Mall

Is this the new comedy central/SNL or something?

I guess don't have a clue on this one.

Whoa, being that the creator created a thing to exist, the outcome is it existing, would not the creator had a hand in that?

"In other words the creator does not control the evolution of its creations "

Did the creator create the capacity for evolution?

The only reason why any evolution exists at all in anything is because the thing itself was created . You can say the creator is the indirect cause of evolution. But in some way has caused evolution and the outcome of a thing existing. 

I may have missed it. Please give your answer to the question below.

If everything went your way, how would you feel or what opinion would you hold of the creator then?

Why's that?

This term became prevalent to use to make genders in relationships more uniform, is that right?

So we don't get caught up in anomalies of same sex persons as a distraction, even opposite sex couples use the term.

One point in time, it was always specified the gender you're involved with ,with the exception of using significant other which can be argued that phrase started the transition. 

But it was more specific than "partner". Society still sees the irregularity in a male saying my boyfriend , so to downplay attention to that, let's muzzle the controversy by homogenizing the language. It also keeps us "politically correct". 

A female saying my girlfriend is a take it or leave it as colloquially it has been expressed differently for some reason usually that a female's girlfriend usually carries no sexual element.

With a male, not colloquially perpetuated. Can anybody share why that has been?

Same sex couples, do you feel shame, embarrassment, not being more specific than saying "partner"?

For one the physical make-up ratio is different.

Then there's the superiority in logical thinking based on the divided traits in parenting .

They are superior.

A chance of you dying is different from a chance of it being a boy or girl being born when it was already verified.

So you either can verify somebody is in proper child bearing child delivering state or you have not or made an error. 

You can verify if your lungs , kidneys, colon, eyes, etc. are functioning properly with proper tests. 

Granted you'll be alive. That's the only factor that throws out all these other verifications. But the point of these tests is proper function while you're alive because not being alive is obvious what their functions are then.

So when you say "oh I can be dead later, there's the risk in that. Then none of these organs will be live and working likewise with a woman dying before, during, after childbirth. All that's risk".

But my initial question really has nothing to do with the risk of a person's life but the pregnancy itself such as a breach which is not across the board for all pregnancies.

But I got my answer from you. I think you're looking at anything as a risk outside of the pregnancy itself which I'm clear on now. That's what I explained to another individual.

So the creator has created the outcome of all things being created but has no control of outcomes.

If everything went your way, how would you feel or what opinion would you hold of the creator then?

I thought that was a mark of a bad one. I see so many called out as well.

What do you think keeps faith going in those that reject the existence of God?

Does anybody see any flaws or down sides from that?

You schooling them ; bravo.

I think I'm being singled out as being a bigot in spite of others that express they don't accept transgenderism . I on the other hand have made no expression.

Do you tell or when is it appropriate to divulge your transgender identity to a person you've met, arranged a date meeting with ?

When do you think it's appropriate?

If we're moving towards a "phobic-less" society, should this be of concerned or should there be a worry of such things perpetuating the phobia?

Another interesting question. A man that is involved with a transgender woman , is that man  a flaming f.......oh...I mean.... is that man gay?

Likewise with the woman. A woman that is involved with a transgender man , is that woman a di...correction, to communicate politically acceptable, is that woman a lesbian ?

Is God hard to love?

Is it because your Father does not always give you what you want?

Is it because your father is your father and not your friend that otherwise would not chastise you , discipline you and punish you?

Provide your essays below.

So much for socialism.

"The god of Christianity prefers a more merciful share and care approach than free market."

"Christians should actually lean to Socialism"

So you're saying there's no other economic system where people can be merciful and care a worth for Christ's sake.

"Free market requires 0 generosity and significant greed and stealing happen in free market economies alot."

A  complete socialist society would eliminate theft, is that right?

Socialism wouldn't require generosity. 

This individual does not have the right across the board to do what they want with their own money.

Not all the way no, you do not have the right across the board to do what you want with your own money.

Well I can say it, no problem.

Ok this is in a variable sense outside the mother herself, such as anything happening such as somebody coming into the hospital shooting the mother.

But what I was asking was about something specific I may not know about that this individual did know that is a general risk within the pregnancy across the board, do you follow?

Like the general risk across the board for all gun fights is somebody can get shot.

But assuming a mother is healthy, proper childbearing and birth delivering condition, all her vital and medical levels are where they are for delivering, what is the risk other than things outside her?

Going back to the car accident illustration, assuming my car is inspected, in well-functioning order, what is the risk with it itself other than other things outside of it to conflict?

So let us have clarity here. Also, complications in pregnancy would not fit all pregnant women because there are women that are healthy, proper childbearing and birth delivering women. Women expected to have problems are medically advised and diagnosed prior or misdiagnosed. This is why constant routine examinations are crucial the same as with maintenance and inspections on vehicles.

I guess either way you splice it. No good news.

What's called COVID-19 , was it , is it a ploy to tailor the population along with the other agendas?

Say that pushing homosexual education in schools, pushing the gay agenda, the transgender agenda, the planned parent agenda, the lesbianism agenda, slut walk agenda, "race" war agenda, BLM agenda, "police" brutality media coverage agenda, say all that isn't enough to push the envelope, one more inch is needed(100,000) or more in extermination numbers.

Was the so called pandemic the top move to instrument a tailoring of the population numbers?

How do we know there's a slight chance in every pregnancy?

So what?

So you can love all people and there's no different types of love.

It also affects those to come in the future as well as us.

Too bad well it may not be too late 

You did say you can argue from both sides.

Sexual activity of others has affected us all.

Love is not hating doing right by the individual.

I'm sorry what was that point you tried to make?

Is the question too personal?

Does anybody have an answer for it?

Hang up on the prejudice thing huh.

The way you can love all people including prejudice folks is to simply not hate. You have no dislike for anybody that would prevent you from doing right by them and making pre-judgments without knowing them. You don't hold grudges or get hung up. You move on free because you don't have emotions that people can control you with . So you'll be free in peace.

Peace be.

People there are no different types of love. Accept or go on wrong.

If loving you is wrong, I don't want to be right.

If it means being without you, I rather live a wrongdoing life.

No it's true. It's just love.

Now a spouse can be divorced, separated from so it's not just children that leaves Father and mother. Spouses die so forget about forever. 

A person ought not to love more than another. Sometimes a person has to remain with a parent for situational reasons.

Just because there's a sexual relationship, doesn't make two types of love. You love your spouse and offspring. One relationship just involves a sexual aspect which is physically expressed.

Bottomline, according to the scripture, baptism was and is a ritual if you want to continue to use that term, is a pledge/response in the operation of salvation.

Do you think it takes God for you to live all?

There's a way to love all. 

Would you like to know how you could start going that way?

Number 3, hardly advisable.

The thing is to not fuel the fire.

The more nonsense they give, the more sense, maturity, sensible, reasonable, intelligent responses to make to them.

They feed off of tomfoolery. Responding to ad hominems with intelligent, logical views distracts the tactic of berating and insulting.

Didn't increase my debt. Every person is accountable for how much or little debt they have. Take the accountability.

There are so many that have figured to work to get support themselves without even doing forty hours.

That's what I say. We're all enslaved in speaking of the commerce world.

People can try to debate that. They haven't even realized the prison that they've been born into. Their parents are enslaved and obligated to arrange for currency satisfaction to receive medical, obstetrician services.

Why can't you love all people?

Perhaps it takes God to have you love all people.

There really is no such thing as different types of love.