Total posts: 4,340
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
NY made a horrible call. I don't want anyone getting government benefits even if it leads to people dying (due to cutting government spending; I'm selfish and proud of it and am among the only ones with the balls to admit it).
So do you want to cut spending on undocumented migrants? Because I think if you are going to do stuff like ban welfare for the undocumented, then you have to ban it for everybody as well. I would be alright with both if both are done; but the piece of dirt you are born on should not give you any legal privileges as it is out of your control.
But Hocul is a democrat, so her ethos is AUP. She can raise taxes on NY's globalists to fund better schools and an expanded medicaid for the state's poor. You can be pro undocumented or pro globalist on this issue, depending on your question to this issue. I see no problem with taking the pro globalist position (the fiscally right wing position).
Here is the difference between you and me. We both are fine with starving undocumented children dying to save the globalists money on taxes, but I'm upfront and honest about it because I don't care how unpopular my statements make me. You believe the same thing; you just are too cowardly to be honest about it. You also are fine with undocumented children starving and freezing to death to save a very small amount of money on taxes.
And if you are on welfare from being a substitute teacher, then I am alright with you starving to death as well so I can save money on taxes. Neither you nor me are immune from the risks of a fiscally right wing economy.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't think any of us could beat up Mike Tyson even in his 60s.
But if Mike Tyson is a rapist, then I hope he does get his ass whopped because he should face death. Life should be hell for rapists.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
@FLRW
I'm fine with labeling both of these as genocides. If we nuked Cairo, then it would be a genocide against Egyptians.
This doesn't justify nation bankrupting reparations to Iraq or Japan.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
What's the alternative? You keep all of your water, but then we don't have advanced public education anymore.
Cutting taxes and government spending means less funds for public education, a total contradiction of, "Save The Children". Most of the MAGA base can't afford private education and Africa has low taxes; it's why they are a shithole.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
the GOP ethos is whatever Trump says it is.
Trump is:
- Pro COVID booster
- Anti confederate flag
The GOP base disagrees with him on this because these are left wing beliefs.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
How am I wrong?
If Israel was as black as Nigeria, then I don't think you would be as pro Israel.
Created:
Posted in:
The GOP does not have a consistent ethos. It's mainly in 4 parties with different goals:
- the fiscal conservatives who want to cut government spending (on education, healthcare, roads, etc). Is fine with poor children starving to death and having worse schools to save even 5 cents a day on taxes.
- the theocrat conservatives (who want tough laws on things stereotypically against the bible).
- the RSG (Race, Sexual Orientation, Gender) conservatives (who back whatever within the overton window backs whites, men, straights, and cisgenders [this means if you aren't in any of these groups, then there is no point in you being an RSG conservative because it goes against your interests]). This includes backing Israel over Palestine because Israel is white and Palestine is brown; if Israel was run by a bunch of black people, then I don't think the RSG conservatives would be as keen on backing them. If you are in a right wing RSG group and you back a right wing on RSG cause, then fine; but don't be upset when left wing people on RSG don't join your cause.
- The conspiracy theorist conservative: Against COVID vaccines, may believe the earth is flat.
The alternative (the left) is merely against people being forced to endure unwanted pain (and most people who vote end up voting for democrats).
Correct me if I'm wrong anywhere.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You think the top 20% of dudes have 5 girlfriends? That's cap.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
@RaymondSheen
The 1st amendment applies to political speech only.
I've always thought that not being able to yell FIRE! in a crowded movie theater because idiots who can't think for themselves would panic and kill one another trying to escape the madness was, well, stupid. Hate speach. How stupid. I hate hate speach but that goes without saying. Or is that thinking? It goes without thinking.
All conservative beliefs can be argued to be hate speech (if you think I'm wrong, then prove me wrong). Should we ban all conservative speech? No; that would be communist (not an exagerration).
Created:
They say Israel killed 30,000 Gazans. Fine.
Lets say they only killed 10 Gazans. Would it be a genocide? No. Only 10 people died.
My cutoff is 150k and what happened in Gaza hasn't met that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What % of men are currently in a polygamous relationship?
Women that claim to have a bf are often lying because they don't want to date us. I'm alright with that; they shouldn't be pressured too.
Created:
Me: Why are you America first for Ukraine and not Israel?
The right: Israel is our ally. They help us with intelligence against radical Islam.
Me: The left says the same thing about Ukraine and Russia.
The right: The Jewish people need a state.
Me: Why? Many religions don't have a state. Ask Zoroastrianism how statehood is going and they will laugh you off.
The right: The Jews need religious liberty!
Me: Why can't they move here?
The right: Because we want the Jews in Israel.
Me: Why? The Muslims think higher of Jesus than the Jews do.
The right: Because they are white and the Palestinians are dirty and brown. We can't say that because being openly racist is socially unacceptable.
Me: Thank you for your honesty.
My take is I am America first with Ukraine and Israel.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
I didn't say English was the only gender neutral language.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
I hate hate speach but that goes without saying.
That's fine, but stating any conservative opinion can be argued to be hate speech. Prove me wrong with a counterexample.
All hate speech should be legal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
So when the top 20% man has access to 5 girls, they will all get used and abused due to the modern woman's insistent greed for the top 20%
There is some dating polygamy, but it's really rare.
If 80% of men are single, then roughly 80% of women are single as well.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't believe any of the following should be censored:
- Matt Walsh and his supporters
- "From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free" supporters
- Pedophilia defenders
There are very few people in G3; but G1 is legal in all 50 states; G2 is censored in all the anti BDS states.
Supporting BDS should be legal in every state.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
If women have this attitude about me, then I don't want to make them uncomfterable; I simply won't date them. I won't ask them out; I don't want to affiliate with someone who would rather be around a bear than around me.
Created:
Posted in:
All of this shaming is done by people who don't even live in the hood.
The love of diversity increases with one's distance from it. I just don't give a fuck how black/white/brown my neighborhood is.
Created:
Posted in:
But I'm a dude. Imagine if I said the following:
I would rather be in the presence of a bear than 8 inner city black dudes named Jammal with gold chains and saggy pants with guns (but not being scared of white people with guns). Someone I know got raped by a black guy.
I get cancelled.
Women can be sexist and it's socially acceptable; whites can't be racist and it being socially acceptable.
The globalist agenda is to make women and men less likely to marry and reproduce so a bunch of immigrants come to this country (who are easier to control). Now, I'm totally fine with migrants coming here; I just don't see anything wrong with white people marrying and having kids and I don't think any race (white or otherwise) should be discouraged from having kids if they can afford them. I even support interracial marriage (which reduces racial purity, and that's totally fine under freedom; I would be cool with marrying a black woman).
The globalists are trying to lower the white fertility rate and even though I don't want kids, I need other people to have kids so my social security gets paid for. People moving to the west should not be easy to control by the billionaires; if they say something you agree with, then fine. But don't be afraid to question authority (whether Trump, Biden, George Soros; it doesn't matter). The same should be true of the MAGA crowd who treats Trump like a God that can't be challenged.
Created:
Posted in:
Samantha Lux: Women pick the bear, men pick the man because women are emotional, men are logical.
Left wing Transwoman acknowledges men and women are different and that men are logical whereas women are emotional.
Emotional brains don't belong in public office whether men (Trump) or women (AOC).
But lets be real, if Andrew Tate said this, then the left would claim it's misogynistic.
But she's right. Women tend to be emotional, men tend to be logical. It's why we should have gender roles.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I procrastinate a fuck ton.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Keep on acting triggered you SJW snowflake.
Created:
Posted in:
The reason why is because being gender neutral is a product of Anglo American Civilization.
I'm proud of my country, I'm proud of my race, and I don't hate minorities for theirs.
So much technology was invented by white people. I don't hate non-whites and I don't take personal accomplishment of what other white people did, but if Americans can be proud of their country being the first one to land on the moon while those Americans never went to the moon (while not claiming Congolese are inferior for never going to the moon) and not be called racist, then I feel I am entitled to the same liberty.
Whites also were the ones that led the abolishment of slavery worldwide (OIP.bwLpG5IDuWtnBumuLdIf8wHaDw (474×240) (bing.com)).
In this context, white power!
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
On the video you sent calling left wing positions evil, here is right wing logic that (I may or may not agree with) that can be used to justify all of those left wing positions:
- Abortion: Increasing government spending by paying for kids in foster care is socialist.
- Climate Change: The scientists say climate change is real. Facts don't care about your feelings!
- Israel / Palestine: Israel is a feminist country. Screw Israel.
- Actual Open borders: We should run this country like a business.
- Children getting gender surguries with the permission of left wing parents: Parental rights.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Yeah; most people prefer to be with their own kind and may preach, "diversity is a strength" but if they live in Vermont and moved there from Brooklyn, then they don't mean what they said.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Are they becoming more or less segregated? But there are instances of towns breaking up over ethnic differences. They don't want to be viewed as racist by other people, but they break up from towns due to racial differences.
The love of diversity increases with one's distance from it. I just don't care how white/non white the neighborhood I live in is. I care more about cheap property that is within driving distance of my job. If that's in Vermont, then fine. If it's in East Hartford, then fine. I don't care.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Blood, pigs, shellfish urked somebody and centuries later they decided that it actually bothers god.
To be fair, blood definitely urkes me. And the other stuff since I'm vegan.
But being degenerate to me is not a good enough reason to ban it and if others don't find it degenerate, then that's fine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Fair.
I would say beastiality just urkes me way more than homosexual sex. Not ban worthy, but I would probably say urking = degenerate. I'm changing my standard.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
In prehistory people didn't always cook the meat, but this was 1920ish.
Then why was HIV obtained in the 1920s and not earlier? People were eating monkeys pretty much forever. Sexual degeneracy happened much more recently (along with a population growth, leading to a higher chance of animals giving at least one human a disease).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Imagine Getting blind maggot drunk one night and ending up on what you thought was your porch.
How do you end up at the wrong house when drunk? You can't even drive to the wrong place; someone else drives you to your home.
Imagin pulling a gun on a "robber"And he then pulls a gun on you.NOW .you've two people with a gun pointed at each other .
And then you shoot the robber, saving your life.
I watch cops and im lead to believe everyone pretty much has a gun on them and a crack pipe
Assuming you are from the UK, then you may be unaware of what life is like in America. In America, there are many people that own guns; open carry is very rare here. Not even Colion Noir recommends it, and he's a gun rights activist.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
2 claims were made by him:
1. The monkey would rip your dick off: Only if it's non consensual. It easily could have been consensual.
2. Once you fuck Monkeys, you don't fuck people: Only if you are open about your history having sex with monkeys (which nobody in their right mind who had sex with a monkey is going to tell anyone about it).
This conversation is funny lol.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Impossible to know, evidence indicates it was a chimpanzee in prehistory.
How did humans get that STI from monkeys? HIV is transmissible through sex; highly unlikely we stepped on monkey blood.
If they got it from someone else, then they weren't the 1st case.
I meant the first case in humans, obtained from a non human animal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
It's not really the death penalty for breaking in to your home as much as it is death penalty to a guy whom you don't know their intentions. They could merely rob $300 from you; that's easy to call 911 for and have the cops get the money back.
It's more like, "This guy might shoot me and take my home. If I have a wife or kids, then he might murder or rape them. I would rather prevent all of that and shoot him before he does any serious damage when he is awake, I just woke up, and he has a huge consciousness advantage and the criminal knows that (so he could really murder or rape whoever he wants and without self defense, we would be fucked and sometimes self defense results in homicide)".
But lets say he merely wanted to steal $300. You having the gun and pointing it at the theft scares the theft into basically not robbing you. Nobody gets shot; but you've prevented theft.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
How do you know? Who got the 1st case of HIV? And who did they have sex with to get that case?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
I suppose you have a fair point. If you are black and only want to be around other black people, then why move to Africa when you can move to Gary, Indiana?
But if you are from Zimbabwe and are fluent in English, if you want to be around other black people, then why move to America? Like every US city is less black than Zimbabwe.
schools are also becoming more homogeneous
I don't think this is true.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
It’s not a bad idea, but it’s not like their neighborhood was 100% French. They may know one other French person; but what made them pick Cincinnati and not Paris or Montreal?
They should be allowed to live wherever they want, but people have a strong tendency to integrate with other nationalities in the US.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
If thats a video of somone fuck8ng a dog , wich it sounds like it is.
It's not. It's an image of something stupid that was said by an Islamic televangelist that was endorsing and encouraging bestiality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
and the amenities that they either expect or desire for themselves or in particular, their families
You can get the same services whether you are a Haitian living in a Haitian Neighborhood or in Suburbia.
sure, but even spanish speaking people tend to gravitate to spanish speaking neighborhoods
If someone only knows Spanish and they are in the US, then they will live where there are a lot of Spanish speakers.
If someone is bilingual (English and Spanish), then they are more likely to live where there are other Spanish speakers, but they also might see white people as racist and not want to live in an area with few immigrants due to the fear of ICE coming to their door. 3rd generation Hispanics often lose this fear.
If immigrants wanted segregation, then America is the wrong place to move as ethnic neighborhoods are hard to find in the US. We assimilate; we learn English with a Yankee accent (even down South as the South is developing a more Yankee accent than the other way around).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
A parody would be the FSM. It also means virtually nobody would take it seriously.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Then butt sex with a dog or a man can be rendered non-degenerate (generate?) by a medical screening.
If no STDs were presented, then I could see that. I would assume virtually every time someone has had sex with an animal, an STI was created. STIs just didn't pop out of nowhere.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Expats tend to live near one another because of the costs and the amenities that they either expect or desire for themselves or in particular, their families.
Integrating doesn't require additional cost.
It is also much easier to communicate in your own language
What if the expats living in the US learn English (most do)? If they didn't know English, then understandable. But about 50% of immigrants that move to America are fluent in English I think (Chat GPT), and their kids are especially more likely to be fluent in English. There is a reason why we are a melting pot rather than a mosaic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
So if it grosses you out but is medically safe then it is not degenerate?
Correct. Example: Eating Brussel Sprouts.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Is it anything that is gross (to you) or is it medically inadvisable (degenerate)?
And, not or. I think both are required. But other than that, I think you are correct.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
So "degeneracy" is just shorthand for "medically inadvisable"?
Medically inadvisable and just extremely gross to even think about. Like, watching 2 men have gay sex; I think it’s gross, but it’s nowhere near a man having but sex with a sheep or goat.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You are more likely to get STDs from but sex with a dog than butt sex with a dude.
It should be legal to do beastiality, but it is highly degenerate behavior and you should be made fun of if you have sex with non human animals.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Not even porn hub has videos of men having sex with goats.
When Porn Hub won't have your kink on there, you know it's fucked up.
Created:
Posted in:
Homosexuality is bad, but this is acceptable:
I think both should be legal, but it is way more degenerate to have sex with animals than it is to have homosexual sex with the same species.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
for the same reason american tourists travel to tuscany and then eat at mcdonalds
That’s food. It would be more like Americans moving to Italy along with a bunch of other ethnic group moving to Italy and then those Americans preferring to only live with other Americans. If that’s you, then why move to Italy?
Created: