Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
Ask me to make you a profile pic here.
Describe what you want and describe your personality in your own words.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405
If you believe Chauvin killed Floyd as the left claims, then you need to prove that the level of Fentanyl in his system, mixed with Meth and other co trolled substances, had absolutely nothing to do with Floyd’s respiratory distress, enlarged heart, and erratic behavior during his lawful arrest. .
False. You need to prove the weight applied to Floyd's neck and chest had nothing to do with it. Chauvin lifted his boot off the ground at times, unleashing huge amounts of weight onto Floyd's neck and he yelled at the doctor that arrived, telling him to back away.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Okay let me hardcarry town or scum even though I post less
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
How is it at georestriction unlocking, speed of connecting etc?
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Nordlynx took wireguard and made it so that it deletes user info every time, Hideme uses raw wireguard which is fast and reaource-light but it notes every time you connect and to which server etc.
Why does it not warn of that?
Malaysia is a borderline Sharia nation. Are you sure it has good data retention policy for the VPN to maintain its no logs? Does it delete logs instantly or every few days?
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Snowden never said that.
Also, that extreme of encryption is actually unnecessary and slows the connection too much.
NordVPN has an encryption method called Nordlynx, almost just as secure and revolutionary speeds. Research Wireguard to understand what is utilises.
Also make sure you realise that your NSA worries and that VPN are not linked in reality.
Has it ever been audited?
Created:
Posted in:
If ancient aliens is Town, flat earth is Scum and vice versa.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
It has 2 still because Public choice nominated it before I unnominated it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I will participate if I can be only casually participating.
Created:
Posted in:
I am busy irl and this is a theme that much like Lunatic's ones is gonna have a ridiculous split that nobody can solve, most likely.
Either that or it is about criminal conspiracies vs political conspiracies or scientific vs anti-science.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Okay, based on certain observations and calculations, I wish to do the following as my one revote, 1 per category move:
People
Leave my nominations as they are.
Debates
Instead vote: US Military Response To Chinese Invasion Taiwan
Forum Threads
Instead vote: What has Airmax done to deliver on campaign promises?
Created:
Posted in:
she shows her beauty to the important people in her life & even more to those she actually intends to mate with.
to literally show her face to someone means she wants to fuck them?
To each their own kink, I suppose.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
Back than body was contrasted to the neck and head, it would have said 'head and body' if it means the level of covering you're implying, that is some extremely fanatical interpretation, are you one of those people who want women walking around in this:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
You are playing semantics. It clearly meant more of a shawl than a veil and was referring to covering one's chest area and sexy curves of any kind from the neck down essentially.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
@RationalMadman,Islam is itself a fascist religion both theologically and politically via Sharia.- Everybody seems to use that word these days, kinda makes you wonder. What does fascist exactly mean to you?
Definition of fascism1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
The term "Islamofascism" is defined in the New Oxford American Dictionary as "a term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".[3]
The earliest known use of the contiguous term Islamic Fascism dates to 1933 when Akhtar Ḥusayn Rā’ēpūrī, in an attack on Muḥammad Iqbāl, defined attempts to secure the independence of Pakistan as a form of Islamic fascism.[4] Some analysts consider Manfred Halpern's use of the phrase 'neo-Islamic totalitarianism' in his 1963 book The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa, as a precursor to the concept of Islamofascism, in that he discusses Islamism as a new kind of fascism.[5] Halpern's primary case was based on an analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he argued that such Islamic movements were an obstacle to the military regimes who were in his view representatives of a new middle class capable of modernizing the Middle East.[6][7] Halpern's work, commissioned by the United States Air Force from the Rand Corporation, arguably represents a mix of mid-Cold War analysis and orientalism.[8]
In 1978, Maxime Rodinson, a distinguished Marxist scholar of Islam, responded to French avant-garde enthusiasm for Khomeini's revolution in a three part article in Le Monde, by arguing that, in response to successive assaults by Crusaders, Mongols, Turks and Western imperialism, Islamic countries had come to feel embattled, and the impoverished masses had come to think of their elites, linked to foreigners, as devoid of traditional piety. Both nationalism and socialism imported from the West were recast in religious terms, in a process of political Islamicization which would be devoid of the progressive side of nationalism and revert to what he called "a type of archaic fascism" characterized by policing the state to enforce a totalitarian moral and social order.[9]
So, Nazis being anti-Islam benefits the stupidly naive left wing who openly embrace the religion without knowing its teachings, roots and nature once it starts to spread within a culture.- I reckon knowing the thing is a prerequisite to embracing it. I don't think the 'stupidly naive left wing' will still be adopting LGBT+Feminism & all the other nonsense if they were, as you claim, openly embracing Islam... Try to be consistent.
I actually agree with you there, they have no idea what it is they are claiming to welcome and embrace. If they did, they'd reject it immediately.
I took the time and effort to study Islam to prove Islamophobes wrong,- Why is this not believable...
I don't know but then again you blindly believe in a book written in times of extreme ignorance founded by a narcissistic sociopath who even had pedophilic tendencies.
all I ended up realising is that there is plenty to be phobic about if one is a left-wing progressive that wants liberty and democracy in their culture and nation.- You go girl. Do absolutely not abandon that Liberty & Democracy of yours, lest others may find it more difficult to overpower you.
This reply doesn't necessiate a rebuttal, it is not an argument or a question.
Not all immigrants and certainly not all cultures (with their ideologies attached) are good for a nation, many come from highly fascistic conservative cultures, if any side should believe in well screened immigration more than the other, it should be the left wing.- By all means, please do. You shouldn't have any conservative nonsense in your nations. We want a 100% queer West.
Just like your nations and cultures aim for extremely fascist conservatism, those of the West you detest are aiming for a tolerant and progressive society. In the end the friction and tolerance can only last until there's a severe push and it is reasonable to fear Islam's spread, they are very rapid at spreading their ideology and very good at blackmailing people to stay within the ethnic group even if they secretly disagree or doubt.
We can agree that if I said these things irl or online with my full name etc attached right here, I would be a cancelled popsicle melting under the ire of cancel culture. That has nothing to do with left or right wing politics and everything to do with irrational tyranny fearing a voice of reason and bravery.- How come you are defending the very thing for lack of the very thing that you are accusing others of... This 'left wing' thing looks pretty 'fascist' to me...
I am agreeing with you, cancel culture is pretty fascistic. The difference is that it generally is done by the society rather than the government.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
I hope the men start supporting and protecting their women in the Iran protests, like good Muslim husbands and brothers should. Do not deny it, I know the Qur'an, blood before government and there is no Quranic verse insisting on the head coverings.
Created:
Posted in:
I posted this just 1-2 days ago or something:
Call me prophetic, eh.
Created:
Posted in:
And here is why it is the left wing liberals that should fear Islam, not the right wing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Public-Choice
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Public-Choice
Oromagi is already in HoF, we can count that as a nomvote, feel free to redo it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
So how will you handle ties if it goes above 6?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
My decision are not final and are subject to change, but this is what I'm feeling at this moment
I hope you are true to your own rule.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Please expand on how ties are going to be decided in this stage to the next.
Created:
-->
@K_Michael
Idk where, they don't record it in the moderation log.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Is it allowed to change our nomination later?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405
Let us exclude pedophilia from my question:
What is wrong with accepting the groups you mention?
Created:
I do not see an issue with reporting things that break the rules.
I also am not the only one who reports things but I do it the most probably and that is due to others caring less about the fairness of votes and the website.
You or posts are all attacks at me, I wonder who is the punk making enemies and who is the enemy tolerating the punk, enlighten me more.
Created:
I am interested how my enemies should act, if it breaks the rules I care even more so.
I am not sure where I said otherwise.
Created:
I believe it's his goal to make enemies of every individual on the site.
Every time people say this, I wonder what it is they mean.
Do you come to a debate website afraid to make enemies? Me neither.
If people think I am their enemy for wanting rules enforced, then am I to cower?
I am happy to be the assumed reporter every time, that is a good shield and keeps other reporters anonymous, I will not crack under pressure nor deny a report was me or confirm it in most instances, that is precisely morally correct to maintain the anonymity of it.
You think that you are the most capable human being (literally) of adapting and learning. I cannot fathom how you can think I am more arrogant or sinister than you and I also do not care. Enemies are a part of life, focus your energy on making your allies happy instead of making your enemies suffer and you will find life is more pleasant, anywhere you go. That is what I do here and elsewhere. You just aren't my ally.
Created:
-->
@Novice_II
I said he had his still, which I think is a wrong decision.
Created:
-->
@Vici
Undefeatable too. That guy has spamvoted for Novice over and over,having his votes repeatedly removed no matter who he votes for elsewhere too as he is weak at justifying votes.
Oh you think it is about politics and not some other thing, we do not agree then.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I use my third forum thread nomination on:
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
You can rate them now, please.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Forum Threads
Third nomination still being considered.
Created:
What do people think of his Piers Morgan interview?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I use my third nomination of people on Novice_II
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You have no idea what I am part of or what nonexistent club you are referring to.
You get some shit and smear, it is your entire MO.
There is no link at all between the defense of Ukraine and this invasion other than that weapons are involved.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
So why the fuck would you want US to betray him if that was the case?
Just stop the propaganda BS. You are a chronic liar or deluded.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
No, what happened was Putin was corrupting Ukraine and the West was less corrupted by him.
Zelenzky was the first non-puppet President. I am not discussing further.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
I actually did that just with some bluntness.
First make the others try.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Jainism is a branch of Hinduism that insists it is its own religion but the very same core ethics so I could agree and not care too much.
I suspect you are Indian since you know of Jainism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I am not a warhawk fan, I am quite moderate on that topic and 100% against the Iraq war and drone strikes on Pakistan and Afghanistan.
I would have left Afghanistan and Pakistan to deal with their own issues or come asking for help. The problem was US made Afghanistan dependent on them for protection against the Taliban and just ripped the band-aid off.
I am pro-Ukraine aid and could not care less what you say.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Please extend it longer than only 3 days. Some people are barely online.
Created:
Posted in:
Debates
^ I nominate the finale debate of the tournament.
I also nominate this epic tie
I am in that too.
Finally, I nominate this infamous debate where corruption almost robbed Novice of a win:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@Greyparrot
@Bones
@Novice_II
@Vici
Self voting does not look bad, take it from the OG entry to hall of fame.
I vote:
People
GreyParrot
Lunatic
I intentionally leave third nomination open/unused.
For those who do not know, we can also nominate 3 debates and 3 forum threads posted preferably in the last year or slightly above that.
Created:
I can take an L, doesn't mean I enjoy it.
You don't get where the line is or what to focus on, you're only focusing on lashing out, not even rattling people to explain why they think you debated wrong. You haven't even fathomed why they are voting against you nor have you gained a single bit of wisdom from your Ls so far in any encounter.
I keep getting better, I tied vs misterchris and that was even with whiteflame himself voting against me. Do you know who else voted against me? Ehyeh, the guy you think is the whole community. The reason his post got upvotes is that there's some users here who have nothing better to do than play victim, much like yourself and think I have really hurt their feelings or some shit. He also reminded people of the fact I block people casually compared to what others take to block.
You can keep running around with this act, you're only hurting yourself. I don't even mean on here with this username that you may not give a damn about the reputation of. People with your approach to life never ever improve and I literally mean never. You are exactly what Dunning-Kruger effect predicts and I don't even buy into the idea of it very often.
Created:
-->
@Vici
Let me tell you what a self-victimising far-from-alpha-male mentality is all about:
Blaming everyone else for the fact you got destroyed in a debate and lashing out emotionally rather than being a cool-headed masculine strategist in the face of said defeat.
Your posts inside that debate in the comments section and on here reek of insecurity, you just don't get it yet. You may never get it for all I know but I was more like you in the past, you mature with experience... If you're smart enough.
Created: