Actually idk if I will, I think this was a low vote count and most didn't understand how to vote on it. I think you like jagged flow raps with rigid rhyme scheme whereas I like a complex 'liquid' flow.
I defaulted membership to be available for all powerful nations that balance each other's greed and powerlust out. This was made crystal clear as the basis for SC membership, I made clear how and why India irrefutably qualifies as representing enough of our species and enough of global interest to compete with at least China and balance it out.
You are the one lying saying I didn't give a basis, Con never gave a shred of it.
If you seriously want a debate with me on an in-deptg topic don't add asinine rukes and traps character limits.
You're just looking for a cheap win and since most voters don't graso that ships going into the horizon isn't them going over the curve even on a curved Earth (because it's too near to be completely over) I don't see what exactly you wanted here other than a cheap victory. I don't appreciate how you've been talking to me in our past few debates and if you keep it up I'll just block you.
Makes you wonder what undedeatable's intentions were woth this debate. Just a rude and asinine tone throughout with a 1k character trap. Pathetic as fuck.
Until Round 2, Con doesn't even mention the concept of a win condition nor does Con explain what makes it more than 0% likely the audience will vote Pro since the rules dictate it.
Your anger and nitpicking don't matter to me. I exolained to you the answer, you nitpick the 'Pro outlining their case' exception to the rule scenario to disprove me... What was the point in asking me? You only look for fights when you ask or tell me things.
The person who accepts the debate sees the description, the person who instigated wrote it, therefore by oure logic both sides agreed to it upon acceptance.
I've been punished both for setting trap descriptions and for accepting and complaining/rule-bending. Ramshutu punished me both times, I don't say I agree with his hypocritical voting but I do say that both approaches have been happening.
Wrong. They are. That is why the CoC says that autowin truisms are rendered unrated troll debates by force. It's something you enforce sporadically if at all.
TY. Btw I don't really think the rivalry is twosided in terms of who is wrong, I actually think Pakistan is completely in the wrong but I said it was two-sided to neutralise your point and make you turn away from India vs Pakistan as that kind of was the only strong thing for you to build on.
Pakistan was founded on the idea that Muslim Indians couldn't coexist with Hindu Indians. That was the literal justification for the partition. It's also shat led Pakistan to fight within itself (as East Pakistan which included Bangladesh, even though it's on the other side of India, had a more peaceful outlook than West Pakistan). That's what most of India vs Pakistan has been about.
Gravity is such a weak force that it's never ever observable, ever.
:)
That is, unless we assume the magical thing making denser objects fall through less dense objects/terrain is by default gravity (which is a hugely erroneous assumption to make if you follow scientific method and want to avoid confirmation bias).
Before giving me things, view them. Neither shows anything other than clouds or CGI graphic depiction putting together an image it claims is from real composites and which it admits is artificially presented.
I'll leave it private especially until you've seen so it isn't taken down for copyright for the audio, though even the visuals might demand that outcome.
I have been inspired to make a Demon Slayer AMV. I am quite good with finding legal free software, audio, movie maker etc and with Animes it's possible to basically legally obtain it so long as I don't upload it anywhere and use it solely for the AMV. I'll PM you it when done (or I could be a famous AMV maker on an alias you never know) but seriously I'll try and make it lol
When a tiny mosquito is next to a massive mountain or cliff, gravity doesn't tug them towards it despite the mass, same for a blue whale and tiny fish around it
It's so utterly absurd when you actually imagine us hurtling through space as a furious spinning ball vs how tranquil the sun and moon's rotation is but I have said that before:
1. Third Party Audits of at least NASA but ideally both NASA and Roscosmos with in-depth interrogation and analysis of each step involved in the mission vs what can physically be proven.
2. Live statellites of some kind. Not that one that just films clouds, real live stallies that properly points down at the planet where the SOUTHERN 'hemisphere' (it's not a hemisphere if earth is flat) is visible. It's extremely important how the south of the planet is probably seen from supposed outer space.
Another issue is crocodile's and the weaker edge's takes. I feel I'd put the effort in and they'd say I didn't prove it was flat. At this point, this is not the debate worth investing effort into put of those I'm in.
Not at all, just tired and busy with other debates and things.
I also don't think this will get decent votes. It's extremely annoying to oht all the effort in for no-vote ties. I'll address this later when I've had more time to analyse voters. I definitely want to save arguments for then. I also noticed inntthe past that people's brains are so hardwired to perceive things like sun and moon rotating as the Earth itself spinning as well as us being on the ground as proof of gravity that I am struggling to forn the new wording that makes the eureka moment happen. I also may want to earn money for it if the writing is that good so I may save some of my drafts for later on.
Shit's pretty 50/50 if your audience is neither deaf nor blind and is seeking to fully immerse.
The visual does have an edge if the audience is NOT trying to fully immerse but if they are, audio matters a lot without a doubt so idk which can even win. I would not want to be on either side of this debate, it's extremely difficult for both.
Actually idk if I will, I think this was a low vote count and most didn't understand how to vote on it. I think you like jagged flow raps with rigid rhyme scheme whereas I like a complex 'liquid' flow.
I am not debating against you here so what does that matter?
Thanks for the vote
I defaulted membership to be available for all powerful nations that balance each other's greed and powerlust out. This was made crystal clear as the basis for SC membership, I made clear how and why India irrefutably qualifies as representing enough of our species and enough of global interest to compete with at least China and balance it out.
You are the one lying saying I didn't give a basis, Con never gave a shred of it.
your vote here has a lot of confirmation bias and twisting of words involved.
both, latter takes priority
If you seriously want a debate with me on an in-deptg topic don't add asinine rukes and traps character limits.
You're just looking for a cheap win and since most voters don't graso that ships going into the horizon isn't them going over the curve even on a curved Earth (because it's too near to be completely over) I don't see what exactly you wanted here other than a cheap victory. I don't appreciate how you've been talking to me in our past few debates and if you keep it up I'll just block you.
Makes you wonder what undedeatable's intentions were woth this debate. Just a rude and asinine tone throughout with a 1k character trap. Pathetic as fuck.
Define just and moral in the description
So if you prove something in 1898 that was proven by the 1800s?
By and before are synonyms in that context.
1899 is 19th Century, not before 19th Century.
the 19th century begins in 1800, not 1900.
The resolution says 19th century which is the 1800s, not 1900s.
nice to see you concede that it matters.
19th century is 1800s by the way.
Until Round 2, Con doesn't even mention the concept of a win condition nor does Con explain what makes it more than 0% likely the audience will vote Pro since the rules dictate it.
Sure, report my vote. Then I will explain why he didn't really.
Cheers
Coal has that bossman pull even now.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#cheating
This and the section above it, read them and combine them.
It implies voters shouldn't reward cheating autowin debates yet it's also fallacious voting to vote against the autowinner just because they did that.
Your anger and nitpicking don't matter to me. I exolained to you the answer, you nitpick the 'Pro outlining their case' exception to the rule scenario to disprove me... What was the point in asking me? You only look for fights when you ask or tell me things.
Dude, why do you always look for semantic loopholes to disagree with me on issues of moderation?
I'm saying post-creation, this debate should be forced unrated.
The person who accepts the debate sees the description, the person who instigated wrote it, therefore by oure logic both sides agreed to it upon acceptance.
I've been punished both for setting trap descriptions and for accepting and complaining/rule-bending. Ramshutu punished me both times, I don't say I agree with his hypocritical voting but I do say that both approaches have been happening.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#cheating
This and the section above it, read them and combine them.
Never reveal your 'why' to your enemy.
Wrong. They are. That is why the CoC says that autowin truisms are rendered unrated troll debates by force. It's something you enforce sporadically if at all.
TY. Btw I don't really think the rivalry is twosided in terms of who is wrong, I actually think Pakistan is completely in the wrong but I said it was two-sided to neutralise your point and make you turn away from India vs Pakistan as that kind of was the only strong thing for you to build on.
Pakistan was founded on the idea that Muslim Indians couldn't coexist with Hindu Indians. That was the literal justification for the partition. It's also shat led Pakistan to fight within itself (as East Pakistan which included Bangladesh, even though it's on the other side of India, had a more peaceful outlook than West Pakistan). That's what most of India vs Pakistan has been about.
How is a debate like this allowed?
But it got dat girth doe ;)
Thank you for the votes.
there is a middle part where it's very hard to pick the right scene(s), I have done a minute fully so far.
he conceded, btw.
Gravity is such a weak force that it's never ever observable, ever.
:)
That is, unless we assume the magical thing making denser objects fall through less dense objects/terrain is by default gravity (which is a hugely erroneous assumption to make if you follow scientific method and want to avoid confirmation bias).
I always find it fascinating that there is never a SINGLE star in the sky from satellite space cameras, it's as if they forgot to fake that.
Before giving me things, view them. Neither shows anything other than clouds or CGI graphic depiction putting together an image it claims is from real composites and which it admits is artificially presented.
I'll leave it private especially until you've seen so it isn't taken down for copyright for the audio, though even the visuals might demand that outcome.
Thanks.
I have been inspired to make a Demon Slayer AMV. I am quite good with finding legal free software, audio, movie maker etc and with Animes it's possible to basically legally obtain it so long as I don't upload it anywhere and use it solely for the AMV. I'll PM you it when done (or I could be a famous AMV maker on an alias you never know) but seriously I'll try and make it lol
no, it doesn't. Not even slightly.
When a tiny mosquito is next to a massive mountain or cliff, gravity doesn't tug them towards it despite the mass, same for a blue whale and tiny fish around it
Those two things would begin to make me consider.
It's so utterly absurd when you actually imagine us hurtling through space as a furious spinning ball vs how tranquil the sun and moon's rotation is but I have said that before:
1. Third Party Audits of at least NASA but ideally both NASA and Roscosmos with in-depth interrogation and analysis of each step involved in the mission vs what can physically be proven.
2. Live statellites of some kind. Not that one that just films clouds, real live stallies that properly points down at the planet where the SOUTHERN 'hemisphere' (it's not a hemisphere if earth is flat) is visible. It's extremely important how the south of the planet is probably seen from supposed outer space.
A 16 year old can also point out flaws with other correct ideas and wise decisions, that haas no impact on the validity
Another issue is crocodile's and the weaker edge's takes. I feel I'd put the effort in and they'd say I didn't prove it was flat. At this point, this is not the debate worth investing effort into put of those I'm in.
Not at all, just tired and busy with other debates and things.
I also don't think this will get decent votes. It's extremely annoying to oht all the effort in for no-vote ties. I'll address this later when I've had more time to analyse voters. I definitely want to save arguments for then. I also noticed inntthe past that people's brains are so hardwired to perceive things like sun and moon rotating as the Earth itself spinning as well as us being on the ground as proof of gravity that I am struggling to forn the new wording that makes the eureka moment happen. I also may want to earn money for it if the writing is that good so I may save some of my drafts for later on.
This debate was conceded and may interest you to read.
DDO has other meanings, one is dungeons and dragons online game.
Most progressives like myself also support what the conservatives do. That barrier is sacred to the fairness of sports on the female SEX, not gender.
This is Rated and conceded, I would highly appreciate a vote if possible.
Shit's pretty 50/50 if your audience is neither deaf nor blind and is seeking to fully immerse.
The visual does have an edge if the audience is NOT trying to fully immerse but if they are, audio matters a lot without a doubt so idk which can even win. I would not want to be on either side of this debate, it's extremely difficult for both.