Total posts: 17,895
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
No it doesn't. Math says we can only lynch x number of times, but it says nothing about when we should vote. This is a swingy game, and we have no idea what scum might or might not be capable of. That's why we need to lynch a scum today.
That’s scum logic. Probability matters. 2/6 shot vs 2/5 shot makes a difference.
Also, you were talking about a VTNL well before 420 was modkilled.
Yes, I was because of the swinginess. I was still open to voting if you read what I wrote, but you’ve been strawmanning the entire game so, I don’t expect you to talk about anyways.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I will pop on at 5pm and make a decision. If you are passionate about Pie being the lynch than you need to put together something to convince me. right now arguments like
He’s been grasping at straws this entire DP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
This seems lie a desperate made up reason to sus someone, especially when the focus should be on the fact that a cop claim was made at all. You probably asked for WF's justification because you were going to sus it no matter what.
I asked because Luna gave Cop as a fake claim to me and Supa in Invincible Mafia. Cop doesn’t guarantee that he is town by any means. You can look it up if you want.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Let me get this straight, Pie. There are really no people you would be comfortable lynching right now?
After 420 modkilled himself, no. Because math says out best chance is we lynch tomorrow and the day after. If we lynch here, we risk mislynching and forcing MYLO tomorrow.
And if there are, you're not willing to fight tooth and nail to get them lynched over a VTNL? You're usually pretty aggressive, so I wouldn't expect you to want to VTNL. That is, unless you are scum and have been cornered with no other out.
That’s not the way this works. Math says the best option is No Lynching here. I’m not cornered by any means. Scum want to mislynch here. They’re relishing the opportunity to mislynch me in particular. Notice how neither Disc or Mharman have even asked me to full claim. Just full blown lynch him for a “scum slip” that doesn’t even make sense.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Another thing I noticed is that Pie was sussing WF even before WyIted's sort-of-counterclaim.
Yes cause his justification was a stretch to me. I could hypothetically see it, but it was still a stretch for a Guard Post to be a Cop.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Ok, so this reminds me of the last game when Pie was scum, and I asked if he wanted to do a 1v1 lynch trade since he was "99.9% sure" I was scum. He derailed that by going on a long speech about how he wants to meet his win condition and getting lynched wouldn't help him do that. Obviously, everyone wants to meet their win condition, but he was missing the point of my argument.
Your point in that game was garbage. I wouldn’t 1v1 as town nor scum. It’s just bad play regardless of affiliation.
The point is, Pie tends to say obvious and vague things as scum (like "vote analysis matters") to cover for suboptimal decisions like VTNL. We can still do vote analysis without VTNL, and in this case not lynching favors scum.
No it doesn’t. Mislynching me favors scum.
If Pie says something obvious and condescending in response to a behavioral read instead of addressing the actual issue, be suspicious!
There’s no behavioral read here. It’s a made up scum slip. Scum weren’t given game information as Lunatic stated besides something like one of x and y roles exist in the game and other you can fake claim like he did in Invincible Mafia
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
If we lynch Pie and are correct, we may have to VTNL at some point after to help find the teammate. In this scenario, I’d still prefer to gain information sooner rather than later, and I’d rather delay VTNLing, hoping that we end up not having to.
So you’d like to sacrifice POE for a bunch of information that can be WIFOMed as you kindly pointed out for the reasoning why I wouldn’t vote WF
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Back to the present:Obviously because of 420 we will now have to VTNL at some point. Now or later?
Right now is better so we get 2 lynches on our terms with max POE. Whoever scum decides to kill also gives us information.
Well, to be honest, I still want to invest in future DPs by ensuring that we have as much information heading into them as possible. If we are wrong here and faced with a MYLO that we have to VTNL on DP2, then so be it.
So you want to VTNL when odds of catching scum are higher and vote when odds of catching scum are lower? Got it.
We’d be entering DP3 with a wealth of information, which is much better than VTNLing here and repeating the same discussions with a new flavor tomorrow.
Under my plan, in the worst case scenario, we have a 40% chance of catching scum. Scum love your plan because when they mislynch me here, an experienced townie dies and town is basically forced to VtNL tomorrow.
There is another reason, however: The chance of a failed NK. While there’s a lot of variables in this game and a lot is possible, I suspect there is at least one protective role among us. That player has the chance to shut down an NK and rebalance the numbers headed into DP2, which would be an ideal 5v2 at that point.
And they can do that even if we VTNL here, which only benefits our numbers because we get another POE opportunity out of it.
Of course, everything I’ve said above assumes we lynch Pie and is innocent, which I think is highly unlikely. It is something to think about for those of you who want to VTNL. You may be right that a VTNL is correct, but it doesn’t have to happen now.
A VTNL right now correct from probability perspective and an information perspective where unless the scum team is exactly Savant/WF, we have information, better POE, and a safety net in a mislynch.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
@Mharman
@WyIted
@Casey_Risk
I will admit this gave me pause for a moment. However it is entirely WIFOM. It means little because you were hesitant at a time when most were, and obviously being the only one to not show at least some form of pause is going to look very suspicious.
The only reason I was hesitant was because of the Cop claim. You were fine lynching him even after that. I could’ve joined you and Disc, but I chose to sleep on it and make a decision in the morning. And what do I wake up to? Scum Pie would have a blast lynching Town WF who is a claimed cop.
To anyone reading this: Remember when my top scum reads were Savant and Whiteflame? Let’s turn the clock back to that time so I can properly ask: What would a VTNL do in a world where Whiteflame and Savant are town?First, town is likely to enter a 6v2 headed into DP2. Not ideal. On top of that, Whiteflame would likely be dead, and Savant roleblocked, leaving him as the most likely lynch of the day. Another townie dead NP2, and town is facing a 4v2 MYLO. They are forced to VTNL for a second time, and are left with a 3v2 LYLO headed into DP4. The two VTNLs wouldn’t have gained much information, and all town would know is that they were wrong to accuse Whiteflame and Savant. But since Whiteflame was lynched in this timeline, no one can be easily held accountable for his death, since all five remaining players can say that they held off on lynching him. No one can easily be held accountable for Savant’s lynch either, given that the whole town would’ve been in agreement in that DP2. So town is left with a guessing game, and they need to be correct twice in a row.A perfect scenario for the mafia members who proposed the VTNL.
So I’m scum for proposing we VTNL instead of agreeing to lynch a claimed Cop because my plan was kill WF at night? #Logic
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
It just seems to me that there's little reason to VTNL. We want scum to be under pressure and at least fear the possibility of being lynched until the end of the day phase
What are you even saying? I’m not scum. And putting votes on VTNL or some yields important information for vote analysis in the future.
, and VTNL will just be the default if we don't lynch someone. No reason to end the day phase early and remove pressure on scum just to do what would happen by default anyway.
Vote analysis matters. Actively wanting to improve town’s chances of lynching tomorrow and the following day in light of a mod kill is optimal. We No lynch here, town gets 2 lynches on their own terms with far more POE and probability. We probability of mislynching today is far greater than tomorrow. And even if we mislynch tomorrow, we will likely have LYLO with max POE
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I don't see the point of engaging with that. If you aren't scum nothing I say is going to convince you that you are and if you are then you aren't just going to admit it so it would just become a fluff argument cluttering the next DP.
So you don’t think you should answer why you scumread me?
If otherwise want to see my reasoning they can go back and look at my previous posts, my break is over in 2 minutes. If we get an extension my second break might happen before DP ends.
Your previous posts don’t say much besides Pie might’ve been buddying me. My interpretation is that you believe Mharman. Then my follow up is why you believe him. Are you townreading him, and if so, why?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
See now you're just proving my point about trying to turn us against each other. I said he wasn't a safe town read, not that he was scum.
No. I’m asking the motivation behind breaking a townread on someone when you read them as null. It’s like you knew they were town and wanted to break the read.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Walked into a clusterfuck at work that I am actively choosing not to be part of so took my break early.
In your own words, please articulate why I’m scum
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I’m not against it. I’ll vote yes.
Why do you townread Whiteflame now?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
If an extension is wanted I can grant one if three or more people want it, since the day phase was stalled until I woke up. It would only be like a two hour extension max though since I got up fairly early
I vote Aye
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
So new math is 6-2. We mislynch now and scum NK succeeds it’s instantly MYLO, vs us No Lynching today and and scum NK succeeding puts us at 5-2, where there’s at least a little more POE, and we can lynch with more information (relating to Savant and WF)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
@whiteflame
@WyIted
@Casey_Risk
Here’s the problem with Mharman’s argument. Mharman believes I’m scum and Whiteflame is town. But that makes zero sense. If that were the case, I would’ve voted Whiteflame long ago instead of sitting there twiddling my thumbs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Okay, so 420 really threw a wrench in the works here. He's about to get modkilled, which will leave us with 6 town and 2 mafia. If we mislynch somebody today, that puts us at MYLO tomorrow, which is nuts. The consensus here seems to be that if we are going to lynch somebody, we lynch either Whiteflame or Pie. I'm not crazy about either of those tbh. I don't like the idea of killing WF due to him claiming cop (I realize that Wylted's role sheds some doubt on his claim, but it's still not a direct cc), and I'm not entirely convinced by the Pie train either. I really don't like the idea of being at MYLO DP2, which makes me think that maybe we should just No Lynch today.
A townie is already dead. Realistically the DP ends automatically on a modkill, unless Luna has some weird policy. No Lynch is optimal. We get information tomorrow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
As for picking Pie, my gutread on his behavior still leans town (frankly, I don't think he's likely to engage in this kind of uncertain play as scum), but some of his more recent posts have been confusing. He kept mentioning how people were derailing the vote when he didn't even have a vote down, proceeded to VTL me because he perceives me as the only other viable choice despite his prior concerns about lynching an un-CC'd Cop. My choice would have been to get a claim from Barney, but now that we have 3 full claims on the table (even if one of those is dead), I don't think it's beneficial to keep seeking more this DP. If it's a choice between a VTNL and lynching him, I'd prefer to lynch Pie, since he's moved into my null pile at this point. It looks like he's making this a heads up between the two of us in the end, so I don't think I'm being given much choice anyway. I'll wait for him to post before making a decision.
I don’t have a choice. Mharman’s logic is completely flawed. Disc seems to believe it for no reason. And Savant has been after me the entire DP. If it’s you or me, I know I’m town. I’m also fine with VTNL in light of 420 being modkilled.
Unvote
VTNL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I gave other reasons. It’s not just the slip, it’s everything else that in context of your slip, makes me believe it is a slip.
You have to think the scum team is exactly Pie/WF for your context to make sense. I’m definitely not scum. If I was scum, you’d have to assume I purposely forced WF to claim and made him state his justification, which has holes in it.
You seemingly townread WF based on your response as to what changed. So here’s the question. If Pie is scum and WF is town, why is Pie hesitating to vote WF?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
doubt
Brown version of church. It’s basically a cult. I’ll tell you more about it later
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I legit want to lynch savant. I am trying to control the impulse right now. What did he claim anyway, I forget?
He claimed an affiliation confirmable role that would be revealed tomorrow
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Just trying to get the lynch on Pie here.
Why? For a nonexistent scumslip? Did you even bother asking if scum were provided game information? Or are you just going to sit here and be pretty and lynch me for no reason?
Anyways. 420 is going to be modkilled and he’s obviously town. Who instantly sussed him earlier today? Savant.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@Discipulus_Didicit
@WyIted
I really do not want to lynch Whiteflame.
You were fine with it last night it. What changed?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Yes, not sure what to make of it TBH
It’s odd for sure. I think I know why he’s thinking the way he’s thinking based on what he just said
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Let’s just say it just makes sense.
Ok fair. I think I know what you mean. Either way. You can just ask Luna if he told scum anything about the setup—which he probably didn’t. I’m fine lynching WF over myself any day. Don’t forget that I was the one who even asked for justification to begin with.
VTL WF
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@WyIted
I think that he saw a warning of a potential bomb from Lunatic, and said “oh damn I gotta watch for that”…. Then, when the time came to say why he didn’t want to wait for your claim, the confusion happened and he slipped
Where did this talk of a Bomb even come up? This talk of a bomb is very interesting to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Could be Mharman and Discipulus_Didicit
I actually see this. The derailment is real
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Did everyone literally miss where I CCed him?I didn't even say it is a perfect CC but it should be discussed
Are you seeing the derailment I’m seeing?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Yup. New conspiracy theory just dropped... it's whiteflame and pie with pie pushing the no-lynch because he is defending his buddy.I'm cool with lynching either one.
Pie/WF makes no sense. I was the one that brought up the justification being weird.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Pie isn't going to vote for whiteflame... God knows why... probably whiteflame's scum buddy.
I said I’d sleep on it. I was the one that brought the justification up. Don’t forget that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
ATTENTIONI think I may have found a scum slip.—————————————————————Post #71: (paraphrased)Wylted: I’ll give you my claim next DPPie: No because Lunatic said the game could end NP1—————————————————————The problem? Lunatic never said that. I checked all of his posts up to that point. He said the game could end quickly for either side, but he never said NP1.
That’s correct, I assumed it could if he’s saying it’s that swingy.
I’ve been feeling that Pie was irrationally and unusually scared ever since he started to promote the idea of a VTNL, but this might be why.
So now you’re parroting Savant talking points?
The only real way Pie can say that Lunatic said the game could end NP1 is, hear me out:1. It were true.2. It was privately confirmed to Pie.3. That there is something potentially lethal to scum that Lunatic wanted to warn them about because he feels that it would otherwise be unfair; for example, a bomb.
I explicitly asked Lunatic if he gave fake roles/claims. He said he did what he’s done every game regarding that. This also doesn’t square with why I would want to No Lynch
That’s my new theory. In this context, a lot of the weird bacon from Pie that rubbed me the wrong way makes a lot more sense too.VTL Pie
Last minute push cause WF wasn’t getting votes?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
If this game is that swingy, that doesn’t mean town can lose NP1 like you fear. That’s likely mafia that can lose that quickly.
Debatable. But why mention the game will end quickly if it’s NP2.
The soonest I can see us losing is NP2. Knowing it’s a 9 player game, the soonest town can lose normally would be DP3, but I can see some weird stuff happening that allows mafia to end the game on NP2. I remember in another Lunatic game (MMA Mafia, where I was scum), Whiteflame and I abused it for the win.
Was that the Vote Thief game?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@Discipulus_Didicit
I know the point you both are trying to make. In an ordinary game, I would agree with you 100%. My only issue is Luna explicitly saying the game could end fast, which I interpret to mean DP2 or NP2.
I’m also still hesitant on lynching a claimed Cop. Granted that this could just as easily be a fake claim cause Luna gave me and Supa Cop as fake claim in Invincible I think. It was a choice between Cop or Doctor with Luna telling us one of the two was in the game and the other wasn’t.
The main issue for me is Guard Post. It’s not the first thing I would think of to make Cop. It makes more sense as a defensive role. Something like a redirector also makes sense just cause the troops in the post are annoying when attacking.
I’m going to sleep on it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@420-1776
Dark Lord.
That’s your category? I’m confused
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Information. I think a lack of a conclusion to this DP would be harmful to us. We’d fail to get the information from a lynch meanwhile mafia will have wiped a townie out of the pool. Sure, we’ll have night actions to look at, but mafia will have just used their own to help with their agenda. It won’t be much but a new flavor to the same discussions.
What information would a lynch bring? For example, let’s say we lynch Whiteflame. What information would you gain from that besides his character and role?
Barring something like a 3v1 MYLO, if I have the chance to lynch mafia at the risk of mislynching town, I will take it.
That’s different that mis lynching a possible Cop. My problem here is that Luna said the game was swingy meaning it could be over after 1-2 DPs. That’s concerning to me.
Ideally we’d see mafia get lynched this DP so that we have their numbers reduced along with the information to along with it, but if we lynch and are wrong, at least we didn’t stand there and do nothing while the scum team dictates the flow of the game.
I don’t think we’ve sat here and done nothing. We have meaningful information. Savant is supposedly confirmable. Whiteflame is possible a Cop. At the very least tomorrow, we will know if Savant is town or not
Sure, town has PRs they can use in the night and mafia has things they can say during the day. But the fact remains that town is strongest playing around the day phase and mafia is strongest playing around the night phase. Let’s play to our strengths.
We are strong, but thematic analysis isn’t possible without a split. That’s the main reason why I think a No Lynch makes sense here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
I will tomorrow.I don’t see it as yet in towns best interest to do a mass full claim. For one thing, the mystery messes with scum.
It’s not a mass claim. You’d only be the third person to full claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I absolutely hate the idea of VTNLing here. I hate it far more than a mislynch.
Why?
Created:
Posted in:
There’s one specific thing I’ve noticed based on what Wylted’s claim and my role that strengthen my view that WF is fake claiming. I don’t know if it’s a coincidence or if it’s a trend. I need to check Luna’s previous game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
How are male players supposed to perform without a fluff machine? 🤨False dilemma anyways. The lynch is inevitably going to be 420.
Can you please claim
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Is he as town as well?
I think so ya
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Really desperate to throw suspicion any way the wind blows, aren't we?
I just want his claim. Plus he tends to be a backbencher as scum. Gotta keep him honest. I’m still for No Lynching
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
What should I be looking at with barney to change my mind on that town read?
No scum hunting. Fluff. That’s off the top of my head
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I don't think savant would be this annoying as scum TBH.
Im getting TP Lyncher vibes from him, but if he’s saying he’s affiliation confirmable, he’s town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Yep, that's Pie's defense. Nothing of substance there.
I already responded to your case. It’s garbage and everyone recognizes that it’s garbage.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Barney and Casey could be scum, but I'm hesitant to pursue those options since Pie is going after them.
I’m not even going to respond to this since it’s idiotic.
Also notice that nobody else has jumped on the "lynch Pie" train, even though that would be a great opportunity for scum if I was tunneling.
That doesn’t mean anything. No one has jumped on a 420 train. It must mean he’s scum. Wow
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Lynching Pie is the safest option. I've already made my case against him, and he doesn't have a confirmable or important role.
Your case is garbage.
That makes him a safe lynch. Even if you don't think he's scummy, he's certainly not close to confirmed town, so going after him is preferable to lynching no one.
No one is confirmed town, and a lot of people townread me.
He's also harmed the lynch effort by pursuing people who claimed important roles or can be confirmed.
I townread Wylted and never wanted him lynched. I dislike WF’s claim but I want to leave him alive. I scumread you, but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt as well. There are at least 4 people ready to lynch you or Whiteflame right, and I could lead that effort, but I choose not to because No Lynch is more optimal at the moment.
He defends himself by saying "xyz is the Meta so we should do that" as a general cop-out, which is what he did last game.
What did I say that even remotely resembles that quote? You’re just grasping at straws.
I'm sure he thinks he's being "objectively townie" right now and that wf is "objectively scummy," but that hasn't been reliable before.
I’m confirmed townie from my POV. My behavior to me is always going to be townie, but I’m biased. Other people townread me except you. My position on you and WF is the same.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Kamala Harris or Biden is the only people who can stay in. Did you see the new leaked video of Trump on the golf cart? He seems to think he is running against kamala
They’re the only two with access to the money. Even then it’s still unclear and GOP groups are getting prepared to sue
Created: