Mall

I would say neither of your choices.

I would word it like this in simple terms.

When you engage in sexual intercourse, expect to get pregnant.

Now this may coincide with one of your choices, both, neither, whichever.

But in those simple specific terms is what I'm saying.

Should therapy be tried rigorously before accepting gender transitioning?

Give me a hard "no" like our other participant did .

I don't know.

The comparison is 100 percent true that's why you haven't given a demonstration to debunk it.

Are you speaking from a legal standpoint?

Right on, I know where you stand on the topic. Apparently you're not in the majority on this subject.

You guys that aren't chiming in must be mad that the attempt failed.

How many here agree?

I'm just speaking in general. So if your yes and no depends on the scenario, that tells me , depending on the scenario obviously, abortion can be worse than slavery.

So we're kind of getting you there.

All presidents assassinated were among the greats.

As I've been saying, according to this site, Donald Trump was the greatest president. This last political agenda that backfired on the planner just further solidified that.

Now if a sniper is using proper crosshairs, the only point in missing to kill is a warning . In this case you can say not to run for next term if you know what's good for you.

Some of you, careful with what you say. Some of you I believe has had some colorful wishful threatful language on here and now you will definitely be fully monitored, watched and under surveillance .

Don't even try to communicate in code.

Another proof of proving the greatest president.

So you say yes, slavery is worst than abortion.

You engage in sex, expect pregnancy just like you use fire, expect heat and burning.

Alright.

If you don't know which is worse, just say that. That's the wisest response you can make as opposed to all that other foolishness.

So you have to experience a thing to judge  what is worse.

Yes I'm qualified to judge and make judgments. Do you have to have experience as a murderer to judge if that is criminal or not? Whether it is heinous or vile?

This is getting as foolish as when I asked you why you don't support the choice of a murderer. You had to make a judgement there based on an act to make that choice of non support.

People have to stop using the word "judge" conveniently to a point they don't have.

Well one day just keep the hope.

When there's evidence for something, then there's no controversy. Perhaps denial at that point from them that reject the evidence. Religion exists because there hasn't been established scientific evidence one way or the other.

That's why debates about God perpetuate.

Is abortion worse than slavery?

Is abortion worse than slavery?

Is abortion just as horrible or worse than slavery?

We're talking about ownership. There are some parallels but slaves have to be alive at the end of the day.

No such slave as a dead one.

Yeah the atheist decided to believe the bird doesn't exist actually without evidence, same belief system on the flip side.

Okay.

Yup no claim.

I don't know.

Yes there's a reason for sexual satisfaction I believe you know and homosexual supporters know but don't care as the concern is with optimal happiness versus health.

No my point on the hostility was not directed towards you- Tradesecret but this other individual.

I included you in the comments as you were being talked about .

Is that how he beat her out?

Interact on whatever not withstanding the scripture unless you just have questions on it.

That's how Trump beat her out right.

Only four. Wow so for the most part an ideal candidate and humanitarian.

I apologize if I offended you. I'm getting what is characterized as a very hostile interaction from you that wasn't before and I don't believe I have been that way towards you.

Now I will say you're in error but I want to present that in an amicable fashion not to be taken as berating you.

Alright. 

I just said not to debate on what you don't know which is the scripture. Again, amicably saying. We can still interact. Don't take what I said so harsh. Just don't debate those things. You see we just go in circles on it. I would think you would just agree not to debate those things we're non fruitful in.

Alright.

No it just means you haven't detected what you're testing for which is what I've been saying.

So if I have a picture that shows no sign or image of a figure I was looking to capture, is the photo negative or positive of that figure?

Doesn't disprove the existence of what the photograph was intended to be photographed.

Difference between being present and detected.

That's what negative means. At least when we're talking about testing. It means the positive is not detected. It doesn't prove whatever is being tested is not present.

That's why I'm saying distinguish between present and detected.

See something may not be detected although present. But that is what the negative is called .

Hopefully you follow what I'm saying.

Why do we desire sexual satisfaction, particularly and regularly with the opposite sex?

See everything has a reason behind it. If you just dig deep enough, you find the truth of many things.

But when you just stay on the surface, you have no knowledge beyond that and it appears that things have a basis sufficient as is based on the limited information known. Then the foundation is shallow and it's so shallow , you become distant more and more from the firm in-depth foundation, everything takes on any kind of order, no rules, liberal, disarray and disorder.

We can see this in many regulated things that once you break away from the core, you collapse or easily fall apart with an unstable, weak, shaky, tossed to and fro foundation.

The distinction has to be made. Just using the term broadly as "discrimination" isn't specific enough.

You say "white supremacy" is dramatic. Good, that's the idea. See dramatics draw attention and focus. 

Causes us to recognize or acknowledge that when someone says "white supremacy", what is that someone is saying?

Are people just talking about discrimination or something that is actually absolutely deleterious, not justified but a form of mistreatment?

Again people may stray away because it sounds like to some at least that a generalization is being made on white people .

Which just causes for more attention and perhaps awareness for what can be an underlying issue kept covertly and under the radar towards victims of that ongoing mistreatment.

But if you want to learn more, look up Mr. Neely Fuller Jr. and another although passed on now, Dr. Frances Cres Welsing. That's either "Cres" or "Cress".

Mr . Fuller is an author and regular guest every Tuesday on a call-in internet radio program, 9am U.S. Eastern time. Podcasts are available on blog talkradio.com/producejustice

Have I offended you?

Is this why you putting out all this irate , vulgar language?

Donald J. Trump is not /was not guilty of:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

So many of course, probably the general public would not.

When you say non whites are just victims of white supremacy , it makes one side feel they're just stuck in a defeatist condition while generalizing that whites are racist and truly never ended slavery.

This is why the typical expression is "systemic racism". 

I can respond as much as my prerogative gives. I'm just having you take my advisement of not speaking on what you appear you don't know as the scripture teach , that's all .

As it goes, take heed and  you do well .

Calling me names don't make your wrong points right. That's what you guys do when you lose, you resort to name calling.

Just stay in denial. Let me ask this since you been inquiring things of me, did you know atheists are just as religious as theists?

I recommend you look up Neely Fuller Jr .

Tell me what you think. He presents that all non white people are subject to the system of white supremacy in all major 9 areas of people activity.

Economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war.

Everything you do is under the control and permittance of white supremacy.

Looks like you agree.