition there’s no price gouging.

this is false. It is only illegal if the competitors are working together. If both companies decide, independently of each other, that they can get away with charging more, there is nothing illegal about that.
You clearly did not read the FTC article I sent.

not exactly, no. Profit is the cornerstone of capitalism. Much of the time, it is more profitable to undercut your rival so you can sell more. But if undercutting your rival only increases your market share by a little, then you can make alot more money if you just raise prices and they do the same thing. With covid, people were expecting inflation. There was a reasonable explanation as to why prices were going up. So companies just kept raising prices far in excess of what they actually needed to.
Again, if supply and demand equilibrium price is not the price all of these companies are charging, by definition, it’s collusion and illegal. Supply and Demand states that it is illogical to have prices above the equilibrium price. If you believe that companies are maintaining a high price level compared to the equilibrium price, then it is illegal.

I'm really not sure if you didn't understand that or not. But yes, Covid, and the policies it triggered, caused the inflation spike. And trump was the one doing that, not biden.
COVID was a recessionary period. To combat recessions, fiscal policy states that to combat it, spending needs to go up. Biden passed a third stimulus bill that wasn’t needed in 2021. Biden passed the trillions in the “Inflation Reduction Act.” All of this is unnecessary spending.

contrary to capitalism? You defitely don't know what capitalism is if you think it is contrary to capitalism. And you're wrong. It isn't illegal.
Literally laws ban this. Otherwise monopolies would be legal. I provided you sources and laws. You have yet to counter any.

are you insane? Trump was being directly paid by billionaires. They used to rent out whole floors of his hotels and then not stay there. The Saudi's were especially large payers of trump. Ivanka got tons of money from China. Trump was, and is, king of crony capitalism.
You’re changing the topic. Inflation wasn’t a problem during Trump. That’s a fact.

so your statement is inflation was stable until trump. Then biden inherited his mess....
Inflation was stable during the Trump presidency. That’s literally a fact.


Under Biden is when inflation skyrocketed — primarily due to the third stimulus bill that wasn’t needed, and other insane spending Democrats did with their trifecta.
Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@HistoryBuff
you think that companies raising prices is illegal? You don't know how capitolism works do you? It's only illegal if they get together and collude to set a price. If they see their competitor raising prices and say "hey, we can raise prices too". That's not illegal. 
False; it is illegal. Supply and Demand still work. You can get more profit even if a competitor has higher prices than you. But, if you set higher prices to effectively monopolize the market indirectly or directly with a competitor in the market, to negate the supply/demand fundamentals, it is by definition contrary to capitalism and illegal.


how could he do that? It isn't illegal to price gouge. I'm starting to think you don't know how capitalism works.
But you are saying that companies are effectively working together to price gouge to prevent “competition.” Competition is a cornerstone of capitalism. So which is it? There’s no competition or there is? Price gouging is only effective when there is collusion or an inference of conduct similar to that by definition. 

lol trump spent trillions in an inflationary period. Your partisan blinders are really bad.
COVID was an inflationary period? I had no clue.

you are contradicting yourself. There must be collusion. IE they have to be working together. If all companies choose to raise prices at the same time and don't communicate about it, that isn't illegal. that's capitolism.
I agree, there must be collusion or an illusion of collusion so to speak. It’s just as illegal because it is contrary to capitalism lmao. You don’t have to sleep with rival companies to effectively monopolize markets.

ok, he does right this minute. But trump did a few years ago. Bush did a few years before that. They definitely didn't go after anyone who donated to them. So to pretend you are outraged that Biden isn't doing something when people you support act either the same way or worse, is childish.
This wasn’t a problem during Trump. Don’t care enough about Bush to know. Under Trump, inflation was stable at around 2-3% until COVID, so the problem never existed.

Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@HistoryBuff
they could, assuming it wasn't a trend everywhere. If all businesses are gouging at the same time, then there is nowhere to go for cheaper alternatives. 
Then that’s illegal. Plain and simple.

lol this is just a sad comment. You made absolutely no argument at all, and yet pretend like you know more than me.
I did make an argument. Biden can use the DoJ to stop the price gouging you claim is happening but he doesn’t want to.

Do you have any idea how hard the republicans would fight against investigating corporations? Are you really pretending like going easy on corporations is a democrat thing?
I know that Republicans wouldn’t have let inflation get this bad in the first place. Spending trillions in an inflationary period sure helps increase inflation. Who would’ve thought.

name some, specifically. Name a law that doesn't allow a company to set a price they want to set. Companies have a wide latitude to set whatever price they want. The idea is that competition will force them to lower prices. but when all companies realize they can make more money by raising prices and that they can get away with it, competition stops forcing down prices. And there isn't really a government mechanism to do anything about it.
Yes there is. You don’t have to have a written agreement. There only needs to be inference that they are colluding to raise prices. Sherman Act. Clayton Act. FTC Act. Just to name a few.

and those same kinds of people fund all the republicans too. SBF also gave huge amounts of money to republicans, you know that right? These people all fund both sides.
I never said they don’t. But Biden is the POTUS and in charge of the DoJ, not Republicans. Biden has the power of prosecution, not Republicans.
Created:
0
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@Greyparrot
If it costs McDonalds 1 dollar to get the materials for a burger, they have to sell it for 3 dollars profit so they can pay everyone's salaries and the business costs. 
If all of a sudden it costs Mc Donald's 2 dollars to get the materials for a burger and they then sell the burger for 4 dollars, that's a huge profit margin drop, and they will be gone very soon.
Exactly. Their profit margin drops from 66% to only 50%. Sales Price will always have a greater magnitude increase than costs. 
Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@HistoryBuff
what does "Biden could put the DoJ in them" even mean? It isn't illegal to raise prices. Basically, it's like their costs have gone up 8%, but they raised prices 40%. It isn't illegal to do that. It's shitty, but I'm not aware of any laws banning them from doing it.
So consumers can go to alternatives and get things for cheaper. Got it. Also, I don’t think you realize how inflation really works, which is okay. Not everyone is a business or economic major.

The only place it crosses the line is if there is price fixing going on. IE all the companies that sell a specific product get together and decide on a price they will sell at to fix the price there. There have been cases of that caught in the last few years. But mostly, it's just the downsides of poorly regulated capitalism.
In which case you send the DoJ in, but again. More profits for companies = more donations for Joe.

If the government wanted to do something about that, they would definitely need laws passed through congress. And the republicans would 100% block anything the democrats tried to do to help people. 
Uh, no they don’t. There’s like a million laws that prevent price gouging, but Biden doesn’t want to. People like Jeff Bezos and Sam Bankman-Fried fund his campaign.
Created:
1
Posted in:
thoughts on israeli war - many libs dont make sense
-->
@HistoryBuff
Hamas isn't the source of the problem. It is a symptom of the problem. As long as Israel continues to treat the palestinians like garbage, a group like Hamas will exist. Even if Israel gets exactly what they say they want, Hamas ceases to exist. A new Hamas would come into existence tomorrow. You can't murder 10's of thousands of civilians and then expect their family members to not want to fight back. The only end to this cycle is to actually negotiate and resolve the underlying issues. As long as Israel continues to treat force as the only solution, they will never be able to end the violence. And they don't even want to. netanyahu is actually a supporter of Hamas. He likes their terrorism justifies Israeli violence and undermines negotiations. 
Palestine had numerous opportunities to accept a two-state solution. They refused to because they want everything — something which they never will get. It’s a fool’s errand.
Created:
1
Posted in:
i decided i no longer approve of biden's job performance
-->
@HistoryBuff
what ideas are you saying he should support? Since a large chunk of inflation over the last few years is just corporate greed jacking up prices because they can get away with it, ultimately, the only way he could do anything about it is some sort of price fixing law. But that would be been seen as massive overreach, and probably rightly so. So i'm curious what actions you feel he could take.
That’s just wrong. Even if you think they’re price gouging, Biden could put the DoJ in them, but he doesn’t cause he needs money
Created:
1
Posted in:
thoughts on israeli war - many libs dont make sense
-->
@FLRW
Remember that the 2017 tax cut reduced the top corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent—a 40 percent reduction. 

What a great way to bankrupt the USA. No wonder Putin loves Trump.
Remember that 35% was like one of the highest in the world and corporations put their companies in foreign nations just to avoid the higher tax rate :)
Created:
1
Posted in:
thoughts on israeli war - many libs dont make sense
-->
@HistoryBuff
no, it's not. I assume you hate joe biden and the democrats. So you are not pro-democratic party. does that mean you also hate america and all the american people? You can oppose a government or even hate a government and still support the people of that country. 
My point was that the people democratically elected Hamas. Hamas fighters are Palestinian. Palestinians and their supporters think Israel shouldn’t even exist.

For example, I support the people of Israel. They have a right to exist and be happy. Their government are genocidal monsters who are murdering 10's of thousands of innocent people. I support the palestinians. Their "government" are genocidal monsters who murdered thousands of people. 
The difference here is that the Israeli people can conduct democratic elections. Palestinians cannot. Whose fault is that?

But Hamas being monsters does not justify the mass murder of civilians. Some civilian casualties are inevitable in war, but Israel is WAY over the line. They've bombed hospitals, refugee camps etc. They told people move to area X because we are going to bomb area Y. Then proceeded to bomb them as the civilians went to area X. Then bombed area X too for good measure. 
It’s not Israel’s fault that Hamas hides among civilians and civilians do nothing about it. If the source of the problem is Hamas, then the people shouldn’t support Hamas. Yet, they are okay with them hiding among them. It’s akin to abetting terrorism basically.
Created:
1
Posted in:
The Bootstrap Paradox
-->
@Best.Korea
Time travel would enable anyone to wipe out humanity by simply going back in time when we were fish.
Unless we live in a multi-verse
Created:
0
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Dr.Franklin
 Are YOU really being serious? Fucking midwit
What do you expect from someone who thinks people like Hitler are “misguided”
Created:
0
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Double_R
That was just too much for you so you felt the need to end the conversation there and ignore everything I said in that part and elsewhere.

Wow.
Cause just like it’s a waste of your time to answer everything I said, it’s a waste of time for me to respond to your post.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Double_R
No. Vermin are diseases infested pests that need to be exterminated. Using that language to describe others is to suggest they are subhuman and therefore undeserving of rights. 

I think fascists (in terms of those who support the ideology) are deeply misguided and dangerous to the rest of us. The antedote against that is education. Fascists only enjoy the power the rest of us give them through our own ignorance and manipulability.
That’s all I needed. Have a nice day!
Created:
2
Posted in:
thoughts on israeli war - many libs dont make sense
Pro-Palestine = Pro-Hamas.

The Palestinian people elected Hamas.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Double_R
Simple yes or no question: do you think fascists are vermin?
Created:
2
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Greyparrot
Ironic part is that Trump called fascists vermin. And yet he’s the fascist. Ultimate big brain.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Question for Trump Supporters
-->
@Double_R
The reason you don't blame Bernie Sanders for the shooting of Steve Scalise is because you recognize how patently absurd that would be. Nothing about Bernie or his rhetoric suggests in any way that he would have wanted that, meanwhile the effects of Trump's rhetoric has had a tangible and unmistakable effect on public sentiment towards political violence.
And Democrats haven’t? What about Maxine Waters? What about Kamala Harris open funding bails for rioters after George Floyd riots. Democratic rhetoric in the form of ending cash bail is leading to robberies and murders in NYC, Chicago, San Francisco, you name it. Trump can say what he wants; Maxine can say what she wants.

It is not a coincidence that support for political violence is at a generational high at the same time we have a president who reminisces about the good old days when the political hecklers would be carried out in a stretcher and refers to his political opposition as vermin. 
Political violence isn’t unique to the modern America. It has been pervasive throughout American history regardless of who is or isn’t in office.

It's not a coincidence that the first time we've ever had a president refuse to concede defeat and leave peacefully is also the first time we have ever seen the US capitol overtaken by mob rioters and Congress being forced to evacuate instead of certifying an election.
Trump left office and Congress certified the election. An insurrection wouldn’t be people causally strolling inside the building. There was more damage caused by George Floyd rioters than these insurrectionists.

Nearly every single J6 rioter has admitted they were there because they thought Trump told them to be there, the guy who mailed the pipe bombs was specifically targeting the people Trump was attacking, and the guy who attacked Paul Pelosi did so because he was radicalized by Trump rhetoric.
Trump did not tell them to enter the Capitol building. Please find me the quote that says he did. Paul Pelosi’s attacker has a history of changing affiliations. We’re only talking about him cause his victim is famous. What about the countless Americans who lost everything cause Kamala Harris put rioters back on the streets?

People like you would pretend it's all just coincidence, but anyone who's ever studied the impact of political rhetoric saw all of those coming and warned us all for years. Trump not only ignored all of that, he's only turned it up higher. To say he's not doing this intentionally defies all credibility.
Campaigning has always been vicious. It is nothing new in American politics. There were people calling Presidents far far worse things in American history. Even if he is saying all of this intentionally, it is within his right to do so.

And if everything I've said was just TLDR for you, Google stochastic terrorism. It's not that complicated.
Ok

The false equivalences from Trump supporters is incredibly tiring.
Americans are fed up with hypocrisy whether you like it or not. It’s an effective talking point whether you think it is tiring or not.

First of all, I think you know Trump is guilty of at the very least some of the charges against him, unless you really think lying to the FBI about the nuclear documents you're hiding next to your toilet is legal.
Irrelevant. I happen to think the Archives didn’t do their job to begin with, and the statutes are unclear.

If you want to know why a top presidential candidate is being charged, look at that candidates actions, then ask yourself why the candidate isn't even attempting to argue the facts or the law in court.
Cause media, believe it or not, is not the arbitrator of truth. Neither you, nor I have the full information. The only people that do are the prosecutors and defense. You are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Either way, I don’t think it’s going to be a fair trial, especially in DC and NY where the jury pool will be tainted.

But setting that aside... Open fascist? If you know anything about how fascism actually works you would know that Joe Biden is the opposite of that in every way. You're clearly not being serious.
Lmao. Putting parents in jail for speaking at school board meetings. Investigating the candidate who is likely to be your political opponent. Putting grandparents in jail for decades for simply walking inside the Capitol while Floyd rioters roam free. Controlled media where journalists‘ questions are pre-planned (don’t even argue this one; everyone knows the media is biased towards Joe). Not to mention open censorship of conservatives.

As a last point, let’s analyze the quote by Trump in the first place: “We will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin.”

By disagreeing with this, you are in favor of let’s see: communism, Marxism,  FASCISM, and radical left thugs.

Where is “political opponents” mentioned anywhere in this quote?
Created:
2