Total posts: 4,920
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I doubt Alec cares about ideological consistency when I doubt he heard about Milo doing Karaoke while in the presence of white supremacists. Recorded on video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLNLPIRS62g
It shows the lack of knowledge about the person who he aligns with. You can't really have an argument with someone when they don't know about the person they align with. Alec would say I didn't know that. You don't really go anywhere until he understands the information shows that Milo supports something he disagrees with or maybe he is too far gone by making excuses for his idols. Who knows. Guess I'll wait for his reply.
Created:
Posted in:
Here is CNN Ratings...https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cnns-ratings-drop-again-after-three-year-low-last-monthSorry, I meant Jeff Bezos. I made a mistake. He would not approve of any good reporting of Trump. Almost 95% of the reporting on Trump on any news outlet besides Fox has been negative, even when he does something good, it is twisted into something bad.
Yes CNN ratings are going down. Negative does not mean it is inaccurate. There is a distinction.
I was just pulling your leg. Man we are gulible aren't we.
Gross generalization while also not supporting your side with evidence.
I am not trying to be a prick, you are trying to be a prick by not realizing things that are common sense and acknowledging aspects of human nature that are learned as life goes on, you lose people, you have friends that admit things to you in their older years that you didn't know about, and learn how it affected them, things you don't find in written papers.
Yes people die, change and newspapers miss out information. I realize that.
Then you calling me stupid for having experience.
I called you st*pid for not being able to understand how to make a good argument. That wasn't about your experiences.
These are things that are learned over time. Reading articles, doing papers, having friends, family, stories told to you, jobs, careers, college (which was really just an extension of being a kid) I have learned so much more by being out in the real world than I did when I was in college... just being on this earth twice as long as you, and being an adult for 22 years as opposed to your 1 year, owning a house, having real relationships, moving around to different areas, changing careers. You don't think that has any clout?
Yes you have lived longer than me and have experienced more but in this scenario I know more. You didn't make good arguments for your side which is why I called it st*pid.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Missed a question mark.Do you seriously think Ben Shapiro is alt-right. If you do I am happy to debate you on this topic
I want you to be taking the Pro side of an argument while I am taking the Con side. I would also like you to start the debate. This would mean I wouldn't debate Ben Shapiro being alt-right because you are not starting the debate instead you are waiving a Round for me to make the claims or asking me to start.
Do you have another topic in mind?
You can talk about CNN being Fake News. Black Lives Matter being bad or something else.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
The I have a black friend meme so I can't be a racist.
If you don't think someone who can have a black boyfriend and still be racist then how about him being a Christian while also being a homosexual? Contradictory to me but you think him having a black boyfriend while also taking a contradictory stance of being a Nazi is somehow too much of a stretch.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Left is more common and for the right to catch up it would actually want to help people not allow Trump to cut social security, carry on wars and socially be bad. This can be seen with the taking of the knee fiasco, transgender ban, Muslim ban and his coverage of the unite the right rally in Charlottesville to name a few.
So basically the right would actually have to be progressives. Not the case because conservatism is what I consider a contradiction to progression which a progressive wants.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Already made a comment on this earlier:How is saying rap is crap bad or far-right?
This is mainly used to add more to why they dislike other races. Rap is crap is just a cherry on top of them hating black people. Attack their culture to make it sound reasonable. Rap is part of people's culture whoever listen to it. Just so happens that blacks digest raps more than whites.This was not done per-capita since it was a survey but I think it would be true per capita blacks digest rap more than any other race.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You said this from this:I did give you a argument? Are you mentally impaired to take logic
your evidence claimed that Ben Shapiro saying "rap is crap" is far right.GREAT SOURCE
Just to make sure you can comprehend this because you have trouble with laying out sentences correctly. Clearly seen with "I did give you a argument?" Which should be I did give you an argument.
This was not an argument against mine. It was simply you stating what my source said. Nothing in here said it was wrong or a wrong metric to call Shapiro far right. "GREAT SOURCE" I think would be sarcasm so was I supposed to argue against your joke as your argument or do you realize you actually don't have an argument? I know you like being contentious (even though you don't even know what an argument is) because you have nothing better to do then going through my past topic posts to find something. Am I really on your mind that much you are willing to spend time to go through my past topic posts to simply engage with me? I would be flattered if you were actually decent to talk too but you are not and with you doubling down on a claim made about what I said instead of what I did wrong really goes to show how much you are out of your depth. I would advise help but doubt you would listen to a "libtard" because you know liberal bad and conservative good is your mantra and you can't go past party lines and realize when someone is right.
If you brain didn't fully understand what I said. I will dumb down my problem with what you said. You simply stated what is but didn't say what was the problem. Saying what is is not a contention you simply I said this but didn't say what I did wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
This is where you don't have a shred of evidence for you claim. I don't see the distinction between you and a Flat Earther when you say something like this. I know you don't have any but I will ask anyway. Do you evidence or am I actually correct about money and your George Soros conspiracy theory holds no weight.I am not wrong, George Soros would rather print fake news against Trump than be real and make money, he has so much money, he doesn't care. If the Washington Post printed something in favor of Trump, he would be on the phone wondering what the F they were doing. Right now CNN is losing viewership because people don't trust what they are spewing, yet they keep spewing it... so they don't care either. Neither did ESPN for the longest time, owned by Disney, but finally wised up and does their best to stay out of politics now. Thank God... More channels should follow their lead.
It is a generalization, but it is true.... I did a poll.
How many people? Where?
How do you know this, do you have evidence to support this claim? I think the opposite, so it looks like we are at a stalemate on that issue.
This is you actually trying to be pr*ck. Realizing my reasonable asks for evidence then decide to simply joke about it. Maybe you don't actually understand you need evidence to support an argument. By definition a person who is a homosexual would have to commit a homosexual act. This can be engaging oral or anal. Must be more but those are the ones that come up first. Is that too difficult for you to comprehend or do definitions of words require evidence as well or maybe you actually understand the joke made by you is actually st*pid and shows just how st*pid you are when it comes to making an argument?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
The banner on the video says exactly that. Did you watch the video?"Women beaten and robbed in homophobic attack in London." It says it almost throughout the whole video, then it switches to.... London Mayor calls Homophobic Attack Disgusting, Misogynistic.
That is just something on the bottom to alert people on the current findings. From their information given to them by the correspondent they have gathered that. Sure they don't know it is the case but it is a business and it does not owe anyone correct news more so something worthy of clicks or watching. London Mayor says something if is true is a fact.
A better question is where doesn't it say it is homophobic?
If people actually watched the video they would realize it is alleged. If people clicked on the video I assume they have watched it through to the end. If they did not. It is not the fault of CNN if they had the wrong interpretation. They didn't watch the entire video.
And yes, I agree with you that CNN and I are speculating on this story. However, I would not have heard about it if they had not reported it, just like most robbery assaults, but they spun it to get clicks... which I agree with you on that as well. This need for clicks is causing a serious division of people.
Division will always be a problem. I hope you don't deny that the right also helped create the divide as well but maybe I am wrong about this. The problem isn't division more so how it occurs. If it occurs with violence as in physical or mental then I am against if it involves one side debunking claims of the other then I am okay.
BTW, I think the same about Fox, they pick and choose what they feel is newsworthy. I am not married to any news network, I do think that the 24 hour news cycle is the enemy of the people. They manipulate the stories to support their agenda, and some don't even care about money, but they still care about clicks.
You are wrong about the money. A private businesses sole aim is to make a profit. Fox, CNN even Breitbart care about money. It will always be about that under capitalism.
What I am saying is I wouldn't pay to see two men kiss, but I might pay to see two women kiss. It's a turn on, just like it is for most straight men.
This is fine but don't appeal to societal norms with most people don't like X. If you do decide to go to that path then I would like evidence because then I wouldn't consider what you said a gross generalization.
Would you say that most gay men and women think that men kissing is a turn on to them, I wouldn't know because I am neither of those?
I think so because a gay man would like gay interactions so it is sort of implied with the label of being gay or lesbian.
Based on my experience though and women I have befriended, I would think that most would say no, also based on the supply and demand for it. I'm just stating the obvious. I can count on probably two hands the amount of major motion pictures that have men kissing in them, but the amount of women kissing women would be way more... you know why? To sell tickets.
Yes money is an aim of a private business.
I do think that many homosexuals were abused as children, or sustained some sort of trauma that affected their sexual preference, or they could have some mental issues. I also believe some of them were actually born that way, so I don't condemn it, and I don't feel ill of it.
At least you cleared that up. The part that I don't like saying is the trauma that affected their sexual preference. Do you have evidence for that? Do you also have evidence that mental issues leads to homosexuality? Everything else is fine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
I am not religious and WTF is a furry?
My second guess applies to you then.
Furries are a community who like furry things like cats and dogs. This can be pushed to lets say human like furries. Basically humans with a lot of fur. Don't like it but if I do stumble upon it I will just close it or simply go somewhere instead of appealing to societal norms or saying I don't X people to not enjoy X thing if it doesn't harm others in a reasonable way.
I agree with you
What do you agree with me about?
and what CNN did is what you are accusing me of doing, the only difference is I don't have a news show and camera to report speculation to the whole world. They don't have the facts and they assumed, along with the victims, that this was because they were lesbians and it was homophobia, which doesn't make any sense. The news makes me mad when they assume things without all the facts, and all the victims are getting their 15 minutes of fame only because they are gay. These girls are now always going to think that they were targeted because they were lesbians, and it had nothing to do with the possibility that assailants were out to rob someone, if not them, it would probably be someone else. Again, both are speculation.
So you agree both you and the CNN coverage is wrong and shouldn't be speculating if you wanted to be taken seriously on a topic?
So you are condemning me for doing the exact same thing that CNN just did. All I am doing is stating what else it could be, but we just don't know. I don't see you condemning CNN.
I condemn CNN for not clearly laying out it was speculation. They did however do a better job than you because they were simply stating what is going on. You were saying what is still speculatory. As you can clearly see from the title of the video "Police are calling for witnesses to come forward after two women were attacked and robbed on a London bus.". They are reporting on what occurred. You were basing ideas off of no evidence. Can you find an instance where CNN in the video stated it was an homophobic attack or were they simply stating what the police were doing or what was reported to have occurred?
As of right now, it is not even news because the facts are these women were beaten up and robbed... which happens to many people every day, and none of them get reported.
Yes it is not a surprise a private business is trying to make money and will do it by picking news story that will gather the most clicks. Fox does the same. What is your point?
The only reason this made the news is because they are gay women and CNN chose to assume that is the reason. Would you disagree with that as well?
A strong case can be made on the currency of reporting on homophobic attacks but you have no actual proof that CNN stated that was their reason. This is of course speculation and if you agree it to being speculation then yeah sure my guess it would also be that they are using this to gain clicks.
Do homophobes ask the people that they fear or dislike to continue to do the actual thing that they fear and dislike, in this case kiss each other, and talk to them about different sexual positions? No, a homophobe would tell them to stop doing it, then beat them up for not complying, but apparently these assailants liked what the lesbians were doing, and wanted them to continue, which is not homophobia.
In the video the correspondent which was Erin Mclaughlin was brought in on the right stated they were spouting homophobic slurs. She talks about it in 1:10 based on the police report. Don't know where the police report it but maybe you have a problem with them not giving a link to it.
On societal norms, I guarantee that if you were brought up during slavery (assuming you are white), during a time that there was no uprising against it, you would not question it. To this day, you think you would, and you hope you would..... Would you be the advocate to end slavery, be put in the history books for doing so?
No if I was living in that time but when looking back we know it is wrong. Since indoctrination is less of a problem now I am allowed to freely make my mind up and since I don't think I would be given the same liberty back then as with now given the more lenient parents I think are now and how much information there is on the internet. If you were indoctrinated into thinking homosexuality is wrong and can't comprehend it being wrong then you have an excuse but if we go by simple values that I am sure we both agree with you won't have an argument. I can win this with one value. People like different things and we ought to allow them to like different granted they are not bringing about harm. If you agree with that value you have no argument against homosexuality or homosexual acts like men kissing.
Do you see anyone from the South in the history books for doing so? The truth is, you wouldn't even realize how wrong slavery is if you were brought up in that era, because you were taught that way. Even if you were against it, you wouldn't have spoken out because you would have been condemned for it.
I understand. I don't believe in free will which is why if I wasn't able to freely think and given the tools to make the right decision on issues then I would be the typical slave owner but that is still not a good argument for slavery or for disliking men kissing so much so you don't want them to do it in public.
I have no problems with men kissing.
You have no problem with men kissing but still you don't want to see it. What do you mean in public or privately?
but CNN reported homophobia as fact.
Do you have a time stamp and quote from the video to support that?
It was not even a question that it might not be, and I am basing this on the facts that we do have, and the victims account of what happened.
Where is this data? Do you have the police report?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
People showing their affection to one another is not supposed to turn you on or off. You are supposed to accept people like different things but guess you can't even do that. That distinction you added that you don't get turned on by two men kissing defeats the purpose of two lovers showing their affection in public. They are not doing it for your benefit it they are rejoicing in what they have.My point is, most people don't get turned on by men kissing, and a lot of people do get turned on by women kissing.... Is this homophobia?
Can you even make a good argument? Do you see anywhere in my comments appealing to someone else that isn't part of this conversation or is it you that is trying to get more validity trying to appeal to societal norms? Appealing to societal norms is not a good argument. If you think that is a good argument then you would have no problem to a person being for slavery just because it is accepted socially.Most guys don't want to see men kissing
I've been to quite a few parties, and egging a man on to kiss another man has never been a thing, but it has for women, they do it (most of the time they aren't even lesbians)... And it is entertaining.
Anecdotes of a specific point in your life growing up where men kissing is seen as taboo but women kissing are not. What is your point? That you still have the same taboo to this day about men kissing?
I don't WANT to see men kissing other men, but it doesn't offend me if it happens, and they can do whatever they want. Just like I don't care if an older couple wants to smack face in a public place, I don't want to see it, but go ahead, doesn't bother me none.
Your too much of a coward to say what you truly think. I personally if I don't want to see something would want it removed like murder, rape and pedophilia but you have added men kissing. That is a problem. I don't like furries but I am perfectly capable of seeing what they are doing and carrying on with my day but guess you can't even do that when you just can't even see men kissing. That is a sign of homophobia and guess you are too much of a coward to state why.
I just think these were guys out to find someone to rob and they happened on this lesbian couple and since they were already robbing them, might as well ask them to kiss each other. I don't think it was the other way around, which apparently the news, and you do.
If it was just this. I wouldn't have a problem but you dedicated an entire paragraph of conspiracy theories mixed in with homophobia saying while appealing to a so-called societal norm with this "I think everyone would agree that two guys kissing is just gross no matter who you are". That was the problem. If you add that thing I quoted from you above with lets say a shred of evidence for your side or possibly critiquing the lack of evidence shown by CNN then I wouldn't have a problem. Why not when unsure about something simply say I think or critique the source instead of giving your homophobic take or at the very least calling a majority of how many people you were talking about homophobic okay?
Their motives were to steal their shit, and that is exactly what they did early in the morning on a tourist bus on the top where they know would be almost empty and the driver would not be able to see them. They could get away with stealing their stuff, and had to knock them down, otherwise they would run after them yelling and screaming, this would happen to a straight couple as well, while they are being lewd to them as well.
Here we are again. No evidence given all this is just guess work. We haven't even got back with the police report and here you are making sh*t up. This is a problem. I don't speak about things that I don't know. I speak about things that I know about or make it perfectly clear that these are thoughts of mine not factual but you can't even do that. Come back to me with the police report saying there was no evidence of it being a hate crime or something. After that I will be on your side when it comes to your conclusion but not your explanation that was based on ignorance since you have no evidence.
Being excited about one girl kissing another girl is hardly homophobia.
Not wanting to see two men kissing is not homophobic?
You haven't actually said why you don't want to see two men kissing but I doubt you would give your reason if you are actually knowledgeable of what you believe is homophobic. I am not a homosexual yet don't say I don't want to see two men kissing. Instead I accept that because it doesn't impact me but to you it impacts you so much that you had to say I don't want to see it and appealing to societal norms to make your stance appear more valid than it is.
My guess is the reason you don't want to see two men kissing is because you are Religious. I am doubtful I am wrong but I have seen d*mb atheists as well so it wouldn't be a surprise if you weren't Religious.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
your evidence claimed that Ben Shapiro saying "rap is crap" is far right.GREAT SOURCE
Anything else or do you have actual criticism against what I said?
It is difficult to argue against someone when they haven't even given an argument.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I don't understand.
Can you be more clear?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
What happened to it just being a robbery? Just go and automatically assume that the people beat them up because they were "together", stealing their stuff was just an afterthought.
In the video they did say they were engaging in some lesbian action. I am guessing kissing so why wouldn't they assume it? Do the criminals need to say as they are attacking their intent behind it or do you not understand what people motives can be without them actually telling us?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
I think everyone would agree that two guys kissing is just gross no matter who you are, but two women kissing is pretty much ok for everyone. Don't argue it, I say the truth, it might be hypocritical, but sometimes the truth hurts.
Speak for yourself. I don't dislike two men kissing even though I am not even a homosexual. I realize people like different things and I accept it. It doesn't harm me in any way but guess it does to you which is why your are appealing to societal norms with "I think everyone would agree that two guys kissing is just gross no matter who you are," then saying "Don't argue it". It does seem like you dislike them and appealing to societal norms is not a good argument while saying I can't even argue it so I am left with you dislike homosexuals and an act of them expressing their love makes you feel bad. With homosexuals I meant men. Homosexuals can be women but in this context I was using it to specifically target a male and male relationship.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
How about you speak about Religion with Ragnar?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
What is this anyway?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Pinkfreud08
It depends on what you like so I will make my selection as varied as I can.
My picks are:
RPG
Gothic (Whichever know a deal that cost less than what it states on steam if you want to buy it)
Heard it was good from a review but haven't played it yet. Still trying to finish other games I have before getting to it.
Does require patch because of the shite port like Saints Row 2 but like Saints Row 2 worth the play. It is more gothic than Gothic which shouldn't really turn you off because the characters to me were fun to interact with and I was allowed to do stuff at my own pace and choose not to do things.
Strategy
Sanctum 2 (Find it cheaper than the steam price as well)
Heard it was good but have only played 1. Basically tower defense with guns.
Open World
Saints Row 2 (Once again can be found cheaper than that price)
If you liked Saints Row 3 and wanted better gangs. This is the game for you. Requires something to install to reduce bugs but it is fairly easily install and there are multiple videos in helping people download it.
Zombies
Call Of Duty: World At War (Don't know about the price)
Specifically the custom maps. There are various to pick from which can include new maps made by the modders or something like Kino Der Toten in COD WAW. Best time I have ever had when zombies were involved was with this game.
Star Wars
Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 2 (Can be bought cheaper)
People say the first is better but they don't know what they are talking about. Basically New Vegas but Star Wars. Less freedom like where you can go but the player still has choices in what they want to do. There is also a character which really makes you think about your choices that does improve the game.
Rockstar
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (If you want to buy it. I know a bundle which is cheaper then buying them separately. Don't buy the standalone not worth it compared to the bundle. Like the same with the Handsome collection if that had one more game)
Best in the series not more needs to be said.
Horror
Amnesia: The Dark Descent ( Can be bought cheaper and might as well buy both games together if you are interested enough to play the sequel)
Heard this game is the best but never played it. Maybe because I am too scared.
SOMA (I think it is cheap but don't really know)
More of a thriller I think but I put it here. It is great like Amnesia but in a different way.
Plat-former
Psychonauts (Cheap)
Played it and enjoyed it. Characters are great. Platforming is enjoyable. All in all the most fun I had with a platformer.
Says you can't run it but I think you can so this is a maybe buy for you
Site in question: https://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?pid=792&cpu=AMD%20FX-6100
Type in gpu as your GPU. Type in the RAM then search the game.
I have this on my PS4. Is fun and worth the buy. Combat fun. Story fun and the main character is hot so the game has everything.
If you do decide to buy this I can think of a cheaper price for it and a video to watch if you are having trouble making a consistent framerate.
I can speak about others but I'll leave it at that. Hope you enjoy.
Created:
-->
@K_Michael
No which is why it is a bad thing.
Being a part of debating but not actually counting to how well you are negates the leaderboards. It is like saying instead of challenging myself to get as high as I possibly can on the leaderboard I instead will creat unrated debates just so my feelings are not hurt with a loss. An unrated loss means nothing just like a unrated win if it doesn't account to how well you are on the leaderboard.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
How about you speak about Religion with Ragnar?
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Says the person who doesn't even know what evidence is but asks for it.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You sure you are alright? I gave you a simple question that was clearly laid out and you said "no". Not my fault you didn't agree with what you said. dustryder has given more than enough information as evidence if you even know what it is. I know you are triggered but look at the bright side you are given evidence from dustryder that Trump is a liar.I am fucking done with you shitty little games that you play when you HAVE NO ARGUMENTS WHAT SO EVER. You add nothing good to this stop squeaking until you have something good to say
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
I asked the question.
Do you even know what evidence is?
You said:
no, what he said was a statement no evidence
So basically no you don't know what evidence is.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
That is really funny. It would be helpful for everyone if you stated that in every debate you were in. Like:no, what he said was a statement no evidence
"I do not know what evidence is".
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Do you even know what evidence is?
Just asking not defending.
Created:
Posted in:
Intelligent design argument kind of.
Let's examine (Hypothesis #1). What qualities or characteristics would we expect the external world to exhibit if it derived from a mind? Let's see what qualities our minds exhibit:(1) intellect(2) creativity/beauty(3) humor(4) intelligibility(5) purposiveness(6) rationality(7) orderliness(8) moral aspects(9) complexity(10) cohesiveness
and
If we take a look at the universe and examine our conscious interactions with the external world, it's much, much more indicative of (Hypothesis #1).
Argument of ignorance as well.
The better assumption is that consciousness is fundamental and the material world is just a manifestation of consciousness.
Created:
@RM
Don't waste your time with someone who delusional and unable to see it. It is a waste of time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Here is "WORDS". I click the last icon which if highlighted long enough a text box opens which states "clear". I click it and my "WORDS" are gone. No surprise. But when I click the third 3 last icon from the left which if highlighted long enough states "undo". It does not bring back the "WORDS" I cleared.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
When I click clear on the words I have just written. It clears but when I click undo it doesn't come back. Any reason why this happens?
Created:
-->
@Alec
RM as in Ramshutu.
Should have just said Ramshutu instead of RM.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
Hey!
What do you think?
Created:
-->
@Alec
1. I am waiting too long to reply.
2. RM is on the top and if he loses I think the winner of the tournament would be on top.
Created:
-->
@Alec
1. Allow them to decide on the topics.
2. There is only going to be 5 debates which hopefully end with each of them in a win and loss.
3. I added PinkFreud08 in because a person would have to do 2 debates but in this instance if they lose they are out.
Created:
-->
@blamonkey
@Barney
@oromagi
@Pinkfreud08
Hey!
Created:
-->
@Alec
Why isn't Pinkfreud08 in the list so that there is 4? He hasn't lost only drawn.
Tournament should be like this:
1 vs 2
3 vs 4
Whoever wins
X vs X
Winner is still undefeated. *Applause*
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Vox is a stupid liberal news station that will try to dethrone anyone if they disagree with their opinions.
Did you actually read his tweets? He shows clear evidence of Steven Crowder violating Youtube's rules which simply go to my first link below and read harassment and bullying.
Video in question of constant harrassment and bullying:
Youtube has done something which is demonetize his videos so at least that is something. So basically under their rules they felt that Crowder crossed the line that the community guidelines Youtube clearly laid out.
Steven Crowder is a conservative comedian that has not violated any of the community guidelines of YouTube, as stated via tweet.
Clearly shown above.
The liberal person was hurt and reported, Carlos Haca, was offended due to his humor and such things. When threatened to take away all monetization from companies and start another ad-pocolypse, YouTube was pressured into removing monetization, ruining someones career for a humor sketch that does not break their conduct policy, all because one liberal got heated
You have yet to give evidence of that "Youtube was pressured". I have shown evidence that Youtube are simply following the rules. I don't think Carlos is a liberal and for you to really does make me think that you think there are actually only two sides as in a conservative and a liberal. The problem is there is a lot more. This can be a communist, anarchist, democratic socialist, social democract, conservative, white supremacist and I think I am missing other labels. Carlos if I know him correctly would align himself with being a democratic socialist or social democrat. I think this shows your ignorance in the person you oppose. I suggest do some research on what you consider "liberal" to find out no Carlos is not a liberal.
This is outrageous and EXTREMELY infuriating. I may not be able to speak about my political beliefs freely without being punished for doing so or being discriminated by it.
Actions have consequences. If you hold a harmful view why shouldn't you be called out for it? If you do that is. If you agree people with harmful views should be called out then stop complaining about not being able to speak freely about your political beliefs. You shouldn't be worried.
Liberals are a violation of our constitution, and the liberal party should be removed and revoked. They spread the propoganda of hate toward Republicans, and disembody the power of speech, and challenge people who contradict their views
Democratic party? If you are for the removal of the democratic party then you are for a one party state. So basically you are for one party to spread propaganda and doing things unconstitutional because they are on your side. This would happen because there is no other party to oppose what they are doing and I think you don't understand the very party you align with does what you dislike. A government shutdown is not constitutional but Trump did it. Were you annoyed by that? Trump spreads false information. so we have both violation of the constitution and spreading propaganda on the right lead by the right's leader.
If you want to know how the government shutdown is unconstitutional ask. I didn't want to put it in because I doubt you would care enough to read and give good enough critiques. I will still tell you how it is constitutional if you want. Just ask before answering what I said.
To sum up your arguments are bad and I wish you realize how bad they are to either come up with better arguments or realize conservatism is actually bad but that is wishful thinking.
Created:
Posted in:
How old are they and how long have they been doing martial arts or something like that for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
I can't believe you picked Magneto. I am still going to pick it.
Created:
I don't use discord so the reward is meaningless and my stories are based on the high points lacking context so I have to really sit down and think of a coherent beginning in order for the middle. Endings are easy if I would get that sorted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
To me this was a forum posts on how many REE's I can do in order to get bored of it.
Created:
-->
@DBlaze
Can a kid be wise?
Yes
Can a young adult be wise?
Yes
Would you only call and old person wise?
No
Are all old people wise?
Generalizations are often untrue. So no.
Wisdom is knowledge. If a kid is knowledgeable about Fortnite then they have wisdom. Sure you can argue being knowledgeable about Fortnite is not a lot but that wasn't what you asked.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
From this post: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/1894
LGBTQ+ people have faced historic discrimination across the globe
Yes I do understand that but a celebration should be about the achievement of said people rather then things they do not have control over. If lets say the pride month was used as a front to protest for rights for the LGBTQ+ community I think it would be more effective in making their lives not an event which I don't fully know what it is about.
Pride is a Celebration of our solidarity as a community.
What does this mean?
It is a celebration of all the battles (win or lose), of all the martyrs and heroes who fought for our equality, of all the successes and defeats that paved the way for equality
But you haven't exactly won the battle for equality when 1st amendment allows theists to have Religious freedom on their practices. This can be the freedom to advocate that homosexuality is not natural. This is very untrue in other countries like Saudi which I think they have gay conversion therapy of some sort.
It tells them that life can--and does--get better.
Really depends. I doubt a lesbian, bisexual, homosexual etc would eventually get a better life living in Saudi. The statement is really difficult to provide examples for.
Pride is not a celebration of homosexuality, but it is a reaffirmation of our human worth notwithstanding our homosexuality. It is a reminder to those depressed kids just starting to navigate their feelings that they are not less human because they are gay.
So it is a kind of reminder LGBTQ+ are also humans not less than. Okay.
We will put on a spectacle to be a counterpoint the hate and prejudice so many of us face.
I doubt a spectacle would be as helpful as political change but that is just a thought.
It is about having Pride in how far we have come, in what we have achieved, in the community we have, and in the humanity we all share, irrespective of our orientations and identities.
That sounds alright. Forgive me for my misconceptions. Don't really hear to much about it and I guess I can't really move away from my anti-SJW views if I don't completely remember them or know which ones they are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vernonwhite
No.Do you want to do a live debate tonight?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
A debate website with a forum page. I can't comprehend how people get high on graphics when all that really matters is its fun factor based on what you enjoy but since people like different things that can be the case.I know but on a debate website....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
People like different things. I can't comprehend how people like gardening but since people can like different things it just so happens there are people who like gardening.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Created: