Total posts: 3,954
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You know the people you see in dreams are not actual consciousness.
I don't. What if you are dreamin'? What if I am just a manifestation of your deepest and darkest fears? You don't know. If you can prove it, do so. If you can't, well, I will consider you convinced.
Created:
-->
@3RU7AL
The entire reason I have wrote this is that I assume Wyited will just assume this means "everyone except him" due to that since he dismiss my logic-based language as "retarded pussy language" or something, I assume he would interpret everything in common sense, which is what this would mean to almost anyone else. In that case, he has essentially hit himself with the foot by not understanding what I have meant.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You must like Chiang Kai Shek then. Is that it?
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You have no ideal how much I dread knowing it's quite possible I am literally mentally retarded, but everyone around me is too polite to tell me.
So you go around mocking other people for their way of writing on the internet and even their national identity because that is TOTALLY how you deal with the problem and not make it worse.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I never said I don't understand you. I am telling you how judges interpret this stupid wording and no not all judges will comprehend you. This isn't about my comprehension, but judges who a lot may be embarrassed to admit they have difficulty understanding your stupid sentence construction.I wouldn't normally give somebody shit for this but I am pretty sure you are a native English speaker who should know better
State one judge that had the same problem against me. One is enough.
I am Chinese, and not a native English speaker. How does it feel when a Chinese kid can use English in more ways than you? It means you can do better?
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Reading problems are problems of reading. That is how English works. No contention on that. If you don't understand how English works, maybe I can send you some resources.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
"If you do have a reading ability, let me know so I can make the text more understandable"
You are understanding it, see? You are doing a good job. I recommend that you keep doing it, no matter how much you complain. Being able to understand external individuals is definitely useful, both emotionally and even semantically.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
At this point I am almost certain that you don't want to understand me.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Not even I understand what Ebuc writes. Nobody does except for seemingly him.
On the other hand, almost all the site members can understand me, except for you. If you have any problems of reading, tell me.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
If you do have a diagnosed reading disability, then tell me. I will attempt to facilitate the direction of my text so they can be interpreted with ease. However, throwing an internet tantrum over what someone else has written as short as this, that can be possibly avoided in trade of a clearer atmosphere in this already small and expected-to-be clean webspace, unless you also have anger issues diagnosed also.
I am not joking. If you really have mental issues, I will take into account that.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
So far, nobody else has said anything about how anything I have written on this side is arduous enough worthy of complaining. Maybe it is your problem, not mine.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Eh… no comment on that. You can live yours, and I should be able to live mine.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
The reason for this is that you have a very disconnected way of thinking. You also will say stuff in weird ways that could be said without losing meaning in less retarded ways, obviously judges will punish this for you. Your IQ barely reaches 3 digits which makes it hard for you to be creative with arguments as well as reduces your ability to comprehend what your opponents are stating.
No, I lost that debate purely because I wasn't funny enough and I didn't see the hidden objective till R2. Humor is subjective and if they don't consider it funny, maybe it is not...
But humor is subjective too. I guess it is mostly that I have completely wasted my R1 without putting my funny points into it.
And I am not trying to be stupid, nor am I one. Just for clarification. Most smart people don't just call other people stupid, and Hawking does not brag about his IQ.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You realize that the PMs are a thing right. Publicly insulting me while I am being 180 over your this account and about 250 over your few other accounts will just make you look worse. If you think I suck at debating, the best way is to instigate one and see just how bad I am, not to publicly ashame me. Also, there is always a reason why I block people, and this time it is not a mouse misclick.
Created:
I believe a non-serious debate should be that the goal of the debate is clearly not or implied to not be what the description says. The Chuck Norris Debate was not who wrote the most practical argument but the funniest. Being someone who used Kritiks as ricin darts, it is really hard for me to write something funny and practical.
Rap battles and song battles are essentially “who can put up the best song/rap here”. The equivalent would be “Funny/Joke battle” where the purpose that is funniness is stated in the description and topic. For debates like this where the hidden goal is not of the topic, I believe should be looked into for unrated shifts.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Rap battles and song battles don’t really count as non-serious debates and I believe your rating gains due to those are completely justified. It is just non-moderation and rated debates shouldn’t exist at one place. If it is rated, it should be moderated, or it can be changed to an unrated status.
Created:
Sorry, there was a typo. That debate's opponent was Conservallectural.
Created:
A few days ago, I got chopped off ELO points for tying the Chuck Norris debate with Conservellateral. First off, why does my ELO change for tying? Shouldn't it stay constant as long as it is a tie? To think a debate as honorable as one ending up on the report of DART Bard, I believe this is a serious concern.
The user ComputerNerd voted on that debate against me, claiming that I was not as funny as Pro whilst providing not even a mention of how I am being unfunny. I reported that vote because I don't think that vote explains thorough enough to be valid(I don't think he is voting against me on purpose though), but the mod's response is simply that this debate is a joke debate, so votes are not moderated. Keep in mind that this debate was RATED. What this means is essentially that vote wars on a rated but non-serious debate would be technically allowed, and provably malicious behaviors, disguised as just sub-sufficient harmless votes would technically be tolerated, meaning that such debates on DART are no longer guaranteed to be just anymore, since voters can just manipulate the winrates of both debaters without either of them getting any say. Sure, maybe this site is small enough that such cases has not happened yet or is not big enough for a serious concern, but it still bothers me.
I propose either of the two.
- Mods should be ready to moderate any debate votes and remove insufficient ones as long as the debate is rated;
- OR Mods should be able to change a joke/non-serious debate from rated to unrated if so, if they think moderating such debates will be too hard.
In that case, either insufficient votes are being removed justly or that informal humor are automatically ineffective to one's ELO rating as soon as such is spotted or called for by reporting as seen by mods. I think this is a good idea.
Either way, that debate should have never affected my ELO points, positively or negatively. It was lighthearted and it was a tie. If you guys have a justification on why a tie results in ELO trading, then tell me here. If you disagree with me, then comment here as well. Just please don't personally attack me for anything I have said and done, and it is fine and I will take them on with a normal heart.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Religion should not be facilitated even through presidency and governmental actions. No one should tell you "You should believe in Jesus" or something out of the blue because this is almost close to violating the 1st amendment or as it seems.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Who is saying he isn't? Well, I don't think he is lying anyways.
This is as uncontributive as those "Bro, who asked" bonk fillers you see in other social media. Seriously, uh, maybe I should take this post as purely to boose post count?
Created:
I got INTJ on this, for some reason. Luckily it is not one of those things where you have to pay like $69.99 to get a result or something.
Created:
Posted in:
Not lying though. Hitler changed people's lives too. The white people into a nationalist hell and the others into the same thing, if you remove “nationalist" from the term before.
Do we want such things? Probably not. Did they change peoples' lives? Yes.
Created:
IDK if this is what we are doing here, but I am ENTP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
"politicism"
Do you have an idea how little that narrows it down?
Created:
-->
@sadolite
This site is not trying to make money. Well, maybe it is, but it is not like they need to protect copyright or anything.
Created:
-->
@coal
Government does not solve problems. It creates them.
*Some* governments solve problems, others create them. For example, Roosevelt probably solved more problems than created, and the opposite can be said about, for example, Pol pot.
Created:
-->
@coal
People who argue against restrictions on gun ownership or use rights tend to be less stupid than the general population.
China has the most population in the entire world within a country.
Most people in China argues against gun ownership.
China holds one of the smartest average IQs in the world.
Your point being?
Created:
-->
@coal
Most atheists tend to be psychologically and psychosocially infantile, compared to their religious counterparts.
Do you mean those people who can prove there is no god, or do you mean people that are too dumb to care? Because the former seems not and the latter seems yes.
Created:
-->
@coal
Islam is not a religion of peace.
I disagree. This is not an unpopular opinion. It has been held by generally most western countries as well as Eastern Countries as well. Pretty much everyone excluding those in the middle east and northern africa and maybe some part of the mediterranian Europe disagrees with them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Uh, is that what the Ancient Greeks and the Ancient Romans do?
Created:
Because the transferring of ownership is extremely hard and the original owners simply forgot, so the ownership goes nowhere. Kinda like if you forgot your Apple ID and password simultaneously. You can’t sign in to anything and you can’t sign out.
Created:
Posted in:
This post was made in the Misc category because it discusses something never tried and the world operates fine without any trials of it.
To be fair, this is the only thing I can think of when someone mentions "senatorialism". https://tse3-mm.cn.bing.net/th/id/OIP-C.dKj29vc7tMDptJj4uy2C8wHaDJ?pid=ImgDet&rs=1
Still don't know why I think of anything about it, and why anyone mentions it.
Created:
Unpopular opinions will either die out immediately or they become as popular as that after an indefintely amount of time, it will become "popular" and the inverse of that will become unpopular, so unpopular opinions will eventually lose their purpose.
Created:
Posted in:
Ah yes, brainwashed poor people mindlessly rejecting communism in place of capitalism just because it is America... That is almost slavery.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Doesn’t change the fact it is poisonous and unhealthy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
cannibalism is not good, it may lead to prion. It is based on genes and mutations and it has no cures as of now. don't eat anyone, even if they are rich or even billionaires.
Created:
If Juggle LLC doesn't exist anymore, what is Airmax working for?
Created:
Posted in:
Damn, collecting 6 pages in less than 12 hrs. I don't know enough US politics to comment on this issue, but that is not something you see everyday.
Created:
-->
@Kritikal
I wouldn't say this if I were to smother pie on a painting. Not saying I will though.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Wow, that sounds crazy. What does that mean again?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@USBurning
Juggle, LLC is a mobile application that connects recruited college students with busy families looking for babysitters, pet sitters and more. This unique platform allows users to see who their friends have used and reviewed, designate favorites, and pay through the app. Juggle helps busy families live their best lives.
You are telling me that DDO was owned by THIS?
Created:
Posted in:
Do you prefer picks, pickles, pickled picks, or picked pickles?
Created:
Posted in:
Do you prefer toasters, refrigerators, toasted refrigerators, or refrigerated toasters?
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
A bit of correction here. It is not "Invasion". It is reunification if it is anything at all. Taiwan has always been a part of China since 1912. Also, I generally refrain on debating on issues regarding China because most evidence that are written in English tend to be Western and Anti-China biased and if I have to bring any evidence, chances are that maybe most of you guys don't know how to read it. Yeah, google translate works, but not quite.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
If one is to put within sleep and cannot ever wake up again after that, that would be classified as "death". a "death" that can be reversed and is not permanent is classified as "sleep" in my own perspective.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
@Reece101
Yah, what’d that convey?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Judging from what you are saying, America isn't "safe" either for you.
If you think I will keep staying in a so-called "authoritarian hell" or something just leave me be. You are free to think that America is better and I am free to think too.
Created: