TheUnderdog

I would say that anybody you fear enough to want a form out of shouldn't be someone you engage in intimate relations with

but I've also said marriage contracts should be explicit and legally binding

It would have to be a little more complicated than you describe to be actually useful.

but the whole "I'm above all this" and this weird "look at how smart I am compared to anyone who I think is in a political party" is exceptionally off putting. 

 And this board is full of absolutely awful personalities, don't feel alone.

Get you a blow job and tell me you think "Well, I don't need that again."

If enduring pain is the qualities of a man, how about you let that sperm live and produce a baby or two and stick around to raise that child to become a productive person of society.  Now you are talking about pain and therefore, a man.  No unwanted pregnancies and no abortions!  Problem solved!

1. Unprotected sex without the desire to reproduce
   
2. No unplanned pregnancies
   
3. No abortions

He'll get his clock cleaned by women soon enough.

Man, it's really hard to go around just not getting any attention from women at all, huh? 

Maybe it's your terrible personality

"if he had worn a rubber, I'm not sure I'd have felt much of anything at all, oh shit, he's calling again"

You're not really like this, right?

Unless you are a biomed or bioeng major who can develop a way for humans to reproduce asexually, ideals like this are dangerous. I mean, how are humanity supposed to progress as humanity if they are told the smartest thing to do is to end one's bloodline?

What's the point?? 1 sentence por favor

If people know they are going to die in a plane crash, there are going to be lots of different responses. That's what happened on the Titanic. And it has happened in lots of other examples of impending tragedy as well.  It is not incredibly unlikely for many people. And celebration is going to look differently in each situation. I doubt that many will pick up a glass of champagne. But some will be incredibly calm. And this is true. Others who have no clue will obviously be freaking out. 

 If however you are in a relationship with Christ, you won't want to commit suicide. 

A person who is in a relationship with Christ has already had their sins forgiven, past, present, and future. Yet if you have rejected Christ, you actually stop yourself from the possibility of forgiveness if you kill yourself before you repent. 

I don't know if murdering someone is worse that suicide. 

How can something be in God's plan and not his will?

I explained that above. 

It would also be a gamble to not put my trust in Hades that he will spare me from the underworld and so I can join Zeus at Olympia, or take a gamble and sacrifice myself (or commit suicide) so I don't end up in Xibalba.

It would actually be a gamble to put your trust in Hades. No one has ever historically tried to find Hades, or Zeus for that matter. No one thinks that they historically lived.

People in that situation don't generally celebrate that they are going to heaven. And yet some might.

But suicide is not the unforgiveable sin.

I don't think God wants people to commit suicide. I am pretty sure the Bible is opposed to unlawful killing.

 It may well end up being that you commit suicide. If so, then that was God's plan for your life. But it certainly is not his will.

 It would be a gamble not to try and make sure you are part of his family. It would be a gamble to trust in yourself. It would be a gamble to think it doesn't matter. Yet it would be reasonable to trust in Jesus for he is the king of kings and he is God.  It would be a gamble not to trust in God. 

OMG, I'm a pussy man !     OMG, I'm a Trump !

Your father will hear about this. And your grandfather. 

What is even more laughable, and not even just tangentially so, is that "2", "2" and "4" require links to understand what they even represent and, believe me when I say this, has BARELY ANY relations to the idea of 2 or 4. This ain't integral spin or beta decay, nor is this an alpha particle consisting or two neutrons and two protons. This "equation" if you can even call it so merely demonstrates the concept of addition and nothing more than that, and the fact that the length and density you have put into your "proof" in order to illustrate the additive property of these two "2"'s (which I may or may not understand based on just what that is) makes it infinitely worse...

basically how Ebuc rolls on this hellscape of a land, and instead I got whatever this is.

Ok that said, now onto my 2D pattern of the 3D torus. So next are the three nucleated hexagons.

0...1...5p.....3p.....6.....4...2p and this is representative of Fullers concept of off-center { the nucleus see Fullers concepts } >

3p...5p..7p....6......9.....8....4..... > more specifically, the nuclei represent tainted { see Fullers concepts } reality >

6..7p..11p......9....12...10....8.....> i.e. our occupied space reality is complementary to occupied space Gravity and occupied space Dark Energy and Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego.

Here below is the 2D version of the 3D Quantum Space-time torus and its 14 nodal events = 91 lines-of-relationship i.e. 14^2, minus 14 and divided by 2 = 91. 91 / 7 = 13 and here we have the same numerical resultant as the 12-around-1 sphericals of the nucleated VE

.....1..................5p......7p.....................11p..........13p.....

-

-

0.............................6...................................12................

................3p.............................9...................................

-

-

..........2p........4....................8........10..............................

The immediate problem in my scenario, is that in this 14 nodal event minimal quantum pulse, the two lines inside the toroidal tube, are our classically observed, physical reality  ---see the sine-wave association /\/\/\/\/ of 0..3p...6.....9.  in past my geodesic representations only considered all of pertinent entanglement was in the outer Gravity { positive curvature } geodesics and the inner Dark Energy { negative curvature } Geodesics.

Is this clickbait?

Or is it a live demonstration that Americans really, really, don't understand math and will keep chucking irrelevant mathematical concepts into whatever they wish before they can be seen as making sense in any way possible?

You decide.

If you accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, and have true faith in him, then yes. 

Now, if we use your mindset, and commit suicide because we know we will get a better life, that is self-serving, and it proves that you aren't really a Christian, because you just took your faith off of God and put it into yourself and your own plan to have a better life. 

Suicide is not part of Gods plan.

Christians: He only pays for repented sins.

This is false. 

That's pure projection. You think everyone is blindly loyal to a party and thus you assume they would be emotionally motivated over something that has no practical significance.

The arguments which you are presenting are a bit cruel, but one can understand your point of view and it is difficult to argue against.

I just dont have a way of weighting the value of human lives, some of which might be contributing more to the benefit of society which we dont know about, some of which might be harming society in unknown ways.

They generally oppose universal healthcare, social security for single mothers, cheap and accesible education and the living wage. More grotesquely many support the detention and deportation of immigrants, the protection of a corrupt and trigger happy police system, many even support foreign invasions and bombing, not to mention the diplomatic and military support of genocides like the one in Gaza. 

Though I don't think that the rich as a rule are more valuable than the poor. 

For example, it would be less unfortunate if a homeless person died in an accident than a doctor

If anecdotes are irrelevant then how could you possibly have information to the effect of "Primary Party switching is very rare."

They only need to switch back if they need to affect a primary in the other party. The guy in the video does not need to switch back to vote for Biden.

It doesn't matter if they like her. They will vote for her if voting for her reduces the chance of what to them is an unacceptable outcome.

No, the northern vote would have been suppressed. There were tons of people who did not feel the duty to die to free slaves. 

As a generalization, yes of course.

But when you are having conversation with an individual, and especially when the point that individual has been making to you is that you do not have as good of an understanding of alternative viewpoints as you think, anyone who actually cares about a productive dialog would refrain from telling the individual you are talking to how they think or what they would think under certain circumstances.

In this book there are aliens whose evolutionary history rendered them exclusively capable of direct telepathy without deception. 

So to be clear about what you should be very aware of as a human being: People do not always do what they say they will do. People's behavior can't be predicted by a simplistic list of "good" and "bad".

"The left does not like Nikki Haley" as if that somehow proves a left-triber wouldn't cast a vote for her? 

Speaking of the civil war, that was full of subversion by both sides. The southern aristocracy knew they were fighting for slavery, said as much publicly (to the right crowds); but they told the average southerner it was about state's rights and they meant it even if it was secondary to preserving slavery for them.

Lincoln denied it was about slavery more than once, to preserve political power; given the full historical context it's as obvious as the Himalayan mountains that the abolitionists including Lincoln were always going to leap at any chance to abolish slavery and that without that motivation there would have been no civil war (as the south easily saw through Lincoln's obfuscations about his  beliefs).

Very much like how left-tribers are currently voting for Niki Haley.

I never said it was.

I don't think it's useless; it's how low IQ people are

Agreed, only a Lowe IQ person would think telling others what they believe it's a great way to have a productive conversation

If you were wondering what county politics caused me to register as a democrat, it was fighting unequal application of county codes.

We've been teaching kids that slavery was wrong for over a century.

That is objectivity a progressive point of view

It's only indoctrination when one disagrees with it.

 It's notable that it tends to come from the most religious segment of the population, their entire worldview is the product of indoctrination. 

How many children do we see at Trump rallies with MAGA hats being interviewed by right wing reporters praising the children for being so smart? Ron Desantis ran in Florida an ad for governor showcasing him teaching his child to follows MAGA while he was still in the crib. None of these anti-indoctrination people cared.

Because to me, that's what you want because it helps retain power for the democratic party.

Has it ever occurred to you that a person might hold a core set of values?

Correct, but what's the relevance?  Gay sex is a choice and about 26% of the US population wants to ban it. 

Wait, are you suggesting that while being gay is not a choice, having sex as a gay person is a choice, a choice that other people should be able to ban? That’s absurd.

give me a specific example of these “leftist talking points” that “program” kids.

1. The left telling kids that transwomen are real women, claiming a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman, and punishing kids who do what you would logically do if they think transgenderism is inaccurate; misgender deliberatly on ideological grounds.  Just like the city Barrow changed it's name to Utgitvick (kindof like transitioning from white to Native).  If you disagree with the name change, you are logically going to continue to call the city Barrow because you prefer the White Anglo American name to the Native one.
   
2. When left wing teachers try and claim Reagan was racist for wanting to cut taxes.  The right likes Reagan, so it would be saying the right like a racist guy.  Totally fine to say that at a political rally.  But don't indoctrinate the kids.
   

Why is it controversial? Because the morons think it’s immoral.

Adults wouldn’t discuss abortion with a 6 year old anymore than they would discuss a hysterectomy or a vasectomy.

Being gay is not a choice anymore than being black is a choice.

if all of that happened, I believe your mind would change on the issue.

Do you have any other useless predictions on what I would believe that you'd rather share as opposed to just asking me what I think?

Is it, "Can't think of very many.", or is it, "Nothing.  The left is always correct."?  Part of me thinks it's the ladder.

Spoke too soon.

Even if Trump and PETA opposed eating bugs, that does not mean PETA supports Trump (or should support Trump).

There is no connection here, and if you genuinely thought there was your mental processes are currently subnormal.

But what I also noticed is that my depression didnt appear even once since then. Of course, it was collerated with lack of masturbation, so maybe that had some effect too.

 I am generally fine with government technology that allows them to "spy" on us to a reasonable extent provided it makes us safer.

What conservative belief(s) do you have?

Can't think of very many.

Some traditions conservatives do not want to support:

1. Roe V Wade
   
2. The progressive income tax
   
3. Trump is not a traditional president
   

The GOP isn't consistent either with being pro status quo.

You're confusing ideology and political party.

but you appear to be growing increasingly incoherent.

Maybe at some point you will straddle the sane and insane worlds and you can translate for ebuc.

That’s ridiculous. The person saying that being gay is immoral is gay. Get it? It’s called hypocrisy 

Taught? You mean how to have gay sex? No, they are teaching kids to be respectful of all people. They are teaching kids to not be bigots. There’s nothing wrong or inappropriate with teaching children to be respectful of others.