TheUnderdog

Who cares what other shits on this site say. This country is A NATION, not a business

I cannot believe someone believes this unironically. What the fuck

 I am however judgemental of anyone claiming to be pro vaccine as technically that would mean they even support the thousands of harmful vaccines rejected by the FDA every year. 

On the other hand, it might also be recognising that abolishing it wasn't going to happen until the world started following Christ and that therefore it is better to put into place fair and just regulations than simply having a free for all. 

The enemies of Israel wanted to wipe Israel of the map. 

Under the Jewish law, kids were not retained as slaves.  Kids did not have to take on their parent's debt. 

Sin always hurts someone else. There are no exceptions. 

Cultural diversity is the goal, not skin color. 

Otherwise, the gates would be open to brown Cubans.

All 3 are economic interventionists. If we see the pattern that the economic freedom index shows us, we can see countries more near the top, have better outcomes. Many Scandinavian countries are above the United States  on the index. All the countries have social programs. 

then ye we should probably do what we can to become more free than the Scandinavian countries that o defeat us on the index, but we should go further. We should drop all social programs so we can drop all poverty as well and have a prosperous country. 

Then Roosevelt created salary caps 

Early 1900s, mot food comes from independent businesses and local farmers. Some reports put it at about 80%. FDA is created and small business owners are destroyed and millions of people are turned into wage slaves. 80% of th food supply is brought to you by less than 10 corporations. 

Honestly it's time to stop believing double digit IQ takes like

"Derp we can solve homelessness by economic interventionism in making them all houses"

(Aka nationalizing houseownership)

Or "derp the best way to get everyone to get good Healthcare is from free Healthcare so they can be put on 3 year waiting lists for life saving surgeries, derp"

Getting rid of corruption is a far left wing idea (and it's a good idea).

Ok; so you support then left wing UHC; got it.  Maybe you should change your libertarian label if this is what you believe in, because UHC is not libetarian.

You really shouldn't be trying to debate people online if you can't understand a conditional statement.

A culturally diverse population needs to be regulated much more than a culturally homogenous population because common morality in a society does not need to be enforced nearly as much as in a society with inherently diverse morality.

For the unelected class in DC tasked with ever expanding regulation creation, diversity is their ONLY strength.

Sweden (the Nordic countries especially and Europe in general) has less public corruption. It allows them to have more public services at similar theft-levels.

The lack of regulation is a major factor as well. Stealing isn't the only way governments damage the economy, wasting enormous amounts of time on people begging for permission and the stagnating uniformity it creates are bad. It also biases the economy towards larger corporations as they can handle the overhead more easily with specialists.

Under the premise that the level of theft must remain the same in the USA I would prefer a nordic model for how its spent, especially if nordic deregulation accompanies it.

That does not mean that reducing the level of theft is any less moral or practical. The corollary is that the nordic countries would be even better if they didn't steal so much from the people.

The contradictions are in the minds of people that don't understand scripture. 

Slaves do consent yes .

 Take a look at the economic freedom index which measures how capitalist vs socialist a nation is. The most economic intervention in say North korea and venezuala have the most poverty, where as the more free market societies have a higher standard of living. 

They are capitalist countries with big social programs, they aren't socialist

They are socialist.

They have high taxes to pay for all of that

Most Republicans are for some sort of welfare state

 A Laissez-Faire economy would almost entirely eradicate poverty. 

Look at how families prior to the welfare state in the 50s easily fed their children 

 now these fucks are just too poor so feed them calorie dense low nutrient food and are nturitio ally starving children while making them fat with empty calories. 

If you want the Jews to be safe when enslaved by Egypt it is probably better to tell them to be the best slaves they can be, to incentivize the Egyptians not to genocide them.

I don't see how it's much different from Jesus telling people to turn their cheek if they are bitch smacked. He isn't advocating for the romans to bitch slap his people. He is just telling his people to endure in an honorable way.

This does not make the bible pro slavery. It makes the bible pro obeying your master if you are a slave.

There are many OT passages that regulate slavery.

Well, in two ways.  The first way was by way of war.  When Israel defended itself or attacked another people group, sometimes, the enemy was captured and not killed. These then became slaves.  Better to have them under your control than let them go to attack you again.  

The second way was by way of selling yourself as a bondservant or as an indentured slave. This was the cultural equivalence of taking out a loan. Israelites could sell themselves off in order to take out a loan. 

Of course, in the NT, it was primarily the Romans and the Greeks who had slaves.  There are very few races of people in the history of the world who never had slaves.  

Also when it comes to the Bible, Christians teach, that EVERYONE is a slave.  There are no exceptions. We are either a slave to sin. Or we are a slave to righteousness. 

There is no other option.  

Reason: If you want UIs deported, then you don't want them getting free healthcare.  If you are against the death penalty, then you support murderers getting free healthcare.

This is weak as hell.

You could replace "healthcare" with "mac & cheese".

In the lego world you've constructed there is a simple answer: exile the murderers.

Was Trump really the government? That's why we say "deep state". The person you elect is not necessarily the one wielding all (or even most) of the power.

Why did the government tell Facebook to censor people when Trump was president?

Of course they do. Just tell your audience to go to your servers (or servers not subject to censorship) instead of Youtube. Crowder, Dailywire, Tim Pool, Alex Jones, Dave Rubin and many more say just that.

One is too many, because one is enough to put fear into the rest.

An argument that breaks down rather quickly when you see evidence that Big Tech is being directed in their censorship by the government and have government agents infesting their high ranks.

To censor without the ability to cut off people's internet is a balancing act.

No if they've bypassed Big Tech using their own servers, which almost all major or controversial ones have.

Well they don't claim that's the reason, even though it is.

 I am not legally allowed to criticize the government because that's what nazis do isn't it.

All fun and games till they accuse you of rape. 

Then you might think that it would be good if they would keep you alive so evidence or appeals might release you some day.

That morally depends on whether you made a promise.

There is a considerable margin of safety between sucking and castration, regardless I wouldn't have to withdraw consent to have my dick bitten off because I would never give it.

Well you can and should have it transmit live to a secure server but think about the truth table compared to the paper.

Just like someone can claim that they withdrew consent after signing the paper, they can claim there was rape after the sex on the recording.

You can avoid leaving behind a bunch of DNA with condoms and gloves. You can prevent reports to the police with murder.

I think we could look into having them work or maybe exile before going straight to executions.

maybe exile

People shouldn't be free of their own promises.

You say these things that make me wonder if I'm talking to a machine or a non-native English speaker. "ring encryption". It's a strategy for encrypting information that takes multiple keys (passwords) to unlock. It has nothing to do with lanyards or finger rings.

rofl, this is why maybe it's worth it to be on this site from time to time. Abnormal mentalities interact in such 'interesting' ways. Straight monkey murder-rape, which I guess is also necrophilia if you intended to suggest that order.

Jeez you are bringing up death a lot.

but if one were to actually sit down and game it out I'm sure lack of sex would be an exit condition.

 It's often followed by murder to eliminate witnesses (singular in this case). 

If you sign the form, can you say no? Because after you sign the form you're essentially going to have no chance to convince a rational jury.

 The form is a big advantage for a man be his intentions good or ill. 

Why would a woman sign? If you think it's to get the man she wants, maybe but she doesn't need it just to have sex with a man.

Rule #1 of reproduction on Earth since the Cambrian has been that there is always a male willing to take the risk.

Now I have a few times suggested using ring encryption to solve the problem of record keeping without sacrificing privacy. Basically you record everything with video and audio, the data is encrypted in such a way that it takes two of three keys to access:

Key 1: Participant A

Key 2: Participant B

Key 3: A judicial authority

This solves the withdrawn consent problem and therefore gives women a motivator for agreeing to this, after all unlike the form this would actually discourage rape.

It also bypasses a host of other problems with paper forms such as the fact that if you give someone a form once they can try to duplicate your signature or copy it with different dates. Those things aren't as hard to fake as you might think. In fact it opens the door to completely fabricated forms for people who never once consented.