"Excuse me, but we should not be using AI here."
"Ok, boss, but I am just training my little program to do basic tasks like finding the path of an intricate labyrinth."
"Calm down James, I know you are surprised by this. I am too. It's the new rule that some lunatic proposed online, and then someone took it in. But it is a rule nevertheless."
"For God's sake, we are an IT company!"
Also, the ranking discriminates against omega males. It is one thing to categorize, the other to put it in a hierarchy. I mean, have you tried ranking races of people over others? How's that?
Also, the so-called male hierarchy objectifies women, as how it is being described here. In all seriousness, given the amount of overpopulation everywhere and the need for everything else, "women" is not and should not be the top-most priority for all men.
Comments are for approaches that are way too valid to be invalid but if I accept the debate they will probably declare me an entire loss because I nitpicked.
Debates deserve a solid topic itself. Most topics are too full of holes(therefore too empty ironically). And debate topics are like a spherical bag of water, 1 hole is too many!
During the waning years of DDO, this would be considered above average. The average debate on DDO would be like "kanye west good iF you disagrre you gay lmao XD" "no u loL you are stoopid XD lmaoo" in 2021.
My mill grinds, pepper and spice;
your mill grinds, rats and mice.
My wife smells, like pure honey;
your wife smells, like bad money.
My chef cooks, with great care;
your chef cooks, with his hair.
I suspect that Pro is plagiarizing the argument. No one types an argument as lengthy as the first one when the other side forfeits unless they are waiting to copy-paste. Although this is just suspicion, I am not sure of it, and I will not blame Pro if it turned out that it wasn't.
"I think they realized they needed to touch grass :3"
Pro conceded here, or at least weakened his argument. Because Pro speculated that Con has already attempted to touch grass, the need may have been gone if Con has already touched grass, which Pro specifically mentioned the possibility of such a case.
"If that's true, then none of oromagi's resolutions mean anything"
Well, I suppose if all words are capitalized, then it is acceptable that they all mean the same as if they were lowercase due to them being styled the same. In this case, the "NO" stand out meaning that it is a choice of wording to include the capitalized version instead of that of the lowercase.
God can the same way a police officer can commit murder and arson. They can obviously do that, it is that they really, really don't want to do that, just that.
“Can” implies the possibility or the possession of an ability, and by that, I firmly hold the PRO position in that of course God can do that(if God exists as said), God just chooses not to do, just like I can crash a car or kill myself, I just choose not to do that.
I simply interpret topics as strings because they are presented as so, and when the opposing side insists this string means something, I prioritize analyzing the string itself and go from there.
It was back when I actually tried taking a debating class and on the last class I tried to be a little cheeky and got labeled “off-topic”. After that, I strove to argue what the topic is and only what the topic is so that it will absolutely never be off-topic, because, well, it is the topic itself, not some vague entity the opposing side thinks the topic is above.
So far, the captalized “NO” is enough reason for me to believe that what Pro thinks Pro is trying to argue is purposefully disconnected from what Pro made the title to be, even if it is an accident. But the title is set in stone, the Rosetta Stone of the ever-growing internet, and upon acceptance the mistake is way too late for correction.
When I have even just threshold motivation, I accept every topic that is obviously exploitable. If you ask why I don’t debate such as Whiteflame, it is because he makes his arguments, well, not so easily acceptable. Still, learning how topics can be exploited just based on how they are written is in my opinion a good strategy for new users, like I did for the past years.
“COVID Vaccines, means Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AZ.”
And F1 means Mercedes, Ferrari, Red Bull, Aston Martin, Mclaren, Williams, etc.
And consoles mean Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, etc.
And smartphones mean Apple, Samsung, Huawei, etc.
And fast food means McDonalds, KFC, Wendy’s, Burger King, etc.
And yes, you should always equate the products to the companies that makes them.
That is not possible, highly implausible at best. You would have to donate clothes, food, your kidney even, etc., to arbitrarily good causes. What does that left you with? Exactly.
Some people hate being called people. I know a guy on social media who dresses in a fox suit all day and refuses to label himself a person. Of course that is not the majority, but when there is a term called "transnigger", who is it to blame? Would it be no one? No one knows.
And yes, I consider furry people, because they have yet no reproductive barrier with people like me and you but do have one with other animals.
Yeah, and what do you think "as alcohol and nicotine are" is possible when the two are entirely different? That is like saying "XXX brand should make cars that are like F1 cars and missile-carrying trucks". Does it even mean anything?
Course. I am not someone who writes the RFD in comments and this is just a remark from what is basically a SW legends fan that doesn't change how tragic Anakin was.
Imagine a game show representing the non-capitalism of North Korea. Oh wait, it is just a prison.
"A guiding principle"
Why yes, George Washington only talked about one principle in this speech.
And the UN. And the Paris Agreement. Oh wait.
Well, the babies cry, so I am pretty syre humans suffer as they undergo birthing.
"I can kill the head of the opposing force with 1 dart only."
"Neat. But I still intend on using 13 of them just because I have them."
"Excuse me, but we should not be using AI here."
"Ok, boss, but I am just training my little program to do basic tasks like finding the path of an intricate labyrinth."
"Calm down James, I know you are surprised by this. I am too. It's the new rule that some lunatic proposed online, and then someone took it in. But it is a rule nevertheless."
"For God's sake, we are an IT company!"
Also, the ranking discriminates against omega males. It is one thing to categorize, the other to put it in a hierarchy. I mean, have you tried ranking races of people over others? How's that?
Also, the so-called male hierarchy objectifies women, as how it is being described here. In all seriousness, given the amount of overpopulation everywhere and the need for everything else, "women" is not and should not be the top-most priority for all men.
Winston was also the man who starved an entire India because he didn't want to waste money and food. "Masculine".
Comments are for approaches that are way too valid to be invalid but if I accept the debate they will probably declare me an entire loss because I nitpicked.
Debates deserve a solid topic itself. Most topics are too full of holes(therefore too empty ironically). And debate topics are like a spherical bag of water, 1 hole is too many!
“as alcohol and cannabis"
That is in of itself impossible. Let's just say, that a large portion of all bars, hotels, restaurants, etc. sell beer and wine but not weed.
"So, first off, white people have genes that makes their skins whiter, while African Americans have other genes that make their skins darker in tone."
*crowd boos*
During the waning years of DDO, this would be considered above average. The average debate on DDO would be like "kanye west good iF you disagrre you gay lmao XD" "no u loL you are stoopid XD lmaoo" in 2021.
The short description makes the topic a truism. You may want to change that.
My mill grinds, pepper and spice;
your mill grinds, rats and mice.
My wife smells, like pure honey;
your wife smells, like bad money.
My chef cooks, with great care;
your chef cooks, with his hair.
You are the same guy who proposes that we ban all porn for fear that children may access it. Do more than one guy run this account?
"shhh i'm saying the both of you are degenerates for taking this site so seriously you are proving my point"
I don't know about her, but because I am already a degenerate and I know it, I consider this realization or acknowledgement flattery. Thanks, I guess.
Let me guess. Without men, women can't reproduce, humanity dies.
Oh, what did poor Richard do to deserve this?
I suspect that Pro is plagiarizing the argument. No one types an argument as lengthy as the first one when the other side forfeits unless they are waiting to copy-paste. Although this is just suspicion, I am not sure of it, and I will not blame Pro if it turned out that it wasn't.
"I think they realized they needed to touch grass :3"
Pro conceded here, or at least weakened his argument. Because Pro speculated that Con has already attempted to touch grass, the need may have been gone if Con has already touched grass, which Pro specifically mentioned the possibility of such a case.
Your ground.
They are used for work and are unlikely to exit working in the foreseeable future unless we initiate an outright deletion of all AI worldwide.
That is the least polite way of saying “I waive.”
Who asked you?
What diseases are "like Alzheimers"?
Can anything be explained sufficiently?
No, this isn’t Toki Pona, and you would not call the current US president “Biden person.”
I prefer the idea being “Nitrogen monoxide god”.
Exactly.
"If that's true, then none of oromagi's resolutions mean anything"
Well, I suppose if all words are capitalized, then it is acceptable that they all mean the same as if they were lowercase due to them being styled the same. In this case, the "NO" stand out meaning that it is a choice of wording to include the capitalized version instead of that of the lowercase.
One of the most genuine compliments I have received over the past year. Flattery is intended to be exhibited.
God can the same way a police officer can commit murder and arson. They can obviously do that, it is that they really, really don't want to do that, just that.
“Can” implies the possibility or the possession of an ability, and by that, I firmly hold the PRO position in that of course God can do that(if God exists as said), God just chooses not to do, just like I can crash a car or kill myself, I just choose not to do that.
Why are they not e raised to the power of people? WHY?
I simply interpret topics as strings because they are presented as so, and when the opposing side insists this string means something, I prioritize analyzing the string itself and go from there.
It was back when I actually tried taking a debating class and on the last class I tried to be a little cheeky and got labeled “off-topic”. After that, I strove to argue what the topic is and only what the topic is so that it will absolutely never be off-topic, because, well, it is the topic itself, not some vague entity the opposing side thinks the topic is above.
So far, the captalized “NO” is enough reason for me to believe that what Pro thinks Pro is trying to argue is purposefully disconnected from what Pro made the title to be, even if it is an accident. But the title is set in stone, the Rosetta Stone of the ever-growing internet, and upon acceptance the mistake is way too late for correction.
When I have even just threshold motivation, I accept every topic that is obviously exploitable. If you ask why I don’t debate such as Whiteflame, it is because he makes his arguments, well, not so easily acceptable. Still, learning how topics can be exploited just based on how they are written is in my opinion a good strategy for new users, like I did for the past years.
What government? The Oceania government in Orwell's 1984? The ministry of magic in Harry Potter? The US government in reality?
And I gotta say, it does matter.
“COVID Vaccines, means Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AZ.”
And F1 means Mercedes, Ferrari, Red Bull, Aston Martin, Mclaren, Williams, etc.
And consoles mean Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, etc.
And smartphones mean Apple, Samsung, Huawei, etc.
And fast food means McDonalds, KFC, Wendy’s, Burger King, etc.
And yes, you should always equate the products to the companies that makes them.
This is effectively a truism. I mean, is helping oneself to get cool clothes and luxurious food not an effective social cause?
Doesn't matter.
I wasn't aware that cats can identify as people, but ok.
I am curious of exactly that there are even opposition arguments. I thought this was a truism lmao.
Infinite cases are possible, how are you going to outline what "half" is? Inf+inf = inf. This makes no dif lmao.
That is not possible, highly implausible at best. You would have to donate clothes, food, your kidney even, etc., to arbitrarily good causes. What does that left you with? Exactly.
Some people hate being called people. I know a guy on social media who dresses in a fox suit all day and refuses to label himself a person. Of course that is not the majority, but when there is a term called "transnigger", who is it to blame? Would it be no one? No one knows.
And yes, I consider furry people, because they have yet no reproductive barrier with people like me and you but do have one with other animals.
They are "people", not "people Too".
Yeah, and what do you think "as alcohol and nicotine are" is possible when the two are entirely different? That is like saying "XXX brand should make cars that are like F1 cars and missile-carrying trucks". Does it even mean anything?
"As alcohol and nicotine are"
You aren't asking for pharmacies, you are asking for bars.
Course. I am not someone who writes the RFD in comments and this is just a remark from what is basically a SW legends fan that doesn't change how tragic Anakin was.
The fact that someone considered Anakin a "disney" character already makes it a virtual loss. Anakin is not and will simply not be one.
Yes. Evolution eventually resulted in some dudes probably writing the bible, meaning it is plausible, meaning it is compatible.