TheUnderdog

They go against nature

are unstable and unpredictable

 influence impressionable young minds to do sick and twisted things to their bodies with HRT and Gender Affirming surgeries

They invade safe spaces of children and adults who are disgusted by them

 threats of punishment if we don't bend over and take it by all the mad hatter Ts. 

Tank uses 100 times more fuel than a car, and jet plane uses even more during flight.

The batteries needed to power them would take days to charge, and would have to be much larger than the ones currently used in cars. Their range would be much shorter than the ones which run on fuel. So a military electric plane would fly for few hours and then charge for 2 days

Current supplies of useful uranium will run out in 200 years under current consumption, but if everyone switched to nuclear, they would run out in 20 to 40 years. Now, there are some theories about converting useless type of uranium to useful, but those are just theories. Most theories which sound too good to be true usually are false.

If nuclear power were used to meet 100% of the world's energy needs, the available supply would depend on several factors, including the quantity of uranium and thorium resources, technological advancements, and the efficiency of nuclear power plants.

Uranium and Thorium Resources

1. Uranium: Current estimates indicate that there are about 6.1 million tonnes of identified recoverable uranium resources. Additionally, unconventional resources, such as uranium in seawater, could increase the supply significantly. Techniques to extract uranium from seawater are being developed, which could provide a virtually unlimited supply of uranium. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), these resources could sustain nuclear power for centuries at current consumption rates (‘A Turning Point’: First Ever Nuclear Energy Summit Concludes in Brussels | IAEA) (Nuclear Energy - Our World in Data).
2. Thorium: Thorium is another potential nuclear fuel with greater abundance than uranium. Estimates suggest that there are about 6.2 million tonnes of thorium resources globally. Thorium reactors are still in the experimental stage, but they promise to be a significant future energy source due to thorium’s abundance and potential efficiency (In focus: EU nuclear energy policy – why it matters to us all - European Commission (europa.eu)).

Technological Advancements

Advancements in nuclear technology, such as breeder reactors and small modular reactors (SMRs), can greatly extend the supply of nuclear fuel:

• Breeder Reactors: These reactors generate more fissile material than they consume, effectively multiplying the energy potential of nuclear fuel. With breeder technology, the existing uranium and thorium resources could last much longer, potentially providing thousands of years of energy (Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System – Analysis - IEA).
• Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): SMRs are designed to be more efficient and flexible than traditional large reactors, potentially improving the overall efficiency and reducing the amount of fuel needed (In focus: EU nuclear energy policy – why it matters to us all - European Commission (europa.eu)).

Energy Demand and Supply Calculations

To estimate the potential supply of nuclear power, let’s consider the following:

• Global Energy Consumption: The world consumed about 173,000 terawatt-hours (TWh) of energy in 2019 (Nuclear - IEA).
• Nuclear Energy Efficiency: Modern nuclear reactors are quite efficient. Assuming an average efficiency of 33% for thermal reactors, converting thermal energy to electrical energy means more uranium or thorium would be required to meet global energy needs.
  

Using these assumptions, let's perform a simplified calculation:

1. Annual Uranium Needs: To meet the global energy demand of 173,000 TWh using current nuclear technology, approximately 7,000 tonnes of uranium per year would be required (based on current consumption rates).
   
2. Resource Lifespan: With 6.1 million tonnes of uranium, the supply could theoretically last around 871 years (6.1 million tonnes / 7,000 tonnes per year) if used in current reactors. With breeder reactors, this lifespan could be extended by several factors, potentially reaching tens of thousands of years (‘A Turning Point’: First Ever Nuclear Energy Summit Concludes in Brussels | IAEA) (Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System – Analysis - IEA).

Conclusion

If nuclear power were to supply 100% of the world's energy needs, current uranium resources could last for several centuries with existing technology and for many thousands of years with breeder and thorium reactor technologies. This makes nuclear power a highly viable long-term energy source, provided that technological advancements continue and safety and waste management concerns are addressed.

I can argue based on a specific issue regardless.

How about the Goodyear blimp in the sky, is that a sign from God?

There is no way to make use of a tank which has to charge for 10 hours so that it can drive 2 hours

In fact, nuclear energy right now is in insignificant amount in electricity production.

Some sources say 200 years under current consumption. 

Yep, I think you nailed it, the age-old debate as to whether religion is a plane engine has finally been resolved. 

1. Norway
   
2. South Sudan
   

But airplanes and tanks and missiles and transport vehicles dont, nor they can.

It happened in Japan few decades ago. Any time where there is an earthquake, a flood or hurricane, you risk disaster. 

But nuclear energy isnt infinite either

You assert that religion is not a plane engine, but the Burden of Proof is on you, what evidence do you have that it isn't a plane engine?

I find it very odd that all ancient people were given signs, such as a talking cloud God, and Jesus raising from dead

Its mass use would be dangerous, since any accident means the area cant be used for decades. 

Plus, military, modern military, runs on oil, not nuclear energy.

You cannot "make" more fuel out of nothing, and when resources such as fuel are finite and you cannot make more of them, using more of them means you will run out of them faster.

L G B are not hated, just the T. But I wouldn't use the term hate as it really is a misnomer here. T are just despised (scorned). 

1. There will be hundreds of iterations of, "The X religion is the one true religion" (X being something like Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.) in changing colors so we know it's not a plane engine.
   
2. There will be no hundreds of iterations of that sort in the sky.

I might want to add another section so that politics is less packed. Maybe something like World Events to cover the Middle East.

If each person ate 1 chocolate every day, they would be able to survive for 10 days. Thats planned economy.

Now lets apply capitalist market to this example.

Because capitalists are competing with each other to sell to customers, and some customers want 2 or 3 chocolates a day, it follows that chocolates are depleted much faster due to customer's and capitalist's greed.

I guess this site was never meant to be popular.

but I think it's useful to divide the forum into different topics.

-> Like, what makes conservatism = good and leftism = bad that justifies banning all future immigration?

I couldn't say.

In general terms of banning immigration or forbidding non citizens to become citizens, I'd have to know the basis for such a prohibition.

So we're not allowing gay polyamorous relationships 

Oh wait, you mean on DART.

Not clear how that's inherently political, since there are left-wing Christians and right-wing atheists.

 Weight correlates with height, but they are two different concepts.

Supply and demand curves existing, for example, is pretty much agreed on. 

People don't want to debate they want a soapbox with a crowd around to slap them on the back and agree with them. 

Why not "polygamy because Mohamed did it and he was based like the confederacy"?

Meeting people in one's field or related to your field can be valuable

Maybe something related to your qualifications/degrees, past jobs, interests?

False.

Okay, back on the ignore list. I told you to stop trying to figure out what my real job was.

He either loses to a 60 year old Mike Tyson and embarrasses himself or he beats the shit out of a senior citizen.