Sidewalker

I will be featured on a live debate channel (likely) in two weeks. The topic is creationism vs Marco evolution.

Can any theists give me studies, points, or books for creation so I can integrate them into my argument? Can any atheists give me points and studies that may be used against me?

So not all republicans are white supremests, but pretty much all white supremests are republicans.

It is at it's core, quite simple; republicans are the conservative party.

Conservatism is about conserving the status quo.

The status quo in America is that white people own nearly everything and maintain the power.

The idea that we should conserve everything as it is, is based almost entirely on fear, so those who are fearful of change, fearful of the other, fearful of losing their livelihood... Tend to gravitate towards conservatism.

People for whom fear is their primary motivator are easier to manipulate by scapegoating.

There is about a hundred times more direct evidence that millions died in the concentration camps than there is that Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, your conspiracy theory approach to evaluating the Holocaust can be applied to anything to achieve any outcome, it's OK to do it, you clearly have an agenda and that agenda isn't about the truth, but most of the members here are whack job conspiracy theorists trying to sell thier own whack job conspiracy theory, good luck trying to gaslight the gaslighting crowd here (most of them are better at it than you BTW). Everyone here everyone here knows conspiracy logic is not logic, the only ones swallowing it are the ones that already want to swallow it. 

If you want us to read Mein Kampf to understand Hitler you need to show us that Hitler wrote it, if you can't do that then we only need to read it if we are interested in Shecky Goldstein.  The question you have to ask, is why they want us to believe Hitler wrote it, how does that let them control us and take us away from the truth of Shecky Goldstein.

That, or admit your approach is agenda based BS and kindly stop trying to associate the words "logic" and "truth" with it, it's offensive that you think we are that stupid.

logic, huh?

you serious?

Mein Kampf was published in 1925/1926. It was serialised in multiple newspapers globally and is available in tens of languages, still available today, and the man we know as Adolf Hitler never said he didn't write it - and - guess what - he started a second book, which is now available as an unfinished manuscript - "Hitler's Second Book" - try arguing what the first one was if not Mein Kampf?

as for your attacks on my logic.

you haven't pointed out a logical fallacy in the flowchart I created that shows how evidence presented at Nuremberg for homicidal gas chambers helps to prove there were none. you've just continued to insult my person and generally talk shit about me.

point out a logical fallacy in the flowchart.

here, try your best

https://postimg.cc/ft2jPbvK

p.s. I actually don't care if people read Mein Kampf. for the third or fourth time, I only care when people state lies about him that they have heard from sources other than him, which they would not state if they had read Mein Kampf. simple.

and no, it's not "he said, she said" - it's things like saying he was a racist.

when there really is no evidence he was...

you could just give me one example and I'll show you how you believe in BS without researching it first.

You need to understand that Hitler didn't even write Mein Kampf, it's a conspiracy...prove me wrong.

the author name is 'Adolf Hitler'

gotcha...!

You need to understand that Hitler didn't even write Mein Kampf, it's a conspiracy

haha, you got me on that to be fair, I was a bit worried when I saw 'Important Video' haha

but still, thanks, you're a good sport to acknowledge there are no logical fallacies in my flowchart.

even though you lack the stones to say it outright

please note: i rejected the 'supreme master race' bullshit that you believe Hitler believed in.

do you know what 'Untermenschen' means?

Typical liberal loser…

tell me one thing wrong with the logic in this flowchart.

I am desperate for error-checking on this.

https://postimg.cc/ft2jPbvK

You said that you reject everything presented in Mein Kampf, but you still whine that we have to read it because...why is that again? 

I said I reject everything presented in Mein Kampf, did I?

er.

do I claim it doesn't exist, or something? I don't get it.

didn't say that though

I also didn't whine that you had to read it. just don't like when people recite bull about Hitler without knowing anything about him from his perspective so I'll call it out

Of course, the reason is you lied about rejecting it, we don't have to read your book to know everything we need to know about you.  You are a white supremacist, you are a liar, and you are dumber than a fucking post.  

I'm actually not white, so... good job on that one

liar how, exactly? tell me one of my lies, go on

and you're smarter than Einstein, honey

In the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale, he describes the mermaid as having a “white skin.”

Andersen was a Dane, he lived in a place where anyone who wasn’t pasty-white (or the sun-damaged variation of pasty-white) was a rarity.

He was also writing explicitly for an audience that equated paleness with female beauty. Upper-class women in Andersen’s culture avoided suntanning; if your skin wasn’t pasty white, you were obviously someone who labored in the outdoors and weren’t a member of the “gentry”.

we don't have to read your book to know everything we need to know about you.

You sound like a left cultist.

I'll just give you a paragraph from Mein Kampf instead. Who the fk is George Santos btw.

Some COVID-19 thing or something. Turn off the news, it's affecting your brain

I am simply calling people out for chatting shit about Hitler when they haven't even read Mein Kampf -- so they are parroting rubbish about him instead of, I don't know, maybe, possibly, perhaps reading the man's own words, first? Or even a critique of them? A parody, maybe?

yes, the winners of WW2 have said plenty nice things about Hitler, and they continue to disseminate the unabashed truth of him almost eight decades later as mandatory education in school - not

p.s. most people I know who became 'Holocaust questioners' did so before they became anti-Semites, not the other way round, as you may have been led to believe

Even by 1916, several alarming signs became apparent. The men at the front were cursingand complaining—they were discontented and justifiably resentful in many respects. Whilethey were starving and suffering and their families at home were in misery, they could stillsee places where there was abundance and festive living. Even at the front itself, everythingwasn’t as it should have been in this respect. There were faint warnings of crisis, but thesewere all still internal matters. The same man who growled and cursed would silently do hisduty a few minutes later as if it were habit. The same company that was feelingdiscontented would dig into the section of trenches it had to defend, as if Germany’s Fatedepended upon this hundred yards of mud and shell-holes. This front line was still formedby the old, magnificent “Army of Heroes!” I would soon experience the difference betweenit and home in glaring contrast. At the end of September, 1916, my division entered thebattle of the Somme (one of the largest battles in the First World War with over 1.5 millioncasualties at the river Somme in northern France). For us, it was the first of the huge battlesthat now followed, and the impression it created is hard to describe. It seemed more likeHell than a war. The German front held out against the whirlwind drumming of the guns forweeks at a time. Sometimes, they were pushed back; then they would advance again, butthey never gave up.

I do know what is in it and what it's about, and so I know that you are lying about it. 

How about you cut the cutesy bullshit and be honest, answer questions instead of all the dishonest distractions that I suppose you think is clever or something.

You are selling the book, the only reason to do so is you accept it's premises, so answer these questions

Are you a White Supremacist or NeoNazi?

Do you believe the white race should be kept pure, and so should remain separate and not marry inferior races.

Do you believe Jews are a parasitic inferior race attempting to control the world?

Do you believe Jews should be eliminated through bloodshed?

Do you believe that the Aryan race is the superior master race to which all other inferior races must be subordinated?

Have you read the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and "The Turner Diaries"?

no, no, no, no, no, yes

'superior master race'

too much Hollywood for you, pal. I doubt you've read Mein Kampf. Maybe you have but you have gobbled up too many post-war propaganda pieces after reading it.

You mean China. The largest single shareholder of Disney is China going by the box office receipts.

I think that when comes to racial roles in Disney, it all depends on the context.

If you take an old character and race swap them, I don't think it's a big deal, as long as it doesn't kill the character, or 

the character in question doesn't have any historical/racial ties.

Take the little mermaid for instance. 

They changed Arial to be black. I would be ok with this but the historical significance, is very concerning.

The original story of the little mermaid took place in the renaissance europe, where racial division was very high.

It wouldn't make sense to the story at all if Arial was black. Plus the original story emphasizes the red hair. Black people biologically don't have black hair. 

So in this case, I am not fine with it, but I guess it depends on the context of the characters. 

My solution is, instead of switching the races of characters, how about just make new ones. 

"My struggle" is a clue that it's not autobiographical, you guys crack me up.

fine, keep reinforcing the fact you haven't read it but act like you know what's in it or what it's about.

I didn't ask you to

Dude.........

A book written by Adolf Hitler is of course going to be saying good things about......Adolf Hitler.

it's not about him.

but you'd know that if you'd read it

clue's in the title

depends on what his manifesto would be.. what party he would run for, who he could rely on to help him, who would oppose him, etc. it's a century's difference, man. and a lot of lies in between that would taint people's immediate opinion of him.

why not ask me a more specific question if you want an answer that will satisfy your curiosity.

serious question to all here: how many of you have read Mein Kampf at least? tired of seeing this rubbish about Hitler almost 80 years on...

Feckless, uneducated intellectual coward of a troll with zero integrity. 

You clearly did not READ the Original Post/Comment!!! 

I read it, and it's idiotic. 

Easy to claim, harder to prove. And you have NOT proven me wrong in anything I posted. Not a damn thing.

You guys think the rest of us are stupid enough to swallow that BS, but we aren't, only right wing (sic) whack jobs are stupid enough to swallow that BS.

Easy to claim it is BS, harder to prove. And you have NOT proven me wrong in anything I posted. Not a damn thing. 

Had you done so, you would have learned that Mps1213 challenged me to a debate over the drug cocktail being/not being what killed Floyd. 

I proved it did. 

No (sic) you didn't.  You right wing whack jobs  think (sic) you can alter history by changing the narrative, it's (sic) bullshit, you can't gaslight us, and we aren't buying into your conspiracy worldview.

Yes, I did. You're just a whiny immature denialist who couldn't argue his/her way out of a wet paper bag. 

And it is to the LEFT nut cases who think they can alter history; pass lie after lie until idiots like you believe it to be true. And boy, you're sure painting yourself to be the poster child of gullibility. 

Again, you have NOT proven me wrong in anything I posted. Not a damn thing. 

The knee issue is completely irrelevant because no one but Chauvin knows how much pressure he applied. Despite that glaring fact, the autopsy clearly denoted that there was no evidence of asphyxiation or any restriction upon breathing. The knee causing Floyd's death is a LIE!!!!! 

The knee issue is of primary relevence, (sic) you know, seeing as the knee was  actually (sic) the murder weapon and all.   

Reading comprehension problems, I (we) see... the autopsy was crystal clear; the knee did not cause his death. He had a heart attack brought on by a drug cocktail and excited delirium. Period. Fact. Period. 

You nut jobs think it's been over a year, maybe they have forgotten that they watched it on TV again and again, do you really think you can gaslight us about a murder that was witnessed by around a billion people?  Your tin foil hat it too tight again.  

It wasn't murder. No more than Michael Brown was murdered. No more than Eric Gardner was murdered. Black males have piss poor health, it's an inherent problem with them as I clearly denoted in on (or more) of my responses. Add criminality, stress, drug usage, etc. to it and the heart will eventually give out as it so clearly did here in the case of Floyd. 

Again, you're just an ignorant denialist too chicken shit to prove me wrong, so you just come out lashing like a scorned little girl. 

The drug dealer in the back seat was NEVER subpoenaed to testify at trial as to what drugs he gave Floyd he consumed just before police approached the vehicle. For a lack of better terms, that drug dealer "disappeared" after Floyd's arrest. Think on that.

You are full of crap, think on that. 

Derek Chauvin was found guilty of murder in one of the most highly scrutinized and thorough investigations and legal processes of all time, all of the evidence was conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt, and whack job right wing extremists are not gonna (sic) gaslight anybody with your conspiracy theories and bald faced (sic) lies.  The preposterous bias of your Dunning Kruger Effect arrogance makes you think all you need to do is change the narrative, but no matter how much you whine, you aren't going to change the facts.

Ah, classic denialism yet again. 

Chauvin was railroaded in a politically charged trial without any merit. The left needed a scapegoat, and Chauvin was it. He was the patsy in the name of racial division and staving off any further rioting by blacks destroying their own neighborhoods. 

You clearly have ZERO education in the legal arena, so your subjective opinions about the criminal justice system and how a criminal trial works is pure diarrhea spewing from your mouth and out your fingertips. 

I did not change any narrative. I espoused the actual facts that were shoved to the side because it did not fit the leftist narrative. 

the cop hovered his knee above the throat of Floyd barely touching it

LOL, you guys are fucking hilarious.

It;s been almost two years since Chauvin was convicted of murder, when you guys are still whining about something from over a year ago, you should put it in the history forum...at least untill they add a "whiney baby" forum.

You clearly did not READ the Original Post/Comment!!! 

Had you done so, you would have learned that Mps1213 challenged me to a debate over the drug cocktail being/not being what killed Floyd. 

I proved it did. 

The knee issue is completely irrelevant because no one but Chauvin knows how much pressure he applied. Despite that glaring fact, the autopsy clearly denoted that there was no evidence of asphyxiation or any restriction upon breathing. The knee causing Floyd's death is a LIE!!!!! 

The drug dealer in the back seat was NEVER subpoenaed to testify at trial as to what drugs he gave Floyd he consumed just before police approached the vehicle. For a lack of better terms, that drug dealer "disappeared" after Floyd's arrest. Think on that.

Oh good, another topic you're making about kids' genitals. 

What happened to Wylted?

People come and go but honestly the only real value point this site has to offer is for white boys who hate too hard to be tolerated on the well managed sites.  Those fuckwits don't have any other place that'll have them, so they slowly just became the majority population here, stroking each other's inner fear furries.   Island of misfit toys but the toys are mostly just racist.

oro nails it. These losers spend all day talking about trans or hating blacks. We're next thing to an incel forum. And baffling what hard knocks GP is supposed to be taking on in order to improve himself. 

the cop hovered his knee above the throat of Floyd barely touching it

Owning a car should be a crime since sooner or later you are going to run someone over.

Also, the claim that you cannot function without a car is false, since humans have functioned without a car for thousands of years.

Its like me saying that I cannot function without my smartphone. Its an obvious lie, but this society is based on lies so I might as well join in.

Most Democrats do not want Biden to run again. 

A. Sin is a concept relative to evolved intellect.

B. Human nature and associated aggression is a base function relative to survival and procreation.

So we could attempt to re-educate the entire human race.

And possibly re-engineer the human machine.

What are the chances of achieving either?

I heard Hillary will have a wine party.

Eye bitten by roach is a rare but possible occurrence that can happen when a roach crawls onto a sleeping person's face and bites their eye. The bite can cause swelling, redness, and pain, and may require medical attention depending on the severity of the bite.

Will that stop Trump from being nominee, or from winning?

And r egardless, does Biden even have a chance of another term with 43% current approval rate which could drop even lower by the time of elections?

https://edition.cnn.com/polling/approval-rating-poll-of-polls

devil. I rebuke you in the name of Jesus Christ. you are a liar and a blashemer. there is no truth in you.

you will leave this place in the name of Jesus Christ. i plead the blood, i take authority over you in the name of Jesus Christ and i cast you out!

Which fact do you have doubts about? The time each person served in their cabinet position? The spelling of their names? Their individual resumes?

Tillerson calling Trump a moron? What?……………..

Since the origin of the fighting words doctrine, the SCOTUS has failed to uphold a single conviction since 1942. I wonder if there could be a consensus in this forum for reversing this trend.

Post your list of what you think are an objective list of "fighting words" uttered in a public setting.

Words that must be excluded are the ones on the list of the recent SCOTUS rulings, namely:

Insults against the American Flag, Fuck the Draft, Bury the niggers, Send the Jews back to Israel, White son of a bitch, I'll kill you, mother fucking, god damn mother fucking police, mother fucking fascist, black mother fucking pig, wearing German swastikas and German uniforms, cross burning, flag burning, God Hates the USA, Thank God for 9/11, America is Doomed, Don’t Pray for the USA, Thank God for IEDs, Thank God for Dead Soldiers, Pope in Hell, Priests Rape Boys, God Hates Fags, Fags Doom Nations, You’re Going to Hell, and God Hates You.

Lol, you really do enjoy your mandatory prescribed 2 minutes of hate.

You are a Marjorie Taylor Greene fan I see.

More like a George Orwell fan.

I don't click on links from strangers. 

It's the Democrats that want to have a regime closest to Putin's with media control, censorship and eliminating opposition. 

The slim hope America has is for Republicans to break away from the Democrats and allow actual Democracy and a government run by the people and not oligarchs, because Democrat voters are most certainly not going to change the current bread and circus regime.

America certainly doesn't need to "retain" that shit.

Democracy of old where people spoke their minds without fear is a relic of the past and is now labeled as Extreme.

GOP might have to reinvent itself like the Democrats did after 1965. 

It's highly unlikely Biden will be impeached with the current House. Biden's daily blunders only help the GOP the longer he stays in office.

It's the Democrats that are worried, not the GOP.

You’re just not worth anyone’s time. 

Trolling intellectual coward that you so clearly are. 

And a liberal too. Makes you a DemonRAT to the core.