Kaitlyn

You are the one that wants to separate whites and blacks by states....right?  Lol

You really need to stop with this victim-blaming line of argument because it's not convincing and it's super toxic.

I am specifically addressing the hyper-repetitive spamming of the same highly provocative claims over and over and over and over and over again.  SInce the topic is always the exact same, why not just add information to a single forum.  Why the super needy, super provocative repition?  It really drags down the tone of the whole website.

Your compulsive repititon is the source of toxicity here.  Please grow up and exhibit stronger self-control.

No positive or successful examples are coming to my mind or Google searches yet.

Though I haven't Googled that much yet.

We get it:  you hate black people.

Do you really have no other topics, interests, hobbies, information going on in your head?  It seems you like you are suffering from some kind of racist OCD and irrationally hell bent on inflicting your nasty spam on the residents of this site.  Race and racial differences are legitimate topics on this site

Some true statements can also be racist.

I 'do think you'd have more success with average people,

In framing it as people having governments and laws that represent themselves,

Rather than we don't like X people.

Though really near everyone dislikes 'some type of X people,

And a number of laws exist for 'some X people,

Though usually for cultural/nurture reasons,

Example, criminal X people, like child molesters being restricted from certain locations or having to self report to their neighbors.

Hm, not much information on Wikipedia about New Africa,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_New_Afrika

Doesn't seem to have 'lasted all that much in popularity though, I think.

"The RNA’s popularity and influence diminished with most of its leaders in prison, but it still claims a membership of 5,000 to 10,000. Its headquarters have been moved to Washington, D.C."

https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/republic-new-africa-1968/

"On July 1, 2013, Chokwe Lumumba was sworn into office as mayor of the city. After eight months in office, Lumumba died on February 25, 2014. Lumumba was a popular yet controversial figure due to his prior membership in the Republic of New Afrika, as well as being a co-founder of the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson,_Mississippi

I'm not familiar with New Europe,

Though it looks more a coalition of European countries based on geography and keeping against military aggression,

Rather than politics, purity?

Aztlan,

Seems more a myth or historical theory of where the Aztecs migrated from.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztlán

My study doesn't conclude that victimization is the reason transgender people commit suicide/have suicidal thoughts.

Of course not, because as I’ve pointed out now half a dozen times already, there is nothing that would qualify as “the reason”. Suicide amongst the population is a complex subject and there are multiple factors at play for any and every category of people. Why do you continue to pretend this is not a fact? 

Firstly, "common sense" is a tautology that I've already called out in this discussion.

It’s not a tautology because it’s not being offered as a logical argument. I refer to certain things like common sense as a way of saying that this conversation has been dumbed down to the point where I see no interest in arguing further.

If you can’t figure out how telling people that they are delusional and mentally ill to the point where their own wishes regarding how they are addressed should not be respected - is the opposite of treating them with dignity and respect… then you’re on your own. You can argue that we are not acting in their best interests to do so, which you have tried to even though you have provided no alternative, but that is a separate issue.

Secondly, you need to give reasons as to why we should respect their gender identity. That's the burden of proof you need to fulfil, elsewise you haven't proven there are good reasons to respect their gender identity

It doesn’t have to be proven, that’s the point. The default position in any civilized society is that we treat others the way they wish to be treated until it comes at a cost to others or to themselves. So the burden is on you, not anyone else, to demonstrate the harm. All you have come up with is a half baked case that they are mentally ill without even defining what qualifies one as mentally ill in the first place or why your definition of mental illness is one that anyone should care about.

Your overcomplication is nonsense.

This is a really basic principal of science. Your referring to it as overcomplication is quite hilarious and clearly demonstrates the problem here.

During the roaring 20's (i.e. economic boom and great wealth generation), crime increased, but as soon at the Great Depression took hold, crime rates actually went down (the opposite of what your hypothesis predicts) #2 - Homicide in the United States, - Full View | HathiTrust Digital Library Crime and the Great Recession | The Great Recession Effects (city-journal.org) 

Interesting read indeed! 

There is so much information. I find it interesting that the roaring 20's - the prohibition ERA - well known corruption in law enforcement saw a great decrease in crime. Who knew making America's past time a crime would some how shift crime away from murder, theft, etc. to supplement the people's needs. Maybe it was bad for business? 

Anyways the last article is interesting. Their conclusion is abortion and increased imprisonment decreased overall crime rates, while same time disproving other factors. Including poverty. Anyone correct me if Im wrong. That is what is suggested yes? 

The decreased and increase in crime is influenced by decrease and increase of incarcerations and abortions. Lets take a closer look into these things. 

https://givingcompass.org/article/the-demographic-breakdown-of-women-who-are-getting-abortions 

This article claims poverty is #2 reason for abortion because the women "cant afford" having a kid. 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresaghilarducci/2021/12/24/59-of-women-seeking-abortions-are-mothers-facing-high-poverty-risk/?sh=21a44913264f

59% of women who seek abortions are already mothers;

-       Women who seek abortions are more than three time as likely to be poor; 49% are poor while the national poverty rate is about 12%;

-       75% of women who seek abortions are low income

https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/incarceration-and-poverty-in-the-united-states/ 

While it is difficult to ascertain whether poverty makes someone more likely to commit a crime, data show it does make a person more susceptible to being arrested and more likely to be charged with a harsher crime and to receive a longer sentence. Adults in poverty are three times more likely to be arrested than those who aren’t, and people earning less than 150 percent of the federal poverty level are 15 times more likely to be charged with a felony

https://www.irp.wisc.edu/resource/connections-among-poverty-incarceration-and-inequality/

Some researchers find links between high incarceration rates among men of color and policy changes that criminalized social problems experienced by many people living in poverty (who are disproportionately people of color). These challenges include homelessness, mental illness, and drug or alcohol problems. The result, these researchers suggest, perpetuates poverty and racial inequality both within and across generations.[5]

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/links-between-mass-incarceration-and-poverty

Although causes of crime are layered and possess multiple factors, we should still be able to see how poverty and inequality are included as factors for crime. 

None of the effect sizes between crime and poverty could be considered strong or even moderate. A meta-analysis of 153 studies found the effect size to be .253 (weak correlation) with only 59% of the studies being statistically significant Assessing Macro-Level Predictors and Theories of Crime: A Meta-Analysis on JSTOR 

I followed the provided link to read this:

Across all studies, social disorganization and resource/economic deprivation theories receive strong empirical support; anomie/strain, social support/social altruism, and routine activity theories receive moderate support; and deterrence/rational choice and subcultural theories receive weak support.

What is your take on these sentences? 

Also real kicker. Disappointment. Cant access information. Oh darn. I guess this is further evidence for @KichiroMS

Lol, 3 pages of Fanchick go brrrr.

You probably still got wedgies in college.

Ha, back to that again, you’re just flailing now! Are wedgies some kind of big humiliation thing in your crap  country along with having a tiny GDP?

I'm going out. Bye

Have a good night loser. Go buy yourself some more “teen sized, highschool clothes” tonight. Lol

Awww looks like I struck a truth!

It’s struck a nerve, you dummy. I’m really starting to doubt you ever went to college.

I'm actually proud I can still fit and wear my old teen sized clothes.

Alright, good alternative to “highschool” since you can’t bring yourself to spelling it correctly. Lol

That's more embarrassing than the wedgies you probably got daily at school xD

Keep trying to walk on your hind legs little doggie.Lol

Poor baby girl. Am I too rough on you?

Did you read the article on how so many women have body image issues? It’s those damn magazine covers that create standards average women can’t possibly meet.

I made you walk back from the term "overweight".

Literally laughing out loud. I can’t believe you went back to that. You see, to look strong you have to come up with new attacks. You are an amateur.

Who cares?

Haha, a woman with an ego. Just like  a dog walking on two legs! People are surprised to see it and it isn’t done very well.

What part of that don't you believe? That's how it goes for most people.

No, high school is definitely spelled as two words for most people.

You continue to make stuff up.

Hey, I don’t even believe Kaitlyn is your real name. It’s probably some fantasy American name you wish you had.

Nope. My mom bought my clothes in highschool from proper stores, and I buy mine now from the same stores and some others.

of course. We all believe you in our own way. And again, what country is high school spelled as one word?

I have no idea what you're talking about by "the incident".

Yes, that is the best way to deal with it. Although some counseling could be beneficial. You don’t want to end up like E Jean Carroll, do you?

Teenage size clothing is literally too small for a big butt. T

Well in your country people mostly dress in used clothing sent from the U.S. 

Oh right I remember you saying you don’t use porn or “happy toys”. Probably because you have been frigid ever since “the incident” in college 

Women who have a big butt can't fit into their old highschool clothes

They can if they had a big butt in high school. That explains your lack of success in attracting a mate.

You're the one who keeps mentioning my weight and height. Again, my weight is well within the healthy range for my height. 

I notice you keep using the words ‘healthy weight’ and “range” instead of attractive weight. Kind of like a dog or a farm animal. Why is that?

You've dropped the argument that I'm overweight and I'm close to my expiration date. Everyone saw that. I love beating clueless losers like you.

I sent a good article to help you deal with your body image issues. But the whole not being married, no children thing is going to take more time, perhaps some counseling. Just because you have a big butt and a flat just doesn’t mean you can’t find a man with the little time you have left.

Here, maybe this will help you with your body image issues. Always remember you are not the only woman out there with these insecurities.

https://www.health.columbia.edu/content/body-image-concerns

5'10

Is that in heels? Last time you said you were 5’9”. Which is it? People who aren’t American tend to have stunted growth from malnutrition. So you are likely exaggerating your height anyway to have some sense of attractiveness.

Haha walk it back because you realize you were wrong

Nonsense. You weigh 142 lbs. and anything over 120 is too much. Most of that weight is in your hips and butt. That is the reality for you and most women.

Overweight women have larger breasts because fat is distributed there, too. It's impossible to be overweight and have A cups.

 But it is possible to have a big butt and a flat chest. I knew girls in college built like that

 with an expiration date that is fast approaching.

You’re not getting it. You are White Trash

You don't appear to have any understanding of female biology at all. That's why you imply I'm overweight whilst saying that I am flat-chested

Ya, there are no flat chested women with big butts in the world. Right. It’s obvious being overweight really bothers you. Why don’t you just eat less and exercise?

Like the other conservative losers on this site, you are so intimidated by my success you have to deny it is real so you won’t feel bad about your pathetic lives. For you it’s especially bad because you’re a female racist and not American. Not married, no children and your expiration date is no doubt fast approaching. 

Meanwhile, there was a study which performed analysis of over half a million Swedish people looked into income levels and future criminality. They looked specifically at crime rates between poor kids who stayed poor into adulthood, and poor kids who become wealthier as they aged. For both groups, the criminality rates were virtually the same. This shows that poverty isn't a cause of crime, but rather a correlation http:/bjp.rcpsych.org/content/early/2014/08/14/bjp.bp.113.136200.abstract 

Site does not allow access. Also this is to a magazine. We need something that is easier to access like this link. 

https://journalofeconomicstructures.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40008-020-00220-6 

Study provided by journal of economic structures looks into multiple countries and multiple statistics to see if results can be viewed across multiple countries. A serious benefit considering not two countries will experience the same economic/social environment. Policies will differ along with the practice of justice/law. 

Sweden carry more socialist policies. Today the difference between incomes is not as large as it is in US or other countries. What govt. considers to be poverty may not be the same in other countries. There are many factors that can influence a study's conclusion, but we can not see the study to determine how it influences the discussion.  

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33197093/ 

In this study, researchers break down poverty as something a person can leave, fall into, have chronically, and more. Those who had fallen into poverty had a higher risk in using drugs to cope with their misfortune. 

If this study translates to american experience, then those in poverty would be more likely to do drugs, which is a crime. Still the goal is to recognize different aspects about poverty and how to research it. 

I'm doubtful one could get the rest of America to support legislatively forcing people out of land they have lived in for generations,

(Well, modern America, and maybe, and maybe again depending 'what people)

I suppose one could try making life for an ethnicity unpleasant, until they leave,

Such as holding Nazi flag parties or something,

But again, I doubt anyone could convince enough racists, to enact such a plan, assuming it could even work.

I'm doubtful one could even gather enough racists to make a sizeable number of functioning number of interconnected communities,

Though I suppose one might argue parts of America are already like that, where sizeable numbers of various ethnic groups live among their own ethnicities,

Eh, so maybe one could make small versions work,

Something the size of a state seems doubtful to me though.

Firstly, IQ is a proxy for intelligence, and it's by far the best by far because it has a ton of predictive validity. I.Q. Validity (debateart.com) I.Q. attempts to determine g factor (generally intelligence) by using g loaded questions (i.e. questions that test for mental ability, avoiding knowledge tests wherever possible). So, when someone scores poorly in a test, unless they're badly sleep deprived or intoxicated, it's a mostly accurate measurement of their intelligence, and that intelligence is mostly heritable.

Anyway, I'll explain it again. I was refering to the intelligence written in the DNA, not the intelligence that is developed by the person which can effectively be measured by a IQ test. The point is that environment plays a huge role in the development of intelligence. But even so, the way the person faces the IQ test can influence the final score as well, because of something called the Pygmalion effect. So, I pose the question, are blacks getting bad results in education because of the prejudices against them? My guess is a big yes.

Secondly, intelligence is impacted by environment, but I.Q. is roughly 80% heritable (leaving 20% to environmental impacts -- happy to expand upon this point if needed). Poverty has virtually zero impact on intelligence, unless the child is severely malnourished (which is exceedingly rare in 1st world countries) or sleep deprived (can't find a safe place to sleep). Even in the case of being severely malnourished, it doesn't affect intelligence that much. It's only recently that Eastern Asian brain size exceeded that of White brain size, and that was due to lack of nutrition for China's poorer people, particularly during the Great Leap Forward (historical Eastern Asian-White difference: Imgur: The magic of the Internet ) (modern Eastern-Asian-White difference: The Construction of a Chinese MRI Brain Atlas: A Morphometric Comparison Study between Chinese and Caucasian Cohorts - PMC (nih.gov) ) . Despite this, brain size only correlates with I.Q. at 0.24-0.4 (depending on the study you read), so East Asians were only marginally less intelligent than what they should have been had they been well-fed.

You might have strong evidence about the percentages you just provided so categorically. I wouldn't dare to do that.

At any rate, I'll prove that you're completely wrong, my dear neonazi.

Thirdly, education doesn't impact intelligence to any serious degree, unless it's at early childhood (but this doesn't matter in the long run). Intelligence (g factor) is latent cognitive ability, not learned knowledge. Being poorly educated is pretty much a result of not having the right genetics for education, of which is compounded by having parents who have bad genetics for education, too (of which are inherited as well). Intelligence becomes more and more expressed as a child ages, so by the time they are 12-18 years old, genetics is the overwhelming factor in intelligence (relevant graph: Imgur: The magic of the Internet ; taken from: The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood - PMC (archive.org) ) (relevant graph: Imgur: The magic of the Internet ; taken from: Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: A life-span perspective. (apa.org) )

I guess you're not aware about the last advancements of genetics. It's well know today that the environment can strongly influence the expression of certain genes and genetical traits, like intelligence. It's called epigenetics. So, I'm not surprised that blacks have low intelligence because of their low socio economic status.

By the way, when I mention education, I mean all what implies education which includes stimulation. The brain is like a muscle that we should work out, otherwise it wouldn't perform at its maximum potential, which is what happens in impoverished people. Things like playing piano, playing chess or learning several languages,are ways to stimulate the brain and intelligence.

Lastly, Black culture is a result of Black genetics impacting the environment, thus making a new environment, thus creating a feedback loop. You wouldn't have "Black culture" without Black genetics (a prominent, stifling genetic component being Black's lower impulse control, of which badly hurts their ability to save/invest long-term: (controls for parental SES and IQ A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety (pnas.org) ) (meta-analysis of relevant data Racial Differences in Self Control – The Alternative Hypothesis (archive.org) )

Are you suggesting that culture is genetic?

TWS made a good explanation about the roots of black culture, which as far as I know is related to ebonics and irish culture. So, the american black culture wasn't made up by slaves but borrowed by irish. Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong.

What you appear to be trying to say is that it's not heritable, in that instance, which is plausible. However, this doesn't dismiss the idea that there are differing levels of testosterone in Blacks versus Whites, both due to environment and naturally, and thereby cause Blacks to be more aggressive. You haven't actually counterargued what I said.

In the same paper I provided, it says there was no difference in T levels among educated young blacks. So that proves your hypothesis is incorrect.

Maybe it's because, the majority of U.S. businesses are small, relatively new and owned by white Americans, according to new data published by the Census Bureau.

So, a black can't rob a black business because there are so few of them.

I seriously think you've never seen a woman's body ever lol.

You have me confused with the conservative losers you are friends with on this site. I’ve been married for30 years and have 2 children who have graduated college.

Into the trash it goes.

Like white trash?

To be fair, I wouldn't say OP provided a reasonable explanation or a solution.

muh constitution

I have responded to everything with my own counter evidence which shows poverty is the biggest determinant of crime.  Read rhd thread.  The evidence is clear 

So let me get this straight.   You want to abandon our constitution and form a new country based on racism 

How does one even define black?  The one drop policy?  

Not going to happen.

Wrong: Blacks far more likely to commit crimes against Whites and Hispanics than the inverse (debateart.com)

I'm not sure if you're ignorant about genetics or you're just being how you really are, but I see you're forcing your conclusions to the detriment of some ethnic groups.

You claimed based on a paper that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites and asians. That is not true, or at least it's a half truth. What the data shows is that blacks have poor results in IQ tests, which is not the same to say they're genetically less intelligent. Intelligence is determined by genes and the environment the person grows up. It's not only genes, so if a child is born in a poor family, there is a lot of chances he ends up being less intelligent than he should be because he is not well nourished nor well educated in his early years. www.unesco.org/en/articles/why-early-childhood-care-and-education-matters. I think I don't need to prove blacks are poorer than whites mainly because of their attitudes and their culture as TWS pointed out.

You also said high levels of testosterone is associated to more violence and agression, and as blacks have more levels of testosterone than whites then they are more violent. This is also a half truth. Actually, researchers are pointing out that culture has something to do with the increase of T levels, it's not a genenital issue. According to the article, "...a growing body of evidence suggests that testosterone is as much the result of violence as its cause. Indeed, both winning a sporting match and beating an opponent at chess can boost testosterone levels. (On the other hand, losing a sporting match, growing old and becoming obese all reduce levels of testosterone.)". The article provides an example of it comparing southerners and northerners young americans blacks, the first have more T levels because of a practice called "culture of honor" that makes southerners to increase their T levels. In other words, high T levels responds to a cultural behaviour rather than a genetic trait.

Blacks and Whites need to be separated. Give Blacks and Whites some good land and let's move past the utter disaster of attempting to create a sustainable multi-racial country.

Kaitlyn de mi corazón, you don't know what you're talking about. As far as I know America already had this racial segregation system and it worsened the american social problems. But at least we all start to know you better and your racist thinking.

You if you like.  It's just more evidence for my claim.   What clear here is you want this to be about race.....when other factors are bigger determinants of crime

I do have one question though

Let's pretend it is about race.....what is YOUR solution?

So what do we take away from these statistics? 

One possible solution to your question at the end...Black community is among if not the most impoverished community in America. Historically this community observed the most financial and social barriers compared to any other community. All these things impact crime. 

Yes, every liberal wants to date a racist chick. My ultimate dream would be a KKK member.

"DIVERSITY" Is our streeeeennngggth!!!

♫♫♫♫♫ Fanchick and Kaitlyn sittin in a tree...♫♫♫♫♫

K-I-S-S-I-N-G

Cause I said you were a racist but you say you are only a race realist. You are certainly a racist. White Nationalist is a racist.

You are too ashamed of your third rate country to say where you are from so it must be a shit hole.

At 142 lbs you likely have a big butt.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/white-nationalist

This is who you identify as.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/073401689301800203

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, several important reviews of the literature failed to establish a clear consensus on the relationship between economic conditions and violent crime. The research presented here applies the procedures of meta-analysis to 34 aggregate data studies reporting on violent crime, poverty, and income inequality. These studies reported a total of 76 zero-order correlation coefficients for all measures of violent crime with either poverty or income inequality. Of the 76 coefficients, all but 2, or 97 percent, were positive. Of the positive coefficients, nearly 80 percent were of at least moderate strength (>.25). It is concluded that poverty and income inequality are each associated with violent crime. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41267-022-00535-5

Most of the crimes were committed by some white people.

Hitler, Stalin, Two world wars, colonizations, holocaust, extermination of native americans...

Hundreds of millions killed.

It seems that some white people, despite being a minority in the world, have committed the greatest amount of crimes. Only some asians could somewhat come close to all the horrible things some white people have done.

What must be noted is that when some white person commits the crime, it is not registered as a crime. For example, most of the rapists are white, but most rapists never get caught.

Black people were oppressed even after slavery ended. We all know how they were forced into poverty and how they had less rights than others. They were treated badly for so long.

I would like to see all white people accepting black people as friends, but some white people still want oppression, as demonstrated by certain woman here, who thinks that black people should be forcefully relocated. Just a reminder, forceful relocation was part of Hitler's plan too. Therefore, we see that Hitler's ideas are still present among some white people, which implies that oppression of black people still exists.

 [Dropped by Savant]

I said "Black people actually mostly commit crimes against other Black people" which was not disproven.

[Not answered by Savant]

If we knew what the causes were, then we could control for them. Criminologists have discovered some causes of crime, and I suspect they will discover more causes in the years to come. You can't control for the effects of some historical event like slavery unless you know exactly what those causes are.

The retraction was based a lot on ideological grounds, rather than factual grounds. 

"The correspondent and geneticist each comment that the genes responsible for skin pigmentation in humans are completely different to the genes in these animals. It therefore makes no sense to extrapolate from these animal studies to humans."

"As required of a review paper, the authors should have been aware of a literature showing that black-white differences in the best-available measure of psychopathy are negligible (Skeem et al., 2004)"

"Rushton & Templer ignored obvious social and educational explanations for higher levels of violence, HIV infection etc. in African and Caribbean countries"

"Rushton & Templer made several errors when interpreting the results summarised by Ducrest et al."

Crime is a social phenomenon, and as such it should be addressed from a social and even a cultural perspective. Genetics has little to do with it.

As for your quest, I think blacks kill more whites because of the hatred against whites. People talk about racism against blacks all the time, which is ok, but they forget the racism against whites, which is neglected by all the society.

Instead of only supporting the "black lives matter" movement, there should be a sort of "reconciliation between blacks and whites" movement. If the society tips the scales only in favour of blacks as the media does it today, you'll have these results.

so many more crimes against Whites and Hispanics

Black people actually mostly commit crimes against other Black people, not Whites and Hispanics in particular. They commit more crimes in general, which you probably already know, and the causes for this are debated. 

Are Black people committing 34 times more crimes than White people per capita? No (they're not even close to equaling total White crime rates, when they'd need to be multiple times higher than White's crime rates for your explanation to be justified): FBI — Table 43

Since they are not, they are committing more crimes against White people than should be accounted for by their increased overall crime rate.  

 [Dropped by Savant]

I assume you will use this to support your conclusion that Black people are genetically wired to be more violent. But there are simply too many societal factors to control for all of them

The OP specifically talks about crime, not necessarily violence (but can include violence).

But anyway, which factors don't you think we can control for?

[Not answered by Savant]

RETRACTED: Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?

"It has recently come to our attention that the following article published in PAID contains sufficient errors and misrepresentation to require our attention, review and action"

Hence, "Retracted."

I would need to see proof for that claim

This is also rich coming from someone who rattles off this with literally zero evidence: "The poor, urban, low intelligence,  unemployed, and poorly educated also commit the most crimes".

Anyway, it's a big write-up that goes well beyond the scope of this thread. In super short paraphrasing, you can look at facts like (1) Rich Black kids are more likely to go to prison than poor White kids Race, Wealth and Incarceration: Results from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth | SpringerLink , (2) Blacks have lower IQ than most other racial groups (and IQ is mostly genetic), (3) Blacks have lower self-control than other racial groups A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety (pnas.org) , (4) Blacks have higher testosterone (and higher testosterone is linked to aggression and crime) Racial variation in sex steroid hormone concentration in black and white men: a meta‐analysis (wiley.com) , (5) The MAO-A Gene (Warrior Gene -- linked to crime) and the different frequencies in which races express this gene  https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/maoa-race-and-crime/, and (6) Blacks having higher Melanin/melanotropin than other races (and either melanotropin or melanin causes more aggression) RETRACTED: Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals? - ScienceDirect .

I could expand upon this and make it 5000 words, justifying every premise in detail, too. 

 [No response]

https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2018/dec/7/brookings-institute-study-finds-direct-connection-between-poverty-and-crime-rates/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/08/income-inequality-murder-homicide-rates