Plisken

If they are actually interested, they should just change the definition of automatic, so it means more precisely that you pull the trigger one time, and a mechanism pushes the trigger into the actuating position for a burst of fire.

There's really no need to ban accessories at all, but from a socialist/prohibitionist standpoint they probably prefer it that way as a means of manipulating the market accessible to the deplorables.  I think another thing to consider is that protectionism will not as easily corrupt the legislative process post Obama because of the establishment in the market for modularity.  

Great, that's an interesting take for the art forum.  Maybe it will take off if you start some threads over there.

What on earth are you talking about?

Not exactly.  Bump stock legislation would not necessarily warrant constitutional protection, but law just needs to be taken with a high level of scrutiny when it comes to the Bill of Rights in general or you could end up with an unconstitutional precedent.  

Greyparrot appears to be a colorblind advocate.

Does the photon stretch when it runs out of space, or does it stretch space-time (the universe)

Okay, what about the thing that is actually travelling in a wave form we perceive as light.

The light stretches, or causes the universe to stretch?

If the expansion of the universe is slower than the speed of light, where does it go, or what happens when it gets to the edge?

I think you are making an assumption on the basis of materialism. I'd wager that physical evidence is probably preferred on an epistemological basis.  

I forget.  It's supposed to be slower relevant to earth, right?  

Whatever you are implying by calling people vile, I don't follow your reasoning.  What about 'being vile' makes someone a good candidate to debate with you?

Why athiests?

*Liberalism is supposed to mean.  To me,....

  I dont know what liberalism is supposed to me, fundamentalism is in a broad sense, a reality of being a protestant, being detached from the Roman Catholic Church yet maintaining the fundamentals.  That is not to do with the material sciences, or literalism.  I do have some really strict adherence in my blood if you are curious, but we have always valued the American idea as long as we've been around to enjoy it, (actually somewhat detatched from politics and national identity), hard working, God-fearing people in most every aspect of life.

Well, that's certainly an appropriate response, because it's not supposed to make sense.  

It might impede learning on some level to some degree, because you developed so much already, learning might not be as easy.

You aren't scaring anyone.  In fact, I find it hard to believe people who've observed your behavior can help themselves, eventually becoming more and more desensitized to your personal writing.

Apples are sweet.

-No you are insane

Yes they are, especially honey crisp.

 -Dude, there's no such thing as a honey crisp apple

This is what people who run apple orchards call apples.  See, look.  This is what I mean by Apple as well.  Here, have an apple.

-Your dictionary proves nothing.  Apples taste like wet fur.

Something to think about 

You are begging for a self fulfilling prophecy by demonizing "America" through "whiteness"

The church doesn't hold that December 25th is the birthday of Jesus though, at least not to my knowledge.  How was that decided?

Obviously not all Christians have Christmas.  Most draw association with the Nativity, and of course it is a time of coming togather and giving.  It was abused in 17th century Massechusets as it is today.

They probably banned it because it wasn't something the theocrats could control and it represented a general disturbance to their order.  

Have you always been antisemitic?

Consumerism is a form of slavery.  It should not be confused with capitalism.

Is the truth a matter of "convenience" to you?

 Why do you want to know as many facts as possible?

What are you getting at here?  Everyone dies, so I feel inclined to assume you have something against either fitness or "strength".  

I am curious after reading your first debate.  Does truth have a basis in reality to you?  

But wait, there's more!  For only four payments of $19.95 you can learn the ancient art of cable cutting.  Cut not one but two cables, for free!!

Cut the cable a little longer than you need so it doesn't weigh as much and we'll size it afterwords.  That way, we don't even have to worry about measuring it wrong.

He claims to have the will power to have read through this entire thread lol.

Really, you can't make 'meaningful' deductions without a measuring stick?

Humans aren't computers that just take an input and spit out something that can be considered as information.  They aren't approaching a problem as a person.  There's no will from which to establish a goal, no practical consideration.  

0.o That mental capacity which enables one to practically function under circumstance in which one may not pretend to comprehend.

Well our epistomology needs work if it can't differentiate between a con man and common sense.  

Important for what?  

If you can't be sure that a state of being is an eternal feature in nature, is there anything you are sure of?  

If time is not always operative than something needs to be, independant of time, for anything to be.  Either time is always operative or its must be possible to be independent of time.

Correct, I don't assume that I have a ticket.

Maybe so, but I don't celebrate Odin, and I don't lose an ounce of sleep over heaven and hell.

Aren't all the gods supposed to reflect Brahman, the supreme creator, somehow?  

If your faith is strong, you will probably think: "Mmm goat", and praise God

If you have your doubts, then don't partake.

There's no sense in quarreling over such matters.

Something does not come from nothing.  That's not fallacious in the way you say it is because the two are mutually exclusive.  One might even ponder that "thing" can be a limited way of thinking but Nothing has no way of resulting in anything.  I bet when I look into this it's going to be indicative of not being able to know certain things at the same time at the quantum level or something along those lines.  

If something can come from nothing, that must put the conservation of energy on shaky ground.

Are you contending that it's possible to get something from the absence of anything?  No energy, no wavy things, no basis for 'reality' of any sort whatsoever...nothing.  That would be the only way to rule out any cause.

I don't know what "it" is or if "it" is.  You just said cause may be unnecessary and later mentioned "it".  Can you relate "it" to me?

I will probably not be able to devote sufficient time necessary for processing theory at the quantum level, but in the interest of the conversation what are you contending is not an effect, not requiring a 'cause', or otherwise consistant with uncaused cause.

If a cause does not "precede" an effect by normative relativity in time, that does not negate the necessity of cause for effect.  

Physics is a class of study related to the concept of matter.