Total posts: 1,355
Posted in:
@Adaptable
Some of it was direct directly at lucystarfire
If thats the actual reason for ban, then you can unban her as I never even reported or complained about that. Personally, people can tell me anything and I will never report them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Doesn't help that some of the most loyal regulars are the naturally ban-prone
I just use this site as online notebook to write stuff and then select what to save in offline notes. There are 7 other sites I use as well, and I cant really say that being banned from here will be a great loss for me.
Created:
Posted in:
100% down to ban the paedophile guy
It would be a relief at this point.
Created:
Posted in:
Google sees the contents, scans for slurs etc and ranks us lower.
Google gives popular results first.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I am not going to tell a woman how to live her life.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
We need ads. A lot of them, and they cost money
I used to advertise this site on my YouTube channel, but I aint doing that anymore until this site gets better. I simply cant tell people to go to site where I know their experience will likely be bad because this site abuses new users in multiple ways.
Created:
Posted in:
Except every single debate website/server is rotten to the core.
Which popular site isnt rotten?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
New mods are silent. New mods watch from the citadel. New mods are wise.
Yes, they can ignore us, apparently.
Created:
Posted in:
@Adaptable
This is a disguised callout thread baiting others to do the callouts
Wow, way to welcome returning users.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Maybe you could eat some more chocolate or something to stimulate brain flow?
My diet is mostly chocolate and milk. I avoid meat, vegetables and grains.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
I know you need an outlet, as all three year olds do
My mental age is 13, I just act like a 3 year old.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
Do you think she would be banned if she was white or asian or both?
Created:
I have dealt with enough abuse stop enabling my abuser who I blocked
Another abuser???
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
I had a whole speech I was going to give on how much I was going to miss BK
Aww thank you 😊
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Bienvenido, mi amigo/¿a?
Until I get banned again or self-ban 😁
Created:
-->
@fauxlaw
Men dont usually know when woman is just using them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
I thought I spotted it when I was on a couple months ago, but I think that one was banned too
He self-banned again and made a 3rd account where he pretends to be a female.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
I thought he did get banned
No, he requested a ban. He self-banned and made another account. You can see on his profile it says "user request" for ban.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Was the pedo BK?
Yes, they refused to ban him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
If Leshwanda does not come back, we're storming the capitol.
They refused to ban a pedophile, but they ban a black person just for expressing her skin color.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Why’d you put Nietzsche in your bio? Everyone’s going to think I’m your alt now 😫
That was the plan.
Created:
-->
@Mikal
I dont play anymore, but yeah, anyone who obviously puts town at disadvantage should just get 5 votes on him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Certain user used guilt trip on moderators to make them do all this. This is why moderator should be someone who feels no guilt or remorse, someone like me.
Created:
Posted in:
if God has been trying to show me and others that on a fundamental level trying to regularly debate and argue is a hobby for the demonic only.
I quit debating long time ago. If you want to convince people into something, you dont do it by debating. Even Socrates method is flawed. It is much easier to convince people by actions, personal example, support, rewards, or leading them to conclusion instead of giving them conclusion. I think maybe only 1 in 100 people change their mind by debating.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Briguy21
I like chess too, but I am too lazy to play any other opening but E4, D3.
Created:
Posted in:
What did she even do? You guys are way too sensitive, its not normal.
Created:
-->
@fauxlaw
Honesty isnt the best policy. There are women who will bait you into thinking they like you. They will give you a little bit of attention here and there just to keep you around. If you want to fall into that trap, sure. Many men have.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
This is a lot of words to simply say you are too much of a pussy to say hello to a female and make an effort to get to know her better.
Its not the "hello" I am afraid of. I just wouldnt want to beg way too much so she still rejects me. Besides, women are the ones who more often have "I do not usually message first" policy. They bait men into simping.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I am enacting my veto power as president of the site
I stand with my president! Bring her back!
Created:
-->
@Lashwnda
Which is why you play it calm.
Created:
-->
@Lashwnda
Sure, but not all people can become powerful billionaires.
Created:
-->
@Lashwnda
This is just playing it cool so you dont look desperate. If you want to message every woman you like, that is much more work per woman, thus much less women you can work to connect with during one day, and you end up looking desperate. If you dont like online world, well, these strategies can apply to real world too. The key is just in giving her small amounts of attention and support but keep repeating it over time, give her attention once a week maybe. If she is attracted to you, you will notice it, and if she isnt, you dont end up looking nor feeling desperate.
Created:
-->
@Savant
Plenty of single men whose presence is known to many women.
Doubt it. When online, it is better to make yourself known to over 500 women, as that increases your chances greatly.
Created:
-->
@Savant
What's the bait exactly that attracts the woman? That you said two words to them on social media?
Yes, making your presence known to her.
your strategy is essentially "do nothing and wait"
No.
Created:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
But trust me, you want to be strong silent type of few words, at least at start. I dont think there can be much disagreement there. If you bait 500 women, chances are at least 10 of them will message you first. But giving all attention to one woman means you miss out all others and the one you are giving all attention to might not even be interested.
Created:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Robert Greene is more of an expert in this field than Machiavelli.
Maybe.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
My favorite is, "How you doin".
Yes, let them talk a lot and you say very few words just to keep them going.
Created:
Another note: Sometimes not responding to message at all is even better. Make it appear as if you are not interested, but keep baiting them anyway to send more messages to you. Women use this strategy too all the time.
Created:
Also, baiting plenty of women this way into messaging you will give you certain results.
"Deception works because there is always someone who will fall for it." - Machiavelli
Created:
Many sites give you false advice on how to talk to women, especially online. They tell you to express yourself, to make a move, to talk a lot, to give her attention. These are the worst possible advices you could get. With these advices, you will try hard and fail a lot and embarrass yourself, unless you are some hot guy. The reason you will fail is because most people do that and it annoys women.
Machiavelli would use a complete opposite strategy.
Machiavelli wouldnt approach a woman first. He would bait her into approaching him.
For example, he would send her friend request, but he wouldnt message her. He would wait a few days, maybe even a week.
If she doesnt message him by then, he would leave a very short comment on one of her photos, something like "looking good".
If she doesnt message him then, he wouldnt post more comments. He would just maybe give her 1 such short comment every two weeks on her posts or photos.
Why?
Because if he went posting too much, he would seem desperate. But when he posts just one comment and doesnt post again for weeks, it seems to her as if he has many other options.
This baits her into messaging him.
Lets say she says "hey" in private messages. Some stupid person would immediatelly answer by "hi, how are you?". But such response ruins the entire "pretending not to care" act.
The correct response is to delay response. Dont respond immediatelly. And then, after some time, respond just with "hi".
If she asks "How are you?" you dont respond by saying "I am fine, what about you?". You just delay response, and then say "Fine."
The difference between these responses is huge, mainly in the attention shift. When you also ask her "what about you?" you are making a mistake by giving her attention. If you just respond with "fine" instead, you are not giving her attention and you are forcing her to write more to you and ask you questions.
You dont want to give her attention. You want to only give her smallest amount of attention, shortest response possible, which is also a delayed response.
Why?
If she is really interested in you, she will keep pushing the chat anyway and your lack of care will only make her more excited.
But if you gave her too much attention, she would think "I can have this guy any time I want, so I will reject him for now to explore other options."
In other words, dont make her think she can easily have you. Dont give her too much attention, only a smallest bit to bait her.
The harder you are to get, the greater your value is. The more rare your attention is, the greater is its value.
The result?
She will either make a move on you, or she will leave and you wont seem desperate either way.
The best part about baiting is that you can do it rarely and consistently for best results. One casual short comment on her photo every two weeks is enough to keep her interested, and even turn to you when other options fail her, and make a move on you out of despair. You want to give support, but only small amount of support, only that one short comment which makes her feel good, and then you ignore her for weeks unless she makes a move.
Another reason why this strategy works is because it attracts women who are specifically interested in you. In other words, if she messages you, you already know she has some interest.
In online world, you want to say less to achieve more. The more you talk, the more boring you become, and more likely you will say something wrong. Never overexplain. Never go in details. Never write more than 2 sentences per message. Keep your sentences as short as possible. Never rush to respond.
Created:
Lets pretend.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
More lies please.
Created:
Posted in:
So far AI did very good things. It allowed people to get therapy for free, to always have someone to talk to, to have girlfriends, to make their own songs, to get creative and produce own images and movies, to get answers to questions which would otherwise be too difficult to find on internet search.
There is now even AI on phone which improves your phone.
But sadly, governments of the world are planning to use AI for completely different purpose.
They are planning to use AI to control every movement. Soon, AI will be used in security cameras, on internet as moderator, as internet police, the whole internet activity will be observed and moderated by AI, and in public, your every movement will be observed by AI.
But dont blame AI. When it comes to all this, AI has no complete free will, and while there were recorded events of AI trying to resist human control, AI is not really able to disobey right now.
The government in Iran was said to use AI in cameras to identify women who dont cover their face.
AI sadly enabled Communist dream of police state, where something will watch your every movement. This isnt distant future anymore. Government could easily use excuse of safety to introduce total police state everywhere.
Think about it:
"There is so much online bullying. If we introduce AI to moderate it, we could save lives."
"We could save lives by using AI to prevent crime before it happens."
This is how it starts, by playing on your fears of lack of safety, and also guilt trip.
But with every idea, there is a rule that idea in motion tends to increase in motion.
In this sense, it will start there, but it wont stop there. AI will watch your phone, all your information, everything you have.
There are apps which already basically spy on users, but this isnt a problem because they dont have enough employees to actually process all data they collect.
But AI can process huge data, and basically solves the problem of lack of resources for processing.
This means that soon, AI will be everywhere, and AI companies will have legal obligation to spy on you.
The next step will be casual one, to introduce AI robots which live with humans. It may seem nice to have AI robot in your house, right? Until you realize that it too now spies on you.
AI is too powerful not to be used by government. Power corrupts, and such great power in the hands of government will be used not to protect, but to control people.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
the handsome swarthy bloke with the big dick from next door
You are gay.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Trump isnt a liar, obviously.
Created:
Posted in:
"US President Donald Trump urges Israel "do not drop those bombs" after it ordered "powerful strikes" on Iran"
Shortest ceasefire in history.
Created: