Total posts: 1,048
Iwantbrainsagain,
Cry some more why don’t ya!!!
Created:
I Want Retard Again,
You’ll never know if I did or didn’t father children. And for me, that’s the beauty of it
LOL!!!
FU!! Clown!!!
Created:
-->
@Double_R
-->@Public-ChoiceCan you name a single crime Trump was indicted before a grand jury for?Just went into great detail explaining how you cannot apply the same standards of a court room to a general conversation...
Uh, last I checked everyone IS presumed INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty in a court of law by a jury of one's peers.
Public opinion, especially the emotively driven ignorant kind, is not a jury of one's peers.
Created:
IwantRooseveltagain,-->@Public-ChoiceSo now you are denying, without evidence, official reports from credible media outlets. The conspiracy theories never end with the left.Not denying that there are dead people who are still on the voter roles, I’m denying that story you cited is evidence that dead people voted, you idiot.You are a Christian liar.
The laughable irony oozing from that retort is fucking hilarious!!!!!
Created:
IwantRooseveltagain,-->@Public-ChoiceI opened the first one, determined it was nonsensical bullshit.
Ignorant asinine GENETIC FALLACY!!!
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
>@TWS1405If I borrow my neighbors car and I get pulled over in it, cop asks if it’s my car, I’m going to say no it’s my neighbors. While the car is in my possession, I still don’t own it and I will be returning it when I’m done using it. So yeah, possession =/= ownership, dumbass.LOL, like your racist orange Messiah, you are just doubling down on your dumbshitness.The fact is, if you borrow your neighbors car, and the cops spend a year asking if you took it and you say you didn’t the whole time, and your neighbor spends that year saying he didn’t lend it to you, then you stole it, and nope, when you steal something you don’t own it, they actually call it “possession of stolen property”, and it’s a crime dumbshit.
Wow, the clear inability of that single-celled pea brain of yours to grasp a simple concept never ceases to amaze anyone here reading your childish ignorant intellectual coward retorts.
My analogy stands as factually accurate to the scenario where the POTUS has BROAD authority to declassify documents and take them with them when they leave office to be prepared for their presidential library. Every single man who has held that Office has done no differently than Trump. I've cited the necessary source(s) to prove this fact, one even including a Federal Court case where a Justice basically said no differently but rather more simply. So simply a 6th grader could understand it, but since you clearly never made it past grade five, well, that's your problem not anyone else's'.
Only persistent "dumbshit" here is you, and your fine dsiplay of your "dumbshittery" is remarkable. Keep it up. We are laughing at you, not with you.
Created:
@TWS1405Nope. If he were guilty and enough fact-based evidence was in someone's possession, someone in a position of authority with charging powers, they would have done so long long ago. The fact that they haven't, well, that alone speaks volumes about the weakness of all the BS claims of criminality upon Trump.So the reason it took years for the Feds to make a case against Al Capone was Capone never did anything against the law. Right? And the reason Capone went to jail for tax evasion was that was the only crime that Al Capone ever committed. Right?
Dumb analogy. Complete non sequitur. Different era. Different crimes. Different reasons. Different everything. Total false equivalency fallacy.
Stop replying to my comments if you intend on keeping me blocked. You only look like an immature child keeping me blocked while still engaging me in debate/discussion.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
If I borrow my neighbors car and I get pulled over in it, cop asks if it’s my car, I’m going to say no it’s my neighbors. While the car is in my possession, I still don’t own it and I will be returning it when I’m done using it. So yeah, possession =/= ownership, dumbass.
Everyone knows a president takes certain documents they’ve declassified with them to be copied for their presidential library. Obama did it and has yet to return all of what he took. Don’t ever anyone bitching about that!!!
Trump is being targeted and blamed for anything and everything under the Sun because he’s an outsider. Pure and simple.
Your childish rants and raves with personal attacks proves beyond any and all reasonable doubt what a poster child for the Dunning Kruger effect you are!! 100% pure intellectual cowardice on your part.
Now GTFOH and go play doctor with IWantRosevelrAgain and IrrationalMadman. Ignorant liberal snowflake little child that you so clearly are.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
PS, PS, - Possession =/= ownership, ignorant dumbass!!!!!
Again, reading comprehension matters.
Knowledge of what happens once documents have been declassified and copied for the Presidential Library, matters.
So, F-off with you and your ignorant racist bullshit.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
I know that racist "reasoning" is different than our reasoning, but if you want to actually communicate with people outside of your Klan meeting, you really need to try to understand how the rest of us think.
You just lost the debate/discussion.
PS. Reading comprehension matters.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
“it. But as an ABA Legal Fact Check posted Oct. 17 explains, legal guidelines support his contention that presidents have broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected, while they are in office.“
“As the new ABA Legal Fact Check notes, the extent of a president’s legal authority to unilaterally declassify materials — without following formal procedures — has yet to be challenged in court.”
Created:
-->
@oromagi
-->@TWS1405I consider it a perfectly friendly act to warn a fellow user that the source he is relying on for his news is a Chinese cult and that he should not trust it. Not sure why you are experiencing all that emotion about it or why you wouldn't want the same kind of heads up but then, I am pretty sure I'm not interested.
Look, I may have jumped into an A-B conversation as C, but it was the tone/inflection of the choice of words that sparked my 'emotion.'
It helps, for the sake of late comers, if you continue to cite the source that proves it is a so-called "Chinese cult" reference. Then perhaps those like myself won't get so irritated with such arrogant declarations!
Created:
Abortion, #1
Religion, #2
The need for Eugenics, #3
Racism and Reverse Racism, #4
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
North Korea is the most scientifically advanced nation on Earth
BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAHHAAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAA
Created:
-->
@Double_R
->@TWS1405Of all the characters in play, absolutely none of them asserting their claims of criminality upon Trump, personally, lack logic and reason and are too full of irrational emotions/feelings.I think you misspoke, but as I understand your point here; the individuals asserting that Trump is guilty lack logic and are emotional.If that’s your point it is completely irrelevant to everything I have said and pointless. The reasonableness of concluding Trump’s guilt or innocence is in no way connected to who asserts it.
You are correct, I misspoke. I meant to say none of them possess logic or reason and are full of emotion.
My point is not irrelevant. As a vast majority of charges laid against others are premised in emotive retorts. Driving and get hit in a car by an idiot clearly in the wrong, you get pissed off and get in their face. If the MSM says X and you should be pissed, and politicians you like parrot the same, you get pissed and believe their bullshit.
ALL the charges levied against Trump have been proven FALSE! Russia-gate. Grab them by the pussy (hyperbole). The ugly woman claiming Trump raped her. It's all bullshit. Until a smoking gun is actually found, I call bullshit on ALL OF IT!!!
Do you believe Trump is guilty of committing a crime with regards to his handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and subsequent investigation into it? Yes or No?
Nope. Every President before him, he himself, and anyone after him have the exact same legal authority to declare, whenever they declare, that any government document is declassified and becomes their own possession for Presidential historical purposes (e.g., shit that goes into their personal Presidential Library).
Created:
-->
@oromagi
- I have warned PC before regarding this source so the fact that he continues to rely on it is telling
Who the fuck do you think you are?
You, warning another forum user... GTFOH!!!
Created:
Posted in:
Everything within the Bible and every unpublished gospel (not in the Bible) is and forever shall be...questionable.
Created:
Posted in:
Are the religious folk that call post-op trans self-mutilators down to outlaw circumcision too?
False equivalency fallacy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Statichead
You're clearly either a child (someone under the age of 16yo), or a very immature young person (17yo+) lacking proper education (your prose demonstrates this fact) and life experiences.
There IS a trans and gay agenda. The agenda began with the gays and now its trickling down to trans and as of late, pedophiles.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
-->@TWS1405-->@oromagiCredible = subjective , basically, according to your answer/definition.
- False. None of these charges are credible because of individual belief. All have some manner of testimonial or evidentiary basis.
Oh BS! Who do you think you are fooling here (other than yourself)!!
Testimonial is laughable!!! People lie to serve their own agenda, or others. Evidentiary basis? Please. do you even know or understand the merits behind evidence and the standards of admission and/or exclusion of it!?! Doubt it. I've worked for a DA's Office, the Courts...have you?
- Seems like you've given up on your claim that if Trump were guilty he would have been/should have been charged.
Nope. If he were guilty and enough fact-based evidence was in someone's possession, someone in a position of authority with charging powers, they would have done so long long ago. The fact that they haven't, well, that alone speaks volumes about the weakness of all the BS claims of criminality upon Trump.
And I do not care about the criminality of those Trump knows, have known, or has had some measure of business dealings with. Those people bear their own responsibility as it was their criminality, not Trump's.
- You don't deny that Trump failed to respond to Congressional subpoena, do you? That is criminal contempt of Congress worth months of jail time, at least.
So what! It's not like he has ever been the first and he certainly will not be the last.
Al Sharpton has far more to answer for, but no one seems to care about that.
- You don't contradict or comment on yesterday's report that Trump Org accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue while making deals with foreign dictators.
Organization, not Trump personally. Big difference.
there is an actual criminal family in the White House with direct ties to our greatest enemy, China
- Quite ignorant. Biden's micro-chip ban, Xi's rage over Taiwan put the lie to any such claim.
Nope. That's psychological projection on your part. I could care less about the micro-chip ban. It's everything else tied to his son, his son's dealings, his son's laptop and all the evidence contained therein, his tapping our energy reserves and giving it all away to foreign countries while denying energy production within our own borders, the invasion he called for at the southern border, the billions upon billions of taxpayers' dollars given to foreign nations, and money laundered through that bitcoin scam to Ukraine back to the democrats in a cyclical cycle.
- This is also whataboutism.
Oh fuck off with that whataboutism bullshit. You cannot have your cake and eat it to.
, and who facilitates acts of treason on a near daily basis.
- Mentally ill QAnon bullshit
Nope. You're just an ignorant denialist.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
This has nothing to do with mere feelings. It’s about applying logic and reason to determine what is most reasonable to believe.
I'll concede that, but you still have one problem. Of all the characters in play, absolutely none of them asserting their claims of criminality upon Trump, personally, lack logic and reason and are too full of irrational emotions/feelings.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
Credible = subjective , basically, according to your answer/definition.
It’s amazing how much time and effort you put out for your anti-Trump rants when there is an actual criminal family in the White House with direct ties to our greatest enemy, China, and who facilitates acts of treason on a near daily basis. At least with the Biden’s there is actual evidence (not subjective credibility), where there is nothing on par regarding Trump.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
If you want to get technical, everyone commits crimes every single day; and most of the time they don’t even know it.
Just because a handful of TDS clowns “feel” like someone committed a crime without actually knowing it for an actual [FACT], just does NOT hold up in court or reality either. in other words, ad populum arguments don’t mean shit where actual facts (to include the absence of same) are concerned.
So keep whining like a little girl about Trump, because it’s clear he grabbed you all by your collective pussies.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
“Credible”? Define that term where the sexual misconduct is alleged. Same for the other so-called “credible” evidence!
If any of the allegations were factually accurate, he would have been charged and tried already just like others under similar charges. But he hasn’t. Having said that, you can make these claims like everyone else who dislikes trump (TDS), but until he sees the inside of a courtroom and stand before a trier of fact, it’s all whiny bitchy nonsense (TDS)!!
why don’t you spend all that time and energy you put into that post on an actual criminal, like Al Sharpton.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
Where is your fact based evidence for the “many many criminal activities,” or are you jsut spewing wishful thinking obfuscation!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Onky “I know you are, but what am I” ignoramus here is your. You keep solidifying your name next to the meaning of the Dunning Kruger effect with each retort.
As for the other dip 💩, I was honorably discharged as an E4. Former drug suppress investigator with CiD. One of very few elite MPs who get that honor.
iWRA is the exact type of low life soldier I busted on a daily abuses for drug possession and/or use.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Typical ignorant childish retort. Denialist. Dunning Kruger effect poster child. You’re the racist, child.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
No such thing as a white supremacist, but there sure as 💩 are black supremacists!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
Only you (RM) and IWantRooseveltAgain. Just you two peas of the same pod.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
RM,
Juvenile. So juvenile.
What are you, six years old or something!
Grow up!!
Incel Manchild!
Created:
This fact should not surprise you.
The left enjoys trying to bury the truth...but sooner or later the truth always prevails. Always.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Nah, I take it back. Your mamma must be hugely disappointed in you. Name calling little childish whore that you are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Wow! That was a really awesome sophomorically banal Dunning Kruger Effect retort laced with one logical fallacy after another. Your mamma must be real proud of you!!!
Created:
Posted in:
Bwaaahaaahaaaa!!
You’re so eff’ing predictable.
I know it’s not pestilence, but you took that key note hook line and sinker and proved my point with that sophomorically banal profane retort.
Then again, maybe on some level I was accurate in that adjective. You are a pest. A disease. A cancer of this forum. Many are chalking you up to being nothing more than a troll. Speaks volumes. Pest. You’re a worm. Vermin. A disease. Be gone with you.
Created:
Only idiot on this website is you!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
-->@IwantRooseveltagainAgain you don't seem to be able to see the difference between attacking what someone says and attacking them personally . That's all peace out.
Most people are not capable of discerning the difference, and he is the poster child of such an individual.
Created:
Posted in:
IwantRooseveltagain,-->@sadoliteI have never attacked you personally without provocation, not ever.You are very snarky. Very snarky and you use a lot of vulgarities. Lots of F bombs. Terrible just terrible dialogue
Pot meeting fucking kettle!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Added11.09.22 02:02PM-->@IwantRooseveltagainYou aren't fucking talking to Donald Trump on this site. Trump doesn't have a god damn thing to do with it. You are just rude and insulting for no good reason and it amazes me that the mods still allow you on this site.
THANK YOU!!!
AMEN!!!!
His attitude, demeanor, behavior and disposition are just pure childish pestilence.
One can only hope that sooner than later the mods will do something about this JarHead clown.
Created:
Ending AA will also, undoubtedly prove that many minorities just cannot complete but for the failures implemented by the intent of AA.
Created:
The fact that the Regans made it a point to sit at the same dinner table every single Sunday, stay in contact, work together...that is the recipe for success across all ages of time, races, religions, groups, families, so on and so forth.
If only everyone on this green earth would see it and do it that way, this world would be a far better place.
Amen
Created:
And despite the lefty conspiracy theories of the idiots of this forum like "IWantRoseveltAgain," among others, all political violence from the past 10 years have predominately come from the left.
If the summer of 2020 and the aftermath is any indication, this November election day will be a repeat of the left throwing its infinite temper tantrum.
Created:
AA, while devised with honestly good intensions went south the moment it was implemented.
It set minorities up for failure with special treatment in high school that resulted in them being ill-equipped to handle the rigors and pressure of higher education. As a result, minorities dropped out of school - both high school and college - at higher rates than whites and/or Asians, especially blacks, namely.
This country was designed to be and meant to flourish as a meritocracy applied to ALL; it was never designed to be a special needs advancement for minorities.
Created:
Posted in:
This is a dumb thread.
I really could care less about sock puppet accounts. That's for the admin and/or moderators to deal with, not regular users.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
-->@TWS1405Department policy doesn’t override SCOTUS.No, it adds to it. When you take an oath of office you are held more strictly by its terms than a regular citizen. For instance "One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”"I as a regular citizen can advocate for the dissolution of the government as a matter of freedom of speech, but a public servant could not.
Local (state) law enforcement are NOT federal officers. 5 USC 7311 applies to federal officers, not state.
Department policy does not add to the constitution. The constitution is the supreme law of the land. Nothing a state or local agency or organization does with state regulatory authority adds nothing to the US Constitution. Period!
You're still wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
All that mumbo jumbo amounts to is a whataboutism.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
👏🏻 great replies, thumbs up 👍🏻
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Public-Choice
Well, I would like to think I caused a spike in involvement since my arrival and bringing forth controversial (taboo) topics on the racially divisive rhetoric in this country challenging some members' confirmation bias.
I'm just not quite ready to commit to a debate precisely for the reasons you identified. Namely 'time' being the main one. Waiting for another's response while understanding life does get in the way, to include myself. Being disappointed if someone disengages in the middle of the debate, wasting time even getting into it with them. So on and so forth.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
1. SCOTUS doesn't determine state law except when two states dispute a case.
No kidding!!! SCOTUS hears cases where there is a constitutional matter/question involved. Clearly that case (and like all other cases) was brought due to a constitutional question/issue where it was believed law enforcement has a constitutional duty to protect/save citizens. They said no.
Department policy doesn’t override SCOTUS. Violation of department SOP are friable offenses, not legal ones.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
TWS1405The SCOTUS decision was a year after the Floyd case.Irrelevant and prejudicialHow is a record of excessive violence irrelevant to a murder trial? If a regular civilian went into a murder trial with assault on his record, they would absolutely bring it up in the trial.Fun how you ignored my other points on Chauvin's oath of office and not checking for breathing.
Doesn’t matter if the SCOTUS case was after Floyd. The ruling/determination applies to the past, present and future.
Didn’t ignore anything. The SCOTUS point was in rebuttal to it.
Created: