TheRealNihilist's avatar

TheRealNihilist

A member since

4
9
11

Total posts: 4,920

Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
people go to and away from religion because of illness and traumatic events
Is this from your or a quote?

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think we ought to apply the rules to moderators as well
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I see the pattern here now. If you don't like Dr.Franklin so much then just ignore him.
Clearly shown he adds nothing informative to the conversation. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Press F to respect RM's legacy
-->
@bsh1
Where it's from is immaterial in this context. Rather, I am concerned with how it is being used in this thread. In the context of this thread (how it is being used here), it is certainly not nonsensical.
This one example of why it is nonsensical
the happier RM's spirit will be ;)

What fits under nonsensical? 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Press F to respect RM's legacy
-->
@bsh1
is ultimately my job to decide.
Sheesh.
In this case, to the extent that there is a clear purpose to the content, it is not nonsensical.
It is literally a meme from Call of Duty Advanced Warfare where you press f to respect a dead guy. It is nonsensical because the game lacks any kind of story which can be seen by simply pressing f to respect as somehow a useful story device.
To the extent that everyone keeps their "press F" posts to a minimum, then the repetitiveness is not excessive, because each post conveys a unique message of support (i.e. a message of support specific to an individual person).
A support of a dead meme which was used because of COD AW's atrocious writing.
There is obviously room for disagreement
The more important question how much are you willing to budge because like you said "is ultimately my job to decide."?

Just something about the COC, it mentions this:
Posting or bumping spam threads,
I have already demonstrated the nonsensical nature so to me it is considered spam, I have to wait on you for that. If you agree every single comment is bumping a spam thread and would need to punished accordingly. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
I think we ought to apply the rules to moderators as well
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
"This website is officially under fascist rule" 

I guess this fits as well for trolling. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
I think we ought to apply the rules to moderators as well
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Which part of the CoC does that violate?
9. Excessive Trolling
Trolling is the use of inflammatory language or extreme and unsupported claims aimed at provoking a negative emotional response. Excessive trolling is strongly discouraged and is prohibited when it significantly interferes with site user experience.

Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
people go to and away from religion because of illness and traumatic events, which is why I find this article so silly and anyone who would accept it as fact overly naive.
How about children born into an atheist family?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Press F to respect RM's legacy
-->
@bsh1
This is not a spam thread. It's borderline
Spamming f is not a spam thread?

Define spam.
but there is a clear purpose to it
I'll address this after the spam definition.

Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
I hope that it's true but I can't say I believe it to be so.
So your a deist not a Christian? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Do you believe in God? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Why didn't you like to state your Religious affiliation?

I think you do heavily imply with C Meyer that you are a Christian because I only hear Christians mention him as a person who makes good arguments for God not atheists because they are not in the know in the next champion of theistic arguments. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
you are free to thing whatever you will, read my posts in the religion forum so you can make an informed opinion.
Oke doke.


You said it is more likely an intelligent designer than a strawman (I consider it to be). 

Stephen C Meyer mention and said he had a powerful argument.

I'll come back to it when I can. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
you know more than I about him, seemed a pretty good call out by you, I got some enjoyment out of it anyway.
Weird. You engaged with more of his conversations but you don't really remember the bare minimum. You are a conservative. I think you are a theist as well. That is my labels I stuck on you. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
hahahaha, ouch, well played
What do you mean?

The very little I know about n8 I knew he made a forum topic about this. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Press F to respect RM's legacy
-->
@Christen
It is RationalMadman from this thread: 

He is the guy who created the topic. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Press F to respect RM's legacy
-->
@bsh1

So this doesn't matter?

Virtuoso I guess is only following what was voted upon as in spam threads are not permitted.



Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
just stimulating discussion/debate
So no change of mind just taking the devil's advocate approach?

I really would've hoped you would have seen the different standards you have with theism and politics. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate Voting Thread (FORMER)
plz

Created:
0
Posted in:
What Happens to Your Brain When You Stop Believing in God
-->
@n8nrgmi
What is the incentive in making this when you are a liberal Christian? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Is Wrick on Break or Something?
-->
@K_Michael
He ain't coming back.

If you want to talk to him here is his discord:

I know because I am in there.

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think we ought to apply the rules to moderators as well
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

Commanding moderators to do something without giving constructive criticism. The latest example.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
I think we ought to apply the rules to moderators as well
Poll (Say Yes or No)
Discussion (Why)
Moderator opinions (Mods say something)

My main argument is that it doesn't actually improve the site. It just allow people to simply say whatever they like to conflate their ego. It creates clutter and nothing is gained apart from knowing how shallow people are. I advise the rules to be enforced universally not disregard when it comes to moderators. 
Created:
1
Posted in:
Locking abuse
-->
@bsh1
He provided no constructive criticism instead decided to conflate his ego by adding this to the DA forum section. 

Why is this allowed?


Created:
0
Posted in:
Locking abuse
-->
@bsh1
Can this moved to the miscellaneous along with pretty much everything Dr.Franklin creates?
Created:
1
Posted in:
Locking abuse
-->
@bsh1
Can we lock this?


Created:
0
Posted in:
Sad Day
-->
@bsh1
Im supadudz dad

B. Personal Attacks
Personal attacks will not be tolerated. The policy prohibiting personal attacks applies site-wide--in debates, forums, private messages, and everywhere else on the site. If you are having a dispute with another site member, the appropriate response is to inform moderation. It is not appropriate to respond with invective or misconduct.

b. Direct Attack
A direct attack is when a user posts something negative about a specific member. Direct attacks may take place within a thread or may constitute the thread itself. Call-out threads (threads in which a purpose of the thread is to attack another users) are severe examples of direct attacks. Generalized complaints about generalized behaviors are not direct attacks.



Created:
1
Posted in:
Never Argue with Religious People
-->
@Paul
When you have magic on your side literally anything you can think of is possible.
Thanks for telling me conceding God existing is a death sentence if you want an argument. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
sure however the argument is that the climate change "solutions" would restrict what people can do and would make their lives not as enjoyable
Not if the government incentives nuclear power. Nuclear power is the best step forward moving away from fossil fuels. Less damage and more safe than that as well. It has a bad rep and for some reason fossil fuels don't have the same. Guess the profiteers are doing a good job at advertising.
For me not having my own vehicle and being forced to take public transportation is a big one.
Electric cars by 2030. Joke. Vehicles would be difficult to change. I think when electric cars become the better alternative. I don't see the need of buying standard cars. Better as in cheaper and more accessible as in electric stations are everywhere.
would hamper my enjoyment and freedom to do what I want, when I want.
You would have to agree you are limiting your freedom to a certain extent. Sure you can possibly pick up your gun and kill someone who really pisses you off but you have personally restricted yourself into not doing it given the state enforced laws.
My Dad has a friend, few storms back they had to evacuate Florida, his friend has a Tesla.  The range on it couldn't get him out of Florida before it need a recharge which takes about an hour.  Just an example of what I don't want.
I heard a different story. They go really far if you charge them. Guess they must've forgot. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Platform development
-->
@DebateArt.com
I saw my comment have a picture but it didn't go through. Is there a reason? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
you could be right, but I haven't heard any such predictions, but again if there is a life after this one then who cares, if there isn't and life is basically meaningless then who cares, you see it just doesn't even matter.  As a Nihillist I would think you'd understand that :)
Yeah it doesn't matter but it might ruin my enjoyment. I don't think anything can be really proved but it doesn't mean I would like to not enjoy life. I am pretty shite at that so I guess I am TheRealNihilist



Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
so long as you end first wgaf?
It might happen during your life time so your life is going to be worse for not doing something about it. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
Can you buy morality, though?
If I save someone's life with money, is that not moral? 
Nobody wants the planet to get hotter. But is preventing such an outcome worth the astonishing cost that it would require us all to pay?
Nuclear power baby.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
-->
@zedvictor4
If man is natural, then man made machines must also be natural.
Man made is what man has created. The creations are more man-made than natural because people are not allowing things to naturally occur instead create things to speed up processes.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
Green hardliners are not more moral than everyone else because they act on their desires to live comfortably as everyone else does, which results in carbon emissions. They might be willing to pay a little extra to lower their carbon footprint, but overall it's a drop in the bucket, and it's also a luxury that many lower-class Americans couldn't afford.
How are they not more moral?
Is reducing the footprint not a good thing to do?
Solar and wind energy are faced with the problems of storage and slow capture, which makes them an unsuitable replacement for conventional fuels on an industrial scale with current technologies. A full transition would cost tens of trillions of dollars and devastate the economy, undoing a whole decade or two of GDP growth (if not more). The new jobs created by this transition would not be enough to justify its enormous cost, and even after the transition was finished we'd be faced with chronic energy shortages (or at least compared to the energy we're able to use daily as of the present).
I am personally for nuclear energy,
The only way forward is a slow transition, which'll be completed by the end of the century. It entails gradual phasing in of stricter emissions and waste standards. Trump's probably going in the wrong direction by deregulating dirty industries to the extent that he has, and perhaps in withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, though I don't know how tolerable the provisions of that agreement were.
By that stuff would be worse. I already dislike the heat. I can't imagine what it would be like in a couple of years from now. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Sad Day
-->
@janesix
Dr. Franklin IS cool.
He is cool if you living in an opposite direction where he is actually good at debating. 

Created:
1
Posted in:
Sad Day
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You have no authority to command him to do anything nor do I think he cares. SupaDudz is cool your not. I am pro-SupaDudz and abort Franklin. 
Created:
1
Posted in:
PewDiePie hits 100,000,000M subs
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Created:
0
Posted in:
PewDiePie hits 100,000,000M subs
-->
@Dr.Franklin

Created:
0
Posted in:
Brave browser support program
-->
@DebateArt.com
Still using it.

From Brave Rewards I have: 
5.35BAT or 0.90 USD
From 88 ads.

Still haven't used it for a month so it can go up to 1 USD. 

I used it from the 16th August up until now so I think I would get around 1.6 to 1.9 USD in a month.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Liberals are stupid
-->
@Mharman
dude, please never make a thread like this again. It doesn't move the conversation anywhere; it only starts a flame war.
Good one. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
-->
@janesix
Nothing that can't be fixed by the Earth and the Sun.
By fixing do you mean burning you alive?

By fixing do you mean the damaged ozone layer that is not repairing? 

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
-->
@Alec
My measure to prevent this is to ban smash and dash.
Do you have a more palatable name?
The husband can find a better job that doesn't require a college degree
A big ask. What makes you sure it is possible?
 It can be achieved and according to the University of Georgetown, there are 30 million jobs that pay $55000 or more per year in the US that don´t require a college degree.
I am guessing those jobs are only available in certain areas and require certain skills. The poor person would require to travel their every time he has work or live there. Living there is not an option given they are poor and the certain skills requires them to know what to do. This would mean in they would have to spend their free time working to this goal. Possible.
They just need to do research on high paying jobs that don´t require a college degree and pick a better job.  Work smart, not inherently hard.  The husband picks a job he likes, gets paid way more than working at McDonalds, they can afford the costs of pregnancy.  Then they can set the kid up for adoption if they want.
I guess. You make it sound so easy but it is easier for you to say that since you are not going through it. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
DATA.  YOU NEED DATA.  FIND SOME DATA.

What do you mean "most poor people are bad with money"?  Based on what?

Paul Niehaus, one of GiveDirectly's founders, does think cash can have long-lasting effects. He points to a similar study in Uganda where the government gave people money and people's incomes went up — and stayed up, even years later. People had used the money to start small businesses, like metal working or tailoring clothes.

Niehaus says for him, the most interesting results from the new research were the improvements in mental health. Getting money made people happier, less stressed out. [LINK]

UNICEF provided the equivalent of $1 million to the pilot, and Davala and Standing gave the local government regular updates on the success of the pilot every three months.

Their research showed that the vast majority of those who took part in the study used the additional income to invest in other income-generating opportunities, like livestock.

The money also allowed children to pursue their education, instead of working to help make ends meet at home. The overall indication of the pilot, was that it could give people the ability to bring themselves out of poverty, and raise a healthier, better-educated populace. [LINK]
Okay. I don't really want to find data because it isn't a debate. I would if I already have the data but I have to sieve through stuff.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Climate Change
-->
@janesix
Climate change is natural. We have no control over it.
So when CO2 is put into the atmosphere because of man-made machines like what fossil fuels power stations. That has no impact on the climate? 

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
What if the mother automatically received $20,000.00 per year per-child.
Depends on the spending habits. If that worked why not give every poor money? I don't think that works because a part of being poor is being bad with money. So adding more money would mean they would lose but they might eventually how to use money. Poor people vary but I think most are poor because they are bad with money. This like 1 thing I agree with Shapiro on. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
-->
@Alec
The husband/boyfriend isn't pregnant, and since they shouldn't be allowed to commit smash and dash
Your should doesn't matter to what does happen unless of course you have measures to prevent this. 
 they would be providing an income for the pregnant woman and the child in the event that the pregnant woman can´t work.
Like I said in a poorer household more often than not the wife/girlfried would also have to work which would mean either the husband/husband gets lucky with a high wage (isn't likely) or they will be both financially worse for having a child because both of them are not working and of course the financial burden that is a child. So basically the poor family is screwed during and after the pregnancy given how much money is lost. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
-->
@Alec
Why are you pro choice?  If you don’t want the kid, you can set the kid up for adoption.
Mainly because the time off work can result in worse outcomes for a poorer household. Since 6 months is a long time it is more than likely someone having financial problems having a baby would make it worse. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Running Primary Poll Thread
-->
@Imabench
Biden woo.

Hope he wins. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
PewDiePie hits 100,000,000M subs
-->
@Gatorade
T-Series is a corporation, YouTube music is a corporation, YouTube Music hit 100 mill before T-Series, T-Series didn't break any records. Pewds did.
YoutubeMusic is not a YouTube channel.
T-Series is. 
T-Series is also the first creator to reach that therefore T-Series has that non-existent trophy.
Created:
0
Posted in:
I think people would rather be hypocrites then state their wrongs
-->
@Alec
Joe Walsh is pro life and against the death penalty.
Do you think I care?
I am pro choice and against the death penalty. When the people don't have to resort to aborting then I would be pro life but the circumstances for people is not good so I remain at my position. 
Created:
0