Mall

It doesn't have to do anything on its own. You just can't do nothing without it one way or the other. I know it sounds grim but it is the reality of commerce.

Please be honest and say one or the other. Was I speaking of this current world or the next?

If you have to live while proving it in the system of commerce, it does indeed cost money because it costs to live. I want you guys to get this.

Directly or indirectly.......Directly or indirectly.......Directly or indirectly....money is involved.

Accept my refutation instead.

If you are against abortion, no exceptions, this would include any stage of pregnancy, not just when a baby is developed. Any stage of pregnancy means any stage.

Otherwise revise your position and say you're not against abortion or you have exceptions.

Now to some of you guys benefit and consistency, if you have exceptions, it is not therefore inconsistent to support homosexuality as well.

I accept your denial as well .

There's absolutely nothing within the system of monetary supremacy you can do indirectly or directly without it involving money.

Some of you don't get that because you never thought about it so in depth. You only think about the moment directly when you not going into the pocketbook. But in the cumulative cyclic economic reality, every move that you make , you're able to do, allowed to do whatever it is while you're alive from a payment of some kind given or on the way to giving payment.

Even when you have no food or money or still costs you to breathe and you have to breathe while praying.

You moved the topic to the next world or life I never paid a point about that but go ahead and deny the fallacy.

You know calling an abortion a medical procedure is masking what it truly is. It's just like saying when the dog gets put down. It's a euphemistically way of putting it.

I accept your conceding.

Ok so you think pregnancy starts when a fetus is developed. So be it that the case , you're not totally against abortion which is the termination of pregnancy which pregnancy exists before the development of a fetus. 

The woman has a developing fetus or a growth towards one because she is pregnant. She doesn't become pregnant after fetus is developed.

See now you're changing the subject moving the goalpost. You're indirectly conceding by speaking about the next world, it's free in the next world.

That's well and good. Free in the next, not free in the current.

So when people terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal development, what is that called?

I'm going to need money to pay for my livelihood on this earth in the world of commerce to do anything or else I'm dead and can't do anything including praying.

Stop looking at everything in a box . Directly or indirectly, money......will .....be.......in....volved .

Very good question to think about.

So you say "fetus", but can an abortion occur prior to the development of a "fetus"?

It actually is not in the world of commerce. Prayer, going to church, reading a book, looking up at the sky, you name it.

Directly or indirectly, catch that. Directly or indirectly, in the system of monetary supremacy, the dollar reigns and dominates.

Why are you against life not being born from heterosexuality but for it not being born from homosexuality?

In the world of commerce, there is exactly nothing you can do and money is not involved. Directly or indirectly.

Are you against abortion no matter what the circumstance?

Have you ever stolen before?

Is taxation theft of your moolah?

Is the dollar worth more than your life?

Yes. 

Now either the system of "racism" exists or it doesn't.

Economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war.

Does the system control and dominate any of these areas of "non white" people activity?

If the answer is no, what does and why isn't that the center of this thread if equality existed as universal people?

A rule for the debate art marketing team, expand the platform like modern day debate.

Better yet, just violence period. How to void all inclinations of being needlessly violent should be the focus.

Anti abortionists are the anti homosexual life sustaining individuals that allow pro abortionists rights to protest against life.

The white supremacists are the masters of confusion.

There's white, non white and white supremacists. No such thing as a white Mexican.

Or even to further confuse, the classification called "some other race".

- NEELY FULLER JR .

If you don't understand white supremacy, what it is and how it works, everything else that you do understand will only confuse you.

- Neely Fuller Jr .

Confidence is always at the forefront.

This culture of singling times out is irrational.

Sky day, rain month, rainbow month. Earth day.

Trump for 2028

Many folks would not accept the challenge. They knew they couldn't refute my points. The one person had so much to say in the comments but when I was on live, the person couldn't argue at all.

The person I debated tried but kept getting off the subject.

Just capitalism all the way. Today is a time like no other for entrepreneurship.

Bill Gates, drop a donation.

Ain't playing into mine .

Give it another 200 years, the P be added on to LGBTQ.

They only get one month like February. Again, not the longest month.

Did you hear my debate on homosexuality being a disorder?

"So because we are slaves to Christ, it is okay for one human being to own another? Does this mean you believe spiritual slavery and chattel slavery are morally equivalent?"

I don't know about "we" but those who are are. So according to biblical order, it is not okay to have another master aside from Christ.

I don't know what spiritual and chattel slavery is by you saying it.

"According to the bible that would be Judaism."

Please give book chapter and verse for this .

Relevant to debating on debate art .

What is the correct religion/denomination according to the Bible?

It's not even mine. I just utilize the reality around us that says water is wet, fire will burn.

Those facts are consistent with cause and effect , right. So we apply that, not I but we that are aware of the universe around us apply the laws, the rules, causality, logic, rationale, etc.

This is what I use to engage with on this site and that's all that's relevant.

That's interesting.

Somebody needs some additional color on his or her skin color for confidence. So the person is not confident in his or her own skin color.

Further more, their confidence is based on appearance.

There is just much to question there.

Plus you don't support beautiful things. Even more to question.

Are you asking to present my stance on false idols ?

Ok well what is your point or questions on the matter?

We can talk about false idols and true ones.

As far as debate art is concerned and what is necessary to apply or know about me is I adhere to the doctrine or teaching of consistency and logic to debate and conversate with individuals on debate art .

No.