Total posts: 17,895
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I don't know, really.The partner voting to rush him and me is also plausible, I just don't buy into it being WF due to how WF spoke in his first post and even in general. The way WF was sitting back after the conflict with me and then okay with Earth and me also added up to him being resistance.
You sadly cannot be on any Mission anymore. We have a chance to find the 3 resistance
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
How about we compromise. I don’t want you to be on the team but you have suggested players
Me, Oro, and WF.
Me, Oro, and WF.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
It shouldn’t take long, just read hypothetical strategies tbh if anything
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I don't townread Earth
It really doesn’t matter. If there’s a Spy action then we know for a fact that there’s a Spy in you two, leaving a 3-1 situation in the remaining 4 at the very least
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@Vader
@whiteflame
Y’all fine with Earth and RM?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I can't think of a reason to objectively prefer one player over another at this point, seems like following a plan designed to allow POE later in the game is the way to go.
+1
I’m fine with Earth and RM per my plan
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I think we should try something like
- 1 should lead 1+2
- if no sabotage, then
- 2 should lead 2+1+3
- if no sabotage, then
- 3 should lead 3+1+2+4
I think for the purpose of the game this should be fine. Only problem I see is if we ever want to make 6 ML over 1, it wouldn’t work. That’s why I suggest spreading it out so 4 can be ML and 1 can be ML with only 2-3 vote failures. Ofc if 14 is Spy then we just never put either on missions until we need a 50:50 shot later in the game. In that scenario 25x plays.
Created:
Posted in:
Scratch what I said above. After 14 go, it’ll be 41x with X being an agreed player. If it’s resistance in R1 ofc. The less people that play the better
Created:
Posted in:
Ok so the number of people going on missions changes each round 23434 in that order. So today gives us our strongest POE if it is a spy action.
I suggest going with SecretHitler tactic for this first round. Have 1 and 4 go on the missions. If it’s R yay, if it’s S, then we have POE. 25x go next with X being an agreed player
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Does the mission leader get to play too? Like if ML is a spy and he sabotages while the two companions are resistance choose resistance, would spies get a point?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Can you restate the points system for lazy people like me?
Created:
Posted in:
Hi sorry I’m out of town right now, I’ll try to check in more often now.
I really don’t care who goes on the mission. The game will probably become a massive probability brain teaser imo
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
also the one that needs to lose the most
Make her a 2x loser like Robert Francis O’Rourke?
Hell ya
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I’ll play, forgot to say /in
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Sounds kinda like SecretHitler
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Did you watch that 2014 clip? Russians were literally cheering in the streets celebrating the triumph over Obama.
That doesn’t count. Trump not knowing how to color is important
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Like I said, if laughter was the only bad thing we had to worry about, please bring Trump back again for god's sake please.
Russians, Europeans, and Chinese had a field day and were laughing in private. But hey, Trump can’t color, it’s the end of the world
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Liberals are revisionists. They already forgot about MLK’s core message.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I don't remember the rest of the world laughing much about US during his 2 terms, maybe you do?
Is that what they really thought, or were they doing it on purpose to make him look bad?
I didn’t see Putin take Crimea under Trump’s watch. I didn’t see a U.S. Ambassador die under Trump’s watch. I didn’t see the Russians violate the red line in Syria under Trump’s watch. What did Trump do that was embarrassing? Telling NATO to pay more? Standing up to the Chinese and Europe on trade?
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Nor Me.The OP was Post Obama.
Implying that nothing during and before Obama was embarrassing
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Well.Do you mean funny embarrassing, or excruciatingly embarrassing?
Ask OP
And of course, history is everything that has happened, not just the stuff chosen to be in history books.Do you or I know, even 1% of our respective homeland's real history.
I never claimed to know it
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
American history is pretty concise 250 to 450 years, depending upon where one chooses to start.And so inextricably linked with European history.So I'm not sure why you think that American history is such a mystery.
Exactly, so I’m sure you’d know some of our most embarrassing moments in history that were far more consequential than “orange man bad.”
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Ignore the person who doesn’t know American history here
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Cognitive dissonance doesn’t go well with these people lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
The mothers are strong and independent enough.
Not everyone can be Stacy Abrams, Governor of Georgia, elected 2018.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Nice but impossible.Humans aren't programmed to be that sensible.
It’s interesting that no one ever talks about the positive uses of guns. Turns out guns can save lives too. But hey, whatever can be used for state propaganda right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Still is my biggest problem with the Conservative party. Fight so hard for lower government restrictions yet fight to overturn Roe v Wade. Especially with the vaccine stuff they preached, hypocrisy.
Does preventing the deaths of thousands of babies, mainly black ones, justify government restriction on abortion? I would agree yes.
The main problem is that this should be a state issue, not a federal one. The justification for a federal limit on abortion is one grounded in mental gymnastics and frankly a non-scientific basis.
Roe v Wade and PP v Casey is set on arbitrary terms that scientists don’t even agree on. Life either begins at conception or when the baby comes out of the mother, not at 20 weeks or wherever the limit is right now. There’s no middle ground. Which side do you want to be a part of?
My body my choice doesn’t apply when your body isn’t in question. You have no right to harm the body of another distinct human being.
Created:
-->
@K_Michael
Sounds interesting but I have like 30 shows I have to watch or complete before lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
So when has the U.S. ever seriously attempted to regulate firearms?There are no real comparisons to be made.And for sure, if someone is intent on killing you, they will do so.Murderous intent isn't the issue though.
Are you advocating for the banning of all guns?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I’m talking about as a way to stop mass shootings, but you know that. Of course the right will care about drug use when people in rural America are dying from opioids.
People everywhere are dying of drug use. I literally live in an inner city for half the year and the amount of drug use is insane. I have zero ties with rural America. Drug use is bad either way.
And to stop mass shootings, identification is most important. His parents, friends, teachers, and peers didn’t know. It’s why I always reach out to people who I think may be having a tough time. Even a little thing can go a long way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I love how concerned the political right gets about mental health in the aftermath of every mass shooting. If only they cared about it at any other time.
Uh I think I do. Depression, Anxiety, Alcoholism, and Drug Use have gone up during the pandemic. All of those are mental health related issues.
But hey more lockdowns are on the table right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
Professionally speaking it was 100% unethical, but I would do the same for my brother. Job can go to hell. Family comes first.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Blacks will be treated absolutely equal to caucasians eventually, things are on the right track with US... Hopefully it will trickle down to lower-profile cases.
I honestly think it won’t. Humans just have an innate fear of the dark. It’s been that way for centuries because that’s how we evolved. Maybe external manifestations of it will go away, but internally, it won’t.
Created:
Posted in:
It’s sad. Mental health is a big problem in the United States, especially after the pandemic.
Created:
-->
@sadolite
OK then who in the entire federal judicial system would step up and do the job? I am not confused by anything but I do take note of your Trump Derangement Syndrome as I never mentioned anything about Trump. That's all you.
Lives in his head rent free lol. It’s hilarious
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
It’s a just a scare tactic at this point. My roommate always wears a mask when he goes out even though he’s triple vaccinated. I haven’t worn a mask ever since going to college with him and we share an apartment.
He literally has a higher chance catching COVID from me than from anyone else.
Then again he literally is a follower of authority. Fauci says I need to be sterilized, he’d do it without question lmfao
Created:
-->
@Bones
Well said!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Show me one piece of evidence that this was premeditated murder. Prove that Kyle intended to kill these people from the beginning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Benjamin
Thus, in practize, there is no armed militia capable of fighting tyranny in the US. If the government became tyrannical, any opposition would be slaughtered by the largest and most well-equiped military in the history of mankind.
I would heavily disagree. Look at Afghanistan and Vietnam for example.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
You think Darwin was wrong, too? No adaptability? I don't think you do.
Climate change activists remind me of Thomas Malthus.
Created: