Mharman

Not sure. There are inactives who haven't had time to answer Pie's question about who has your role now.

Sometimes GP just... says stuff like that. For better or for worse.

Eh. He called all of us actual fucking trolls last time he was mislynched as town. I wouldn't take it personally.

I don't think Savant's non-flip has anything to do with Greyparrot's new role. Bio-engineer doesn't seem to match Savant's entry. Most likely scenario is scum's flip being hidden on death.

vote count?

I'm pretty sure Trump knows he's not gonna get a third term lol. I didn't know Canada had term limits, though. That's kinda fucked lol.

I'm going to guess so. May have been a dick move on my part to use that. Sorry Wylted

Really thinking Vader shot correctly now lol.

Even with 14 players, I think 2 town killing roles might be a bit much, especially if one is vigilante

I'm not convinced that there are two killing roles. Also, I just said why you're probably town.

Did you forget to add someone to the purgatory thread?

Actually that changes things though. I was gonna take Banana's side thinking she explained things poorly (and some sketchy things about Vader)... but now I may have to conclude he shot correctly, which would imply he's town. Hold on lemme think.

Oh here's something btw...

Savant isn't in the purgatory thread, despite being dead.

I'm gonna have to second Pie here. Give all details or get lynched.

I know you say you've given all, but I don't think that's the case.

Please give a synopsis of everything, even if you've already stated some of it.

I have some thoughts on that... although it is certainly going to depend on Banana's full claim. Give me bit to type it up.

So, are we all forgetting about Vader vs. Banana here?

Does your rejection kill people, or is that a separate part of your role?

You tagged the wrong person

Alright fuck this shit. My brain cannot process this right now and the solution is to sleep.

I think I’ll be better off tackling this tomorrow.

 Do not rush into a lynch… we have time.

Assurance of your affiliation is more important than the usefulness of your role. Anything that makes us more likely to lynch Vader over you should be considered helpful. 

Alternatively, he could just not be a vig and it’s a gutsy fake claim.

Not necessarily but I see the theory.

You worded that weirdly. Please try again

Wylted limited what his players can’t say. Real or fake, that’s a new one.

What in the hell?

Honestly, why Vader wasn’t roleblocked is a good question to ask.

you should probably unblock Pie so he can tag you in games

oh I wanted the link for image not the shitty soundcloud music lol

nevermind

oh you know what? It's not even that Pie knew of Casey's role- it's that he knew such a role belonged to Casey. Yeah, he really is town.

If Pie is town and also right about Banana idk what to even say to that. I'll move Banana to null

Give examples of what you mean. I'm not buying it.

If Savant was scum, he must've had some ability to hide his flip on death, and Vader must be town. Scum would have targeted Casey, which does make sense.

However, Savant may have been janitored, at which point Vader is almost certainly. The only theory I have for Casey being dead would be something to do with Savant's role.

And how does that relate to scum messing up?

Does yours not mention Israel vs Hamas?

So, what was the scum slip up you were looking for?

why would your target be flipless? My first thought is that Savant would've been janitored by the scum team.

Two deaths. Interesting. Janitor as well.

Now the question remains, would scum or town be more likely to be informed of a role that can stop a lynch?

Collective guilt is a plague on society and antisemitism will not solve whatever problems you think they cause.

Greyparrot's probably got the best option, although I've been thinking about a flat tax. I will add that I've recently become a libertarian, and am not sure if AnCap or MinCap is better. So "no taxes at all" may be my answer in the future depending on which path I choose. It is certain, however, that increasing taxation will harm the economy.

At minimum, the solution isn't to tax the hell out of people (which loses revenue once you reach a certain threshold- per the Laffer Curve), it's to cut spending. Not "maybe" but by a lot. Most of what our government does should be privatized, with only defense, currency, infrastructure, and some common law being its role. And that's the bare minimum cost reduction for me. Charity, education, healthcare... they will not cease to exist just because they are not funded by the government, nor will any concerning amount of people be cut off from them.

Eh. Noted on GP I guess

Every time I see a suggestion like this, the same line of thinking is missing. One particular question is never asked.

How are these people you’re about to tax going to react to the new taxes?

Inclined to buy Earth’s claim. Feeling like chasing scum. We until 6:30pm tomorrow.

Have fun with Earth. I’ll be watching.