Total posts: 8,122
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Do you allow third parties to joint win with the main two parties (ie mafia, town)?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
pie thought savant was lyncher last game, and that was plausible given his behavior.
yeah, Pie did say that to me in discord
Why is it bastard?
A conversation for another day. TLDR is that nowadays I like my smaller size games to have two factions only, and I like giving town some form of quick way to figure out there is a TP in the game if I do put one in any game
I don't think it's worth debating now... the bigger question is whether or not Casey would do that... we know Pie would so I'll give your theory credit there
They win. Sometimes the mods will allow them to join win with the winning party. I did in my last game, though, admittedly, makes third party feel kind of useless. I just did it because I know how people tend to dislike non joint winning third parties.
This is a good question for Casey.
Created:
Posted in:
Now my thoughts are changing a bit. I am wondering if he is a 3rd party lyncher, whose goal is to quickly lynch savant dp1 and then try to side with town (why he is putting us in his town pile).
I initially dismissed the idea of a tp lyncher, but now that I think about it, Pie did tell me he thought someone was a tp lyncher last game… Lemme go check my discord messages with him I think he said it there
Even so, imo tp lyncher is incredibly bastard in a 9 player game if town has no way about finding out about them… really hoping Casey would ignore Pie if he ever told her to put that role in a game….
What are the consequences of a tp lyncher getting a lynch anyways? I gotta look that up
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
The Restless Spirit claim is interesting given that it was Casey's fake claim last game, but given how it was brought up, WyIted remains a town lean.
Well, Casey did design this game. Perhaps she looked up the role when fake claiming it last game and thought it would be neat to include in this game
Created:
Posted in:
Yeah I highly doubt there’s a tp
And to be honest, if I am looking at from a “who wants to blend in” perspective, I’m going to vote Savant
I can at least understand Austin’s play based on his claimed role.
I don’t understand how a magistrate would just throw their role away unless they want to blend in. Savant is known for tunneling, and it shocked me he would just out that role the second he got it given the power over a lynch that it gets him
Also, going within Austin’s group of three seems logical, but I was questioning it, and Lunatic was questioning it even more I think. Now I get why he wanted to look elsewhere toward me and earth. But Savant stayed within the ring of three… under my new line of logic, it would be because straying outside of what town is doing, even in the slightest, may be too much of a risk for him
And to be honest, the justification on his character is still a little awkward after thinking more… it sure isn’t as concrete as Austin’s imo
And I also just trust Wylted a lot.
VTL Savant
For death
Created:
Posted in:
heats just ended… they are having a break before the main event
you know what? I actually respect the hell out of Lunatic for not claiming. It’s a move that screams “I don’t need to blend in”
And honestly, looking at this game from that angle makes more sense
I’m down to go for Savant or Austin
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I’m at the race track. Was posting from the car.
I’m not gonna vote Lunatic because I think we’re at 3 after looking at Casey’s most recent count and seeing Wylted’s vote.
But I want his full role claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Also, I think we should cross examine/interrogate all three of Austin, Savant, and Lunatic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
We don’t have to lynch Lunatic just yet. Let’s wait for a claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I’ll join in on the pressure in a sec lemme go count how many votes are on Linatic rn
Created:
Posted in:
Shit I might be addicted to mafia
Ok maybe addicted is not the word word but I am hyper focused on this game
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
no enjoy vacation
Hear me out: We do, in fact, ball… but why haven’t we considered: “fuck it,”?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Oh wait Athena does check out then.
God I read that earlier while looking at all the characters ages in the wiki so I would know what year to say when I asked everyone for their character’s birth year
Yeah some other dude got accused and Athena’s testimony saved his ass… I could’ve reaffirmed Savants aim earlier but I completely forgot ffs
Created:
Posted in:
Going to a small dirt racetrack in the middle of Fucking Nowhere, Iowa with my dad and sister.
See y’all at 11 cst… I think
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Let me know your thoughts when you’re done. You are my top town read and I still think your abilities in reading others are superior to mine.
Created:
Posted in:
Fuck it. If I keep posting like that instead of trying to craft the perfect analysis post that is organized with links to my sources and formatted correctly and addresses counter arguments with a cherry on top, I would have plenty of time to play the game while enjoying my time with the extended fam
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
I’m waffling now lol
Chat, should I stay in the game?
Created:
Posted in:
Fuck now I feel like posting that lifted a burden off my shoulders and now I feel like I could play the rest of the game if I did the rest of my posts like that
Fuck
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Oh I forgot about Barney. Lmk know if he can’t, I have connections and can find someone else.
Created:
Posted in:
My final thoughts before I dip:
I’m still leaning scum on Lunatic. I don’t understand the logic of what he’s doing this game. I feel like his vote on me was complete nonsense earlier, basically just “Mharman exists, maybe it’s him” and then he just builds a case later because we disagree on what RVS is. Then, when I say “how tf am I going to know your ideas from your perspective,” he just says I’m playing it off as a misunderstanding. No shit I’m gonna get defensive, Lunatic; your logic is shit and I’d rather not be mislynched. In his eyes, my denial is a confession. If that’s all he’s got that’s hilarious.
Not to mention, he isn’t even looking within Savant and Wylted that much anymore. He spent a lot of time talking about how Austin could be on some gambit. I don’t buy that- I think if you’re in a claimed dreamer’s group, scum is either in your group or the person claiming dreamer. If this is some kind of town gambit on Austin’s part, it’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen, and I think Austin smarter than that. I think Savant is right when he says what Lunatic is doing this as a way of dodging POE.
But, for whatever reason, Wylted townreads him. I can’t say I agree, but I will admit Wylted’s reads were better than mine last game. So who knows what Wylted’s figured out. I mean he says Lunatic being erratic is a town tell but Lunatic doesn’t strike me as the erratic type. Maybe Wylted has something else figured out, but I don’t see it.
Leaning town on Savant. I’ve been reading his posts and to me, I see the thought process. I see how he jumps from one idea to another, but it looks more cohesive than erratic. To be honest, even if he is tunneling a bit, I don’t see how that makes him scum. He was literally town and doing that last game. Not to mention that if Austin is to be believed, it makes sense to focus on looking for scum among those three he dreamed about.
I will admit however, that his role claim doesn’t make much sense and being willing to character claim so early with little pressure isn’t automatically towny given that we’re in a game where mafia can ask who’s in the game. And if Wylted’s logic about Lunatic’s behavior is correct, then perhaps Savant’s behavior and thought process as expressed in his posts are a little too crafted.
I still hard town read Wylted. The first slip where he tagged Pie could’ve been easily faked, but the whole thing where we false CC’d Austin bc two character have similar names is towny af to me. There’s also just his vibes in general.
My read on Austin is weird. Again, either he’s found scum among his pool of three or he’s scum; I don’t think he’s doing any weird gambit if he’s town.
I like him as town from a mechanical standpoint. I think Wylted is right that dreamer sounds like a role Pie would put in his game and I also like how well his character and role fit together. It feels a little too concrete to be faked by mafia who learned Maya Fey and dreamer wasn’t in the game. It is possible given that Pie having a say in this setup means there’s a chance he could told Casey to reward scum who go for the risky claims (I think this was the case in the Percy Jackson game he did?), but I don’t think it’s likely because of how well it looks like it fits, especially from my perspective.
From a behavioral standpoint, it’s a bit strange. It feels like he drew way too much attention to his own softclaim, breading over and over again… it’s like he wanted town to figure it out as soon as possible, and to me, the point of breading is to be less obvious so you can reveal it when the time is right. Even his earlier appeal to how Maya was the deuteragonist of the series feels disingenuous given what was stated on Post #1. It reads as “look at me, I’m this role and I can’t possibly be scum!”
And yet, if he really did dream about those three and knows one of them is scum, it makes sense if he were to start leading town in the direction of those three asap. I just think the way he approached it is so weird.
As for everyone else… I’m still unsure. I kinda line what Owen is doing here, although the buddying with Savant is a little bit excessive. But hey, maybe if you’re a rookie you’re gonna be hard buddying the only person you town read. I feel like Earth is hiding a bit too far in the back, so that’s off putting. Whiteflame is interesting, but nothing strikes me as wrong about him. Joebob is also hiding in the back a lot; at least Earth took the time to consider whether or not they should go with my claim suggestion. Whenever JoeBob does step in he’s basically says something like “I have no idea what’s going on, please helps.” I don’t think Joebob is that much of a noob anymore.
So my current scum reads are Lunatic and Joebob. Savant, Earth and Austin are possible; Austin is more plausible than Earth, who is more plausible than Savant imo
I recommend y’all lynch Lunatic this DP and go from there. If y’all really feel I’m that wrong on Savant, go for it I guess. But please, keep an eye on Austin and dig deep into him if scum isn’t lynched today.
That’s all, peace out.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Look. For hours I was analyzing the game but got exhausted and gave up. Imma be honest I don’t wanna play this game anymore… I’m on a vacation with extended family and I’m just sitting in a cabin while everyone else in my family is doing stuff together. I shouldn’t have joined this game to begin with, but I like mafia and don’t want it die out. But to be honest, this game is feeling like way too much of a chore right now so I think I’m gonna dip. I’ll try to find someone to replace me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
If you really think your role sucks, there's no reason not to.
Created:
Posted in:
Starting on those reads on Owen, Whiteflame, Earth, and JoeBob
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I didn't notice this behavior. I now town read lunatic. Let's lynch savant after Austin confirms he is not full of shit.
Why would you town read Lunatic for this? If he believes that counts as an RVS, then sure it's not scummy, but how is that towny? Genuine question because you had the best reads last game.
Created:
Posted in:
So it's getting late and I'm going to go to bed in about 5 minutes. I'll post my reads tomorrow morning, but the summary is that I still scumread Lunatic (for reasons other than his earlier vote on Wylted), I still townread Wylted, and I now townread Savant. These reads aren't based on any kind of POE- just my thoughts on their behavior. Additionally, I have a newfound FOS on Austin, so if something changes and I start to townread Lunatic while still townreading the other two, I will have a scumread on him. I have no thoughts on anyone else because I'm convinced we'll find scum among the previous four, but I will analyze them before posting my reads so I have something on everybody.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I should mention that you said RVS was a "random vote stage." I always thought of it as a "random vote start." Perhaps that's the reason for this discrepancy?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Due to the fact that I have been off wylted for way longer than I was on him
Due to the fact that Wylted had the whole debacle where he incorrectly CC'd Austin. I don't think anyone could scumread him after that.
I have been on you almost twice as long.
The only reasoning I've seen you give is this whole RVS thing. Got anything more than a disagreement over what we think of when we hear the acronym "RVS?"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
In my mind, an RVS is one of the first posts you make in a game, almost immediately after the game starts and nothing is going on. In my mind, it is not a post made a page and a half after the game has started, two hours after your first post. I felt like stuff was going on by then.
I suppose I'll back off on that point given that different players are going to have different ideas about this sort of thing, but I don't know why you would expect me to have your idea on that.
Created:
Posted in:
I think outright character claiming is a bad idea right now. However, I will steal an idea from Pie: I want everyone in this game to state whether their character is a lawyer or not a lawyer, AS OF CURRENT LORE, as stated in the fandom wiki. Additionally, many pages on the wiki state the character's age/reckoned birth year... please state whether they were born before or after January 1, 2000.
I'll go first: Lawyer, born before Jan 1 2000.
Created:
Posted in:
Seriously if he was RVSing it doesn't make sense to do it so late... and even if that is somehow an RVS in Lunatic's mind, how tf am I gonna know that?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
2. You started your participation in this game with six posts of analysis (including Wylted).
Expanding on this: I don't see how someone goes from slightly townreading Wylted for a slip, to going null on it, to then randomly voting Wylted. If you were looking to RVS someone to get the game going, why wait until page 2 and your 7th post of the game?
With that in mind, how can I be confident you vote on Wylted was RVS, and that Wylted didn't just erroneously give you a way out when he said it was?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Question: How was I supposed to know your vote on Wylted was RVS?
1. You said you were dead serious on it in post #72.
2. You started your participation in this game with six posts of analysis (including Wylted).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I don't believe in any sort of multiverse, but let's entertain the idea for the sake of argument.
It would be completely irrelevant. The original question about killing baby Hitler is about how we would handle things in our own timeline if we could change them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I believe their claim. Their character and role make way too much sense. Even the game and theme design of it makes sense.
If I'm scum and asking Casey about who's in the game for a fake claim, I'm not asking about the protagonist or any deuteragonists. I'm asking for a more minor character. Not for someone who's obscure, just for someone who isn't at the forefront of the story.
Created:
Posted in:
As it stands, we do have one scum between Lunatic, Savant, and Wylted.
This was said earlier, but I am repeating it. I am warning the rest of town not to stray from this idea. Austin is hard town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
The nuke question is something I'm still undecided on.
As for killing Hitler as a baby, I wouldn't. While WWII was tragic and took the lives of many, the butterfly effect that resulted created as many, if not more. People were dispersed, and they met new people that were found at their new home. In some cases, a refugee married someone they met in their new home, resulting a new bloodline being created. In other cases, someone had a changed outlook on life after the war, which resulted in that someone marrying a different person than they would have previously. Same concept.
To be honest, I don't think I would exist if WWII never happened. My grandfather was in the Navy during WWII, stationed in the Pacific theater. He never saw battle, but I would be shocked if his experience in the military didn't change him. It certainly impacted his decisions going forward, which likely ensured he would meet and eventually marry my grandmother.
I can guarantee I'm not the only one who wouldn't exist if WWII didn't happen. Should I sacrifice myself, many of the people I know, and who knows how many others around the world, for the sake of those whose fate was already decided back then? Absolutely not.
Sure, there'd be many individuals that would exist in place of us all; however, they don't exist, so we have no moral obligation to them. We have the people in this world right now.
And that's not even factoring in the future, where the butterfly effect would get even more intense.
Created:
Posted in:
WyIted was being WyIted. Luna voted him for no reason other than WyIted not being scum in a while and mod pysche. He could have seen WyIted's behavior as an opportunity to rally town against him, maybe.
True, but I definitely need to double check my scum read on Lunatic and my town read on Wylted. You’re not off the table either.
Created: