I'll create 3 separate troll debates with 12 hours response time. As long as you don't forfeit for any of them, I can reinstate your voting privileges.
I suspect there aren't many active voters at the moment to account for all the current debates in need of votes.
DART has become too complacent in the illusion of security, regarding the verified voters they trust to judge objectively. But the very nature of debate is competitive which means a diversity of new perspective will keep this site High-Stakes.
The responsibility of reading/spectating/judging debates will be the incentive newcomers need to actively participate more in the site.
I would say a few votes are necessary to become a good debater versus the reverse.
"Those dumb bitches you battled got 0 voters per battle,
I merely set this up and one of those very dumb bitches licks your boots after making it clear that me challenging you before him has him rattled,
He's a toxic little cretin type to lie as he tries tattles,
So kindly get your head in the zone here, I'm a tiger, they're cattle,
I'm at most the bull the impregnates them, I'm the breeder, you cucky cluck-cluck feathered-asshole,
This is charity, I'm letting you prove you're anything here, so thank me as each bar hits like a paddle."
😂😂😂
Still waiting on that challenge, big man.
Or is the best you can do is throw shade and cry about me in dms?
Seems unlikely that Little Rodent could intentionally sabotage you just for me to win.
That would require the brain cells to write a semi-competent RFD.
Polytheist was probably the only troll (if she was one) who was perhaps the greatest method actress.
I genuinely could not tell if she was genuinely raging or if it was all a part of the act.
"Careful. Best.Korea is the only person here better at trolling than you."
Best.Korea was only slightly better than BrotherD.Thomas in terms of trolling, but it's still so close of a match that they're very even.
Best.Korea and BrotherD.Thomas are the funniest trolls on the site, thus far. Effective in terms of comedy, but not so much at trolling.
Their Shock Value schtick is too repetitive to the point that it's predictable and nobody really takes the bait, but they are quite literally funnier than anyone else on the site.
IWantRooseveltAgain and badger aren't even good trolls, but they're better than BrotherD and Best.Korea. But badger and Roosevelt are trash at humor, so they're nowhere as good comedians as BrotherD. and Best.Korea.
The current record-holders for the best trolls on the site are Wylted, Sidewalker, and Ramshutu.
With the exception of you, IWantRooseveltAgain, and badger, I'm on good terms with everyone here.
Including Devon, the one you're currently challenging.
Devon was ready to leave the site because he didn't want other people's drama and bs, and I personally talked him into staying and ignoring everyone else.
I also talked Bella3sp from leaving the site because I knew she contributed a lot.
Me and Mps (The guy you fought with on his first day.) had a temporary beef, but we resolved that.
I criticized Wylted for being partly responsible for the site's failure because he's deliberately choosing to step down and I'm currently clowning the site's current president Badger.
I criticized Mike, the site owner, for not actively leading his community.
I also like TWS1405, but I did call him a Karen.
Now you want to call me vile, a sociopath. Toxic to other users or whatever bs. Fine
Feel free to characterize me however you want, but ask any of the current users how they feel about me and see if any of them agree with you.:
You should take pride. (<--- By which I mean, overestimate yourself.)
You're one of the few great debaters that actually came up with an interesting topic.
I'm so tired of all the abortion/trans/religious debates. Nobody cares about that garbage.
Bring back debates about dueling, stoicism, or anything similar.
While copying and pasting probably did give me somewhat of an advantage, I'm a pretty big fan of this subject that I believe I could script all the possible arguments both sides make.
Me for instance, I read a lot about Arthurian Legends, Shakespeare, or the old-school dueling back in Abraham Lincoln's time.
It's just that there are more arguments to make as Con, but I do think your knowledge of the subject is strong enough to win as Pro against the typical decent debater. For instance, you destroyed that one person and you're doing a very good job against Bella3sp.
I intend to recreate this debate against anyone who will accept, but this time, I'll be Pro.
We can recreate the debate and switch sides. (I'll be Pro, you can be Con.)
But basically as Pro, I would've likely considered abandoning the Population argument entirely because I feel there are better arguments to be made for legalizing dueling.
Would you be interested in becoming a judge in my Tournament?
I realize you’ve turned down Voter requests in the past, but I think you’re really smart.
There are some subjects that will be within your domain (like science, chemistry, pharmacology.), most might be out of your depth. (Religion, history, politics.) But I believe that’s a semi-requirement for beginning judges because they may have less biases.
I'll create 3 separate troll debates with 12 hours response time. As long as you don't forfeit for any of them, I can reinstate your voting privileges.
Even if you type one word response, it counts.
I invited you to be a judge in The Tournament.
This is the first debate so far.
Others will be coming up shortly.
Pleasure's all mine.
I suspect there aren't many active voters at the moment to account for all the current debates in need of votes.
DART has become too complacent in the illusion of security, regarding the verified voters they trust to judge objectively. But the very nature of debate is competitive which means a diversity of new perspective will keep this site High-Stakes.
The responsibility of reading/spectating/judging debates will be the incentive newcomers need to actively participate more in the site.
I would say a few votes are necessary to become a good debater versus the reverse.
Congrats!
Thanks, guys!
I appreciate it
Would you guys like to vote?
Arranging to vote on this later today.
Looking forward to it, guys.
Yeah, ill get to it later on today
A vote bomb would have to at least constitute a deliberation without reading the debate.
Best.Korea’s vote is a vote-bomb. The rest are not.
I don’t consider them vote-bombs on the basis that they don’t display any biases and have shown a reading of the debate.
In my opinion, they’re fair votes.
Rated only allows Max response time for 1 week.
But I can make it Standard to extend it to 2 weeks.
Your choice.
Unless you mean Voting.
"Those dumb bitches you battled got 0 voters per battle,
I merely set this up and one of those very dumb bitches licks your boots after making it clear that me challenging you before him has him rattled,
He's a toxic little cretin type to lie as he tries tattles,
So kindly get your head in the zone here, I'm a tiger, they're cattle,
I'm at most the bull the impregnates them, I'm the breeder, you cucky cluck-cluck feathered-asshole,
This is charity, I'm letting you prove you're anything here, so thank me as each bar hits like a paddle."
😂😂😂
Still waiting on that challenge, big man.
Or is the best you can do is throw shade and cry about me in dms?
Pathetic.
Rat-Man is too stupid to vote effectively.
I highly doubt he wrote any of the votes here.
Seems unlikely that Little Rodent could intentionally sabotage you just for me to win.
That would require the brain cells to write a semi-competent RFD.
Thanks for your guys’ vote.
Yes.
It’s how I got Voting Privileges to DavidAZ.
If I challenge you to three separate debates and you accept them immediately, you could have voting privileges in the next 3 hours.
Polytheist was probably the only troll (if she was one) who was perhaps the greatest method actress.
I genuinely could not tell if she was genuinely raging or if it was all a part of the act.
It's definitely not genuine anger. It's part of the character he's created.
The Ruse.
If you want to see triggered, just look at TWS's replies to idiots like Roosevelt and badger in the forums.
"Careful. Best.Korea is the only person here better at trolling than you."
Best.Korea was only slightly better than BrotherD.Thomas in terms of trolling, but it's still so close of a match that they're very even.
Best.Korea and BrotherD.Thomas are the funniest trolls on the site, thus far. Effective in terms of comedy, but not so much at trolling.
Their Shock Value schtick is too repetitive to the point that it's predictable and nobody really takes the bait, but they are quite literally funnier than anyone else on the site.
IWantRooseveltAgain and badger aren't even good trolls, but they're better than BrotherD and Best.Korea. But badger and Roosevelt are trash at humor, so they're nowhere as good comedians as BrotherD. and Best.Korea.
The current record-holders for the best trolls on the site are Wylted, Sidewalker, and Ramshutu.
Thanks for the vote, guys!
Would you like to vote on this debate too?
You guys want to judge?
If you agree to judge, I will get you both voting privileges.
Want to do a debate with hand-selected judges that are Muslim?
I’ll be outmatched, as they will all be more likely to vote for you.
Could you guys vote on this?
Great last argument!
😱😱😱
Please. Let’s be civilized about this.
Have you checked your blood sugar levels recently?
I assure you there’s no reason to shout.
Also. Thanks for staying btw
*"Ask any of the current users how they feel about me and see if any of them agree with you.:
WeaverofFate, Bella3sp, Savant, Slainte, Mps1213, Devon, SkepticalOne, Public-Choice, AustinL, Sidewalker, Lemming."
Now before you say anything else.
I only want to know, do you want that rap battle or not?
Keep in mind, you mentioned it first.
With the exception of you, IWantRooseveltAgain, and badger, I'm on good terms with everyone here.
Including Devon, the one you're currently challenging.
Devon was ready to leave the site because he didn't want other people's drama and bs, and I personally talked him into staying and ignoring everyone else.
I also talked Bella3sp from leaving the site because I knew she contributed a lot.
Me and Mps (The guy you fought with on his first day.) had a temporary beef, but we resolved that.
I criticized Wylted for being partly responsible for the site's failure because he's deliberately choosing to step down and I'm currently clowning the site's current president Badger.
I criticized Mike, the site owner, for not actively leading his community.
I also like TWS1405, but I did call him a Karen.
Now you want to call me vile, a sociopath. Toxic to other users or whatever bs. Fine
Feel free to characterize me however you want, but ask any of the current users how they feel about me and see if any of them agree with you.:
WeaverofFate, Bella3sp, Savant, Slainte, Mps1213, Devon, SkepticalOne, Public-Choice, AustinL, Sidewalker.
So much for that big talk, huh?
Just as I’ve called you before.
Spineless.
Challenge me and I'll accept.
Good luck.
You're not going to do shit, besides take it.
You're unblocked.
You know someone is annoying as fuck when they manage to make someone as chill as Barney snap.
Barney doesn’t get paid enough to deal with this shit.
In-fact, Barney doesn’t get paid at all.
On second thought, Slainte might be a little busy with IRL at the moment.
It’s probably better to leave him out for now.
Thanks for the discussion, Mps.
When I recreate this argument, I’ll be Pro this time and see if I can win against someone random by defending legalization.
Slainte is going to win this.
All good bro.
Happens to me too. 😂
You should take pride. (<--- By which I mean, overestimate yourself.)
You're one of the few great debaters that actually came up with an interesting topic.
I'm so tired of all the abortion/trans/religious debates. Nobody cares about that garbage.
Bring back debates about dueling, stoicism, or anything similar.
While copying and pasting probably did give me somewhat of an advantage, I'm a pretty big fan of this subject that I believe I could script all the possible arguments both sides make.
Me for instance, I read a lot about Arthurian Legends, Shakespeare, or the old-school dueling back in Abraham Lincoln's time.
It's just that there are more arguments to make as Con, but I do think your knowledge of the subject is strong enough to win as Pro against the typical decent debater. For instance, you destroyed that one person and you're doing a very good job against Bella3sp.
I intend to recreate this debate against anyone who will accept, but this time, I'll be Pro.
Yes, I will.
We can recreate the debate and switch sides. (I'll be Pro, you can be Con.)
But basically as Pro, I would've likely considered abandoning the Population argument entirely because I feel there are better arguments to be made for legalizing dueling.
Thanks for the votes. ^.^
Would you be interested in becoming a judge in my Tournament?
I realize you’ve turned down Voter requests in the past, but I think you’re really smart.
There are some subjects that will be within your domain (like science, chemistry, pharmacology.), most might be out of your depth. (Religion, history, politics.) But I believe that’s a semi-requirement for beginning judges because they may have less biases.
Mall’s good, huh?
Mall and Mps just might be the funniest debate duo pair.