Total posts: 8,222
Posted in:
-->
@Statichead
I guess. The thoughts don’t have to be profound, though. A couple of pages ago, I typed “frogs” because I was thinking about frogs.
Created:
Posted in:
Laxalt lost the Senate race I thought he would win. Oh well. A split house would've been Democrat control by tirebreaker anyway.
Meanwhile, on the House side of things: Republicans need one more to gain the House. I think they'll do it.
Created:
Posted in:
Some forums rarely get any topic designated "hot."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
I think, but do not know,That the politics section of the forum,Has more likes than any other section.
Probably. Not easy to verify.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
You forgot to @ me.
Anyway, fair enough.
Created:
Posted in:
11 is a number that is pointed out so often when it is repeated.
Created:
Posted in:
I do not like the state of Illinois.
Created:
Posted in:
Is there a limit to the number of posts that can be made in a thread, on DART?
Probably not. This thread will have a very large number in a few years, though. I'm sure of it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
I get what you're saying. An individual uses the idea that the end justified the means, to justify their wrongs. You are correct there. However, I would say that the temptation of robbing the bank clouded their judgment, and they succumbed to immorality. By their own choice, but still.
We can both be right here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
How is a person able to act in a way that they think is wrong?
They disregard their own morals in favor of temptation. When they are done, they cone to the realization of what they've done.
Created:
Posted in:
Funnily enough, yes.
Lol.
I tend to leave DART on a tab of my computer,
Same, although I have to try not to sometimes.
And 'do enjoy the random thought thread, as a place just to idle, speak my mind.
Can't argue with that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I use my TI-84 all the time. It’s easier to graph things to solve equations and also to save numbers
The math required by my courses isn't as complicated, so I never have to save numbers.
But yeah, this thread has convinced me calculators are superior to Google. Just not in my case.
Also: Of course you're repping Texas Instruments when it comes to calculators.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
For tests in many different contexts, people needs to be able to use a calculator but can't be permitted access to the internet.
I didn't consider that. Most of my exams are online and none of the exams in my current classes will require any math.
Still, another point for normal calculators.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
The other would seem to have the worse moral dilemma.
Lol. Which one is "the other?"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
And so goes the argument between a moral objectivist and a moral relativist.
Anyway, if you were the "onlooker" as you mentioned above in Post #3, would you view one or the other as worse?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Not telling you what to respond to or anything; again, I just find it funny.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Or is a cell phone just a calculator with more features?
I'd argue it is not, since a cell phone's main feature is its various uses when it comes to communication.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Man, you seem to respond to everything here. Do you live in this thread? No offense; I just find it funny.
Created:
Posted in:
I've had a Casio calculator for years and years and years. 30 or more. And the battery is still the original. How long do they last?
There's one advantage to a normal calculator: You don't need to buy a new one every 5-10 years. Still, computers are necessary for a lot of work, to the point where you have to buy one every 5-10 years regardless. It won't make a difference if you have a physical calculator or not.
This does make me think of one advantage of using a physical calculator, though: It may be easier to focus on computation, since computers can access near-endless programs and websites that can be distractions.
Created:
Posted in:
How likely is Sam O'Nella to disappear from YouTube again?
Created:
Posted in:
I wonder how people react when they see stuff I post here. Do they think I'm weird?
I don't care, it's just funny to see how people view others when exposed to their random thoughts. Even in casual conversation, when peeople say something strange and then say they're "just thinking out loud."
Created:
Posted in:
How many corn kernels currently exist in the United States?
Created:
Posted in:
As I've continued to do coursework in college, I've noticed one thing: I've yet to use the calculator I bought. It just sits there on a desk in my dorm room, only to be moved when I do the dusting.
When it comes to all the math I've needed in my classes, I just open an extra tab and use Google's calculator, or sometimes, I use certain websites for more complex mathematics.
Out of curiosity, how many of you, when working for your jobs or doing assignments in school, use a physical calculator? And how many use Google or a website? Which do you consider better and why?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
I prefer it off the cob though, gets stuck in my teeth less,
Me too. Although then you have to use a spoon or fork and it gets hard to scoop some of the kernels up once you're almost done. Unless you use a spoon and fork and use one to push the kernels into the other, but that just uses an extra utensil.
As for eating corn when on the cob, we differ there. I rotate all the way around before moving to the right.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
I'm asking about what actions are considered "tolerant" or "intolerant." I'm not talking about dictionary definitions (I probably should've clarified that more).
A good measuring stick would be how one answers the question, "What is the worst consequence(s) you can give to someone for their words without crossing ethical or moral boundaries?"
For me, it is a ban from a social media platform, or a defamation lawsuit. I also place limits on both of these. For example, I do not believe in banning people from social media for stating falsehoods; I am only okay with it when they do things like doxx people, stalk their profiles to slam them on posts made years ago, or knowingly and intentionally attempt to incite people against them. As for defamation, there needs to be proven falsity and maliciousness or extremely high-level negligence, although falcity doesn't need to be proven if the issue is private enough; also, there should be no prison time and the worst possible fine should never make them so poor they can't care for their basic needs without a homeless shelter.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
@TheUnderdog
What is tolerance? What is intolerance? From person to person, they seem to mean something different every time.
Tagging both of you in here because if you two have the same definition I do, then you're both kinda right in my book.
Created:
Posted in:
I love writing stuff. If the topic is something of my interest, I can genuinely enjoy an assignment.
Created:
Posted in:
I care very little for gubernatorial elections outside of my state (with two exceptions this year).
Not my state, not my problem.
Created:
Posted in:
Morals are objective, but our perception of them is subjective. Some are objectively wrong, and some are objectively right. There is no human that will ever get every moral correct. The reason we debate what is moral is to get as close as we can. This is not the same as subjective morality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
I don't really have the time. Beeeeeeg college paper coming up.
Have you tried putting this game in the Discord server? If not, I'll do it real quick.
Created:
I've been thinking about this more recently. So I'm changing this. Pie's warning has been removed, and RM's ban is now indefinite. It will end at my discretion, which will be when I feel like I can put him into a game without him raging so hard. He might be mad at this, or he might not care since he's basically quit mafia anyways; I don't care. This is insurance.
I'm not convinced Pie's play was designed to bait RM anymore. I think it comes from a genuine disdain for RM. Looking at his posts, and previous posts, their beef goes way back, so there were clearly motivating factors before the game even started. I would argue that putting them in a game together is like putting Mentos into a Coke bottle. And to be honest, I understand why Pie has this disdain for RM. I think he'd be better off not talking to him at all, but I understand.
About RM: In so many beef/arguments/callouts on this site, he is a common denominator. I will give three recent examples to back this up: He started a random argument with Supa in an endgame thread, he made a random call-out thread on Oromagi, and he got snarky with Barney in that thread without provocation. Buy and large, so many other users have beef with him it's hard to count. The reality is that he has an abrasive personality, and then complains about "abuse" when he gets pushback. Like I said previously, I understand his condition, but it is no excuse here. He needs to fix his attitude.
Created:
-->
@Barney
I don't. All that does is encourage users to quit debating once they take a hiatus. Not everyone has the IRL time to be on this site frequently. And I also believe the skills of the best debaters should be recognized. This includes past debaters.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
I must say, you have a very unique way of typing. It does do a good job of showcasing your thought process.
Created:
Posted in:
Looking at it now in the morning, I am going to make two predictions:
1: Republicans will take the House majority. While Democrats are going to gain a lot of ground as more of these races are called, I believe Republicans have built up enough of a lead to complete the flip as the extremely close races are called. I'm thinking 219-216.
2: The Senate will be split, 50-50. The Republicans are demolishing the Democrats in AK. Republicans hold a narrow lead in NV, and I think it will hold with 77% reporting. Democrats are winning in GA, and I think they will hold it by a very small margin, even with a runoff. Democrats have a relatively comfortable lead in AZ.
Created:
Posted in:
As it stands, the Democrats have a 2 seat lead in the Senate and the Republicans have a 34 seat lead in the House. Goodnight y'all. See you in the morning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
But you’ll concede they are positions held by typical MAGA Republicans
Not really. The stolen election one, yes. The others, no. Regardless, I am not your typical Trump supporter. Your argument here is an association fallacy, and worthless against me.
So you think the KKK should be allowed into the public square. Great.
As long as they are peaceable in their assembly, yes. Do I agree with them? No. Are they losers? Yes. Does that mean they need to be muzzled? Absolutely not.
Also, your comparison of Trump supporters to the KKK is ridiculous. It's the same time of mindset all opponents of free speech use. Villainize them, then discredit their defense, then silence them. There's a recently-coined term for this logic: Ad Hitlerum Fallacy.
At this point, we might as well call this your theme song.
I disagree with your knee jerk assessment that there is anything nefarious happening other than an honest mistake
The only thing I said was nefarious was the negligence of the three poll workers. This is not an honest mistake. Again, the sheriff said that one of the workers knew the order from the leader of the three was wrong, and did it anyway.
I believe Indiana is the source of most of the guns used in crimes in Illinois
That's a red herring. You really have nothing, don't you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Reasonable, educated, and well informed American citizens
And who defines who they are?
Things like Obama wasn’t an American citizenTrump won and the election was stolenCovid vaccines are part of a socialist plot to control usClimate change is a hoaxMore like someone disagrees with reality
None of those are positions of mine lol. Nice strawmans.
I’ve already come to the conclusion these people cannot be saved. They cannot be reasoned with. They need to be silenced or at least be driven underground, Like a KKK follower. They must not be allowed to go mainstream.
And that's how we get a totalitarian government that cannot respect freedom of speech. It's a pretty anti-American and anti-human rights position, actually.
Bullshit. You are obviously suggesting something nefarious is happening. Lying by omission is still a lie. You omitted that the people denied part of the ballot were half Republican half other, and the suspended poll workers were from both parties.
I never omitted anything. CNN did in their article, and I took the extra step to find the Twitter post that contained the omitted information.
And my point was that voters should be watchful (regardless of party). I never stated that this was any one-sided plot. Don't put words into my mouth.
Created:
Posted in:
Indiana update:
Mostly Republicans extending leads, or keeping large ones. One Republican took a lead. IN-07 has yet to start.
For the senate race:
Todd Young (R-Incumbent) rises to a +22 lead over Thomas McDermott (D) and +55 lead over James Sceniak (L) with 27% reporting.
For the House races:
Frank J. Mivan (D-Incumbent) holds a +20 lead over Jennifer-Ruth Green (R) with 20% reporting in IN-01.
Rudy Yakum (R) rises to a +51 lead over Paul Steury (D) and a +70 lead over William Henry (L) with 14% reporting in IN-02.
Jim Banks (R-Incumbent) rises to a +31 lead over Gary Snyder (D) and to +59 over Nathan Gotsch (I) with 41% reporting in IN-03.
Jim Baird (R-Incumbent) drops to a +40 lead over Roger Day (D) with 16% reporting in IN-04.
Victoria Spartz (R-Incumbent) rises to a +20 lead over Jeannine Lake (D) with 36% reporting in IN-05.
Greg Pence (R-Incumbent) drops to a +38 lead over Cynthia Wirth (D) with 29% reporting in IN-06.
Latty Buschon (R-Incumbent) rises to a +46 lead over Ray McCormick (D) with 19% reporting in IN-08.
Erin Houchin (R) takes a +27 lead over Matthew Fyfe (D) and a +60 lead over Tonya Millis (L) with 20% reporting in IN-09.
This concludes this Indiana Update. Again, users from other states, keep us posted!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Lies are not entitled to free speech. You can’t prove anything to a conspiracy theorist, because they are not rational people.
And who defines what is a "lie" and what isn't? Your statement would set an easy to exploit precedent if we followed it here.
I am focused on the truth.
Then start acting like it lol.
You on the other hand are an alarmist, screaming fire when there is none.
Again, Post #34. I explained to you why I am not being a conspiracy theorist. You ignored it and continued to stick your fingers in your ears, repeating the same thing like a child.
Again, these people deserve nothing but derision.
"Oh, no, someone disagrees with me politically! Prove them wrong? Nah, don't feel like it. Let's mock and deride them instead!"
You're not convincing anyone with that lol. All you've done is give people reasons to stick to their beliefs, and to avoid talking to you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
The better of two evils, I guess. Sucks that we have to do that as voters sometimes, but whatever.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
Wow, Miami-Dade is going red in Florida. Clinton won this county by 30 points!!
DeSantis is a gigachad, and it looks like Rubio is going to be benefitted by association.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
They're looking like Republican strongholds right now. Pretty much as expected.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
That’s nonsense. It’s not suspicious if they denied ballots to both Republicans and Democrats. It is in no way criminally negligent.
It is. The law doesn't care who was denied, it cares that you take precautions into ensuring you do such an important job correctly. In case you missed it, the sheriff stated that one of the workers knew it was wrong and continued to follow the orders.
Sheriffs are some of the biggest kooks in elective office. Fortunately they don’t decide who gets prosecuted.
Well that's a bad faith argument. As for the courts, they can decide whatever; I will almost certainly trust their ruling on this, whatever it may be. We'll see what happens.
Is that what you do, respect others?
Correct. Even those who disagree with me, like Oromagi, Whiteflame, and Barney. Just not you, because of the way you behave.
People who engage in conspiracy theories need to be denied a forum to cause mischief. You are one of these. You need to leave. People who engage in conspiracy theories and spread lies and repeat nonsense deserve nothing but derision.
As per what I said in Post #34, I am not engaging in any of the sort. Regardless, even conspiracy theorists have a right to free speech on this site. You don't like a conspiracy theory of theirs? Prove them wrong. It's pretty easy when your focus is on finding and showcasing the truth instead of scoring victories and being a dick.
Created:
Posted in:
Indiana update:
Indiana has begun.
For the senate race:
Todd Young (R-Incumbent) opens with a +12 lead over Thomas McDermott (D) with 3% reporting.
For the House races:
Rudy Yakum (R) opens with a +45 lead over Paul Steury (D) and a +68 lead over William Henry (L) with 2% reporting in IN-02.
Jim Banks (R-Incumbent) opens with a +17 lead over Gary Snyder (D) and a +50 lead over Nathan Gotsch (I) with 18% reporting in IN-03.
Jim Baird (R-Incumbent) opens with a +44 lead over Roger Day (D) with 1% reporting in IN-04.
Victoria Spartz (R-Incumbent) opens with a +14 lead over Jeannine Lake (D) with 5% reporting in IN-05.
Greg Pence (R-Incumbent) opens with a +50 lead over Cynthia Wirth with 2% reporting in IN-06.
Latty Buschon (R-Incumbent) opens with a +35 lead over Ray McCormick (D) with 4% reporting in IN-08.
Matthew Fyfe (D) opens with a +25 lead over Erin Houchin (R) and a +61 lead over Tonya Millis (L) with 5% reporting in IN-09.
This concludes this hour's Indiana Update. Users from other states, keep us posted!
Created:
Posted in:
Not suspicious. It was just a mistake. Some Democrats were also denied those same ballots. Don’t be such a conspiracy theory looney
Mistake or not, it still is suspicious. At the very least, it's criminally negligent. The Sheriff did say that they were looking into the possibility of filing criminal charges. As for your accusations of conspiracy theory promotion, keep in mind that nothing I stated here is false, and that I'm not implying there is any widespread effort by Democrats to steal the elections, either. All I am saying is that I implore voters (Democrats, Republicans, and others alike) to report what they find is suspicious. It's not unheard of for pollsters to go rogue, and it can be caused by Democrats and Republicans alike.
Most of the people here are Trumpers. They are not deserving of respect nor do I want to “make nice”with them. I’m here simply to tamp down the nonsense and expose the idiots to some reality that they won’t find on twitter, FOX News, or OAN.
Then kindly fuck off from this site. These are discussion forums, not WWE Monday Night RAW. You have no place here if you are not going to respect others, despite the disagreements you may have with them.
Created: