PressF4Respect

Town gets a pointless role that does nothing for them

Why's that? Don't all town have useless roles?

My grammar isn't the best either, but my role PM looks like it was written by a half asleep two year old. 

Interpretation, logic and commonsense

But to answer the question no, I'm not relying entirely on testimonial evidence, there are other factors that indicate the proposition of Theism.

Well understanding the nature of spirituality and having a full comprehension of what evidence consists of (the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid) the evidence that correlates with that nature is abundant. Since we can assume that we are not dealing with material objects we can study like we would in our universe we move over to testimonial evidence. Spirituality and religion are the fields that observe that nature, testimonial evidence is what we would want to use as a cross reference and everything is fair game. This would include NDE's and OBE's, spiritual encounters and paranormal study. I can link you with a channel that has a huge database of NDE's and medical facts that collaborate with the testimonials, and these are average people not selling any religious ideas. We're talking about the soul leaving the body after brain death (which begins only 4 min after the heart stops beating).

Having my own encounters with spiritual beings and other experiences I cross examine other testimonies. Together I have my own evidence and a mega storehouse of evidence at my fingertips. Whether or not you wish to categorize spiritual based evidence is up to you( as in weak or strong), but I can help you sort it all out.

NOUN

mass noun

• 1The use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
  

There is more direct evidence that the conscious soul exists independent of the physical body than any other topic. 

The very nature of the conscious soul is immaterial

Yes, because the physical experience is actually the outermost layer of the soul and creation. As you get higher into the worlds of God there is less and less materiality to the point where you eventually have the mental worlds and pure conscious worlds, and all of this comes out the universal mind of God.

Have you ever heard of the universal mind? 

Well the soul is eternal so the experiences are endless, the Creator is an eternal creative force we should never put limits on such a Reality. When you leave this world it's the same as our physical universe, there are many many planets, galaxies and forms. You can call it a multiverse, creation has layers and so does the soul.  As well you could end up coming back to earth, depending on your progress and Kama.

Just to add, there isn't just two places when you leave this body, those are two of many options. Creation is massive, if you think the universe is enormous wait til you see what else exists!

I said we have our own will, it's just not free as in we do whatever we want with no effect. 

Genesis 1:27, NIV: "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."

Evolution says nothing about how life starts. Evolution is concerned only with change after life begins.

As for abiogenesis, there is not a single shred of evidence for it in existence 

Logic. God is omnipotent. Another omnipotent being cannot exist.

I do not take them at face value. You asked how is the bible credible and I told you.

I repeated because my experience informed me it was needed.

If you think repeating something for the sake of doing so is pointless, don’t repeat things for the sake of doing so.

Not in reality. It’s a difference without distinction

But I told you my views. If you think something else is credible, that is your business.

You were the one who made the claim (there are plenty of non-biblical records of God appearing in any location), therefore, you are the one who has to substantiate it.

Nonsense. You asked if there were, I said there were. You can look it up, but I am under no obligation to offer it to you. It is not part of my argument and matters not one bit to me.

It's not enough to make generalized statements. In order to substantiate your statement here, you need to provide specific examples.

Like most liberal atheists, you are confused and thinking I am seeking validation from you, or that you are somehow vetting me. My answer was enough for me. Accept or reject it.