Mall

"Yes. The atoms that make up your body were just somewhere else. At least that’s how I understand it."

Makes sense.

Where were you before the womb?

If you were where you were, what about before then?

Wouldn't that mean you've always been alongside the different ages, "prehistoric" times, extinct animals and as long as the universe has been?

How do you feel having the "IN GOD WE TRUST" dollar bill reign over your life?

In one way or another there's rule over your life.

Yes in regards to immigration, illegal aliens and laws regarding immigration , the legality surrounding this matter is in line with some sort of security and protection and there's been talks I've heard of a wall around the boarders to strengthen that security just like having a fence up around perhaps your residential property in the name of security, why does this not suffice ethically being a mention and focus towards what's ethically justified ?

Thanks.

Explaining your view is one thing.  But when you can't answer a question, just be forthright with that. No pretenses.

Ok well just say when you can't answer instantly when you can't. Nothing to fear.

Yes what I'm letting you know is the question I'm asking, do you think you'll overcome not getting emotional and or frustrated over debating,also will you answer questions to help people get understanding and  get answers to their questions?

Will you be willing to elaborate your answers or answer follow up answers?

Of course Romans 7 doesn't conflict as it rejects divorce as Jesus does and has said what was meant from the beginning. 

God is not divorcing the legitimate church so a legitimate wife is not to be divorced from the husband. If there is departing, the only option is reconciliation of the wife to the husband as those that have been reconciled to the Father according to the scriptures that have long departed from him since the garden .

"If I showed you a spot in the Bible where God HIMSELF divorced Israel, doesn't that demonstrate that it is a valid end to a marriage covenant? And given that I think Jesus is God, wouldn't that be enough? "

NO. . I'm asking to show where in scripture where divorce of a man and woman was approved by Jesus . Something his father HATED by the way. Jesus the Son mind you.

According to the scripture God will destroy body and soul from the second death. But the scripture is not teaching for others to kill putting one another to death because God has taken place to do so and will. 

Doesn't work. Instead of running from what's asked, just concede.

You are a true deflector when it comes to questions . I don't know what you guys are scared of. Y'all need to overcome this. They're just questions.

If you get exposed to be wrong, so be it.

You be alright.

Let's elaborate this for the people.

What happened in your aging to help you overcome?

Please answer yes or no.

Is artificiality synonymous or the same as natural?

Yes "white" supremacy.

A joke is right and once the person get serious, the realization will be made known about the conflict with that person .

Exactly because so called whites don't have the same issue thanks to privilege honestly known as white supremacy.

Sounds like good news since overpopulation is an argument you tout as valid.

Why isn't "white lives matter" a thing?

Cool because atheists don't step that far.

So synthetic and natural are synonymous to you .

Is artificiality synonymous with natural?

"Yeah, that's what I thought. "

Of course I was getting your thoughts on the subject mind you. Just a forum comrade, just a forum.

How did you overcome?

Did Jesus approve of divorce?

I'm glad you agree with my point that these are scriptural ideas . 

Which are different from scriptural teaching, scriptural approval and condemnation.

If I ask show me in the scriptures where divorce is approved by Jesus , you either can show it or you can't. I can show you in scripture where it says it's something God hates.

That and Romans 7 all conflict with that. But in regards to what you think, your personal belief on it, you can believe divorce is justified now, apparently to what you learned in or from a false church assembly I guess.

Not in scripture , oh no.

Do you think you can overcome yourself, overcome getting emotional and frustrated by simply debating?

You're saying all these statements but you have no scripture that states divorce is justified. You're just giving commentary of an idea. 

Notice that. I'm giving all this scripture that denies divorce. Just straight from the words of the book,not my own.

You have a fan . Is this person a bigger fan of you or Trump?

I guess we'll know when the person uses your profile image as his or hers, whoever the person really is.

As I told another individual on here , it depends on how you use the word "religious".

If one uses the word believe or belief to mean religious, then I guess when one believes in living a certain lifestyle, healthy, nutritious or poor, the one is religious about it. The one is committed to it, consistent to it, faithful to it. It's usually backed up with some kind of action.

What do you mean by "believe neither, but accept both"?

What's supposed to be the difference?

By you saying " is the product of synthesis," you're now in agreement that not all things are natural. Albeit backwards .

You said not theses days .

In the former days you'd get emotionally elevated is that right?

Do you ever get frustrated?

Can you not withstand the heat in the debating kitchen?

Air your grievances, gripes and problems with one another on this topic .

Do you get angry,become passive aggressive, irate and berating to whom you're debating?

Take this time to lay down on the virtual couch in this therapy session .

Stumped you . I'm sure a scientist has an answer.

So do we have evidence of man evolving from non man or do the scientists just believe in this based on something similar in another process?

A said preacher can preach out of the Bible without claiming God is real. He believes God is real so he's preaching about what he believes.

His job is to preach so that others will believe. Doesn't have to make a claim to a fact one time .

It's about faith, not claiming facts .

Okay .

"human condition" is too broad to classify either way.

A person born in the condition the person was born in was natural. The condition of that same person being taught something like "racism" wasn't natural to that person because it was conditioned would mean they're not naturally a "racist". 

Think some more before you respond to this.

Hunting them, that's funny.

God or the big boom .

The big boom is another religion then. The atheists that believe in the big boom are religious.

When will the apes , gorillas in the animal zoo in a cage kept by zookeepers evolve into mankind that can go into the human zoo better known as the penal prison?

So man never evolved from non man.

Dinosaurs that exist with us today are their bones.

Do we really have evidence of evolution of man from apes?

When will the rest of these apes change?

Why hasn't anything else changed in that manner?

Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?

Dinosaurs exist with us now we know.

" Of course they do. It is they that make the claim and have been preaching about him, his creations, his existence"

Making a claim and preaching are two different things. A theist can preach about God but necessarily make a matter of fact claim. 

"You cannot take racism and apply your logic globally."