Total posts: 547
-->
@zedvictor4
Can you put a warning label on your fruitkus?
Created:
It’s actually pretty funny what ChatGPT had to say about DebateArt
Created:
Will Dart be up on the 15th tomorrow?
Created:
-->
@Mikal
@Savant
There is a lot of coding stuff we are working on. May be a bit before it’s fully fully operational. But it’s getting to where it’s functionalSavant is busting his ass to make it work
Oh okay 👍. Thank you guys so much for making it work🙏.
Thanks @Savant
It’ll be great to have a debate website with everyone still
Created:
-->
@Allah
He openly admitted to wanting power and dominance, so his next religion could even be Satanism given that that is the actual religion of power and dominance.
What do you mean?
If the answer is obvious and I don’t see, it’s because I haven’t done a whole lot of serious research into Satanism
Created:
-->
@Allah
I also assume he got offended by my new account's name and description.
I mean yeah if Allah, a real deity, can beat Meowbahh then he is serious competition for the Catholics’ God
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Of course, from what I've been reading, forever might only be two days.
Gawrsh, you gave me “end of the world” vibes for a split second
Created:
-->
@Mharman
I made a few postsy'all are gonna have to start calling me new name soon
Why does it say on Debate Craft that you have been a member since 2023?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
I thinking you're ducking out of the point. Not just now .In a partnership, does only one take on the name of the other only?
Not in all partnerships so not necessarily
Created:
-->
@Allah
You think he'll arrive with a new philosophy and religion or stay Catholic tentatively?
I was surprised to hear about the change because I thought he was a hard-core Taoist or at least pseudo-Taoist but then he became Catholic.
He is good at surprising me
Created:
-->
@Mikal
Tech is live. Savant is busting his ass on it and still working through some bugs but the template is up. Hoping it will be be fully usable in the near future.
First "Opinion" I see on there: "Should there be male birth control?" Pffffffhhhh....
Created:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
Hey, back after a long time on inactivity. What new site?
What's new keeps on fluctuating because there always updates on current events.
For example, RM left and then he came back and now he's gone again, so idk what's new out of that for you
Created:
-->
@Allah
Adaptable ran away when he saw the true God Allah arrive at the site.But he is still watching, so here is something for him:Kafka Metamorphosis (great book).Man who provides for entire family, one day wakes up as big bug. His entire family he provided for rejects him and even suggests getting rid of him because he couldnt provide for them anymore.This shows the danger of entering into relationships where your only worth is what you provide, because if you ever find yourself unable to provide, you get rejected.Conditional love is not love, but transaction. So you shouldnt ever seek to be provider, even if it seems good plan. You will just work yourself to death.
Oh my God he's back. I don't even worry about Best Korea being banned. He is a trustworthy boomerang
Created:
Posted in:
@AdaptableRatman
You posted 1/3rd of the poem at most.Without the other parts it is less blatant what he said.
I read the whole poem when it was posted earlier today, and the part that was saved by @LucyStar was the most potentially incriminating segment imo. Though of course, it’s potential to be incriminating of pedophilia precisely is not so
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
If the above post is accurately reflective of what he said than I assume he is innocent of being a pedophile or even writing a pedophile poem or whatever conspiracy is going on here.
I think Zed was just trying to write a witty story about plums in all honesty, and it unfortunately contained a rather inconvenient misspelling of a certain word
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
I read it and it is not for family storybook time
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Pierrelechien1
Debating is very strange?What is Zedku?
Zedkus are Zed's way of expressing himself to us, though they are not without their consequences.
If you debate on here against @LucyStarFire, it's gonna get weird
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Umbrellacorp
"This Is Just To Flame" – Skipper and Hitler’s Brain
I have beaten
the Jews
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for Auschwitz
Forgive me
they were Judaists
so blue
and so cold
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Marriage means they’re partners.
I think you’re pretending to misunderstand things now
Created:
Posted in:
@LucyStarFire
You shouldn’t be sorry. He’s accepted the consequences for his actions like a big boy and naturally asserts being a 13 yr old girl with mind of 3 year oldI dont have mind of a 3 year old. My mental age is 13. I just act like a 3 year old. Get your facts right!
Ah, you’re right. I had it mixed up. Why is your personality so confusing? 🫠
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Umbrellacorp
After looking at what he/she posts on youube i feel sorry. I am gonna be nice from now on.
You shouldn’t be sorry. He’s accepted the consequences for his actions like a big boy and naturally asserts being a 13 yr old girl with mind of 3 year old
Created:
Posted in:
This is what I ask y'all. Will you support that and people act slow like they do know what support means knowing they support a lot of things they gravitate towards. Will you support that or only support women that believe they can be equal to men like in partnerships and just be their own individuals?
Mall asking me to support anything sounds like he’s trying to convert me to Mallism
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
This is another thing. Many of you talk about partnerships, but why do women take on the man's last name only?Is she not representing him?Is she not beholden to him, answer to him, belongs to him?There's questioning that if you claim to be equal and partnering but only one name changes.
Patriarchic structure is the reason for wife taking husband’s name. Man and woman are partners in marriage which is its own concept from family, and in marriage not only is the wife the husband’s but also the husband is the wife‘s and they belong to no one else.
There is a tethering of the man to the woman, not just woman to man. They both have standards to honor for each other’s sake
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Umbrellacorp
How old are you if you don't mind me asking?
@LucyStarFire is easily upwards of 40 years old but with mind of 4 year old
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@21Pilots
I have a son named Greg Heffley. Can you teach him some math? He is struggling big time
Created:
Posted in:
Superman illegally entering a country and the government flipping out about that is hilarious to me. Put that on Saturday Night Live cause that is too funny.
He’s basically a god that is omnipotent, and the people of earth are complaining about him flying into their country without a passport 😂
Created:
Posted in:
@AdaptableRatman
I thought you are confessional Lutheran. Why are you joking about symbolic porn?
Symbolic porn never once crossed my mind. I thought it looked like one of the biological sex symbols for male or female.
I am not a very good example of a Christian. I am quite hypocritical
Created:
Posted in:
@AdaptableRatman
The pencil in cog ones look very inappropriate.
It's the gender icon for cis people. Straight as a pencil
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
No. If that is the case, children are partners. The respect for children are not to be diminished.
The children’s opinions are not respected as much as the wife’s.
I disagree that children are partners. That’s not the family dynamic.
I don’t think it’s disrespectful or demeaning to a child to say he or she is not an authority figure in the family or at least not as authoritative as the wife and father
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
So yes it appears you agree there's no difference in the Father guiding the children as well as the wife so obedience does come into play of that.
No, the wife is the husband’s partner and there is more discussion that takes place. The father respects the wife’s voice more than the children’s. You know how parents talk about things right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@21Pilots
Link doesn’t work for me
Created:
Posted in:
#1 is my vote
#2 needs some work to be suitable. The block character on the right looks a little ominous or unfriendly, and it doesn’t seem very mainstream as such
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
When did Dart go dark the first time?The domain expired around this time roughly one year ago and we spent a while in the dark about whether it would come back.
Oh, I was on hiatus during that time
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
If you are interested in being a part of this or just want to be sure that you can still be a part of this community should DART go dark again, please go ahead and join the server and provide your insights on the process:
When did Dart go dark the first time?
Created:
Hey guys, when is Dart meant to go dark? Is it July 11th? I read somewhere the date, but I forgot and can’t find it again
Created:
But if you are honest there are multiple Americans that don't Truly support the first 2 amendments especially the as-written 2nd amendment because the basis of it isnt even self defense but militia against government which is literally domestic terrorism.
@AdaptableRatman
That was written in the event that we have a terroristic government so we are then within our rights to form a “civilian army” to defend America from an oppressive tyrannical power, even if that power is our own government
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Yes, that is a similarity. But the relationship the father has with his wife is different than the relationship with his children and same with the wife towards both types of people.
The children (should) respect both parents, but the wife does not respect the children as authority figures
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Children don’t totally equate to wife/mother in context of family dynamic
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Do you support children obeying their parents?
Yeah
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Should wives obey their virtuous husbands?
I think my answer would vary depending on what is implied by “virtuous.” Is this meaning portraying a superiority for one’s own moral standards, or are they indeed good moral standards?
If the latter, I think it is wise to take the instruction of someone who has a well-developed moral compass
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Remember that Trump sells $399 Gold Sneakers.
I won’t buy them because I don’t want to have them ruined when I go in the pond to save Fauxlaw’s child
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@LucyStarfire
It means Adaptable has blocked you.
Idk why he would’ve, but yes the icon is under his profile
Created:
Posted in:
What does the red icon of the stickman head with a lock next to it under someone someone's profile mean?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@LucyStarfire
I think it’s a good idea for societies especially wealthy societies to promote donating and philanthropy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ultracrepidarian
You can’t save everyone. Anyone that thinks otherwise has a savior complex.
Yes, a monster you’d be to think your shoes are worth more than a drowning child’s life, and an idiot you’d be to hold both variables in equal comparison until you should conclude the child’s life is more important.
I think it’s good to donate money to help children get a meal. But why would someone be a terrible person for wanting to enjoy a cup of coffee occasionally or even every day? Again, u can’t save everyone.
Imo, if you have enough resources and wealth to indulge in superficial wants then you are rich. Some people are more wealthy than they think, and so maybe there are a ton of people that could do with donating more and being more generous.
But I will say after growing up in U.S. for 2 decades it’s been my experience that the mindset is to grab more and more for yourself. I think at least some of it is caused by generational and cultural impact, and we can’t always hold the son completely responsible when he was raised by a bad father or by a bad community that developed in him a greedy and covetous mindset
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Umbrellacorp
Today we do not need any wife obeying a husband or vice versa
Sometimes one spouse has the better solution to a problem, and sometimes that spouse with a better solution is the husband.
So if what you mean by “no need to obey” is that “women should never obey” I don’t think that’s the best answer because sometimes husbands are right about things
Created: