Total posts: 3,472
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I wonder if there are other unfortunate numbers for any of those other HoF balls
What am I missing, why is #283 an unfortunate number?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
There are 21.6 sextillion planets in the Universe.
Are you positive, maybe you should count again just to be sure.
There is only human life on one planet. I guess humans are unique.
How do you know this?
So far, we have found intelligent (human) life on 100% of the planets observed, how did you extrapolate that out to only 1.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
You may go back to getting your education on X now.
He got his degree at Trump University.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Which is why the marxist left calls an elected president dictator while funding anarchy in the streets burning Teslas.
We burn the Teslas with our Jewish Spece Lasers.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
If you think about it, nothing good lasts forever. SS trust fund will run out in 2033That's going to happen with or without doge. If someone is going to fix that, I would love for Trump to take a hard fall for it to save America and SS.
Smells like DOGE Shit to me.
Created:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I dont think thats true. Most women I know...
But you don't know any women.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fauxlaw
He was being investigated, was facing a forced ban, so he had himself banned, presumably because when the moderators ban you, you can't come back under a different name, it must be the case that under a self-requested ban, you can come back anytime you want.
That's the only thing that makes sense of it, others have been banned, came back before the ban time is up, and been permanently banned for it, can't remember his name but that's how that whack job racist got banned for life, I think.
Apparently, one bans the specific account, the other bans the person. Looks like it was a smart move on BK's part.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I understand, but free speech argument was already brought up at the start and mods still said site could shut down if promoting that stuff. If its not hackers, owner not allowing, or losing host place for site, then I dont know what it could be. Driving away users?
It's not that hard to understand, it is illegal for pedophiles to solicit sex with children on the internet, you can try to unpack that simple statement and make you a victim, you can say, yeah but what if children want it, but none of that matters, it's a simple fact about the internet.
You'll have to get your rocks off some other way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@helperman
This is honestly the weirdest thing I've seen happen on the internet
You must not have explored the Internet at all.
Created:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Has it been 27 years already?
My, how time flies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
If you think about it, nothing good lasts forever. SS trust fund will run out in 2033That's going to happen with or without doge. If someone is going to fix that, I would love for Trump to take a hard fall for it to save America and SS.
Yes, it's a war, we must destroy Americans to save America, MAGA is our savior.
Let's all cheer for the destruction of the government, the old, the handicapped, children, trans, black, brown, LGBTQ, and liberals.
We don't need no stinking democracy, make America Aryan again, Hip Hip Hurray!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I haven't set any Teslas on fire, I should be fine.
Sure, you still have all that pain and suffering to celebrate, woo hoo.
Missed Social Security checks no big deal to Trump commerce secretary as attacks on agency escalate: Trump Commerce Secretary says, “Let’s say Social Security didn’t send out their checks this month. My mother-in-law— who is 94—she wouldn’t call and complain. She just wouldn’t.”
There you go, even old people want Musk to get their money, let's all cheer for fucking over the oldest Americans.
WOO HOO!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I see you too are happy for Trump to take the blame. Welcome to the club brother.
I see you too are happy for Trump to take the money. Welcome MAGA comrade.
Created:
-->
@7000series
You are arguing what we should do sixty-five years ago?
What makes you think this is an unpopular opinion?
Are there people who don't want Hawaii to be a state?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I believe you live in a privileged myopic world of delusion.
I believe he lives with his parents and doesn't actually have to work for a living.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Even if you believe there's no waste and fraud being safeguarded by stubborn federal holdout employees, we can't afford 2 trillion a year. It's gotta go one way or the other. I am totally good with Trump taking the blame if it means USA is saved.
That’s a good minion, uninformed as hell, but that’s the way Trump likes his minions, he just loves the poorly educated.
Let’s talk about the facts, Trump’s orgy of bloodletting aimed at federal staff are a matter of revenge, not efficiency, the total employee expense is less than 2% of the federal budget, at best it will be a drop in the bucket regarding the budget deficit.
Despite using the name, “Department of Government Efficiency” to fool his poorly educated suckers, the mass firings will not increase efficiency, it will only degrade customer service and reduce access to everything from school lunches to IRS tax assistance. To remove any doubt that his goal is not to increase government efficiency, his abrupt firing of inspectors general from 17 federal agencies, the inspector general of a federal agency is the individual most tasked with ensuring agency efficiency.
In case he has fooled you into thinking this is all to reduce the federal budget deficit, you should know that his budget proposal calls for a 4 trillion increase in the debt limit, what happens to all that money, it goes straight to his millionaire and billionaire oligarchy, 5.4 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthiest 1%. It calls for cutting 800 billion in Medicaid funding, the program that provides for health care in rural areas, his voters. Without Medicaid, there would be no hospitals and clinics in rural areas, 50% of children in rural areas depend on Medicaid for their health care.
You can cheer the devastation of children. families, people with disabilities, older Americans, hospitals, and nursing homes, but should do so knowing that they will all suffer so that Trump can give $4.5 trillion to the richest Americans.
Trump is the president that increase the federal debt by more than any president in history, his plan is to do so again, and despite what he has his uninformed suckers thinking, it has nothing to do with efficiency, it is not to reduce the budget deficit, it is to take the money from the needy and give it to the richest Americans.
You are right, "we can't afford 2 trillion a year", and with Trump's budget. it will be 3.1 trillion we can't afford.
Woo Hoo let’s all cheer for cruelty and destruction! Seeing people suffer gives us a woody, violence and death is wonderful, let's stick it our enemies, the American people.
Let’s all cheer so the billionaires can get richer! Hip, Hip, hooray!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Bet that ruined your day, sorry.Yes, I had a good cry about kids I know nothing about getting deported to a place I have never been.And then I woke up.
You will cheer right up to the moment they come for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Can adult Americans even be trusted to make rational decisions?
Why make decisions when you have a dictator to make decisions for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Separate families and put children in cages, YIPPEE!Trump sent the kids home with the parents this time. You win.
Bet that ruined your day, sorry.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Better yet, everybody should just stay home and order Door Dash when they get hungry.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
The Justice Department, the FBI, and US Military, are all just Trump’s weapons for revenge, and his appetite for vengeance is insatiable.I am okay with revenge against corruption.
Says the fan of the most corrupt administration the world has ever seen.
Separate families and put children in cages, YIPPEE!
Deport dissenters, Woo Hoo!
Shit on the Constitution, Hurray!
Can't wait till the military attacks the homeless, LGBTQ, and those terrible trans people, that will be awesome.
This is great television, Hallelujah!
Created:
Posted in:
I just read Chief Justice is being verballly attacked by Fox news commentators, because Roberts is citing 100 or more years of law that Trumpet thinks he can just crush into dust.
First of all, it’s 247 years of Us constitution Trump thinks he can just crush into dust, and Chief Justice Roberts doesn’t even get a vote.
John Roberts, presided over the best Supreme Court money can buy, to last year grant Trump legal immunity in doing anything he wants if he claims it is an “official act”, inciting an insurrection was considered an official act by that court, his lawyers argued successfully to that court that this immunity would extend to ordering SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent (or Supreme Court justices for that matter). I’m pretty sure Trump knows that Chief Justic Roberts can stick his silly little lecture, since last year his court that ruled the Judiciary has absolutely no power over Trump’s criminal actions.
These MAFiA nutters want anarchy for USA and for Trumpet to be a dictator, and stomp on USA rule of law if it gets in his or MAFiA's way.
There is a reason Trump says, “I love the poorly educated”, this is what happens when Putin, white supremacists, and trailer trash team up to elect a president.
Wake USA citizens before your put in concentration camps or worse. These nutters feeling more and more empowered with freedoms to verbally attack others unjustly and I fear much worse is coming soon. Trumpet calling to impeach a judge for following USA law.Be afraid USA citizens who stand for liberty against those who believe freedom means the do what ever please to other USA citizens, because they are empowered by Trumpet and others in power. Yikes!
You want MAGA to wake up and refuse to live the lie, even though the lie feels so damn good to these people? You are right to "fear much worse is coming soon."
He has total control over these people, Trump told them that they are the victims of a culture war, that only authoritarian rule can save their country. Trump told them that Putin is their friend, and Americans are their enemy, and they believed him, he told them the US government is their enemy, LGBTQ is the enemy, trans people are their enemy. His lies have convinced them that their country is under siege, that this is a war to save their country, The culture war is, for them, a real war, and in real wars, rules have to be broken, laws set aside, and enemies have to be destroyed by any means necessary. Seen as weakness, democracy, decency, compassion, and respect are irrelevant in wartime.
What I find most frightening is how easily it was to desensitize them by dehumanizing their perceived enemies. The sheer joy they find in hurting people, the way they are energized by cruelty, how a man with a toy chain saw can work them into a joyous frenzy over thousands of people losing their jobs, how they take pride in the hatred he has brought to the surface. Again, and again the rhetoric of hatred gets them frothing at the mouth at the promise of retribution, when they are the transgressors and none of their so-called enemies are at war, they are simply innocent targets of MAGA’s wrath.
Don’t count on these people waking up, the last thing they want to be is “woke”, and how would that happen anyway? They don’t watch news because Trump told them the free press is the enemy of the people, they watch the propaganda channel and think it is news, they were told not to believe what they see and hear, and there is no need to think for themselves, what could possibly wake them up?
It might be too late, but what the rest of us need to wake up to is what’s next, it's what he promised, it's what got him re-elected.
He promised the voters he would be a dictator on day one, and they elected him, let’s look at what did he did on day one? One of Trump's first executive orders, signed the evening he took office on January 20, was titled, "Declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border of the United States." Under Section 6 of the order, Trump directs Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to submit a joint report with recommendations for actions that "may be necessary to obtain complete operational control", it specifically cites the option of “whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807."
The Insurrection Act of 1807 gives the president broad powers to deploy the military domestically in response to what he deems to be emergency situation. All the lies about a city in Ohio having been overrun by Haitian immigrants who were eating all the cats and dogs, the lies about a city in Colorado completely under the control of Venezuelan street gangs, the lies about “millions and millions of illegals are pouring into our country every week.”, the lies about how the survival of this country is under attack by liberals, trans, LGBTQ, “the enemy of the people” press, and the “deep state” of the US Government, all of it to establish the legal premise for invoking the Insurrection Act, and to lay the predicate to invoke martial law. Then he will be th full blown dictator he promised his voters.
He has mused about invoking the Insurrection Act for years, calling it a “Magic Power”, throughout the second campaign he has spoken of weaponizing the law enforcement and the military against civilians, with the promise of infringing the “other” American’s civil liberties. When he recently spoke at the Justice Department describing his adversaries as “scum,” “savages,” and “Marxists,” as well as “deranged,” “thugs,” “violent vicious lawyers,” and “a corrupt group of hacks and radicals within the ranks of the American government.”
In the “Friday Night Massacre” at the Pentagon Trump fired the nation’s top uniformed officers, including all of the top uniformed lawyers at the Army, Navy and Air Force, the three star generals whose primary responsibility is to review orders from the commander-in-chief and defense secretary, to decide whether they’re legal. In case there is any doubt as to why this happened, recognize that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth explained these actions were taken, preemptively, to prevent them from blocking “orders that are given by a commander in chief.” For years Trump has promised he would be a dictator and invoke martial law if he came back to power, and we elected him, this is what half the country wanted.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 consolidates federal power under the president and allows him to deploy the military against the American people, it allows him to declare martial law and set aside our Constitutional rights and guardrail laws.
His followers don’t need to wake up, Trump has fully awakened their hatred and bloodlust, Trump promised martial law, violence, and the complete destruction of their enemies, and they were fully awake when they elected him.
A futile “talking to” by Chief Justice John Roberts, a man who already granted him immunity from the law, isn’t going to have any effect, it’s just more political theater. Roberts granted him the power to attack anyone he wanted, and then reconsidered when he attacked the judicial branch, and MAGA will cheer until he attacks them, there is no mutual loyalty from a dictator, and he won't give destruction of the people who elected him a second thought, he will enjoy sticking it to those "suckers and losers".
The Justice Department, the FBI, and US Military, are all just Trump’s weapons for revenge, and his appetite for vengeance is insatiable.
Created:
I just love the intellectual threads.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Ha, thanks for your confidence in me.
I think I was agreeing with you, but you just say it differently, like real extremely differently.
Created:
Posted in:
The short answer is because there is no observational or experimental reason whatsoever to believe in the existence of monopoles.
They exist as purely theoretical mathematics, and I'm pretty sure the theory began when a group of mathematicians got really high and said "wouldn't it be cool if..."
That, plus they aren't even possible theoretically. The existence of magnetic monopoles would fundamentally violate our physical theories of electromagnetism, and electromagnetism is kind of a big deal in physics, you know, foundational to the unity of a vast amount of interrelated scientific disciplines, and all that.
If you really want to try to unravel the world ofscience, you probably need to be armed with a little more than absolutely nothing in the way of observational or experimental reasons to do so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Oh, didn't know that.
For a guy that requested it, he sure did a lot of complaining about being banned.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
According to the Ban Details, he's been banned for 27 years, typo perhaps?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
In various cultures and historical periods, children have been granted decision making power much earlier than in modern western societies, and this enabled them to be more capable than children in western societies.
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were talking about this century, so let me reconsider, OK, I considered, and if you have a time machine, still no, you still can't fuck children.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I am glad you are enjoying our debate here, but anyway. Ability to consent, like all abilities, are developed with practice. By not letting children consent and teaching them to obey, their ability to consent is reduced and this enables adults to take advantage of them. It is also reducing their ability of consent even when they turn 18, due to lack of experience and practice in making their own decisions.
No, you still can't fuck children.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Well, there is no perfect nation on this planet.Well, sure, but if people want to make bad choices, then they shouldnt be surprised that their nation only gets worse over time.
Yes, and when you make bad choices, you get to put on a dress and dance for Butch as foreplay.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Children usually choose food which they know they like. The mere act of choosing requires knowledge, proving that children have some knowledge.
Nobody said children don't have knowledge, you are just babbling nonsense non-sequiturs.
Nothing you have said is the least bit relevant to the question of consent, you can't fuck children under any circumstances. Not if you pretend you still don't understand, not if you blather on and on that children should be able to let you fuck them, not if you make children out to be the victim of laws that protect children, you can't fuck children, ever.
Let's jump ahead and summarize all your next posts, and all your next threads about it.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Blah blah blah, no, you still can't fuck children.
Faster, harder, a little to the left.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
If children couldnt have knowledge, then sending them to school would be pointless as they couldnt learn anything.
Nobody said children can't have knowledge, the reason you send them to school is, so they gain knowledge
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I've never taken acid, I'll admit I'm curious as hell, but I never tried it.
Anyway, reading this thread is what I imagine taking LSD would be like.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
If children cant consent, then everything done to them is done without their consent. So school, healthcare... are all done without their consent. It is immoral to force things on others, even if you consider it beneficial.
No it isn't, children are dependent on adults for their care, they are not responsible for themselves, their parent or legal guardian is responsible for their care.
For example, you cant force people to go vegetarian or to meddle in their life the way you think is beneficial, because what is beneficial is determined by what is wanted, and something unwanted cannot be beneficial. In this way, saying that children cant consent is a concession that school and healthcare and whole of society are immoral and evil.
Nonsense, there is nothing immoral or evil about caring for the young until they are able to take care of themselves.
You really think you can convince us that we are evil and immoral if we don't let pedophiles fuck our children, get a grip.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Well, what is the point which is being missed by the question?
The point is the same as in the last fifty threads where you ask this question.
Consent is defined as giving permission, children cannot give you permission, children have no right to overrule the law, and before you do your predator song and dance, NO, children are not the victim of the laws that are there to protect children, break those laws and you will be the victim.
This was the case the last hundred times you asked, and it won't change if you ask another hundred times.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Common, just one argument. Do I have to say please?
If you really need to rub one out, you can always go back to one of the other fifty threads you've done.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Are you going to give any arguments here?
Is your keyboard sticky?
Created:
-->
@Savant
Let's say you are a Republican, if vandals spray painted elephants on your carNazis have repeatedly spray painted swastikas to promote racism. It's like putting a burning cross in front of a building or hanging a dummy from a noose. Spray painting elephants does not have the same connotation.and defaced your home with slogans like "No to GOP"Except in the first three examples I linked, there's no text. Just swastikas being spray painted.When people spray paint them on the Nazi's car, that's when.So buying a Tesla is Nazi behavior, but spray painting a swastika isn't? Also Nazis would put swastikas on their cars all the time. Or spray paint them on other people's property, kind of like protesters are doing now.What about this one? Do you think whoever painted that is telling the Nazis to "get out"?
Yeah, you are right, these people are probably showing their support for Nazis.
I'm sure the Nazis appreciate it too.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Giving children right to consent protects children from abuse. If parents have no right to deny their children of choice, then they are less likely to deny children of choice. This protects children from over controlling parents. Over controlling parents are scientifically proved to harm child's decision making development and child's knowledge and confidence and ability to reject unwanted advances.
Nonsense, your question has been asked and answered a hundred times here, it's a stupid question and you can't seem to get enough of it, the question becomes, are you whacking off to this thread?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Children who become smartest are those who have choices in childhood, so saying that children shouldnt be allowed to choose or consent is harmful.
The definition of consent is to "give permission", not matter what the child says, you don't have permission, the child cannot give you permission, you don't have the right, and children can't give you a right you don't have.
It's really not complicated, if you still don't get it, maybe Butch can drill it into you, so to speak.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You wouldnt want anyone else deciding about you without your consent,
That's my point Sweetcheeks, Butch is deciding about you whether you consent or not, so it doesn't matter.
so saying that children should suffer that treatment is inconsistent.
No, it isn't inconsistent, maybe Butch likes it when you play hard to get, maybe he won't respect you in the morning if you consent.
You don't get to pretend there are no consequences, what's the point of fantasizing that children can give consent? Either way, you squeal like a pig.
Fantasize about Butch for a minute, after you squeal like a pig for him, did you have the right to consent?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I am merely defending the position that it doesn't matter whether or not they consentSo can they consent or not?
OK, so if you consent, Butch makes you squeal like a pig, if you don't consent, Butch makes you squeal like a pig.
So, did you have the right to consent?
Consider Butch's feelings, is he more satisfied if you consent, or don't consent?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You want to debate if children have the right to consent to being raped?No. I am merely defending the position that children can consent.
I am merely defending the position that it doesn't matter whether or not they consent.
Are you going to present arguments for why children shouldn't be given a choice?
OK, here is my argument, it doesn't matter.
I win.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Canadians see Trump as the spoiler.
Americans see Trump as a soiler.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Of course, children can consent, but that doesn't matter, consent gets you prisonThis isnt a debate about prison punishment. Its a debate about if child should have a right to choose. I defend position that child should have a choice. My opponent defends position that child shouldnt have a choice.
You want to debate if children have the right to consent to being raped?
Even though, either way, you get to squeal like a pig for Butch?
Created:
-->
@cristo71
I have been wondering the same thing. If they think Musk is really a closet Nazi, how would swastikas be an offense to him? Or if swastikas are offensive to him, doesn’t that mean he is decidedly not a Nazi? Isn’t this what actual Nazis do to intimidate people?
I guess in will remain a mystery until we see whether or not Musk thanks the vandals.
Maybe the people who spray painted the cars meant it as a complement, yeah, that's probably it, they are probably big Musk fans, and he probably appreciates it.
Created:
-->
@Savant
Protestors are drawing swastikas on cars. See here, here, and here. Apparently, this is being done in an effort to fight Nazis.
I'm pretty sure it's directed at Elon Musk, here is the beginning of the article you posted:
"Vandals sprayed swastikas and anti-fascist slogans on a Tesla car showroom in The Hague on Sunday night in a jab at owner Elon Musk, who is an adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump and faced outrage for delivering a "Nazi salute" last month."
"The perpetrators defaced the building's facade with slogans like "No to Nazis" and "Fuck off fascist," and drew swastikas on the entrance door of the building, echoing a similar incident that took place in Berlin last week."
And your thinking is, if Musk is a Nazi, why would he have a problem with this? Seriously?
My question is, are any Nazis bothered by the drawing of swastikas? I was under the impression that Nazis draw swastikas all the time.
Let's say you are a Republican, if vandals spray painted elephants on your car and defaced your home with slogans like "No to GOP" and "Fuck off Republicans", you would be OK with it, you know, because Republicans use images of elephants all the time? Seriously?
When did swastikas become an anti-Nazi symbol?
When people spray paint them on the Nazi's car, that's when.
And when they are used to call a senior government official a Nazi, then too.
I really doubt Musk is confused about what they mean to convey by their use of the symbol.
Created:
Posted in:
Of course, children can consent, but that doesn't matter, consent gets you prison, no consent gets you prison, and in prison it doesn't matter to your boyfriend Butch whether you consent or not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Are you asking us to lie, why would we compromise our integrity by pretending he's not an idiot?Dont get me wrong, I like when people make themselves miserable by hurting each other. The easiest way to destroy any group is to turn it against itself and watch it slowly devour itself and destroy itself. But I really cant understand why you guys do this. Its like watching those group suicides.
I think I'll survive.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
The criticism about Trump is *why* he wants a third term, the answer is because he's actively trying to rewrite our constitution for his own personal benefit.
Trump's argument, "I have my own Bible, why can't I have my own Constitution?"
"I don't repost to you, I report to Putin, and he said I could"
Created: