“When I made the rule, I didn't assume people would be intentionally annoying. But at this point I don't care, you're just giving me ELO.”
“We'll see how glad you are when this debate is over”
I’m not berating you. I think you’re a good debater, but.:
“ Technically, your first argument is below 3,000 characters.
“Characters (including spaces) 2497”
If it weren’t for your quotes in block test, you’re below the character limit.”
Rational. These aren’t my own words, I swear.
But Whiteflame said Machine Gun Kelly would destroy K-Rino lyrically.
What are your thoughts?
I actually knew Weaver didn’t know much about rap, but I was curious to see how he would vote on a rap battle that wasn’t a regular debate.
👀
Black Thought is pretty lethal
I’ll give them a listen.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TfYgzgaU8-0
I believe Tech N9ne comes the closest to matching K-Rino, in terms of lyricism and flow.
I take it Weaver isn’t your preference for voters on a rap battle?
What about Tupac vs K-Rhino?
Voters with decent rap knowledge IMO are K_Michael, Athias, and SupaDudz.
@RationalMadMan
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1626-rap-battle?open_tab=votes&votes_page=1&vote_number=1
https://www.debateart.com/debates/552-ramshutu-vs-rationalmadman-rap-battle?open_tab=votes&votes_page=1&vote_number=1
Thank you, sir!
I think an argument could be made by Pro that God is evil (according to his own standards he sets for everyone else.).
Everyone is welcome to place a vote.
No, I worded that badly. My apologies.
I didn’t mean I didn’t want you to vote. I meant I chose Weaver because I like the video commentary.
Please vote if you want.
I chose Weaver specifically to judge on this because I’m a fan of his voting style.
His and AleutianTexan’s. (RIP. He stopped coming online.)
Thank you!
One more debate to finish, it looks like!
Could I get a vote on this debate?
Thanks for the vote!
The topic is heavily one-sided, but I believe it’s still winnable by Con.
Me.
This was probably a inspired debate.
(2:30-2:36) Round 1
“All coked out, talkin smack
Like a drooling inbred skinhead”
(2:37-2:41) Round 1
“Spouting rhymes with jokes as weak as your hairline.”
I remember you reading these lines, but I didn’t get points for them.
Which category do they fall under in the video?
Either way, that’s respectable.
I lack the fortitude to do that.
You must have a lot of patience to read all these same debates and vote.
“When I made the rule, I didn't assume people would be intentionally annoying. But at this point I don't care, you're just giving me ELO.”
“We'll see how glad you are when this debate is over”
Oh no.
What happened?
Viper was recreating the same open challenge, so I just accepted again.
Thank you sir!
AustinL- Thx, bro!
Barney- Thx for the vote!
Thanks man. 😂
Those voices were killing me
😈😈😈
No sweat.
Just a momentary setback.
He voted for you, ya know?
Not me.
Is your approach to semantics based on methods that have been studied or is it entirely unique to what you have observed works?
glad i could help u!
:)
it's more common than u think.
so long as it's a possibility and i keep accepting your debates in the future, what's to stop me from using that?
ok, but i could cite from a source that is completely unrelated to my argument.
And this isn't a personal attack btw because you seem ok, but that part genuinely confuses me.
But you yourself admitted you would be fine with a two-sentence argument as long as I cited a quote in block test to meet the character limit.
So that's a contradiction.
Ouch.
Not sure what I did to trigger you.
Do I need to incite another riot in the Comments Section?
“You have to be somewhat unlikable for me to even consider it.
I don’t even find you annoying.”
You have to be somewhat unlikable for me to even consider it.
I don’t even find you annoying.
It's official.
You have never been in a Flame War.
Flame War- "A lengthy exchange of angry or abusive messages between users of an online forum or other discussion area."
One hour away just in case you still wanted to vote.
Also, thanks Barney!
Why did I get tagged 3 times?
Thank you!
So I could get away with writing a lazy argument as long as I spammed the letter ‘g’ enough times?
But you didn’t write them, you just copied and pasted.
I’m not berating you. I think you’re a good debater, but.:
“ Technically, your first argument is below 3,000 characters.
“Characters (including spaces) 2497”
If it weren’t for your quotes in block test, you’re below the character limit.”