Mall

Well give me book chapter and verse for what you said. Scripture says prove all things and every man is a liar and believe not every spirit.

That's incorrect. Scripture said let us make man. Man was not made yet so the plurality doesn't apply to man. Man didn't make himself. Man doesn't even live or move on his own.

Then the next verse 27 in Genesis 1 says God, not Gods. Singular...

Do you want an explanation of what "US" is in verse 26?

"Death is a door through which all who shave lived on Earth in the flesh will pass, but with perfected, uncorrupted flesh

is what that phrase should have said in my post #97. I mangled it. Sorry."

Is there scripture for this or something you made up?

When it says "let us make man" in Genesis, the "us" is plural but the next verse says God (singular), so with the plurality, that means more than one.

Question is, more than one what?

Is Jesus God and is God the Father and did God lay down his life?

"all who have live on earth in the flesh will pass not perfected, uncorrupted flesh."

What do you mean by "pass not perfected, uncorrupted flesh" and what does it have to do with Jesus Christ whom was never to return to corruption?

Is Father God's name Jesus Christ according to the scripture?

Did Father God get crucified, died and pierced on the cross?

Correction: though we have known him.

The problem is not with any of what you said. The issue is believing that the Son of Mary never came to an end.

They we have known Christ after the flesh, right now and here after know we him no more.

I read it and said be ready to give an answer. Being crucified and resurrected has nothing to do with flesh and blood so it is not answering the question.

When you can't answer you move the goalpost.

Even after resurrection he didn't say he was flesh and blood so you're condemned there. He was no longer the same son that was not glorified that could shed blood.

Scripture said we have heard of the patience of Job , we have seen the end of the Lord. JESUS the son of Mary is no more. Through we have known Christ after the flesh , now and here after, know we know him no more.

Many individuals don't catch this. They see the name Jesus, think nothing of flesh and blood.

Is Jesus the son of Mary flesh and blood in heaven now?

Scripture teaches God was received up into glory. 1 Timothy 3:16. 

Not the son of Mary. The son of Mary was flesh and blood, not yet glorified. Jesus said himself a spirit have not flesh and bone as you see me have. He didn't say say flesh and blood.

Does sitting at the right hand mean actually positioned on the right side of God or does it mean power, the son of man has received/given all power?

Where.  ....... you .......in .......the ......so called .......Catholic Church?

So to get it on record and do like the scripture say, yea or nay, is the son Jesus of Mary, flesh and blood in heaven now?

Where you in the so called Catholic Church?

Man invented.

All the invention of man. Westernization and Christianity.

The son of Mary was flesh and blood. Is he flesh and blood in heaven right now?

Do you believe Jesus the son of Mary is in heaven now according to the scripture?

You ought to come on discord.

We can talk. Just discuss.

You heard my live discussions right, posted on YouTube.

That's it takes folks. You back these individuals in a corner they can't get out of and they have to submit.

I could change my mind if you answer the questions. 

This is the problem with many of you in cowardice.

You can't defend your stance and you run. This is debate art. It truly is an art you flee in being artistic with.

You want to judge with people being in caves but know you can't back up that you have actual evidence but what people have told you.

I accept your conceding.

I can hear the hearsay from in the cave as you call it, so what is the difference?  Am I supposed to hear it better outside of it?

Do you think what you hear or read is actual evidence?

Please don't be that naive. You actually have to SEE things for yourself in event. It's not what you can read or hear or what somebody says and with good reputation that proves anything.

You've been lied to if you were taught that. If your teachers weren't liars, they were just as ignorant, taught the same falsehood.

You said he wanted  to be a religious leader. So is it he wanted to be or is he considered that by those that are lacking in knowledge?

What do you mean Jesus wanted to be a religious leader?

You better stop believing hearsay. Just let me help you on that. You'll be better off.

You're going by a lot of hearsay and reputation calling it evidence. 

You say we but I know nothing about alien life except those coming across the boarder. I know nothing about reincarnation.

Do not make the statement that anybody who does not use profanity cannot be trusted, bottom line.

Otherwise you will be challenged to prove your statement and be shown to be in error twice.

The fact of the matter is, the person is making generalizations based on myopic or subjective standpoints. I believe age was mentioned by this person but the person still has not reached maturity to avoid making an error like that.

Something like that.

You prove or demonstrate objective things which you can't. A person cannot be trusted that uses no profanity is not proven true. 

So nobody is to trust what you're saying just because of your so called experiences.

I said both positions are faith filled. Reputation is hearsay, not evidence.

You haven't proven anything. Like you say, you don't have to and you haven't.

So you believe what a person says without evidence and how's this different from believing what others say such as prophets , apostles and ministers in the scripture?

Both are faith filled positions .

Scripture say there is a way that seems right but the ways there of are destruction.

Scripture say if you don't believe I am he, you will die in your sins. 

He that believe on him as the scripture has said , out of his belly shall flow rivers of living waters.

So search the scriptures for in them you think you have eternal life. When it comes down to what is true, all you have are those scriptures to go by .

Yes you'll notice profanity used the most in a hostile fashion and negative condition. 

Case and point by this thread. As you'll see, individuals got super defensive with the "I don't have to prove anything" back off - type of response. With an ultra defensive interaction of "why don't you curse and why you don't and you prove yours" type of a thing.

You'll find these folks can't even explain themselves, why they do or say certain things like having an unknown identity of themselves. When you're just following the crowd, this happens and introspection is lost. 

If you can't explain your own self in erudite terms, definitely retire the profanity.

That was somebody giving a link titled that I believe. But that somebody if you notice didn't directly say of that one's own that provided the link, why that person uses profanity and the point of it used.

See, you have to catch those details when interacting with people . Nobody could state the reason why. If you notice as well, I received multiple comments with deliberate redundant uses of it. Just proving its non necessity and idle usage.

One person admitted it was unnecessary and tried to flip the onus on me why I don't use profanity. I don't use it because you who I originally asked, that ducked out of the question gave me no reason to use it.

Guess what, no response. People will respond until you debunk them. Then they'll flee from you, evade you, block or ban you. Some of these people get so emotional at debating they'll block you because they know they can't refute you. When they see you unfazed unmoved by votes and still argue a perfect consistent defense, they see that none of this will discourage you so they do what? They block you out with rating systems and try to block you from messaging and ban you.

But no where in these comments, could anyone give a reason. One person knew a reason couldn't be given and said with profanity, "I don't have to prove ****". While making claims according to an experience touting them as reality. Is the person's point supposed to be more firm and solid and grounded but adding the profanity?

See I suspect this person and many others add on the cursing as a additional phony barrier fortified exterior. 

"I'm using profanity now so it's a signal that things are getting hostile and I'm getting irate so don't continue further in questioning me because you're endangering yourself into a hostile environment".

The body language/verbal and gesture readers probably could concur with this. What happens when people get angry, irate, emotional?

In customer service, irate customers start using all sorts of colorful language. When you think you can't get your point across due to a deficiency in vocabulary, you'll use what you think will strike negatively and in turn can promote even further escalation of hostility.

But things are solved with evidence, the truth, from answers to questions like in court. Justice is not ruled in colorful provocative language. The jury is not supposed to be moved by that. 

Let the folks answer for themselves.

Why do you personally, what is the reason you yourself following your own mind, nobody else's, uses or not use profanity?

This person said, people that don't use profanity are not to be trusted. Foolish.

Ok say it again. Why do you use profanity?

The person ended up agreeing with me.

So at your age you still don't know why you use profanity.

I suspect you care about what some people think or else you couldn't sustain in society.

Case and point by a lot of you. So many questions left unanswered. Start your introspection today.

I rest my case by your statement.

Do you think you can get you point across without profanity?

Do you tend to use profanity when you get emotional?

Do you use it to build up a pretense of an exterior wall to shield your true vulnerability?