Total posts: 1,048
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
My point was in correcting your error. Obviously.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
You ASSume too much.
I never said I believed him. I merely said you didn’t watch the entirety of the clip.
Created:
Posted in:
Here is a perfect example where and why an abortion is necessary and morally acceptable:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Please don’t derail this thread with that question. He’s already trying to do that here in a thread he created:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Oh, and as far as you’re concerned here at this site… I [am] the “authority” on the abortion topic. And that goes for anyone else here too.
To date NO one has successfully rebutted ANY of the positions I’ve put forth. No one.
Here endeth the lesson.
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Not a “feeling,” it’s an observable FACT!!
If you find it humorous, then all you’re doing is insulting him/her/it further. You’re the one compounding the problem, not I.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I don’t name call. I ALWAYS use apt adjectives to accurately describe the attitude, behavior, demeanor and disposition of another.
Based on your submitted profile, you were born in 2006 seeking “civil” discourse here.
Well, you’ve been anything but “civil” the moment I blew your confirmation biased position on abortion out of the water. Which makes you a #hypocrite.
And your flagrant display of the Dunning Kruger effect knows no bounds. Your sophomorically banal retorts are of no surprise. No more than is your psychological projection.
I have over 30 years academic, professional and life experience on you kid. You’re too young and wet behind the ear to even know what you’re talking about in this discussion. Hence my repeated point of addressing the fact you LACK not only the requisite knowledge of the subject, but also the emotional and intellectual intelligence to even debate/discuss this subject.
You need to do more personal research but most of all, you still have a lot of growing up to do.
PS, I’m not even going to dignify you vagina comment to human crap. You’re too young and uneducated to even comprehend this subject matter. It’s like you dove into the deep end of the swimming pool on purpose so you could drown. Drown you did.
Now give it a rest. You have successfully proven What a dumbazz you are on this subject. Why keep digging the hole deeper???
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Annoyance and irritation =/= comedy. It's just that, annoyance and irritation.
Created:
Posted in:
IWantBrainsAgain,I don't care who you cheer for in politics, this kind of stuff should concern everybody.Stop watching FOX News to get information you idiot
Asinine and Presumptive Genetic fallacy. And a rather ignorant one at that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Fetal viability has absolutely nothing to do with a birthed individual at any stage of their Maturation. It’s a patently false equivalency fallacy to compare a pregnancy at the point of fetal viability and that of a born person.Ok well I ask you this, what is your definition of born person?
Does stupid come naturally, or do you have to work at it...just a little bit?
Did you even read what you just wrote? Do you not know/understand/comprehend what the term born means?
FFS kid. Wake up!!!
Fetal viability has absolutely nothing to do with a birthed individual at any stage of their MaturationThe definition does if you look at it logically.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
A birthed person is no longer a fetus you dumbass!!!!!!
Dare I repeat myself once again, you are I’ll-equipped to even be engaged in this debate/discussion.You lack logic and are full of bullshit emotive ignorance.Your ignorance on this subject ans the Bible is why o removed you, not because of your emotive fictional 💩And name calling is not an argument and will not get you anywhere.
Hypocrite. You're one to talk about "name calling."
PS. Adjectives =/= nouns. Hence, it's not "name calling."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Your delusions of grandeur proceed your penchant for the Dunning Kruger effect.
Also, your psychological projection is amusing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You’re an idiot.
Fetal viability has absolutely nothing to do with a birthed individual at any stage of their Maturation. It’s a patently false equivalency fallacy to compared a pregnancy at the point of fetal viability and that of a born person.
Dare I repeat myself once again, you are I’ll-equipped to even be engaged in this debate/discussion.
You lack logic and are full of bullshit emotive ignorance.
Your ignorance on this subject ans the Bible is why o removed you, not because of your emotive fictional 💩!
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I dont always read what I write. Most of the time I dont write what I think and I dont think what I write.
Then you serve ZERO purpose here and I VOTE that everyone here simply IGNORES you, since you clearly do not take this site (ie., topics under discussion) let alone any member/interloper here SERIOUSLY!
By definition you are a TROLL
PEOPLE: DO NOT FEED THE TROLL!!!!
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I use Nord. Good service.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Roe v Wade was doomed from the start. It was bad case law.
So is the gay marriage law.
Both were clear cases of legislating from the bench.
Like Roe, nowhere in the US Constitution is gay marriage let alone trans rights enshrined.
It's all a fucking joke, and it is BAD COMEDY!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
NO FUCKING "BABIES" INVOLVED!!!Yes F***ing babies involved.
Quoting out of Context FALLACY!
This is what was stated:
It is an affirmed FACT that 89-94% of ALL abortions are done BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the MAJORITY of those being done BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. NO FUCKING "BABIES" INVOLVED!!!
No, NO FUCKING "BABIES" INVOLVED!!!
Ok let's go back to when you said you think that 22 weeks should be the cutoff point for abortion.What happens at 22 weeks that makes you believe that that should be the cutoff point?Easy question just answers that, and we can move on from there.
I already have. Once again you demonstrate your fucking lack of obvious reading compression skills.
I'm not going to go through all of your arguments, and point them out, because then I would straw away from the topic at hand.Just answer this question so we can move on from their.
Well folks, and there you have it. This clown was never serious about wanting to know what others think on the subject he put forth with unsubstantiated subjective claims.
Do NOT use logical fallacies you do not understand and incorrectly put forth.
I have done more than answer your questions. The answers have already been given before you even asked the question. Which PROVES you did not read anything I wrote OR once again, just did not comprehend that which what was written.
Quite while you are behind. That is, unless you enjoy making an absolute ignorant ass of yourself on the subject at hand!!
Created:
Posted in:
Post #54 - And this story is being buried already in the MSM due to the fact it does NOT fit their narrative.
Typical liberal PC bias.
BTW: How in the flying FUCK does a guy buy a handgun and get possession of it THE SAME DAY!
Every handgun I have purchased, and knowing the law of most states, there is an extended waiting period for handguns.
Is VA special?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Tucker Carlson: "I lost the super secret totally authentic totally damning documents that would have shown that Hunter was totally guilty. Hunter must have took 'em!"so...Tucker didn't make copies before chucking them in them mail?
You clearly didn't watch the entirety of the clip.
Tucker didn't send the documents. Try again.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ComputerNerd
...but engaged in scummy and toxic tactics to get to where he is.
Couldn't agree more.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
HA HA HA!!!!
You are 0 for 0 on two threads you started here: this one and the abortion one.
Best quite while you are behind, very behind.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
-->@YouFound_LxamAnd as far as bad sexual decisions, there are very cheap and easy ways to use protection while having sex.Condoms are a big example of this.
No protection from sexual activities is 100% effective. Hence another reason why abortion should remain a girl/woman's autonomous right to privacy to choose what happens to and/or inside her body.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
And I don’t care what the abortion process is. It’s irrelevant to the autonomous god given right of liberty and choice that a girl or woman must possess and retain at all costs.It's not a god given right to dismember babies.
Again, what's with you and your obvious lack of reading comprehensions skills!?!
It is an affirmed FACT that 89-94% of ALL abortions are done BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the MAJORITY of those being done BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. NO FUCKING "BABIES" INVOLVED!!!
Less than 1.3% of ALL abortions are done AFTER 22-24 weeks gestation for very specific legit reasons (stillborn, severely diseased fetus, danger to the life of the girl/woman) and NOT on a mere whim.
So yeah, it is very much a god given right to have autonomy over their own body and their very life/existence.
As I said in post #3 (that you continue to conveniently ignore), the only reason(s) for late term abortions (less than 1.3% of ALL abortion) are for extenuating circumstances and not for convenience.I actually did in post #23, by stating," But how many cases of that happening happen a year? Maybe a couple. But we should not make abortion legal, just because there are two cases where it has to be done. Because a lot of people will just use that as an excuse to get rid of the child.
Redundantly: Less than 1.3% of ALL abortions are done AFTER 22-24 weeks gestation for very specific legit reasons (stillborn, severely diseased fetus, danger to the life of the girl/woman) and NOT on a mere whim.
But that means that an abortion should only happen if the mother has already had an examination before getting pregnant, finds out that if she gives birth, then she will 100% die, and there is no alternative at all.
That's not how it works, genius! FFS! You have absolutely NO requisite knowledge of this subject to even be engaged in it. In other words, you are an uneducated fool arguing as though you think/believe what you're arguing is truth whereas everyone else is false. That makes you the poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
A lump of coal isn’t [a] Diamond.An acorn is not an oak tree.A block of wood isn’t charcoal (burnt wood).So on and so forth.Same could be said about sperm, or the female's egg, but when natural processes occur, then all of these transformations can happen.
No shit sherlock. But you are still missing the obvious salient fact of reality in each of those statements of FACT:
POTENTIALITY =/= ACTUALITY!!!
Never has. Never will!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Novice_II
Seeing the people engage in semantic debating hurts my head.I generally know how it feels to talk to people who are not following for some reason, so I end up tapping out when they dodge questions.
No, people do not dodge your questions. They answer them in ways that you just do not like and ignore their answer(s) claiming they dodged your question. I know this for a fact because you have done that to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Truth be told, you seriously lack the requisite knowledge of this subject to even be having this discussion. You prove exactly why emotion has no place here where scientific (eg, psychology, biology, physiology) and legal facts and logic are concerned.
Moreover, you clearly do not understand let alone appreciate the special yet delicate nature of “fetal viability.”
Eyebrows, hair, testicles or ovaries forming, and/or an immature but albeit functioning underdeveloped organ does NOT = fetal viability.
Every time you say “baby” or “a living human” you are confusing cellular life with personhood. They are not one in the same.
And I don’t care what the abortion process is. It’s irrelevant to the autonomous god given right of liberty and choice that a girl or woman must possess and retain at all costs.
As I said in post #3 (that you continue to conveniently ignore), the only reason(s) for late term abortions (less than 1.3% of ALL abortion) are for extenuating circumstances and not for convenience.
Morality doesn’t confer fetal viability either. Morality is a human concept that is entirely subjective. Your morality doesn’t begin where you claim another’s ends.
And the 1,000 year appeal to ad populum argument is a patently asinine use of a logical fallacy in this debate/discussion.
Like I said, your unbridled ignorant emotions on this subject clouds any ability to be logical about it in order to see the fact based truth of abortion where human procreation and sustainability of human society let alone the planet due to overpopulation is concerned.
Now go sit down, have a Coke and smile. Think, ponder and reflect on all that I’ve posted to date before contemplating your next reply.
Created:
Posted in:
IWantBrainsAgain,
You’re using affirmed incorrectly again dummy!!! with 3 exclamation points
No, I am/did not. You just don’t comprehend it correctly.
Prove me wrong. Literally. Don’t just childishly claim it. Prove it. Dive into linguistics and make your case.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Well miscarriage isn't abortion.
🤦♂️
Yea it is. It’s a “natural” abortion. The females bodily defensive mechanism to keep her safe from potential death.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
At what point is it morally wrong to kill a living human in the womb.
It was only the third reply in this thread.
And it is not [a] living human (being).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Baby: a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.
No it doesn’t.
Reading comprehension problems?
“Newly or recently born” = a very young child.
Birth is the transition between pregnancy to child/baby, not before.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It’s not [a] living human (being) either.
And don’t be a dick about it either.
It’s not distressing, it’s fucking annoying when people use the wrong term to describe that which it doesn’t even describe.
A lump of coal isn’t [a] Diamond.
An acorn is not an oak tree.
A block of wood isn’t charcoal (burnt wood).
So on and so forth.
Your last statement (er, question) is a strawman. Never said or remotely asserted what you’re misconstruing.
Created:
Posted in:
Everyone needs to just STOP using the term “baby” (babies) in this debate/discussion. Such an ignorant misnomer. A pregnancy ≠ [a] baby.
A zygote ≠ [a] baby.
A blastocyst ≠ [a] baby
An embryo ≠ [a] baby
An unviable fetus ≠ [a] baby
“Baby” = an emotive term designed to illicit emotional attachment to the potential idea of a birthed baby.
Potentiality ≠ actuality. Never has. Never will.
Created:
Posted in:
IWantBrainsAgain,
The predator doesn’t need to make any public admissions you “jackazz”!
The media and Congress affirmed it…publicly!!!
Don’t quote the dictionary when you clearly don’t know how to within the correct context.
PS, you just really made an idiot of yourself with that ignorantly sophomoric banal retort.
Created:
Posted in:
IWantBrainsAgain,
The ONLY affirmed “sexual predator” to ever sit in the Oval Office was Bill Clinton.
The second “sexual predator” affirmed by video and photographic evidence to ever sit in the Oval Office is Joe Biden (and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree with Hunter Biden).
Unproven allegations that anyone can pull out of thin air doesn’t make one a “sexual predator,” it just makes them a target for harassment by those who don’t like him AND are looking for both money and their 15 minutes of fame.
Fact.
Yours Truly,
Smarter than you!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Thank you. For some reason I always forget that very salient fact in this debate/discussion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I’m both pro-choice and pro-life.
Pro-choice up to 22 weeks gestation.
Pro-life after 23 weeks gestation.
Depending on the year looked at, on average, 89-94% of ALL abortions happens before 14 weeks gestation with the majority of those happening before 6 weeks gestation (medical abortion).
Less than 1.3% of ALL abortions any given year are after 22-24 weeks gestation, the point of sustainable fetal viability. Those are for cause and not on a whim.
Without fetal viability there really is no argument pro-life can make. None. As zed pointed out, pure pro-lifers (no exceptions) are generally speaking, hypocrites due to their selective morality.
For example, the no exception position forcing a girl/woman to go through pregnancy (which has a lifelong effect on their psyche and physiology) and be personally, legally and financially responsible for the product of that pregnancy for 18 long years without so much as a sliver of help from the pro-lifer. They demand and force responsibility upon another where they’re unwilling to assume it in her stead.
The other downfall of the pro-lifer position is it always fails to take into consideration the effect of adding another human not only to society but also the planet will have. Especially when the mother is unwed and neither mentally and/or financially prepared for losing 18 years of their own life, giving it to another for free and with little to no appreciation from various individuals close to her and from those that have nothing to do with her yet would force this upon her.
Abortion is morally acceptable when the totality of the big picture is taken into consideration.
Created:
Posted in:
Disgruntled black man goes on murder spree than kills himself. Coward!!!
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Of course. Cause I’m the only one here telling the fact based truth about these encounters. That’s how you knew.
Created:
What else is new.
These idiots actually believe they have a right to question cops doing their job, refusing lawful commands, aggressively grabbing at a cop, reaching for their taser and/or service weapon, and all to contradict society’s established law and order.
When you’re dumb enough to do this and you get yourself killed, you reap what you sow. Your fault, not the cops.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
You know exactly what it means.
My comment in reply to your sycophant nonsense about 9yo wasn’t naive. It was on point.
And I didn’t live any measure of a sheltered or religious life. I’m anti-religion as much as I am anti-groomer of innocent children.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Nice backpeddle there champ. Not buying it.
The manner, tone, effort, attitude, behavior and demeanor you’ve displayed from day one signing up here says otherwise.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
You’ve just joined the ranked of the queer theory crowd groomer pedophiles. Loser.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Way to demonstrate the Dunning Kruger effect
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
But IWantBrainsAgain will report on it as if it is 100% fact because his TDS is out of control.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Pedophile groomer speaks again. 🤦♂️
Created:
-->
@Athias
A 9 year old has no conceptual idea what sexuality is let alone the consequences of the multitude of actions and/or responsibilities, much less the consequences that go along with it.
You’re an idiot. A god damn idiot for saying that let alone supporting it. You rank up there with Epstein. Damn pedophile groomer.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Don’t try engaging Best.Korea. He’s a pedophile. He’s made several posts advocating for it and the sexual liberation of children. He’s not worth your time or effort.
Created:
Posted in:
Wrong.
Those who supported trump are educated. More than liberals who promote drag queen story hour and castration and mutilation of CHILDREN in the name of “queerness.”
You are TDS on steroids and heroin.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
First and foremost, you did not prove me wrong. Delusions of grandeur on your part.
Secondly, facts support a premise, they are not the premises.
Lastly, you lack logic. That much is certainly crystal clear.
And nope, not sensitive about anything. Just losing patience for your continued intellectual cowardice.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
If your retort wasn’t about any alleged inaccuracies of my comment, then it stands to reason any rebuttal of yours wouldn’t even be on point.
So fuck off, ignoramus. You’re not worth my time. Childish turd that you are.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I read it and you’re still wrong. Period. my reply stands factually accurate. Yours does not. NoW go play in the sandbox with Iwamtbrainsagain and Snowflakewalker.
Created: