Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
@TheDredPriateRoberts
@David
For anyone interested in the advice I just gave, I have fully confirmed that if you have privacy badger and correctly configure it, webrtc literally does not leak. In fact a WebRTC leak stopping extension will be overriden by privacy badger to ensure it doesn't leak, regardless. All good VPNs since around 2017 learned of this leak and implemented stoppers to it but that's only if you have the 'true program VPN' whereas if you are trying to use their extension to access VPN, they won't usually stop webRTC leaks unless they're an extremely good one (I believe NordVPN stops it, even with the extension).
On firefox, go into 'options' of privacy badger (I can show you where if you want, PM me for advice or ask in public) and select 'stop WebRTC leaks manually. On Chrome this may not be an option, especially if you have a good VPN because Chrome interacts more actively with other things that override webRTC leaks and will actively stop the leaks if the VPN asks the browser to. this, then makes it stop all other extensions trying to prevent WebRTC leaks because it doesn't like any 2 extensions having power over the same thing if it can be avoided.
Firefox allows you to do the same thing multiple ways, so it doesn't stop you preventing webrtc leak with privacy badger on top of your VPN stopping it (the same thing being done twice).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
Rated affects Rating, Unrated does not. All "Judge Debates" (non-open-voting debates) are supposed to default to unrated but I'm unsure if Mike's coded that correctly yet.
Created:
-->
@Castin
Well, now you found out that the advice 'stick up for yourself and they stop bullying you' is only a long-term plan that involves a lot of strategy and perseverence.
Everyone picks on everyone if they can get away with it, especially scumbag bullies. You're easy to like, you make yourself weak and say you are worthless to our community repeatedly, while saying the opposite about others. It's difficult to bully you without making other enemies who will bully back on your behalf because you've wounded your ego so much that there's nothing left to scar and very much to lose from the bullying.
I know how people with antisocial personality disorder (both sociopaths and psychopaths) think and operate but I have an inverted angle upon their theory. Why use and abuse when you can use the users, let them hurt you and even use the hurting in an advantageous way with street rep etc and then help those they'd otherwise target, especially the ones who reward kindness. Being pragmatic is a wise decision, losing your moral compass in order to stay pragmatic is the least pragmatic move you can make if you wanna enjoy life and feel good about yourself on any deeper-than-skin level of emotion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
My symptoms of 'autism' are moderate, I'm not the catatonic type who can't function and have zero shame in it. Dr. Franklin literally comes on the website to laugh at people and things, it's his 'thing' idk. He actually has come to be third place forum poster by spamming 'hahaha' or such posts in many variants, it really was the least hurtful thing that was said to me on here in the past 48 hours pretty much. I don't support the mocking of autistic people at all, I just don't see why that particularly got you offended. PressF4Respect and Ramshutu are far nastier towards me in extremely personal ways in this thread and others, they are the real issue.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
When you say ignorance is bliss are you linking it in with the intolerance?
Created:
Posted in:
Strength is shown in how one tackles humiliation, not in running away from it when it's available to remove it and punish the wrongdoer.
Created:
Posted in:
An unconfident, insecure person would unblock you the moment you said 'if you're secure don't block me you functionally illterate dumbshit who can't do anything right' but I'm secure and your bullying doesn't work on me.
Get the fuck out of my life, seriously, you're actually becoming a real fucking nuisance around here.
Created:
-->
@Castin
Try getting a backbone and actually being confident, people will pick on you in no time. I was just doing me too, that's how I know your ending line is not appreciating that I'm doing me, not seeking out war.
Trace back every single flamewar I have with people on this website, they start being nasty to me first, really brutally nasty way before I do.
Bsh1 and Mike used power against me, you can't find the start of those flamewars in words, but with the others you can.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm extremely confident, very strong but yeah I'm egotistical.
1/3 not a bad attempt for someone of your capacity.
Created:
Posted in:
Difference between you and me isn't what we can dish out, it's what we can take without breaking.
Bring it, shutu, make them call me dumb, ignorant and all of that. I'll come out better than ever.
You don't know me or where I come from, I am from gritty as fuck survivors on both sides of my bloodline, that's all I'll say. If nothing else, I am that motherfucker to outlast when I can't outsmart, outperform when I can't outwit, outluck when I can't outthink.
I don't need to be smarter than you, I don't need to be greater than you at any one thing. I don't care how inferior I look, what you use your words to paint the picture of man. I was born and bred the type to never let the hands coming up from the ground, pull me into the mud for long enough to kill me. You can keep at it, weeks, months, years. I may die IRL, my legacy will outgrit yours for decades, you get me?
I am sick and tired of you running around like you're some god here, accusing me of having no right to do the same. You and your gang will one by one learn that I am not built like the other pussyboys you're used to picking on and running off of sites. I quit, I return. I'm put out, and yet I burn.
You don't know that Schmidt is bought and serving agendas that have 0% to do with Google itself, that's fine by me. Indulge in your ignorance. He's reading this chat after all, he knows what I think and how accurate I am. He can't do anything about it, just can 'flag me' so I never get employed by Google or some intelligence agency, not that I ever would given my overall outlook.
Created:
Posted in:
ramshutu, you don't understand capitalism or shares, it doesn't matter how much you preach about it or get upvoted here you don't know how it all works.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
I am in the shadows. this is a shithole of the internet where people bully each other freely so long as the chief mod dislikes the victim and likes the perpetrator(s). This is a great place to be in the shadows from intelligence, which is admittedly scarce anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
good, then shut up and stay irrelevant or admit you just lied.
Created:
Posted in:
If you read either round of my debate I clearly elaborate on votin gshares and how investment firms own them in all corporations that are large enough.
Created:
Posted in:
a.) In your debate you didn’t realize that there was a difference between voting and non voting shares, you seemed to be arguing that workers must own 50% of the company. As a result - you lost, as you were just posting irrelevant made up opinions with which your opponent had brought actual linked facts.
the thing is this is the entire point at which you go wrong. I didn't at all fail to realise that. You did and so did cogent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
because hating myself is a sure fire way to be respected.
Created:
Posted in:
Became the easiest and most difficult guy to have beef with all at once.
I could go back to a post I made a few hours ago and list what I've done but there's no point, I am pathetic and useless.
And yet, I'm still more relevant than you'll ever be.
Created:
Posted in:
great achievement, probably the only noteworthy thing you did on your time on DART, right?
Created:
Posted in:
Actually, you'd find the opposite. When not anonymous, that's when people are most obligated (especially over mediums that google censors, such as YT, blogspot and Google search itself) to conform to their agenda in order to get seen and not killed for it etc.
#think
#sheep
Created:
Posted in:
the debate with cogent was about voting shares, whether it was type b or type a they were the type of share he was comparing. you, in that context, brought up a ton of points and focused only one one tiny semantic thing about Google that ignores the fact that behind Schmidt are many private equity investors with extremely corrupt agendas at times.
I don't understand how that in any shape or form disproves that he's the very 'broker' who simply bought his way into Google that I described (buy in then call themselves Google).
Created:
Posted in:
perhaps because i'm too busy thinking rather than laughing, bullying and sheepishly following the media i'm told is reliable.
Created:
Posted in:
try writing anything half as good as my OP, let's see who is dumb or lacking originality.
Created:
Posted in:
you're the one who mentioned venture capital.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
No, I'm not. You're the one trying to make me cry though, you sadistic sociopath. Seriously, I think you get on the Internet and are like 'who's an easy prey to pick on with my limited intelligence and EQ'... Oh look, others are picking on him, let me join in F** yeahh!!!!! woooooooo! I'm so powerful!!!!!!!
Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
What makes you think i am psychotic with the flat earth stuff, as opposed to paranoid?
Created:
Posted in:
I find it truly exhilarating that those on the top are complaining about how easy i had it amd crying. LOL you got your rewards man, lighten up. Why the fuck is everyone at my throat seriously, get the fuck over yourselves literally who even are half of you? Irrelevant until you abuse me, thats what.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PressF4Respect
which part was genuine? the penguins or the goodbye?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PressF4Respect
your threads in this section belong in the trash can, deleted for spam and callouts. maybe miscellaneous or personal would do though.
Created:
Posted in:
Here's your latest:
pure defence, no counter explanation of the universe than what she offered etc. I know if I vote against you, grudge voting will come to me so I'm debating whether or not to vote.
Created:
Posted in:
Somebody
Type1 - AKA Sparrow (who you knew was Type1 from CreateDebate account as well as me exposing him there and to you on the Trello and also you accepted it after noticing he got banned which was due to me outing him to the mods, I didn't accept his debates as back then I thought banned users had debates deleted and that there was a standard to be upheld by the CoC that bsh1 and virtuoso expliticly said wasn't there but conveniently went back on many months later when it suited them) I accepted Sparrow's debates much, much later on in his account's debate creating history after I realised you all got free wins from him and that it didn't matter what I exposed, you were allowed to keep them.
I saw many of these later-linked debates unaccepted. I didn't accept them. I reported them, assuming they'd be deleted as he got banned and they violated CoC, I was wrong.
Here examples of how far you take abusive bad faith debating against him in ways you'd punish me for doing against any other debate in your votes, but because it's Sparrow and you have such a high social standing on the site, your 'homies backed you up' with your bullshit angle: AKA Raganar and Oromagi...
I can give you others but you'll say they weren't free wins, just Christians you defeated by hard work so whatever, you couldn't lose against them if you tried since you have no Ramshutu after you in the votes with any excuse to worry about, especially not me as I don't want you revenge-voting me,
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
I doubt it. Nothing can create randomness itself other than random generation itself. This would mean that if randomness circles back to itself that it wasn't random after all, but then that leads to a logical fallacy in that the organised fate had a random origin of itself with no clear 'back in the circle' type thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
NASA is the illuminati and they faked that the earth is round for no reason.
no reason? Do you want the reasons?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
"at least they don't"
Actually their ratings are entirely due to free wins, if you mean the top 2. I can pinpoint the overall rating gains from such wins and also elaborate on when/where they knew the user was banned beforehand or would be angry and useless because it's someone who was furious and didn't care about winnning at the time of writing.
I wasn't one of them, oromagi so called 'genuinely defeated me' by ramshutu's logically fallacious vote but ramshutu did defeat me twice, second time was my own doing first was me accepting a debate i knew i'd lose to just shut him up about me 'not really believing' that he has an agenda when he votes against me and lies often in his rfd's in cunning ways.
Created:
Posted in:
nothing really changes,
shit just rearranges.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
goodnight, not sure how I offended.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Wars often start because one side thinks 'we must kill them, for they attacked us in this lesser indirect way!' oh lord they want to hurt us more because they hurt us before!
Wars often stop starting because a very intelligent general, diplomat or leader of a regime says 'na, let's see if there's another way to inventivise peace or clear up a misunderstanding here.'
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Wrong. It was common sense that led to voting into power every single tyrant in history (all dictators originally were 'voted in' at least the person before them etc). It took common sense to stay tame and obedient to this power.
Only intelligent rebels ever saved such a shitshow from the bastard running it, each and every time. Mandelas are few and far between, some will label them terrorists, some will label them god tier strategists who know that to defeat monsters you must be a beast yourself. Common sense gets people nowhere when the leadership want war and/or conflict. Common sense is seeing a police officer beating up, raping, killing, framing people around you and keeping your head down to not end up under their wrath. Stupidity is to beat up or yell at the police officer. Intelligence is to tactically film, interview, expose anonymously, the officer/s online and irl with a team so that even if you die, they can't ever truly bury the evidence or conspiracy.
Intelligence then is required to use the original rebel's information in a way that gets other nations and outside help motivated and furious (or paid-off) enough to act in the favour of the oppressed and abused. If you have common sense, you become a tame little pussy-ass puppy who is just as likely to submit to a saint as to a devil.
Created:
Posted in:
56% lol. Schmidt is literally a buy-in 'call me Google now' shareholder with many people backing him financially and influencing him, precisely as I said. the people behind him are not Google, at all.
Created:
Posted in:
yeah you can twist it any way you want. this is a nice semantic loophole to avoid admitting that type A stock can vote, bravo you 'win'? lol?
I have a debate due very soon and stuff to do, I can't be fucked with your bs.
Created:
Posted in:
again just semantic dancing, if type A can vote and type B can vote and overall the percentage ends up being that the voters are mainly not Google or bought their way in and are on paper google employees hiding many interests and secret funders behind them, it follows that the etnire point I made in the context of that debate are right.
you can run around semantically using A and B all you want, that doesn't even cover the fact that not everyone officially owning the stocks is the entirety (or near to it) of the people funding them, as individual representations of the group interest (to fund Google on their behalf or be a Google board member on their behalf)
You don't know much about Google or Facebook if you don't realise they were NSA ploys from extremely early on in their rise.
Created:
Posted in:
Eric Schmidt (CEO from first venture capital, hired by page and Brin)
perfect example of someone buying their way in, on paper being a Google employee. that guy is responsible for so much of google's surveillance and corruption further downt he line due to who is behind him but you wouldn't know that, you don't care who is funding him or that he wasn't part of the original 2 that you said owned 97.5% of what they own 14% of.
Created:
Posted in:
you are changing what you said to suit your agenda.
97.5% of B class stock are not owned by private equity, or any board member that wasn’t present at the founding of the original google enterprise.
wrong. 14% and there were only 2.
Created:
Posted in:
Completely confident, even on a surface level the remaiing 44% must have been traded, which ignores the fact that all stocks owned by Google themselves are actually 'traded' but bought by Google before others could (or wanted to), is all.
You're also ignoring the fact that someone can pay Google as a private interest with a very private contract and say it's contingent on them owning part of what, on paper, is the board member's shares. NSA have done this 100%, as have many others. The remainder hide behind the 44% people (and/or maybe are them).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
That is complete nonsense. Social progress should include social stability as part of it. I am less angry at you, more at this arrogant wannabe who decided to bully me and talk in such a rude tone and demeanour for no reason at all when I perfectly understood you and was trying to debate. The fact that he didn't reply to my last post despite being online since, tells me enough, shame he can't apologise.
Anyway, as for your outlook in general, I don't agree. Common sense is often what leads to wars and conflict in society, especially when miscommunication/misinterpretation is at play.
Created: