Mein Kampf is actually good history material, for example. My English teacher literally recommended the book. He wasn't a Nazi of course, he is just an avid lover of historical studies.
It really depends on how you teach kids the books. You are not going to declare Mein Kamph the ideological epitome the kids are supposed to preach, you are going to use it as pure historical material, as it should.
Or...I don't. Most debates are "standard" here and a number of them is >=1week for argument time.
Either way, this update basically ruined my motivation. I am probably not going to be trying for competition here because it is often just not worth it.
...Until he realizes that the high school does not allow computers the same way it allows phones, meaning that typing arguments mid-week is virtually impossible. That is a new rule.
I firmly hold the opinion that the sentence is grammatically incorrect that it holds no technical nor practical meaning. Therefore, it means nothing, and cannot be "proven". It can be "disproven" though, by disproving the proposition that such a claim can be upheld at all. Unless the CON's BoP is to prove the inverse of the "sentence" if it even is one, Con wins by default.
This is one of those cases where the case itself can actually be decimated due to a misspelling. Yes, I know this isn’t a serious full-size debate, but never misspell your topic titles.
Taking the fetus out but killing it by a means other than just taking it out(terminating pregnancy) such as dipping it into HCl acid makes it possible for abortion to not necessarily be murder, even if we consider fetuses “alive” in all cases.
Just realized that my stats look probably like Mharman's as well. Good thing that my dad just bought a pot of herbaceous plant so now I don't even need to go out to touch grass.
Just to show you that proving such is an impossible feat. The best arguments involve bashing the other side, just like in the politics. Really a topic where no theoretical objective argument exists.
Confidential files about recorded history are, indeed history books. Now try to make them free. I dare you. Even if you really dare to do so, I bet that agents in more than one country will be out there to get you. And if you really do that, you--as the one who basically stole information--are the guilty one, not the agents protecting them.
Course you can, it is just it is not guaranteed to be a good alternative. I could just replace prisons with everyone with even the slightest of the petty crimes with instant liquidization on the spot so prisons are replaced with death penalty at large. It is suggested by me. Can it work? Technically yes. Does it? Maybe not, but still fits the topic.
Pretty sure this is already made "legal", 'though not 2 individuals, but two armed forces 100,000 and over each with a firearm in their hands and dull multicolored suits on them.
"Stem competitions are something that access creativity and those other factors unlike the testing."
Such as PhysicsBowl, BBO, USABO, AMC12, they only have multiple choice questions. By what margins do they prevail over what you consider "standard testing"?
To be fair, some STEM competitions like the AMC12 and UKChO and PhysicsBowl are basically standardized testing. By abolishing them you are just taking away things to do from kids good at science and math and stuff.
This is still minus the existence of math majors. Sure, biology majors aspiring to be biologists can intern at even HS level, but how can the university know that you know how to calculate with 3D matrices or to find the hamiltonian of anything? How does the university know that you know enough about general relativity and particle physics to assign you as a grad student to a particle accelerator?
Standardized tests should, for the most part, not be obligatory in the US(For example, AP exams, the SAT, the ACT, etc), but abolition is something else. By abolishing you are also taking away the right of those who knows how to actually benefit from them.
"Con has to prove that the Quran contains contradiction"
If Con tries to prove that the Quran indeed contains contradictions, that means Con proved the title to be correct, which is the opposite of what Con should do... especially when no explicit topic was given in the description itself either...
Looks we have different ideas of how debating skills work... Now that I know you definitely won't use it here, I will just open it up. You using this argument will lead to agreement by the opposing faction, rendering that the opposing faction in reality actually is arguing your claim as well! Opposing points would therefore be useful to justify your position.
Is anything directly based on the Bible that still survives till today?
Is anything not indirectly based on the Bible in the western portion of the civilization?
I would say that I don't know any instance that would say no to either, and I am 99% confident that the consititution is one of the ordinary objects subjecting to "yes" to both.
I have no problem with being sold in pharmacies, as long as they aren't issued as freely as medicine for the common cold. You shouldn't just stroll in and take it from the counter. Such drugs should require strict enforcement that will ensure they are only distributed to those that need it, in acceptable doses.
Well, this is a meme. This is the opening speech for a badly made scat gore video that was so badly made that after appropriate censoring it has become comedy material in both Japan and China. It is basically about two guys arriving at a restaurant but everything they serve there is made out of poop.
Wrong, you cannot pay an association, only members, just like you can pay the cellist of an orchestra but you can't just pay "the orchestra", you can pay the driver of the bus, not the bus.
Most of my thoughts are literally way too abstract for people to fall their eyes upon that they would automatically be regarded irrelevant although they are solid points to a possible interpretation. So as years went by I have learnt to type my first thought that works in the comments because everyone would regard me a troll, which I probably am.
The fact that you consider "metal beam abortion" and "tree trunk abortion" arguments in of themselves, let alone SEPARATE points, speaks volumes about how you didn't even read my argument clearly.
My conclusion was made in R3. Did you read any of that?
Pro. Standardized testing is like the only advantage I have here. Could you imagine if colleges look at my applications based majorly on how much charity work, sports team experience, popularity among students, etc. and decide on that? I wouldn't think about it.
Being famous is amoral. Not immoral, just amoral.
Well, there sure are rovers, I believe one of them was launched and it landed in 2021.
Mein Kampf is actually good history material, for example. My English teacher literally recommended the book. He wasn't a Nazi of course, he is just an avid lover of historical studies.
It really depends on how you teach kids the books. You are not going to declare Mein Kamph the ideological epitome the kids are supposed to preach, you are going to use it as pure historical material, as it should.
Or...I don't. Most debates are "standard" here and a number of them is >=1week for argument time.
Either way, this update basically ruined my motivation. I am probably not going to be trying for competition here because it is often just not worth it.
...Until he realizes that the high school does not allow computers the same way it allows phones, meaning that typing arguments mid-week is virtually impossible. That is a new rule.
How are you sure that the all married individuals are known within the human society?
The domain of a normal distribution(and therefore the student t-distribution, all of them) is infinite, BTW.
I firmly hold the opinion that the sentence is grammatically incorrect that it holds no technical nor practical meaning. Therefore, it means nothing, and cannot be "proven". It can be "disproven" though, by disproving the proposition that such a claim can be upheld at all. Unless the CON's BoP is to prove the inverse of the "sentence" if it even is one, Con wins by default.
This is one of those cases where the case itself can actually be decimated due to a misspelling. Yes, I know this isn’t a serious full-size debate, but never misspell your topic titles.
I hold the CON position. There are, so far, no “cucumers”, so banning them contributes to basically net no utility.
Taking the fetus out but killing it by a means other than just taking it out(terminating pregnancy) such as dipping it into HCl acid makes it possible for abortion to not necessarily be murder, even if we consider fetuses “alive” in all cases.
What kind of evolution? Surely allele frequency’s changes along a population inside an ecosystem violates nothing in the Bible does it!
Is responsibility possible to be assigned?
I challenge with my grandmother's roasted brisket she used to make when I was little.
I never said that it wasn't OK to have them lol. It just makes it funnier.
The millionaire's kid with an indoor garden smiles and carefully puts sleep to his gaming PC.
Just realized that my stats look probably like Mharman's as well. Good thing that my dad just bought a pot of herbaceous plant so now I don't even need to go out to touch grass.
Ad hominem and a Tu Quoque. LMAO
Just to show you that proving such is an impossible feat. The best arguments involve bashing the other side, just like in the politics. Really a topic where no theoretical objective argument exists.
Touched grass. It was poisonous. I got sick. 0/10 recommended.
Those are historically valuable. That said, you should have in every right defined what "history book" is.
What is Pro and what is Con?
Confidential files about recorded history are, indeed history books. Now try to make them free. I dare you. Even if you really dare to do so, I bet that agents in more than one country will be out there to get you. And if you really do that, you--as the one who basically stole information--are the guilty one, not the agents protecting them.
Course you can, it is just it is not guaranteed to be a good alternative. I could just replace prisons with everyone with even the slightest of the petty crimes with instant liquidization on the spot so prisons are replaced with death penalty at large. It is suggested by me. Can it work? Technically yes. Does it? Maybe not, but still fits the topic.
Well, sure no/body/ is gonna use it /one/ specific way.
Pretty sure this is already made "legal", 'though not 2 individuals, but two armed forces 100,000 and over each with a firearm in their hands and dull multicolored suits on them.
Not mutually exclusive. I forgot what the fancy word for this fallacy is, but I am pretty sure that the topic involves a fallacy here.
After that my AP testing week is over, I can finally find something else to do, here.
"Stem competitions are something that access creativity and those other factors unlike the testing."
Such as PhysicsBowl, BBO, USABO, AMC12, they only have multiple choice questions. By what margins do they prevail over what you consider "standard testing"?
To be fair, some STEM competitions like the AMC12 and UKChO and PhysicsBowl are basically standardized testing. By abolishing them you are just taking away things to do from kids good at science and math and stuff.
This is still minus the existence of math majors. Sure, biology majors aspiring to be biologists can intern at even HS level, but how can the university know that you know how to calculate with 3D matrices or to find the hamiltonian of anything? How does the university know that you know enough about general relativity and particle physics to assign you as a grad student to a particle accelerator?
Standardized tests should, for the most part, not be obligatory in the US(For example, AP exams, the SAT, the ACT, etc), but abolition is something else. By abolishing you are also taking away the right of those who knows how to actually benefit from them.
"Pro believes it doesn't contain contradictions and Con has to prove it does."
That is your statement. Con is supposed to disprove that using anything.
If I were you, I would be more careful in wording the very title of this webpage.
"Con has to prove that the Quran contains contradiction"
If Con tries to prove that the Quran indeed contains contradictions, that means Con proved the title to be correct, which is the opposite of what Con should do... especially when no explicit topic was given in the description itself either...
Looks we have different ideas of how debating skills work... Now that I know you definitely won't use it here, I will just open it up. You using this argument will lead to agreement by the opposing faction, rendering that the opposing faction in reality actually is arguing your claim as well! Opposing points would therefore be useful to justify your position.
You do you, but the thing is that you can actually win by arguing what I said.
Is anything directly based on the Bible that still survives till today?
Is anything not indirectly based on the Bible in the western portion of the civilization?
I would say that I don't know any instance that would say no to either, and I am 99% confident that the consititution is one of the ordinary objects subjecting to "yes" to both.
I have no problem with being sold in pharmacies, as long as they aren't issued as freely as medicine for the common cold. You shouldn't just stroll in and take it from the counter. Such drugs should require strict enforcement that will ensure they are only distributed to those that need it, in acceptable doses.
"We have learned" no sir I have not.
Well, this is a meme. This is the opening speech for a badly made scat gore video that was so badly made that after appropriate censoring it has become comedy material in both Japan and China. It is basically about two guys arriving at a restaurant but everything they serve there is made out of poop.
I think you meant "vvvv" instead of "^^^^", because on this site, more recent comments are placed on the top.
Disallowing abortion for rape victims benefits no one except the rapist.
Wrong, you cannot pay an association, only members, just like you can pay the cellist of an orchestra but you can't just pay "the orchestra", you can pay the driver of the bus, not the bus.
人间の三大欲求は、食欲、性欲、睡眠欲。その中でも食欲は人によって生命维持のために必要报道であり、动物系においては快感を本当らしい。优先して行动するようプログラムされております。食事を取ることにより、満足感、また、美味しいものを食べることにより、喜びは精神上好ましい影响を与えます。また、そのあくらく追求に情热を倾ける方々が存在します。それを一般的に食中と呼びます。とレストランではその世の中には様々なウイングなものを饱きてしまわれた方々が、素质の方々にふさわしい食材を提供しております。
That is exactly why I don't go to beaches unlike most of my 'friends'. Strangely, this opinion budded before I even watched Star Wars ever.
Only the Prequel Trilogy? Not even Return of the Jedi, let alone canon comic issues? That is a hard handicap, oof.
Most of my thoughts are literally way too abstract for people to fall their eyes upon that they would automatically be regarded irrelevant although they are solid points to a possible interpretation. So as years went by I have learnt to type my first thought that works in the comments because everyone would regard me a troll, which I probably am.
If that weren’t a joke, I would have accepted the debate.
For reference, for the last segment, replace the 3rd line with:
System.out.print(t1 == t2);
And it would still return False.
String t1 = "0.99999...";
String t2 = "1";
System.out.println(t1.isEqual(t2));
Guess what it will print? False.
The fact that you consider "metal beam abortion" and "tree trunk abortion" arguments in of themselves, let alone SEPARATE points, speaks volumes about how you didn't even read my argument clearly.
My conclusion was made in R3. Did you read any of that?
"Are you Pro or Con on this particular subject?"
Pro. Standardized testing is like the only advantage I have here. Could you imagine if colleges look at my applications based majorly on how much charity work, sports team experience, popularity among students, etc. and decide on that? I wouldn't think about it.
That is my bad, I thought most of the userbase was American. Sorry.